-
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jan 2022Lung cancer has attracted much attention because of its high morbidity and mortality worldwide. The advent of immunotherapy approaches, especially the application of... (Review)
Review
Lung cancer has attracted much attention because of its high morbidity and mortality worldwide. The advent of immunotherapy approaches, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically changed the treatment of lung cancer, but a novel and unexpected pattern of treatment response-- pseudoprogression, has been observed simultaneously which complicates the routine clinical evaluation and management. However, manifestations of pseudoprogression vary and there are many disputes on immune-related response assessment and corresponding treatments for lung cancer. Therefore, we summarized the possible mechanisms, clinical manifestations and corresponding treatment measures of pseudoprogression in lung cancer, as well as potential methods to differentiate pseudoprogression from true tumor progression.
Topics: Disease Progression; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Immunotherapy; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 34800651
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103531 -
Current Oncology Reports Nov 2018Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat melanoma brain metastases. One potential complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a phenomenon... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are increasingly being used to treat melanoma brain metastases. One potential complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a phenomenon called pseudoprogression, in which a tumor transiently increases in size due to lymphocyte infiltration. This article reviews the characteristics of pseudoprogression and their clinical implications.
RECENT FINDINGS
Pseudoprogression can be challenging to differentiate from true progression noted clinically or radiographically, thereby complicating management decisions and potentially confusing patients and their families. The transient tumor enlargement can also cause symptoms that mimic true tumor progression. Because the use of immunotherapy on melanoma brain metastases is a relatively new treatment paradigm, there is limited evidence to guide clinical decision-making and prognostication related to pseudoprogression.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Humans; Immunotherapy; Melanoma; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab
PubMed: 30413981
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-018-0722-x -
BioDrugs : Clinical Immunotherapeutics,... Aug 2020Indications of immunotherapy in oncology are continuously expanding, and unconventional types of response have been observed with these new treatments. These include... (Review)
Review
Indications of immunotherapy in oncology are continuously expanding, and unconventional types of response have been observed with these new treatments. These include transient progressive disease followed by a partial response, described as pseudoprogression, that raises the question of treatment beyond progression; and rapid disease progression associated with clinical decline, reported as hyperprogression. However, there are currently no consensual definitions of these phenomena and their impact on daily practice remains unclear. We reviewed existing data on pseudoprogression and hyperprogression with a focus on the definitions, incidence, predictive factors, potential biological mechanisms, and methods published to help distinguish pseudoprogression from progression and hyperprogression. The incidence of pseudoprogression ranged from 0 to 15%, with some authors also including disease stabilization after a first progression. For hyperprogression, incidence ranged from 4 to 29% with various definitions, and several authors reported a correlation with worse survival. Both phenomena were observed in a large panel of cancer types. Several radiological and biological methods have been reported to help distinguish pseudoprogression from progression and hyperprogression, such as analysis of radiomics, and circulating-tumor DNA or cell-free DNA, but these need to be confirmed in larger prospective cohorts. In conclusion, pseudoprogression and hyperprogression are both frequent types of responses under immunotherapy, and there is a need to better characterize these to improve the management of cancer patients. Treatment beyond progression should always be considered with caution and necessitates close clinical monitoring. In case of suspected hyperprogression, immunotherapy should be stopped early.
Topics: Disease Progression; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Prospective Studies
PubMed: 32394415
DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00425-y -
Journal of Neurosurgery Sep 2023Management of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is complex and involves implementing standard therapies including resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, as well... (Review)
Review
Management of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is complex and involves implementing standard therapies including resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, as well as novel immunotherapies and targeted small-molecule inhibitors through clinical trials and precision medicine approaches. As treatments have advanced, the radiological and clinical assessment of patients with GBM has become even more challenging and nuanced. Advances in spatial resolution and both anatomical and physiological information that can be derived from MRI have greatly improved the noninvasive assessment of GBM before, during, and after therapy. Identification of pseudoprogression (PsP), defined as changes concerning for tumor progression that are, in fact, transient and related to treatment response, is critical for successful patient management. These temporary changes can produce new clinical symptoms due to mass effect and edema. Differentiating this entity from true tumor progression is a major decision point in the patient's management and prognosis. Providers may choose to start an alternative therapy, transition to a clinical trial, consider repeat resection, or continue with the current therapy in hopes of resolution. In this review, the authors describe the invasive and noninvasive techniques neurosurgeons need to be aware of to identify PsP and facilitate surgical decision-making.
Topics: Humans; Glioblastoma; Neurosurgeons; Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 36790010
DOI: 10.3171/2022.12.JNS222173 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Dec 2020Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with clinical benefit in lung cancer. However, response patterns to immunotherapy, including pseudoprogression and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Immune checkpoint inhibitors are associated with clinical benefit in lung cancer. However, response patterns to immunotherapy, including pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, are difficult to diagnose, and their mechanisms remain unclear. This review aimed to describe two response patterns observed in lung cancer, namely pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, including their epidemiology, diagnostic characteristics, and plausible mechanisms.
METHODS
We performed a comprehensive literature search in the PubMed database, using keywords "pseudoprogression", "hyperprogression", and "lung cancer", among others. The literature was examined for pseudoprogression and hyperprogression characteristics and plausible mechanisms.
RESULTS
Pseudoprogression manifests in multiple forms; however, the immune system-related response criteria and biopsy data are helpful to make accurate diagnosis. Serological biomarkers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), might help distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression. The incidence of hyperprogression ranges within 5-19.2%, depending on definition. The unique response pattern of rapid progression is observed not only with immunotherapy, but also with other treatment regimens. Molecular mutations and amplifications may result in hyperprogression; however, the exact mechanism remains unclear.
