-
Nursing Management Mar 2021
Topics: Humans; Morale; Morals
PubMed: 33633014
DOI: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000733652.27670.8a -
Military Surgeon Feb 1953
Topics: Humans; Military Personnel; Morale
PubMed: 13012880
DOI: No ID Found -
Mental Hygiene Jan 1951
Topics: Humans; Morale; Warfare
PubMed: 14815447
DOI: No ID Found -
Dental Survey Dec 1977
Topics: Morale; Personnel Management; Practice Management, Dental
PubMed: 274429
DOI: No ID Found -
Nursing Times
Topics: Humans; Morale; Sports; United Kingdom
PubMed: 22973647
DOI: No ID Found -
Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy Sep 2017
Topics: Biomedical Enhancement; Empathy; Ethical Theory; Humans; Moral Obligations; Morals; Social Values
PubMed: 28710657
DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9791-0 -
ILAR Journal Sep 2021Some animal research is arguably morally wrong, and some animal research is morally bad but could be improved. Who is most likely to be able to identify wrong or bad... (Review)
Review
Some animal research is arguably morally wrong, and some animal research is morally bad but could be improved. Who is most likely to be able to identify wrong or bad animal research and advocate for improvements? I argue that philosophical ethicists have the expertise that makes them the likely best candidates for these tasks. I review the skills, knowledge, and perspectives that philosophical ethicists tend to have that makes them ethical experts. I argue that, insofar as Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees are expected to ensure that research is ethical, they must have philosophical ethicists as members.
Topics: Animal Care Committees; Animal Experimentation; Animals; Ethicists; Humans; Morals
PubMed: 33369619
DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilaa021 -
Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare... Apr 2016It seems natural to think that the same prudential and ethical reasons for mutual respect and tolerance that one has vis-à-vis other human persons would hold toward...
It seems natural to think that the same prudential and ethical reasons for mutual respect and tolerance that one has vis-à-vis other human persons would hold toward newly encountered paradigmatic but nonhuman biological persons. One also tends to think that they would have similar reasons for treating we humans as creatures that count morally in our own right. This line of thought transcends biological boundaries-namely, with regard to artificially (super)intelligent persons-but is this a safe assumption? The issue concerns ultimate moral significance: the significance possessed by human persons, persons from other planets, and hypothetical nonorganic persons in the form of artificial intelligence (AI). This article investigates why our possible relations to AI persons could be more complicated than they first might appear, given that they might possess a radically different nature to us, to the point that civilized or peaceful coexistence in a determinate geographical space could be impossible to achieve.
Topics: Artificial Intelligence; Bioethics; Humans; Moral Obligations; Morals; Personhood; Social Responsibility; Value of Life
PubMed: 26957450
DOI: 10.1017/S0963180115000559 -
Current Opinion in Psychology Apr 2022Moral courage, that is, defending moral beliefs despite personal risks, is often seen as a hallmark of prosocial behavior. We argue that prosociality in moral courage... (Review)
Review
Moral courage, that is, defending moral beliefs despite personal risks, is often seen as a hallmark of prosocial behavior. We argue that prosociality in moral courage is, however, complex. While its prosociality is often evident at a higher societal level, it can be contested in some aspects of morally courageous acts. We review the literature on two such aspects and highlight that differences and conflicts in moral beliefs, as well as the confrontational nature of many morally courageous acts, call into question prosociality. We recommend that future research takes the complexity of prosociality in moral courage into account to obtain a comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the psychological underpinnings of moral courage and its contributions to the functioning of societies.
Topics: Altruism; Courage; Ethics, Nursing; Humans; Morals
PubMed: 34634716
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.004 -
Annual Review of Psychology Jan 2024Nearly five billion people around the world now use social media, and this number continues to grow. One of the primary goals of social media platforms is to capture and... (Review)
Review
Nearly five billion people around the world now use social media, and this number continues to grow. One of the primary goals of social media platforms is to capture and monetize human attention. One means by which individuals and groups can capture attention and drive engagement on these platforms is by sharing morally and emotionally evocative content. We review a growing body of research on the interrelationship of social media and morality as well its consequences for individuals and society. Moral content often goes viral on social media, and social media makes moral behavior (such as punishment) less costly. Thus, social media often acts as an accelerant for existing moral dynamics, amplifying outrage, status seeking, and intergroup conflict while also potentially amplifying more constructive facets of morality, such as social support, prosociality, and collective action. We discuss trends, heated debates, and future directions in this emerging literature.
Topics: Humans; Social Media; Morals; Punishment; Social Support
PubMed: 37906950
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-022123-110258