-
Vascular Health and Risk Management 2024We aim to access the effect of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. (Review)
Review
AIM
We aim to access the effect of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.
METHODS
This was a review of pericardiectomy for constrictive pericarditis.
RESULTS
Cardiopulmonary bypass is actually an important maneuver to attain complete relief of the constriction. The short additional time of cardiopulmonary bypass during the procedure has very little effect on the risk of morbidity of the main operation.
CONCLUSION
Incomplete pericardiectomy perhaps was the cause of postoperative remnant constriction and high diastolic filling pressure leading to multiorgan failure. Complete pericardiectomy (removal of phrenic-to-phrenic and the postero-lateral and inferior wall pericardial thickening) using cardiopulmonary bypass should be the routine for total relief of the constriction of the heart.
Topics: Humans; Pericarditis, Constrictive; Pericardiectomy; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38348404
DOI: 10.2147/VHRM.S439292 -
Multimedia Manual of Cardiothoracic... Oct 2021Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease. Its exact incidence remains unknown, probably because many cases resolve without diagnosis. Indications for...
Pericarditis is the most common form of pericardial disease. Its exact incidence remains unknown, probably because many cases resolve without diagnosis. Indications for pericardiectomy from the standpoint of the cardiac surgeon are based mainly on the physiopathology of 2 different entities that can overlap: inflammatory or relapsing pericarditis and constrictive pericarditis. Surgical indications are not always straightforward. Patients with inflammatory or relapsing pericarditis may undergo radical pericardiectomy because they experience severe symptoms despite maximal medical treatment or have sequelae from the medical treatment. Pericardiectomy is the standard treatment in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis and persistent symptoms who are in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV and a class I recommendation in the European Society of Cardiology/European Association of Cardio-Vascular Surgery guidelines. The goal of surgery is always complete removal of any site of inflammation through a radical pericardiectomy.
Topics: Humans; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis, Constrictive
PubMed: 34817937
DOI: 10.1510/mmcts.2021.069 -
The Veterinary Record Jan 2017
Topics: Animals; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Pericardiectomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28130521
DOI: 10.1136/vr.j419 -
The Veterinary Record Jan 2017In patients with recurrent pericardial effusions, pericardiectomy is indicated. The purpose of this study was to describe a transdiaphragmatic approach for subtotal...
In patients with recurrent pericardial effusions, pericardiectomy is indicated. The purpose of this study was to describe a transdiaphragmatic approach for subtotal pericardiectomy in dogs and to evaluate its feasibility. In total, 20 canine cadavers weighing less than 10 kg (group S) and 20 weighing more than 20 kg (group L) were used. Within each group, half underwent a subphrenic pericardiectomy via an intercostal approach and half via a transdiaphragmatic approach. For each approach and within each weight group, the percentage of resected pericardium was calculated and compared. Additionally, a case series of nine consecutive client-owned dogs that underwent a transdiaphragmatic pericardiectomy for pericardial effusion was reported. Exposure of pericardium and associated phrenic nerves was excellent in cadavers and clinical patients. In group S, the percentage of resected pericardium was not significantly different between the two approaches. In group L, on the other hand, the percentage of resected pericardium was lower with the transdiaphragmatic approach compared with the intercostal approach (P=0.001). In the clinical patients, no intraoperative complications were encountered and no recurrence of pericardial effusion was seen. Subtotal pericardiectomy via a transdiaphragmatic approach is straightforward and a safe surgical procedure to obtain permanent pericardial drainage in small and large breed dogs.
Topics: Animals; Cadaver; Diaphragm; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Feasibility Studies; Pericardial Effusion; Pericardiectomy; Thoracotomy; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27881694
DOI: 10.1136/vr.103962 -
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular... May 2022Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a rare disease, and the diagnosis and surgical treatment of CP remain challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate our Japanese...
OBJECTIVE
Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is a rare disease, and the diagnosis and surgical treatment of CP remain challenging. The aim of this study was to evaluate our Japanese single-center experience with isolated pericardiectomy for CP to elucidate the factors associated with improved outcomes.
METHODS
Over a 20-year period, 44 consecutive patients underwent isolated pericardiectomy at our institution. The cause of CP was: idiopathic (59%), postsurgical (32%), tuberculosis (7%), and postradiation (2%) of the patients. All patients were diagnosed with CP using multiple modalities, including echocardiography, cardiac catheterization, computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Median sternotomy was performed in 42 (95%) patients. Twenty-eight (68%) patients underwent radical pericardiectomy.
