-
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2015Inaugural traumatic patellar dislocation is most often due to trauma sustained during physical or sports activity. Two-thirds of acute patellar dislocations occur in... (Review)
Review
Inaugural traumatic patellar dislocation is most often due to trauma sustained during physical or sports activity. Two-thirds of acute patellar dislocations occur in young active patients (less than 20 years old). Non-contact knee sprain in flexion and valgus is the leading mechanism in patellar dislocation, accounting for as many as 93% of all cases. The strong displacement of the patella tears the medial stabilizing structures, and notably the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), which is almost always injured in acute patellar dislocation, most frequently at its femoral attachment. Lateral patellar glide can be assessed with the knee in extension or 20° flexion. Displacement by more than 50% of the patellar width is considered abnormal and may induce apprehension. Plain X-ray and CT are mandatory to diagnose bony risk factors for patellar dislocation, such as trochlear dysplasia or increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), and plan correction. MRI gives information on cartilage and capsulo-ligamentous status for treatment planning: free bodies or osteochondral fracture have to be treated surgically. If patellar dislocation occurs in an anatomically normal knee and osteochondral fracture is ruled out on MRI, non-operative treatment is usually recommended.
Topics: Algorithms; Biomechanical Phenomena; Braces; Diagnostic Imaging; Humans; Immobilization; Incidence; Ligaments, Articular; Orthopedic Procedures; Patellar Dislocation; Physical Examination; Recurrence; Risk Factors
PubMed: 25592052
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.001 -
Minerva Pediatrica Feb 2020Acute patellar dislocation affects approximately 1:1000 healthy children 9-15 years of age, and up to 50% are at risk for recurrent dislocations. In adults the condition... (Review)
Review
Acute patellar dislocation affects approximately 1:1000 healthy children 9-15 years of age, and up to 50% are at risk for recurrent dislocations. In adults the condition is associated with long-term complications, such as osteoarthritis and impairment of knee function. However, literature describing the outcome in a pediatric population is sparse. The present review article evaluates the long-term effects on knee function and cartilage quality after traumatic patellar dislocation in childhood, and also to evaluate the reliability of two clinical tests of medio-lateral knee position, in healthy children.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Child; Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint; Recurrence
PubMed: 28353323
DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4946.17.04882-4 -
Clinics in Sports Medicine Jan 2022Congenital dislocation of the patella is a rare condition characterized by lateral dislocation of the patella that is irreducible without surgical correction. Although... (Review)
Review
Congenital dislocation of the patella is a rare condition characterized by lateral dislocation of the patella that is irreducible without surgical correction. Although there is no clear inheritance pattern, it is associated with several congenital syndromes. Patients often demonstrate flexion contracture, loss of active knee extension, increased tibial external rotation, and absent patella in the trochlea. Treatment requires surgical management and is comprised of lateral release, medial stabilization, quadriceps lengthening, and distal realignment. Results are generally favorable after treatment; persistent flexion contracture and redislocation are the most common complications. Further study is needed to define the optimal timing and treatment strategy for this uncommon condition.
Topics: Humans; Knee; Knee Joint; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Tibia
PubMed: 34782069
DOI: 10.1016/j.csm.2021.07.010 -
Zeitschrift Fur Orthopadie Und... Dec 2011The diagnosis and treatment of patellar dislocation is very complex. The aim of this study is to give an overview of the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and to... (Review)
Review
AIM
The diagnosis and treatment of patellar dislocation is very complex. The aim of this study is to give an overview of the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and to point out the latest developments in diagnosis and treatment of patellar dislocation.
METHOD
The authors electronically searched Medline, Cochrane and Embase for studies on the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint and for conservative and surgical treatments after patellar dislocation. We extracted baseline demographics, biomechanical, conservation and surgical details.
