-
Leukemia & Lymphoma Sep 2003Pipobroman (PB) is a neutral amide of piperazine with a chemical structure close to that of alkylating agents, although the exact mechanism of action of PB has not been... (Review)
Review
Pipobroman (PB) is a neutral amide of piperazine with a chemical structure close to that of alkylating agents, although the exact mechanism of action of PB has not been demonstrated. PB has well documented clinical activity in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). Recent long-term follow-up studies on PV and ET patients receiving PB have facilitated the definition of the risk of late transformation into myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM) or acute leukemia (AL). This report gives an overview of the treatment with PB in patients with PV and ET focusing on clinical activity, administration dose and schedule, toxicity, impact on short- and long-term complications. From our experience and from the data reported in the literature the high clinical activity of PB in both PVand ET becomes evident. This drug allows, within 3 months, to attain a response in more than 90% of patients, without clinically relevant toxicities. The 10-years risk of thrombosis of patients treated with PB is about 15%, similar to that registered with hydroxyurea, the most widely used agent in PVand ET. The antiproliferative activity of PB on bone marrow megakaryocytes seems of particular value in lowering the occurrence of post-PV and post-ET MMM, whose risk (< 4% at 10 years) is the lowest registered with available treatments. The 10-year risk of acute leukemia with PB is 5% in PVand 3% in ET, which is only slightly higher than that expected as a natural evolution of the disease. In conclusion, the use of PB is a definite alternative to hydroxyurea in patients with PV and ET at high risk of thrombosis.
Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Acute Disease; Alkylating Agents; Female; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid; Middle Aged; Pipobroman; Polycythemia Vera; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Primary Myelofibrosis; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis
PubMed: 14565648
DOI: 10.3109/10428190309178768 -
American Journal of Hematology Jan 2019Disease Overview: Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms respectively characterized by erythrocytosis and...
Disease Overview: Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms respectively characterized by erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis; other disease features include leukocytosis, splenomegaly, thrombosis, bleeding, microcirculatory symptoms, pruritus, and risk of leukemic or fibrotic transformation. Diagnosis: Bone marrow morphology remains the cornerstone of diagnosis. In addition, the presence of JAK2 mutation is expected in PV while approximately 90% of patients with ET express mutually exclusive JAK2, CALR, or myeloproliferative leukemia mutations. In ET, it is most important to exclude the possibility of prefibrotic myelofibrosis. Survival: Median survivals are 14 years for PV and 20 years for ET; the corresponding values for younger patients are 24 and 33 years. Certain mutations (mostly spliceosome) and abnormal karyotype might compromise survival in PV and ET. Life-expectancy in ET is inferior to the control population. Driver mutations have not been shown to affect survival in ET. Risk of thrombosis is higher in JAK2-mutated ET. Leukemic transformation rates at 10 years are estimated at <1% for ET and 3% for PV. Thrombosis Risk: In PV, 2 risk categories are considered: high (age > 60 years or thrombosis history present) and low (absence of both risk factors); in ET, 4 risk categories are considered: very low (age ≤ 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type), low (same as very low but JAK2 mutation present), intermediate (age > 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild-type) and high (thrombosis history present or age > 60 years with JAK2 mutation). Risk-Adapted Therapy: The main goal of therapy in both PV and ET is to prevent thrombohemorrhagic complications. All patients with PV require phlebotomy to keep hematocrit below 45% and once- or twice-daily aspirin (81 mg), in the absence of contraindications. Very low-risk ET might not require therapy while aspirin therapy is advised for low-risk disease. Cytoreductive therapy is recommended for high-risk ET and PV but it is not mandatory for intermediate-risk ET. First-line drug of choice for cytoreductive therapy, in both ET and PV, is hydroxyurea and second-line drugs of choice are interferon-α and busulfan. We do not recommend treatment with ruxolutinib in PV, unless in the presence of severe and protracted pruritus or marked splenomegaly that is not responding to the aforementioned drugs.
Topics: Adult; Aspirin; Bone Marrow; Busulfan; Disease Management; Disease Progression; Hemorrhage; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Interferon-alpha; Janus Kinase 2; Mutation; Phlebotomy; Pipobroman; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis; Young Adult
PubMed: 30281843
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25303 -
Deutsches Arzteblatt International Jan 2008
PubMed: 19633773
DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2008.0071d -
Blood May 1982Between 1971 and 1981, 74 patients with polycythemia vera were treated with pipobroman using a high-dose induction, low-dose maintenance regimen. Complete remission was...
