-
Seizure Dec 2020Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide. Despite a dramatic increase in treatment options over the... (Review)
Review
Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting approximately 50 million people worldwide. Despite a dramatic increase in treatment options over the past 30 years, it still ranks fourth in the world's disease burden. There are now close to 30 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), with more than two thirds introduced to the market after carbamazepine (CBZ) and one third after its derivative, oxcarbazepine (OXC). Following the introduction of these newer AEDs, the role of CBZ and OXC in the therapeutic armamentarium for seizure control and effective epilepsy management needs to be reviewed. The main guidelines list both CBZ and OXC as first-line options or second-line alternatives for the treatment of focal-onset epilepsy and primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. While evidence suggests that overall AEDs have similar efficacy, some newer AEDs may be better tolerated than CBZ. In line with this, there have been changes in treatment patterns, with many variations across different countries. However, CBZ remains among the two or three most prescribed drugs for focal epilepsy in many countries, and is widely used across Europe, Africa, South America, and Asia, where it represents a good compromise between cost, availability, and effectiveness. OXC is among the first-choice options for the initial treatment of focal-onset seizures in several countries, including the US and China, where the oral suspension is commonly prescribed. This review provides guidance on the optimal use of these two drugs in clinical practice, including in children, the elderly, and in pregnancy.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Oxcarbazepine; Topiramate
PubMed: 33334546
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2020.10.018 -
Pharmacogenomics Apr 2023Oxcarbazepine (OXC) is one of the preferred drugs for partial seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. However, clinical studies have found that there are... (Review)
Review
Oxcarbazepine (OXC) is one of the preferred drugs for partial seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. However, clinical studies have found that there are considerable differences among different populations in OXC therapeutic efficacy or safety that result from the function changes of metabolic enzymes, transporters and other receptors involved in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics . The authors collected all the information on the clinically reported associations between variants of common genes (e.g., , , ) and OXC. In conclusion, these associations based on variants are beneficial for adjusting the medication regimen, which could be useful for individualized treatment with OXC.
Topics: Humans; Oxcarbazepine; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Pharmacogenetics; Epilepsy
PubMed: 37092337
DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0177 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Apr 2022Background and Objectives: Hyponatremia is one of the most common adverse effects in patients treated with oxcarbazepine (OXC). Different risk factors for OXC-induced...
Background and Objectives: Hyponatremia is one of the most common adverse effects in patients treated with oxcarbazepine (OXC). Different risk factors for OXC-induced hyponatremia have been described as age, female gender, dosage, and combination with other drugs During our clinical practice, we noticed that a longer duration of treatment with OXC could be associated with a higher risk of hyponatremia, therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate factors that may increase the risk of OXC-induced hyponatremia. Materials and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from our clinical database at the Department of Neurology of the Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics. The sample was divided into three groups: OXC consumers (n = 31), other anti-seizure medications (ASMs) consumers (n = 43), and controls absent ASMs (n = 31). All groups were matched by age and gender. Hyponatremia was defined as <136 mmol/L. Results: The frequency of hyponatremia was significantly higher among OXC patients (61.3%) compared to other ASM patients (5.4%) and controls (3.2%). The mean serum sodium concentration in the OXC group was 133.1 ± 5.1 mmol/L. The frequency of severe hyponatremia among OXC-treated patients was 19.4%; this subgroup was older than patients with moderate hyponatremia and normonatremia and had a longer OXC treatment duration compared to a subgroup of normonatremia. The average duration of OXC therapy was 8.7 ± 5.5 years with a range from 1 to 21 years. Serum sodium concentration and duration of treatment with OXC demonstrated a significant negative correlation (r = −0,427, p = 0.017). Each year of therapy with OXC increased the risk of hyponatremia 1.3 times (OR = 1.326, 95% Cl 1.027−1.712, p = 0.031). Other factors (gender, age, polypharmacy, OXC dosage, and serum concentration) did not show a significant association with the development of hyponatremia. Conclusions: Longer duration of treatment with OXC is an important factor in the development and severity of hyponatremia.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Hyponatremia; Oxcarbazepine; Retrospective Studies; Sodium
PubMed: 35629976
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050559 -
Lancet (London, England) Jul 1989
Clinical Trial Review
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Hyponatremia; Inactivation, Metabolic; Oxcarbazepine
PubMed: 2568525
DOI: No ID Found -
Brain and Behavior Nov 2022To compare the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) and Oxcarbazepine (OXC) as monotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) and Oxcarbazepine (OXC) as monotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar from January 1, 2000 to May 11, 2022, with no language restrictions along with The ClinicalTrials.gov website and the WHO International Controlled Trials Registry platforms. We pooled the risk ratio (RR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for the efficacy and safety outcomes. The quality of included trials was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.