RESULTS
Understanding the biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint is necessary to understand the pathology of patellar dislocation. The patellofemoral joint consists of a complex system of static, active and passive stabilising factors. Patellar instability can result from osseous and soft-tissue abnormalities, such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, a high tibial tuberosity trochlear groove (TTTG) distance, weaknesses of the vastus medialis obliquus or a lesion of the medial retinaculum. Recent studies have focused on the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and have shown that the MPFL is the most significant passive stabiliser of the patella. Following patellar dislocation, an MRI should be standard practice to detect an MPFL rupture, osteochondral lesions or other risk factors for redislocation. An acute first-time patellar dislocation without osteochondral lesions and without severe risk factors for a redislocation should follow a conservative treatment plan. If surgical treatment is required, the best postoperative results occur when the MPFL is reconstructed, leading to a redislocation rate of 5%, this includes cases that have a dysplastic trochlea. Duplication of the medial retinaculum show very inconsistent results in the literature, possibly due to the fact that the essential pathomorphology of patellar dislocation is not addressed. Addressing the exact location of the rupture of the MPFL with a suture is possibly more convenient, especially after first-time dislocation with associated risk factors for a redislocation. Recent literature does not encourage the use of lateral release, since this can increase patellar instability. Indications for lateral release include persistent patellar instability or pain reduction in an older arthritic subject. For correcting a patellofemoral malalignment, the TTTG distance should be measured and a medial transposition of the anterior tibial tubercle hinged on a distal periosteal attachment should be considered. Cartilage lesions on the medial facet of the patella are a contra-indication for medial tubercle transposition. For cartilage lesions of the lateral facet, antero-medialization of the tibial tubercle can be successful. A tubercle osteotomy can be efficiently combined with MPFL reconstruction. We believe that patients with open epiphyseal plates should be treated with duplication of the medial retinaculum. In the presence of patellar maltracking, an additional subperiostal soft tissue release with medialisation of the distal part of the patellar tendon can be performed.
CONCLUSION
It seems that the predominating factors for patellar dislocation are heterogenic morphology in combination with individual predisposition. Non-surgical treatment is typically recommended for primary patellar dislocation without any osteochondral lesions and in the absence of significant risk factors for redislocation. If surgical treatment is deemed necessary, addressing the essential pathomorphology has become the primary focus.
Topics: Arthroscopy; Humans; Patellar Dislocation; Physical Therapy Modalities
PubMed: 21544786
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250691 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Apr 2020Primary patellar dislocation is often the initial manifestation of patellofemoral instability. Its long-term consequences can include recurrent dislocation and permanent...
BACKGROUND
Primary patellar dislocation is often the initial manifestation of patellofemoral instability. Its long-term consequences can include recurrent dislocation and permanent dysfunction of the knee joint. There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of primary patellar dislocation in the relevant literature. The main prerequisite for a good long-term result is a realistic assessment of the risk of recurrent dislocation.
METHODS
We carried out a systematic literature search in OvidSP (a search engine for full-text databases) and MEDLINE to identify suitable stratification models with respect to the risk of recurrent dislocation.
RESULTS
In the ten studies included in the current analysis, eight risk factors for recurrence after primary patellar dislocation were identified. Six studies revealed a higher risk in younger patients, particularly those under 16 years of age. The sex of the patient had no clear influence. In two studies, bilateral instability was identified as a risk factor. Two anatomical risk factors-a high-riding patella (patella alta) and trochlear dysplasia-were found to have the greatest influence in six studies. In a metaanalysis of five studies, patella alta predisposed to recurrent dislocation with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.259 (95% confidence interval [1.9; 9.188]). Moreover, a pathologically increased tibial tuberosity to trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and rupture of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) on the femoral side were associated with higher recurrence rates. Patients with multiple risk factors in combination had a very high risk of recurrence.
CONCLUSION
The risk of recurrent dislocation after primary patellar dislocation is increased by a number of risk factors, and even more so when multiple such risk factors are present. Published stratification models enable an assessment of the individual risk profile. Patients at low risk can be managed conservatively; surgery should be considered for patients at high risk.