Between 1971 and 1981, 74 patients with polycythemia vera were treated with pipobroman using a high-dose induction, low-dose maintenance regimen. Complete remission was achieved in 51 of 54 previously untreated patients (94.4%) and in 17 of 20 patients (85%) previously treated wih radioactive phosphorus (32 p) and busulfan. The earliest modifications were noted on day 16, and on the average, blood counts were normal by day 45. Thirty percent of the patients relapsed, the mean duration of the remission being 17.5 mo. Following recurrence pipobroman was consistently effective in the same doses but the mean duration of the next remissions was 10 mo. Transient leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 8% and 7% of patients, respectively, during initial phase, and anemia was noted in 3 patients. Macrocytosis was noted in 20% of patients during maintenance phase. Three cases of acute leukemia and 3 cases of osteomyelosclerosis were recorded, all occurring in patients who had previously received 32 p and/or busulfan. No hematologic malignancies were seen among patients treated with pipobroman alone; follow-up exceeded 6 yr for 20 patients and the median follow-up period was 3.6 yr. Pipobroman appears safer than other alkylating agents; it is as effective as 32 p and works more quickly. Longer follow-up will be required to evaluate the drug's oncogenic potential, which is still not known.
Topics: Drug Evaluation; Female; Humans; Male; Pipobroman; Polycythemia Vera; Primary Myelofibrosis
PubMed: 7074217
DOI: No ID Found -
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis Jun 2006Despite recent discoveries made in myeloproliferative disorders other than chronic myelogenous leukemia, which it is hoped will result in earlier diagnosis, and better... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Despite recent discoveries made in myeloproliferative disorders other than chronic myelogenous leukemia, which it is hoped will result in earlier diagnosis, and better evaluation and management of patients, hematological evolution to myelofibrosis, acute leukemia, and myelodysplastic syndromes (AL/MDS) remain major causes of long-term mortality in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) patients. Evaluation of long-term leukemogenic risk of currently available drugs, therefore, is crucial. We report updated results of three French prospective trials of hydroxyurea and pipobroman in PV and ET patients with a median follow-up longer than 10 years. The results show that the incidence of AL/MDS is higher than previously reported with no evidence of a plateau (with approximately 40% of AL/MDS cases occurring after the 12th year of follow-up). Although hydroxyurea currently remains the first choice in the treatment of high-risk PV and ET patients, the use of nonleukemogenic drugs, such as interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) or anagrelide, should be assessed more widely in randomized trials using accurate diagnostic criteria and taking into account the presence of the JAK2 mutation, given that they may have an impact on disease evolution.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Interferon-alpha; Janus Kinase 2; Leukemia; Male; Mutation; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Pipobroman; Polycythemia Vera; Prospective Studies; Protein-Tyrosine Kinases; Proto-Oncogene Proteins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Time Factors
PubMed: 16810617
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-942762 -
Leukemia Sep 2013Under the auspices of an International Working Group, seven centers submitted diagnostic and follow-up information on 1545 patients with World Health...
Under the auspices of an International Working Group, seven centers submitted diagnostic and follow-up information on 1545 patients with World Health Organization-defined polycythemia vera (PV). At diagnosis, median age was 61 years (51% females); thrombocytosis and venous thrombosis were more frequent in women and arterial thrombosis and abnormal karyotype in men. Considering patients from the center with the most mature follow-up information (n=337 with 44% of patients followed to death), median survival (14.1 years) was significantly worse than that of the age- and sex-matched US population (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, survival for the entire study cohort (n=1545) was adversely affected by older age, leukocytosis, venous thrombosis and abnormal karyotype; a prognostic model that included the first three parameters delineated risk groups with median survivals of 10.9-27.8 years (hazard ratio (HR), 10.7; 95% confidence interval (CI): 7.7-15.0). Pruritus was identified as a favorable risk factor for survival. Cumulative hazard of leukemic transformation, with death as a competing risk, was 2.3% at 10 years and 5.5% at 15 years; risk factors included older age, abnormal karyotype and leukocytes ≥15 × 10(9)/l. Leukemic transformation was associated with treatment exposure to pipobroman or P32/chlorambucil. We found no association between leukemic transformation and hydroxyurea or busulfan use.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cohort Studies; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Incidence; Leukemia; Male; Middle Aged; Polycythemia Vera; Prognosis; ROC Curve; Young Adult
PubMed: 23739289
DOI: 10.1038/leu.2013.163 -
British Journal of Haematology Dec 2001
Review
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia, Aplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Chronic Disease; Cyclosporine; Female; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Middle Aged; Pipobroman; Thrombocythemia, Essential
PubMed: 11736962
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2001.03138-4.x -
British Journal of Haematology Mar 2002Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a disease associated with an elevated risk of thrombosis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pipobroman (PB) in the...
Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is a disease associated with an elevated risk of thrombosis. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pipobroman (PB) in the long-term control of ET patients who had, at diagnosis, one or more of the following currently known risk factors for thrombosis or haemorrhage (high-risk patients): age > 60 years, history of thrombosis or haemorrhage, platelets >1000 x 10(9)/l. From 1978 to 2000, with a median follow-up of 10 years, 118 previously untreated high-risk ET patients (median age 62 years, range 25-82), were treated with PB at the starting dose of 0.8-1 mg/kg/d. All patients reached a platelet count <600 x 10(9)/l and 91% achieved a platelet count <400 x 10(9)/l. During follow-up, 13 patients had thrombosis, with a 10-year cumulative risk of 14%. Acute myeloid leukaemia, myelofibrosis and solid tumours occurred in three, two and seven patients with a 10-year cumulative risk of 3%, 2% and 7% respectively. Actuarial survival at 20 years was 64% and the standardized mortality ratio was 1.1 (95% CI: 0.7-1.7), not statistically different from the general population (P = 0.54). Age was associated with a higher risk of death (P = 0.00009) and thrombosis (P = 0.003). The duration of PB treatment did not correlate with the occurrence of second malignancies. This study, with a median follow-up of 10 years, demonstrates that pipobroman is effective and well tolerated. The low cumulative 10-year risk of thrombosis, leukaemia and solid tumours indicates that pipobroman is an adequate treatment for patients with high risk ET.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Pipobroman; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Primary Myelofibrosis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk; Thrombocythemia, Essential; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 11886392
DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1048.2002.03367.x -
The Lancet. Haematology Jul 2022The phase 3b, randomised, open-label RESPONSE-2 study in patients with inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly showed superiority of the Janus... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly (RESPONSE-2): 5-year follow up of a randomised, phase 3b study.
BACKGROUND
The phase 3b, randomised, open-label RESPONSE-2 study in patients with inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly showed superiority of the Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for the primary endpoint of haematocrit control at week 28. Here, we present secondary endpoints of the RESPONSE-2 study after 5 years of follow-up.
METHODS
RESPONSE-2 was an open-label, randomised, phase 3b study done at 48 hospitals or clinics across 12 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and Canada. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly, who were intolerant of, or resistant to hydroxyurea, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or less were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ruxolitinib or best available therapy for up to 80 weeks. Patients received oral ruxolitinib at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day or best available therapy. Patients assigned to best available therapy could cross over to ruxolitinib at week 28 if the primary endpoint was not met, or after week 28 and up to week 80 if best available therapy was ineffective or not tolerated. Patients receiving ruxolitinib at week 80, including crossover patients, could continue ruxolitinib treatment up to week 260. We assessed secondary endpoints at week 260, including durable haematocrit control, median duration of haematocrit control, median haematocrit level over time, number of phlebotomies, and overall survival. Analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02038036 and was completed on April 7, 2020.
FINDINGS
Patients were enrolled between March 25, 2014 and Feb 11, 2015. 149 patients were randomly assigned to ruxolitinib (n=74) or best available therapy (n=75). The median follow-up was 67 months (IQR 65-70). At randomisation, best available therapy regimens included hydroxyurea (n=38), interferon or pegylated interferon (n=9), pipobroman (n=5), lenalidomide (n=1), or no treatment (n=22). Between weeks 28 and 80, 58 (77%) of 75 patients in the best available therapy group crossed over to ruxolitinib; no patients continued best available therapy after week 80 per protocol. 97 patients received ruxolitinib until week 260, including 59 (80%) of 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group and 38 (66%) of 58 patients in the crossover groups. At week 260, 16 (22%; 95% CI 13-33) of 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group had achieved durable haematocrit control, with estimated median duration not reached (NR; 95% CI 144 to NR). Median duration of haematocrit control was not reported for patients in the best available therapy group due to the small number of responders by week 80. During the 5-year follow-up, median haematocrit level among patients in the ruxolitinib group remained below 45%. 60 phlebotomies were required among 74 patients in the ruxolitinib group in 260 weeks, and 106 phlebotomies among 75 patients in the best available therapy group in 80 weeks. 5-year overall survival was 96% (95% CI 87-99) in the ruxolitinib group and 91% (80-96) in the best available therapy group. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events (exposure-adjusted per 100 patient-years) in the ruxolitinib group (n=74) and best available therapy group (n=75) were hypertension (eight [2·4%] vs three [5·6%]), thrombocytopenia (one [0·3%] vs three [5·6%]), and thrombocytosis (0 vs four [7·5%]). Exposure-adjusted rates of any-grade thromboembolic events were 1·5% per 100 person-years (five of 74 patients) in the ruxolitinib group and 3·7% per 100 person-years (two of 75 patients) in the best available therapy group. No treatment-related deaths occurred during the study.