RESULTS
Two RCTs included a total of 574 newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients (the LEV group [282 patients] and the OXC group [292 patients]). LEV group when compared with the OXC group had no significant difference in the pooled estimate of seizure freedom at week 24. (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.62-1.05, p = .11). Similarly, there was no significant difference in the pooled estimate of withdrawal due to adverse events (AEs) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.34-2.23, p = .77). The commonly reported AEs in both trials were dizziness, headache, rash, somnolence, and nasopharyngitis with zero medication-related death and few serious AEs.
CONCLUSIONS
LEV is noninferior to OXC in terms of seizure freedom at week 24 and treatment withdrawal rate due to AEs among adults but long-term treatment data is still missing. Future multicentric double-blinded RCTs and real-world studies are of great need.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Oxcarbazepine; Levetiracetam; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial
PubMed: 36184821
DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2779 -
Clinical Neuropharmacology 2020Carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and eslicarbazepine (ESL) acetate belong to the dibenzazepine family. In this context, the aim of this literature review is to... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and eslicarbazepine (ESL) acetate belong to the dibenzazepine family. In this context, the aim of this literature review is to evaluate the clinical epidemiological profile, pathological mechanisms, and management of CBZ-, OXC-, and ESL-associated movement disorders (MDs).
REVIEW SUMMARY
Relevant reports in 6 databases were identified and assessed by 2 reviewers without language restriction. Reports where the individuals only developed tremor or ataxia after CBZ/OXC/ESL use were not included. A total of 73 reports containing 191 individuals who developed MD associated with CBZ/OXC/ESL were identified. Were found, respectively, the following: 33 patients with myoclonus, 23 with dystonia, 14 with tics, 13 with dyskinesia, 8 with parkinsonism, and 5 with akathisia. In the group not clearly defined, there were 44 with myoclonus, 29 with dyskinesia, 20 with dystonia, 1 with incoordination, and 1 with akathisia. The mean age was 28.53 years. The most frequent sex was male in 52.77% (38/72), and the drug indication was epilepsy in 74.19% (69/93). The mean (SD) CBZ dose when the MD occurred was 692.68 (363.58) mg. The mean time until MD onset was 33.59 days, and the mean recovery period was 8.7 days. The most common form of MD management was drug withdrawal.