Topics: Conservative Treatment; Humans; Patellar Dislocation; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32519945
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2020.0279 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2015Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. Following reduction of the dislocation, conservative... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Patellar dislocation occurs when the patella disengages completely from the trochlear (femoral) groove. Following reduction of the dislocation, conservative (non-surgical) rehabilitation with physiotherapy may be used. Since recurrence of dislocation is common, some surgeons have advocated surgical intervention rather than non-surgical interventions. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating people with primary or recurrent patellar dislocation.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, CINAHL, ZETOC, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) and a variety of other literature databases and trial registries. Corresponding authors were contacted to identify additional studies. The last search was carried out in October 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled clinical trials evaluating surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating lateral patellar dislocation.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently examined titles and abstracts of each identified study to assess study eligibility, extract data and assess risk of bias. The primary outcomes we assessed were the frequency of recurrent dislocation, and validated patient-rated knee or physical function scores. We calculated risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences MD) for continuous outcomes. When appropriate, we pooled data.
MAIN RESULTS
We included five randomised studies and one quasi-randomised study. These recruited a total of 344 people with primary (first-time) patellar dislocation. The mean ages in the individual studies ranged from 19.3 to 25.7 years, with four studies including children, mainly adolescents, as well as adults. Follow-up for the full study populations ranged from two to nine years across the six studies. The quality of the evidence is very low as assessed by GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) criteria, with all studies being at high risk of performance and detection biases, relating to the lack of blinding.There was very low quality but consistent evidence that participants managed surgically had a significantly lower risk of recurrent dislocation following primary patellar dislocation at two to five years follow-up (21/162 versus 32/136; RR 0.53 favouring surgery, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33 to 0.87; five studies, 294 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 222 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 104 fewer (95% CI 149 fewer to 28 fewer) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery. Similarly, there is evidence of a lower risk of recurrent dislocation after surgery at six to nine years (RR 0.67 favouring surgery, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.08; two studies, 165 participants), but a small increase cannot be ruled out. Based on an illustrative risk of recurrent dislocation in 336 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 110 fewer (95% CI 195 fewer to 27 more) people per 1000 having recurrent dislocation after surgery.The very low quality evidence available from single trials only for four validated patient-rated knee and physical function scores (the Tegner activity scale, KOOS, Lysholm and Hughston VAS (visual analogue scale) score) did not show significant differences between the two treatment groups.The results for the Kujala patellofemoral disorders score (0 to 100: best outcome) differed in direction of effect at two to five years follow-up, which favoured the surgery group (MD 13.93 points higher, 95% CI 5.33 points higher to 22.53 points higher; four studies, 171 participants) and the six to nine years follow-up, which favoured the non-surgical treatment group (MD 3.25 points lower, 95% CI 10.61 points lower to 4.11 points higher; two studies, 167 participants). However, only the two to five years follow-up included the clear possibility of a clinically important effect (putative minimal clinically important difference for this outcome is 10 points).Adverse effects of treatment were reported in one trial only; all four major complications were attributed to the surgical treatment group. Slightly more people in the surgery group had subsequent surgery six to nine years after their primary dislocation (20/87 versus 16/78; RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.89, two studies, 165 participants). Based on an illustrative risk of subsequent surgery in 186 people per 1000 in the non-surgical group, these data equate to 11 more (95% CI 76 fewer to 171 more) people per 1000 having subsequent surgery after primary surgery.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although there is some evidence to support surgical over non-surgical management of primary patellar dislocation in the short term, the quality of this evidence is very low because of the high risk of bias and the imprecision in the effect estimates. We are therefore very uncertain about the estimate of effect. No trials examined people with recurrent patellar dislocation. Adequately powered, multi-centre, randomised controlled trials, conducted and reported to contemporary standards, are needed. To inform the design and conduct of these trials, expert consensus should be achieved on the minimal description of both surgical and non-surgical interventions, and the anatomical or pathological variations that may be relevant to both choice of these interventions and the natural history of patellar instability. Furthermore, well-designed studies recording adverse events and long-term outcomes are needed.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Humans; Patellar Dislocation; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult
PubMed: 25716704
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008106.pub3 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Feb 2022Trochlear dysplasia consists in deficient trochlear concavity, giving rise to a flat or convex trochlea, and is the main risk factor for patellar dislocation. Surgical... (Review)
Review
Trochlear dysplasia consists in deficient trochlear concavity, giving rise to a flat or convex trochlea, and is the main risk factor for patellar dislocation. Surgical indications depend on familiarity with trochlear dysplasias, and especially those of high grade, identified on clinical examination and standard and cross-sectional imaging, and on quantification of associated instability factors. Treatment strategy is accordingly determined "à la carte" to correct these factors one by one. Sulcus deepening trochleoplasty corrects the morphology and is the appropriate etiological treatment. It gives good results in terms of recurrence of dislocation, but tends to cause knee stiffness and patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Indications are based on objective patellar instability associated to high-grade B or D dysplasia. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction should be systematically associated. The lateral retinaculum is systematically sectioned, as patellar tilt is never reducible in such high-grade dysplasia. Trochleoplasty corrects the sulcus defect, resolves protrusion and enables proximal realignment. The main complications are stiffness and pain due to persistence or onset of cartilage lesions. Trochleoplasty is indicated: 1) in first line for objective patellar instability associated with high-grade dysplasia; or 2) for recurrence in high-grade dysplasia previously managed by other surgery. The aim of the present study was to review the literature on trochleoplasty and address the following questions: how to define high-grade dysplasia? What are the key clinical and radiologic points? What are the risk factors for patellar dislocation? What trochleoplasty techniques are available? What results can be expected? Level of evidence: V; expert opinion.
Topics: Femur; Humans; Joint Instability; Ligaments, Articular; Patellar Dislocation; Patellofemoral Joint
PubMed: 34863959
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103160 -
The Knee Dec 2019Little guidance exists on the management of the first-time patellar dislocation. The aim of this article was to review current guidance for management of this condition. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Little guidance exists on the management of the first-time patellar dislocation. The aim of this article was to review current guidance for management of this condition.
METHODS
Recent meta-analyses, systematic reviews and current consensus documents relating to first-time patellar dislocation were sourced. An instructional lecture was then created and delivered at the acute knee injuries session at the British Orthopaedic Association 2019 annual conference, which was presented on behalf of the British Association for Surgery of the Knee. This article has been written based on this lecture.
RESULTS
There is a paucity of literature relating to management of the first-time patellar dislocation. Many studies are of poor design, with inadequate follow-up, making it difficult to draw conclusions from them. However, based upon available information and consensus from working groups it is recommended that patients presenting with first-time dislocation should be assessed to ensure they have not sustained an alternative or associated injury that may require surgical intervention, be assessed and counselled for the risk of recurrent dislocation, and be referred for initial conservative treatment. Surgical stabilisation should be reserved for patients with recurrent instability.
CONCLUSIONS
Most patients with a first-time patellar dislocation can be managed conservatively, having excluded associated injuries. Due to the poor quality of the literature, care must be taken interpreting the results of studies. It is clear that further research is required in this field.
Topics: Consensus; Conservative Treatment; Female; Humans; Joint Instability; Male; Orthopedics; Patellar Dislocation; Recurrence
PubMed: 31727430
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.10.015 -
British Journal of Hospital Medicine... Aug 2021Patella dislocation is one of the most common knee injuries, accounting for 3% of acute knee injuries. Despite its prevalence, patella dislocation is often missed, with...
Patella dislocation is one of the most common knee injuries, accounting for 3% of acute knee injuries. Despite its prevalence, patella dislocation is often missed, with a haemarthrosis often the only sign, albeit a non-specific one. A thorough history and examination are necessary to identify patella dislocation and its potential causes. Investigations should include cross-sectional imaging to evaluate both osseous and soft tissue structures in order to guide management. Management in the acute setting is normally non-operative, but damage to structural supports, osteochondral defects or recurrent dislocation should prompt consideration of operative treatment. Operative treatment should address the soft tissue stabilisers and/or osseus deformities that predispose to, or occur secondary to, patella dislocation.
Topics: Humans; Joint Dislocations; Knee Injuries; Knee Joint; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Prevalence
PubMed: 34431342
DOI: 10.12968/hmed.2020.0429 -
The Journal of Small Animal Practice May 2021
Review
Topics: Animals; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Patella; Patellar Dislocation; Stifle
PubMed: 33600015
DOI: 10.1111/jsap.13311