-
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) Feb 2014
Review
Topics: Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Carbamazepine; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Oxcarbazepine; Prognosis; Radiosurgery; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
PubMed: 24534115
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g474 -
JAMA Neurology May 2024Women with epilepsy (WWE) require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy, which may be associated with an increased risk of major congenital... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
IMPORTANCE
Women with epilepsy (WWE) require treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) during pregnancy, which may be associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) in their offspring.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the prevalence of MCMs after prenatal exposure to 8 commonly used ASM monotherapies and changes in MCM prevalence over time.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This was a prospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study conducted from June 1999 to October 2022. Since 1999, physicians from more than 40 countries enrolled ASM-treated WWE before pregnancy outcome was known and followed up their offspring until 1 year after birth. Participants aged 14 to 55 years who were exposed to 8 of the most frequently used ASMs during pregnancy were included in this study. Data were analyzed from April to September 2023.
EXPOSURE
Maternal use of ASMs at conception.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
MCMs were assessed 1 year after birth by a committee blinded to type of exposure. Teratogenic outcomes across exposures were compared by random-effects logistic regression adjusting for potential confounders and prognostic factors.
RESULTS
A total of 10 121 prospective pregnancies exposed to ASM monotherapy met eligibility criteria. Of those, 9840 were exposed to the 8 most frequently used ASMs. The 9840 pregnancies occurred in 8483 women (mean [range] age, 30.1 [14.1-55.2] years). MCMs occurred in 153 of 1549 pregnancies for valproate (9.9%; 95% CI, 8.5%-11.5%), 9 of 142 for phenytoin (6.3%; 95% CI, 3.4%-11.6%), 21 of 338 for phenobarbital (6.2%; 95% CI, 4.1%-9.3%), 121 of 2255 for carbamazepine (5.4%; 95% CI, 4.5%-6.4%), 10 of 204 for topiramate (4.9%; 95% CI, 2.7%-8.8%), 110 of 3584 for lamotrigine (3.1%; 95% CI, 2.5%-3.7%), 13 of 443 for oxcarbazepine (2.9%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.0%), and 33 of 1325 for levetiracetam (2.5%; 95% CI, 1.8%-3.5%). For valproate, phenobarbital, and carbamazepine, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of MCMs associated with increasing dose of the ASM. Overall prevalence of MCMs decreased from 6.1% (153 of 2505) during the period 1998 to 2004 to 3.7% (76 of 2054) during the period 2015 to 2022. This decrease over time was significant in univariable logistic analysis but not after adjustment for changes in ASM exposure pattern.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Of all ASMs with meaningful data, the lowest prevalence of MCMs was observed in offspring exposed to levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine. Prevalence of MCMs was higher with phenytoin, valproate, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital, and dose dependent for the latter 3 ASMs. The shift in exposure pattern over time with a declining exposure to valproate and carbamazepine and greater use of lamotrigine and levetiracetam was associated with a 39% decline in prevalence of MCMs, a finding that has major public health implications.
Topics: Humans; Female; Anticonvulsants; Adult; Pregnancy; Young Adult; Adolescent; Epilepsy; Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Middle Aged; Longitudinal Studies; Pregnancy Complications; Prospective Studies; Valproic Acid; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Phenytoin; Lamotrigine; Carbamazepine; Phenobarbital; Cohort Studies; Oxcarbazepine; Prevalence
PubMed: 38497990
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.0258 -
Epilepsy & Behavior : E&B Oct 2004Oxcarbazepine (OXC, Trileptal) is a modern antiepileptic drug (AED) used as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without... (Review)
Review
Oxcarbazepine (OXC, Trileptal) is a modern antiepileptic drug (AED) used as both monotherapy and adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures with or without secondary generalization in adults and children above 4 years (USA) or 6 years (Europe) of age. Although OXC has been developed through structural variation of carbamazepine (CBZ) with the intent to avoid metabolites causing side effects, significant differences have emerged between the two drugs. The mechanism of action of OXC involves mainly blockade of sodium currents but differs from CBZ by modulating different types of calcium channels. In contrast to CBZ, which is oxidized by the cytochrome P-450 system, OXC undergoes reductive metabolism at its keto moiety to form the monohydroxy derivative (MHD), which is glucuronidated and excreted in the urine. The involvement of the hepatic cytochrome P-450-dependent enzymes in the metabolism of OXC is minimal. Although it does not prevent interaction with oral contraceptives, it explains why OXC can be more effectively combined with other AEDs such as valproate compared with CBZ. Switching from CBZ to OXC normalized CBZ-associated thyroid and sexual hormone abnormalities and pathological lipid values in small patient samples. OXC is often better tolerated than CBZ and causes fewer rashes than CBZ. Add-on or substitution treatment with OXC was effective in controlled trials even when CBZ did not achieve sufficient seizure control. This constitutes compelling clinical evidence that OXC and CBZ are distinctly different medications. From postmarketing experience in over 1,000,000 patient years, OXC had an advantageous risk-benefit balance also in comparison to other new AEDs. OXC should be preferred over CBZ and other older AEDs because of its proven efficacy and excellent side effect profile in children, adolescents, and adults with partial seizures.
Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Oxcarbazepine
PubMed: 15380112
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2004.07.004 -
Xenobiotica; the Fate of Foreign... Aug 1986The disposition of the new anti-epileptic agent oxcarbazepine (10,11-dihydro-10-oxo-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide) has been studied in two healthy volunteers...
The disposition of the new anti-epileptic agent oxcarbazepine (10,11-dihydro-10-oxo-5H-dibenz[b,f]azepine-5-carboxamide) has been studied in two healthy volunteers following an oral 400 mg dose of 14C-labelled drug. The dose was excreted almost completely in the urine (94.6 and 97.1%) within six days. Faecal excretion amounted to 4.3 and 1.9% of the dose in the two subjects. In the 0-6 days urine samples the biotransformation products have been isolated and identified. 10,11-Dihydro-10-hydroxycarbamazepine (GP 47,779) and its two diastereoisomeric O-glucuronides were found as main metabolites. Taken together, they accounted for 79% of urinary 14C. Unchanged oxcarbazepine, and its sulphate and glucuronide conjugates were isolated in smaller amounts only (13%). Other minor metabolites were the trans- and cis-isomers of 10,11-dihydro-10,11-dihydroxy-carbamazepine (approximately 4%), and a phenolic derivative of GP 47,779 (less than 1%). The biotransformation of oxcarbazepine proceeds mainly by reduction to GP 47,779, and subsequent conjugation with glucuronic acid. Reduction is stereospecific, favouring the S-configuration of GP 47,779. Direct conjugation of oxcarbazepine, in the enol form, is a minor pathway. Oxidative reactions are unimportant.
Topics: Biotransformation; Carbamazepine; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Feces; Humans; Male; Oxcarbazepine; Stereoisomerism; Time Factors
PubMed: 3765657
DOI: 10.3109/00498258609043567 -
Oxcarbazepine in the treatment of epilepsy in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.Journal of Intellectual Disability... Dec 1998Oxcarbazepine is similar to carbamazepine in its mechanisms of action and antiepileptic efficacy, but has better tolerability and fewer interactions with other drugs.... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial
Oxcarbazepine is similar to carbamazepine in its mechanisms of action and antiepileptic efficacy, but has better tolerability and fewer interactions with other drugs. Very few data are available on the usefulness of oxcarbazepine in patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy. From January 1991 until October 1994, the present authors treated 40 patients with intellectual disability and epilepsy under the age of 18 years with oxcarbazepine. The mean age at onset of epilepsy was 12 months (range = 0-132 months). All patients had previously been intractable to antiepileptic drugs (including carbamazepine in 29 patients). The age at onset of oxcarbazepine therapy ranged from 0.8 to 17.1 years (mean = 6.2 years). Thirty-one patients (78%) received other antiepileptic drugs simultaneously with oxcarbazepine. The mean follow-up with oxcarbazepine treatment was 18.8 months. The mean maximum oxcarbazepine dose was 49 mg kg(-1) day(-1) (range = 21-86 mg kg(-1) day(-1). A reduction in seizures of at least 50% during oxcarbazepine treatment was observed in 14 out of 28 (50%) patients with localization-related epilepsy and in 5 out of 12 (42%) patients with generalized epilepsy. Efficacy was transient in three patients. An increase of atypical absences was observed in one child and an emergence of drop attacks in another. Side-effects were observed in 16 (40%) patients; in eight (20%), these lead to dose reduction or discontinuation. Oxcarbazepine appears to be an effective and well-tolerated drug for children and adolescents with intellectual disability and epilepsy.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Intellectual Disability; Oxcarbazepine; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 10030431
DOI: No ID Found -
Pediatric Neurology Aug 2007Oxcarbazepine, a carbamazepine analog, was approved for use as an antiepileptic agent in the United States in 2000. A search of the United States Food and Drug... (Review)
Review
Oxcarbazepine, a carbamazepine analog, was approved for use as an antiepileptic agent in the United States in 2000. A search of the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System identified nine cases of oxcarbazepine-associated angioedema in pediatric patients aged 16 years and younger. We describe in detail the first U.S. case report, of a 4(1/2)-year-old boy who experienced angioedema during treatment with oxcarbazepine. The reporting rate for angioedema was calculated to be 9.8 cases per 1,000,000 pediatric patients. Oxcarbazepine-associated angioedema manifested by swelling of the face, eyes, lips, or tongue or difficulty swallowing or breathing (or both) is a rare but potentially life-threatening reaction for which early recognition and management are vital.