RESULTS
The postoperative diagnosis in all patients was CP. Among the multiple modalities, cardiac MRI had the greatest diagnostic sensitivity (97.2%). There were no operative or hospital deaths; late mortality occurred in seven (15.9%) patients in the series. Multivariable analysis showed that preoperative low LVEF was a risk factor for long-term mortality. Seven patients were readmitted for heart failure postoperatively. Multivariable analysis showed incomplete pericardiectomy and use of a preoperative inotrope were risk factors for readmission for heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS
The diagnosis using multimodality imaging for CP was effective in our institution and tagged cine MRI had the greatest sensitivity in diagnosing CP. Preoperative condition, including preoperative low LVEF or inotrope use, was correlated with long-term outcome after pericardiectomy. Pericardiectomy should be performed early and as radically as possible to prevent recurrent heart failure.
Topics: Heart Failure; Humans; Japan; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis, Constrictive; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35119592
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-021-01718-x -
The Heart Surgery Forum Jul 2021Acute kidney (renal) injury (AKI) is a severe and common complication that occurs in ~40% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. AKI has been associated with increased... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Acute kidney (renal) injury (AKI) is a severe and common complication that occurs in ~40% of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. AKI has been associated with increased mortality and worse prognosis. This prospective study was conducted to determine the risk factors for AKI after pericardiectomy and decrease the operative risk of mortality and morbidity.
METHODS
This was a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing pericardiectomy. All patients underwent pericardiectomy via median sternotomy. Serum creatinine was used as the diagnostic standard of AKI according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes classification. All survivors were monitored to the end date of the study.
RESULTS
Consecutive patients (N = 92) undergoing pericardiectomy were divided into 2 groups: with AKI (n = 25) and without AKI (n = 67). The incidence of postoperative AKI was 27.2% (25/92). Hemodialysis was required for 10 patients (40%), and there were 5 operative deaths. Mortality, intubation time, time in intensive care unit, fresh-frozen plasma, and packed red cells of the group with AKI were significantly higher than those of the group without AKI. Both univariate and multivariate analyses showed that statistically significant independent predictors of AKI include intubation time, chest drainage, fresh-frozen plasma, and packed red cells. The latest follow-up data showed that 85 survivors were New York Heart Association class I (97.7%) and 2 were class II (2.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
AKI after pericardiectomy is a serious complication and contributes to significantly increased morbidity and mortality. Prevention of AKI development after cardiac surgery and optimization of pre-, peri-, and postoperative factors that can reduce AKI, therefore, contribute to a better postoperative outcome and leads to lower rates of AKI, morbidity, and mortality.
Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Creatinine; Critical Care; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hospital Costs; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis, Constrictive; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sternotomy
PubMed: 34473037
DOI: 10.1532/hsf.3869 -
American Journal of Cardiovascular... 2005Bacterial pericarditis occurs by direct infection during trauma, thoracic surgery, or catheter drainage, by spread from an intrathoracic, myocardial, or subdiaphragmatic... (Review)
Review
Bacterial pericarditis occurs by direct infection during trauma, thoracic surgery, or catheter drainage, by spread from an intrathoracic, myocardial, or subdiaphragmatic focus, and by hematogenous dissemination. The frequent causes are Staphylococcus and Streptococcus (rheumatic pancarditis), Haemophilus, and M. tuberculosis. In AIDS pericarditis, the incidence of bacterial infection is much higher than in the general population, with a high proportion of Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare infection. Purulent pericarditis is the most serious manifestation of bacterial pericarditis, characterized by gross pus in the pericardium or microscopically purulent effusion. It is an acute, fulminant illness with fever in virtually all patients. Chest pain is uncommon. Purulent pericarditis is always fatal if untreated. The mortality rate in treated patients is 40%, and death is mostly due to cardiac tamponade, systemic toxicity, cardiac decompensation, and constriction. Tuberculous infection may present as acute pericarditis, cardiac tamponade, silent (often large) relapsing pericardial effusion, effusive-constrictive pericarditis, toxic symptoms with persistent fever, and acute, subacute, or chronic constriction. The mortality in untreated patients approaches 85%. Urgent pericardial drainage, combined with intravenous antibacterial therapy (e.g. vancomycin 1g twice daily, ceftriaxone 1-2g twice daily, and ciprofloxacin 400 mg/day) is mandatory in purulent pericarditis. Irrigation with urokinase or streptokinase, using large catheters, may liquify the purulent exudate, but open surgical drainage is preferable. The initial treatment of tuberculous pericarditis should include isoniazid 300 mg/day, rifampin 600 mg/day, pyrazinamide 15-30 mg/kg/day, and ethambutol 15-25 mg/kg/day. Prednisone 1-2 mg/kg/day is given for 5-7 days and progressively reduced to discontinuation in 6-8 weeks. Drug sensitivity testing is essential. Pericardiectomy is reserved for recurrent effusions or continued elevation of central venous pressure after 4-6 weeks of antituberculous and corticosteroid therapy.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Drainage; Humans; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis; Therapeutic Irrigation
PubMed: 15725041
DOI: 10.2165/00129784-200505020-00004 -
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery Jun 2021Pericardiectomy has traditionally carried relatively high perioperative mortality and morbidity, with few published reports of intermediate- and long- term outcomes. We...