INTERPRETATION
5-year results from the RESPONSE-2 study support the use of ruxolitinib as a second-line therapy of choice for patients with inadequately controlled polycythaemia vera without splenomegaly.
FUNDING
Novartis.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Interferons; Nitriles; Polycythemia Vera; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Splenomegaly
PubMed: 35597252
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(22)00102-8 -
The Lancet. Haematology Mar 2020Polycythaemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by excessive proliferation of erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic components in the bone marrow due... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Polycythaemia vera is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterised by excessive proliferation of erythroid, myeloid, and megakaryocytic components in the bone marrow due to mutations in the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) gene. Ruxolitinib, a JAK 1 and JAK 2 inhibitor, showed superiority over best available therapy in a phase 2 study in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. We aimed to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib with best available therapy in patients with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea.
METHODS
We report the 5-year results for a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study (RESPONSE) that enrolled patients at 109 sites across North America, South America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients (18 years or older) with polycythaemia vera who were resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either ruxolitinib or best available therapy. Patients randomly assigned to the ruxolitinib group received the drug orally at a starting dose of 10 mg twice a day. Single-agent best available therapy comprised hydroxyurea, interferon or pegylated interferon, pipobroman, anagrelide, approved immunomodulators, or observation without pharmacological treatment. The primary endpoint, composite response (patients who achieved both haematocrit control without phlebotomy and 35% or more reduction from baseline in spleen volume) at 32 weeeks was previously reported. Patients receiving best available therapy could cross over to ruxolitinib after week 32. We assessed the durability of primary composite response, complete haematological remission, overall clinicohaematological response, overall survival, patient-reported outcomes, and safety after 5-years of follow-up. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01243944.
FINDINGS
We enrolled patients between Oct 27, 2010, and Feb 13, 2013, and the study concluded on Feb 9, 2018. Of 342 individuals screened for eligibility, 222 patients were randomly assigned to receive ruxolitinib (n=110, 50%) or best available therapy (n=112, 50%). The median time since polycythaemia vera diagnosis was 8·2 years (IQR 3·9-12·3) in the ruxolitinib group and 9·3 years (4·9-13·8) in the best available therapy group. 98 (88%) of 112 patients initially randomly assigned to best available therapy crossed over to receive ruxolitinib and no patient remained on best available therapy after 80 weeks of study. Among 25 primary responders in the ruxolitinib group, six had progressed at the time of final analysis. At 5 years, the probability of maintaining primary composite response was 74% (95% CI 51-88). The probability of maintaining complete haematological remission was 55% (95% CI 32-73) and the probability of maintaining overall clinicohaematological responses was 67% (54-77). In the intention-to-treat analysis not accounting for crossover, the probability of survival at 5 years was 91·9% (84·4-95·9) with ruxolitinib therapy and 91·0% (82·8-95·4) with best available therapy. Anaemia was the most common adverse event in patients receiving ruxolitinib (rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·9 for ruxolitinib and 8·8 for the crossover population), though most anaemia events were mild to moderate in severity (grade 1 or 2 anaemia rates per 100 patient-years of exposure were 8·0 for ruxolitinib and 8·2 for the crossover population). Non-haematological adverse events were generally lower with long-term ruxolitinib treatment than with best available therapy. Thromboembolic events were lower in the ruxolitinib group than the best available therapy group. There were two on-treatment deaths in the ruxolitinib group. One of these deaths was due to gastric adenocarcinoma, which was assessed by the investigator as related to ruxolitinib treatment.
INTERPRETATION
We showed that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective long-term treatment option for patients with polycythaemia vera who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. Taken together, ruxolitinib treatment offers the first widely approved therapeutic alternative for this post-hydroxyurea patient population.
FUNDING
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fibrinolytic Agents; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Interferon alpha-2; Interferon-alpha; Nitriles; Pipobroman; Polycythemia Vera; Polyethylene Glycols; Prognosis; Pyrazoles; Pyrimidines; Quinazolines; Recombinant Proteins; Survival Rate; Time Factors
PubMed: 31982039
DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(19)30207-8