CONCLUSIONS
The number of cases associated with CBZ is higher than those with OXC + ESL. We believe that the study of CBZ contributes not only to the improvement of this drug but also to the knowledge about the drug-induced MD of OXC and ESL. In the literature, the description of the MD onset and recovery has been poorly reported.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Ataxia; Carbamazepine; Child; Child, Preschool; Dibenzazepines; Female; Humans; Infant; Male; Middle Aged; Movement Disorders; Oxcarbazepine
PubMed: 32384309
DOI: 10.1097/WNF.0000000000000387 -
Pharmacotherapy Aug 2001Oxcarbazepine is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been registered in more than 50 countries worldwide since 1990 and recently received approval in the United... (Review)
Review
Oxcarbazepine is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been registered in more than 50 countries worldwide since 1990 and recently received approval in the United States and the European Union. Oxcarbazepine is a keto analog of carbamazepine and has a more favorable pharmacokinetic profile. It is rapidly absorbed after oral administration and undergoes rapid and almost complete reductive metabolism to form the pharmacologically active 10-monohydroxy derivative. Oxcarbazepine exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, no autoinduction, and minimal interaction with other AEDs. Ten controlled trials demonstrated that oxcarbazepine is safe and efficacious in the treatment of partial seizures across a wide range of ages (children to adults), situations (recent onset to treatment-resistant epilepsy), and uses (monotherapy and adjunctive therapy). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events are related to the central nervous system. Treatment-emergent hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium level < 125 mEq/L) occurred in 3% of patients treated with oxcarbazepine in clinical trials. According to the efficacy and safety profile established in the controlled trials, oxcarbazepine represents an important new treatment option indicated for monotherapy and adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures and as adjunctive therapy in children aged 4 years or older with partial seizures. Although structurally similar to carbamazepine, significant differences exist in the pharmacokinetics, drug interaction potential, adverse-effect profile, and dosage and titration between these two agents, and they should be considered distinct therapeutic agents.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Oxcarbazepine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 11718497
DOI: 10.1592/phco.21.11.904.34513 -
Seizure Mar 2000
Review
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Humans; Oxcarbazepine
PubMed: 10845729
DOI: 10.1053/seiz.2000.0391 -
Practical Neurology Oct 2021Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a highly disabling disorder characterised by very severe, brief and electric shock like recurrent episodes of facial pain. New diagnostic... (Review)
Review
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a highly disabling disorder characterised by very severe, brief and electric shock like recurrent episodes of facial pain. New diagnostic criteria, which subclassify TN on the basis of presence of trigeminal neurovascular conflict or an underlying neurological disorder, should be used as they allow better characterisation of patients and help in decision-making regarding medical and surgical treatments. MR imaging, including high-resolution trigeminal sequences, should be performed as part of the diagnostic work-up. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are drugs of first choice. Lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, botulinum toxin type A and baclofen can be used either alone or as add-on therapy. Surgery should be considered if the pain is poorly controlled or the medical treatments are poorly tolerated. Trigeminal microvascular decompression is the first-line surgery in patients with trigeminal neurovascular conflict while neuroablative surgical treatments can be offered if MR imaging does not show any neurovascular contact or where patients are considered too frail for microvascular decompression or do not wish to take the risk.
Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Oxcarbazepine; Trigeminal Neuralgia
PubMed: 34108244
DOI: 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002782 -
The Lancet. Neurology Sep 2020Trigeminal neuralgia is a very painful neurological condition with severe, stimulus-evoked, short-lasting stabbing pain attacks in the face. The past decade has offered... (Review)
Review
Trigeminal neuralgia is a very painful neurological condition with severe, stimulus-evoked, short-lasting stabbing pain attacks in the face. The past decade has offered new insights into trigeminal neuralgia symptomatology, pathophysiology, and treatment, leading to a change in the classification of the condition. An accurate diagnosis is crucial because neuroimaging interpretation and clinical management differ among the various forms of facial pain. MRI using specific sequences should be a part of the diagnostic workup to detect a possible neurovascular contact and exclude secondary causes. Demonstration of a neurovascular contact should not be used to confirm a diagnosis but rather to facilitate surgical decision making. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are drugs of first choice for long-term treatment, whereas microvascular decompression is the first-line surgery in medically refractory patients. Advances in neuroimaging techniques and animal models will provide further insight into the causes of trigeminal neuralgia and its pathophysiology. Development of more efficacious treatment options is highly warranted.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Decompression, Surgical; Disease Management; Humans; Neuroimaging; Oxcarbazepine; Pain Measurement; Trigeminal Neuralgia
PubMed: 32822636
DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30233-7