PURPOSE
Pericardiectomy has traditionally carried relatively high perioperative mortality and morbidity, with few published reports of intermediate- and long- term outcomes. We investigated our 15-year experience performing pericardiectomy at our institution.
METHODS
Retrospective study of all patients who underwent pericardiectomy at our institution between 2005 and 2019. Baseline demographics, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes including long-term survival were analyzed.
RESULTS
Sixty-three patients were included in the study. 66.7% of subjects underwent isolated pericardiectomy while 33.3% underwent pericardiectomy concomitantly with another cardiac surgical procedure. The most common indications for pericardiectomy were constrictive (79.4%) and hemorrhagic (9.5%) pericarditis. Preoperatively, 76.2% of patients were New York Heart Association class II and III, while postoperatively, 71.4% were class I and II. One-, three-, five-, and ten- year overall mortality was 9.5, 14.3, 20.6, and 25.4%, respectively. Overall pericarditis recurrence rate was 4.8%.
CONCLUSION
Pericardiectomy carries relatively high overall mortality rates, which likely reflects underlying disease etiology and comorbidities. Patients with prior cardiac intervention, history of dialysis, and immunocompromised state are associated with worse outcomes.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Comorbidity; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Tertiary Care Centers
PubMed: 34158104
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-021-01561-4 -
BMC Anesthesiology Jun 2023Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is an uncommon disease that limits both cardiac relaxation and contraction. Patients often present with right-sided heart failure as the...
BACKGROUND
Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is an uncommon disease that limits both cardiac relaxation and contraction. Patients often present with right-sided heart failure as the pericardium thickens and impedes cardiac filling. Pericardiectomy is the treatment of choice for improving hemodynamics in CP patients; however, the procedure carries a high morbidity and mortality, and the anesthetic management can be challenging. Acute heart failure, bleeding and arrhythmias are all concerns postoperatively.
METHODS
After IRB approval, we performed the retrospective analysis of 66 consecutive patients with CP who underwent pericardiectomy from July 2018 to May 2022.
RESULTS
Most patients had significant preoperative comorbidities, including congestive hepatopathy (75.76%), New York Heart Association Type III/IV heart failure (59.09%) and atrial fibrillation (51.52%). Despite this, 75.76% of patients were extubated within the first 24 h and all but 2 of the patients survived to discharge (96.97%).
CONCLUSIONS
Anesthetic management, including a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology of CP, the use of advanced monitoring and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) guidance, all played an important role in patient outcomes.
Topics: Humans; Pericardiectomy; Retrospective Studies; Pericarditis, Constrictive; Heart Failure; Anesthesia
PubMed: 37264299
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02155-4 -
Journal of Cardiac Surgery Jun 2018We studied the impact of radical pericardiectomy on early and long-term patient survival, postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and left... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
We studied the impact of radical pericardiectomy on early and long-term patient survival, postoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis compared to a sub-total pericardiectomy.
METHODS
From 1991 to 2016, 41 patients underwent pericardiectomy for chronic constrictive pericarditis. Sub-total pericardiectomy was performed in 17 (41%) and radical pericardiectomy in 24 (59%) patients. Patients in the two study groups had statistically similar NYHA functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, and cardiac catheterization data. Follow-up was 100% complete with a median time of 4 years.
RESULTS
Radical pericardiectomy resulted in increased survival rates at 10 years (94%) compared to sub-total pericardiectomy (55%) (P = 0.014). In the idiopathic chronic constrictive pericarditis sub-group, long-term survival rates were also increased after a radical pericardiectomy (P = 0.001). Eighty-five percent of patients after a radical pericardiectomy were in NYHA functional class I or II after 5 years and 94% up to 25 years versus 53% and 63%, respectively, for the sub-total pericardiectomy group.
CONCLUSIONS
Radical pericardiectomy provided superior 10-year survival and clinical functional improvement in patients with chronic constrictive pericarditis compared to sub-total pericaridectomy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Cardiac Catheterization; Chronic Disease; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardiectomy; Pericarditis, Constrictive; Stroke Volume; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 29761570
DOI: 10.1111/jocs.13715