Topics: Angioedema; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Humans; Male; Oxcarbazepine; United States
PubMed: 17675030
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.03.010 -
Toxins Aug 2023We sought to assess the efficacy of combining onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) as add-on therapy to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in treatment-refractory patients with...
We sought to assess the efficacy of combining onabotulinumtoxinA (BoNTA) as add-on therapy to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine in treatment-refractory patients with trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) who failed to respond (less than 30% response rate) to adequate monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective study on 15 patients with a definite diagnosis of TGN, according to the established criteria, and underwent BoNTA as part of their treatment plan. A single BoNTA session was administered subcutaneously, according to patients' perceived zone of pain, at different dosages ranging from 30 to 200 units (mean ± standard deviation: 87.3 ± 39.2). All patients (15/15; 100%) reported large reductions in the severity of their TGN-related neuropathic pain. The mean pain score on the VAS scale significantly decreased from 9.3 ± 1.1 to 3.7 ± 1.2 at 2 weeks after injecting BoNTA ( < 0.001) and remained stable at 4 and 24 weeks post-injection. Regarding the impact of BoNTA on patients' health-related quality of life, there were significant improvements in both the physical and mental health domains ( < 0.05) of SF-36 tool. BoNTA may be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with refractory TGN when added on to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine. The use of a single BoNTA session for TGN treatment may be an alternative to surgical interventions and as add-on treatment to oral medications, providing patients with a minimally invasive, effective, safe and well-tolerated option.
Topics: Humans; Oxcarbazepine; Trigeminal Neuralgia; Botulinum Toxins, Type A; Follow-Up Studies; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Carbamazepine; Pain
PubMed: 37755965
DOI: 10.3390/toxins15090539 -
Neurology May 2024Levetiracetam is a widely used antiseizure medication. Recent concerns have been raised regarding the potential prolongation of the QT interval by levetiracetam and...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
Levetiracetam is a widely used antiseizure medication. Recent concerns have been raised regarding the potential prolongation of the QT interval by levetiracetam and increased risk of sudden cardiac death. This could have profound implications for patient safety and for prescribing practice. This study assessed the potential association of levetiracetam with cardiac outcomes related to QT interval prolongation. We compared outcomes of patients taking levetiracetam with those taking oxcarbazepine as a comparator medication that has not been associated with prolongation of the QT interval.
METHODS
The sample included patients who were newly prescribed levetiracetam or oxcarbazepine from January 31, 2010, to December 31, 2019, using administrative claims data from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW). The analysis focused on a combined endpoint of sudden cardiac death or ventricular arrythmia, which are both linked to QT interval prolongation. We used a new user design and selected oxcarbazepine as an active comparator with levetiracetam to minimize bias. We used propensity score weighting to balance the levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine cohorts and then performed weighted Cox regressions to evaluate the association of levetiracetam with the combined endpoint.
RESULTS
We identified 104,655 enrollees taking levetiracetam and 39,596 enrollees taking oxcarbazepine. At baseline, enrollees taking levetiracetam were older, more likely to have diagnosed epilepsy, and more likely to have diagnosed comorbidities including hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, and coronary artery disease. In the main analysis, we found no significant difference between levetiracetam and oxcarbazepine in the rate of the combined endpoint for the Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% CI 0.42-1.47) or Cox regression with time-varying characteristics (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.41-1.50).
DISCUSSION
When compared with oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam does not correlate with increased risk of ventricular arrythmia and sudden cardiac death. Our finding does not support the concern for cardiac risk to indicate restriction of levetiracetam use nor the requirement of cardiac monitoring when using it.
CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE
This study provides Class II evidence that sudden cardiac death and ventricular arrythmia are not more frequent in patients older than 17 years newly prescribed levetiracetam, compared with those prescribed oxcarbazepine.
Topics: Humans; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Anticonvulsants; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Arrhythmias, Cardiac
PubMed: 38560823
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209177 -
CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems... Feb 2022Oxcarbazepine (OXZ) and levetiracetam (LEV) are two new generation anti-epileptic drugs, often co-administered in children with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs...
Oxcarbazepine (OXZ) and levetiracetam (LEV) are two new generation anti-epileptic drugs, often co-administered in children with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs). The anti-epileptic effect of OXZ and LEV are linked to the exposure of OXZ's active metabolite 10-monohydroxy derivative (MHD) and (the parent) LEV, respectively. However, little is known about the confounding effect of age and EIAEDs on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of MHD and LEV. To address this knowledge gap, physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was performed in the PK-Sim software using literature data from children greater than or equal to 2 years of age. Age-related changes in clearance (CL) of MHD and LEV were characterized, both in the presence (group 1) and absence (group 2) of concomitant EIAEDs. The drug-drug interaction effect of EIAEDs was estimated as the difference in CL estimates between groups 1 and 2. PBPK modeling suggests that bodyweight normalized CL (ml/min/kg) is higher in younger children than their older counterparts (i.e., due to an influence of age). Concomitant EIAEDs further increase MHD's CL to a fixed extent of 25% at any age, but EIAEDs' effect on LEV's CL increases with age from 20% (at 2 years) to 30% (at adolescence). Simulations with the maximum recommended doses (MRDs) revealed that children between 2 and 4 years and greater than 4 years, who are not on EIAEDs, are at risk of exceeding the reference exposure range for OXZ and LEV, respectively. This analysis demonstrates the use of PBPK modeling in understanding the confounding effect of age and comedications on PKs in children and adolescents.
Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine
PubMed: 34816634
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12750 -
The International Journal of Risk &... 2023Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders, affecting more than 50 million people globally. In this review we summarised the evidence from... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Epilepsy is one of the most common chronic neurological disorders, affecting more than 50 million people globally. In this review we summarised the evidence from randomised controlled trials of gabapentin used as monotherapy for the treatment of focal epilepsy, both newly diagnosed and drug-resistant, with or without secondary generalisation.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the effects of gabapentin monotherapy for people with epileptic focal seizures with and without secondary generalisation.
METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 24 February 2020) on 25 February 2020. CRS Web includes randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRA), and the specialised registers of Cochrane Review Groups including the Cochrane Epilepsy Group. We also searched several Russian databases, reference lists of relevant studies, ongoing trials registers, conference proceedings, and we contacted trial authors.
RESULTS
We found five randomised controlled trials (3167 participants) comparing gabapentin to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and differing doses of gabapentin as monotherapy for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy and drug- resistant focal epilepsy with or without secondary generalisation. Two review authors independently applied the inclusion criteria, assessed trial quality, risk of bias, and extracted data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence and present seven patient-important outcomes in the "Summary of findings" tables. The quality of evidence was very low to moderate due to poor reporting quality, poor trial design, and other risks of bias, such as selective presentation of findings and potential heavy industry input. Better quality research may change our certainty in the effect estimates. None of the included trials reported on the number of people with 50% or greater reduction in seizures and time to withdrawal (retention time) in an extractable way. Gabapentin-treated participants were more likely to withdraw from treatment for any cause (285/539) than those treated with lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate pooled together (695/1317) (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.25; 3 studies, 1856 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), but not carbamazepine. Fewer people treated with gabapentin withdrew from treatment owing to adverse events (190/525) than those treated with carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate (479/1238), (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.91; 1763 participants, 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), but not lamotrigine.
CONCLUSION
Gabapentin as monotherapy probably controlled seizures no better and no worse than comparator AEDs (lamotrigine, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and topiramate). Compared to carbamazepine, gabapentin was probably better in retaining people in studies and preventing withdrawals due to adverse events. The most common side effects associated with gabapentin were ataxia (poor co-ordination and unsteady gait), dizziness, fatigue, and drowsiness.
Topics: Humans; Gabapentin; Oxcarbazepine; Topiramate; Epilepsy; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Seizures; Lamotrigine; Carbamazepine; Drug Resistant Epilepsy
PubMed: 37393439
DOI: 10.3233/JRS-235001