CONCLUSION
Atypical response patterns, such as pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, are increasingly common in clinical practice. Immune-related response criteria can help diagnose pseudoprogression. Molecular mechanisms of hyperprogression remain unclear. Biomarkers for pseudoprogression and hyperprogression are required.
Topics: Circulating Tumor DNA; Disease Progression; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphocytes; Neutrophils; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
PubMed: 32857178
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-020-03360-1 -
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics Nov 2017Initial diagnostics and follow-up of gliomas is usually based on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the capacity of standard MRI to differentiate neoplastic tissue from... (Review)
Review
Initial diagnostics and follow-up of gliomas is usually based on contrast-enhanced MRI. However, the capacity of standard MRI to differentiate neoplastic tissue from posttherapeutic effects such as pseudoprogression is limited. Advanced neuroimaging methods may provide relevant additional information, which allow for a more accurate diagnosis especially in clinically equivocal situations. This review article focuses predominantly on PET using radiolabeled amino acids and advanced MRI techniques such as perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) and summarizes the efforts of these methods regarding the identification of pseudoprogression after glioma therapy. Areas covered: The current literature on pseudoprogression in the field of brain tumors, with a focus on gliomas is summarized. A literature search was performed using the terms 'pseudoprogression', 'temozolomide', 'glioblastoma', 'PET', 'PWI', 'radiochemotherapy', and derivations thereof. Expert commentary: The present literature provides strong evidence that PWI MRI and amino acid PET can be of great value by providing valuable additional diagnostic information in order to overcome the diagnostic challenge of pseudoprogression. Despite various obstacles such as the still limited availability of amino acid PET and the lack of standardization of PWI, the diagnostic improvement probably results in relevant benefits for brain tumor patients and justifies a more widespread use of these diagnostic tools.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Glioma; Humans; Neuroimaging
PubMed: 28862482
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2017.1375405 -
International Immunopharmacology May 2018Immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be one of the most promising immunotherapies with significant clinical benefits and durable responses in multiple tumor types. A... (Review)
Review
Immune checkpoint inhibitors appear to be one of the most promising immunotherapies with significant clinical benefits and durable responses in multiple tumor types. A heterogeneity of responses appears in patients receiving checkpoint blockade, including pseudoprogression where the tumor burden or number of tumor lesions increases initially before decreasing. Another special response observed after checkpoint blockade is hyperprogression, a phenomenon reflecting a very rapid tumor progression following immunotherapy, suggesting that checkpoint blockade could impact detrimentally on a small subset of patients. As immunotherapeutics, especially anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents, become more widely available, evaluating the efficacy of these novel drugs poses a major challenge to clinicians, who aim to avoid either premature withdrawal of the treatment or prolonging ineffective treatment. Although the mechanism and recognition of pseudoprogression have gradually come to light, the incidence, basis, identification and predictive biomarkers of hyperprogression have been largely unknown, and this review documents the existing research findings and points out the areas where further studies are badly needed.
Topics: Animals; Antibodies, Monoclonal; B7-H1 Antigen; Carcinogenesis; Clinical Decision-Making; Costimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell Receptors; Humans; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Treatment Outcome; Tumor Burden
PubMed: 29579717
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.03.018 -
Biomedicines Jan 2022Glioblastoma is the most frequent malignant primitive brain tumor in adults. The treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. During follow-up, combined... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Glioblastoma is the most frequent malignant primitive brain tumor in adults. The treatment includes surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. During follow-up, combined chemoradiotherapy can induce treatment-related changes mimicking tumor progression on medical imaging, such as pseudoprogression (PsP). Differentiating PsP from true progression (TP) remains a challenge for radiologists and oncologists, who need to promptly start a second-line treatment in the case of TP. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging, perfusion MRI, and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging are more efficient than conventional MRI in differentiating PsP from TP. None of these techniques are fully effective, but current advances in computer science and the advent of artificial intelligence are opening up new possibilities in the imaging field with radiomics (i.e., extraction of a large number of quantitative MRI features describing tumor density, texture, and geometry). These features are used to build predictive models for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic response.
METHOD
Out of 7350 records for MR spectroscopy, GBM, glioma, recurrence, diffusion, perfusion, pseudoprogression, radiomics, and advanced imaging, we screened 574 papers. A total of 228 were eligible, and we analyzed 72 of them, in order to establish the role of each imaging modality and the usefulness and limitations of radiomics analysis.
PubMed: 35203493
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10020285 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Jan 2021With new therapeutic protocols, more patients treated for glioblastoma have experienced a suspicious radiologic image of progression (pseudoprogression) during... (Review)
Review
With new therapeutic protocols, more patients treated for glioblastoma have experienced a suspicious radiologic image of progression (pseudoprogression) during follow-up. Pseudoprogression should be differentiated from true progression because the disease management is completely different. In the case of pseudoprogression, the follow-up continues, and the patient is considered stable. In the case of true progression, a treatment adjustment is necessary. Presently, a pseudoprogression diagnosis certainly needs to be pathologically confirmed. Some important efforts in the radiological, histopathological, and genomic fields have been made to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression, and the assessment of response criteria exists but remains limited. The aim of this paper is to highlight clinical and pathological markers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression through a literature review.
Topics: Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Glioblastoma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 33307200
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103188 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Mar 2021After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and... (Review)
Review
After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and follow-up. Conventional treatment response assessment is evaluated via conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2/FLAIR), which is unreliable. The emergence of advanced MRI techniques, MR spectroscopy, and PET tracers has improved pseudoprogression diagnostic accuracy. This review presents a literature review of the different imaging techniques and potential imaging biomarkers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression.
Topics: Biomarkers; Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Glioblastoma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging
PubMed: 33515701
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103230