-
Progress in Transplantation (Aliso... Dec 2021Observational studies suggest that low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg daily for normal renal function) is as effective as and perhaps safer than... (Observational Study)
Observational Study
Observational studies suggest that low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis (450 mg daily for normal renal function) is as effective as and perhaps safer than standard-dose valganciclovir (900 mg daily) in preventing CMV infection among kidney transplant recipients. However, this practice is not supported by current guidelines due to concerns for breakthrough infection from resistant CMV, mainly in high-risk CMV donor-seropositive/recipient-seronegative kidney transplant recipients. Standard-dose valganciclovir is costly and possibly associated with higher incidence of neutropenia and BKV DNAemia. Our institution adopted low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis for intermediate-risk (seropositive) kidney transplant recipients in January 2018. To analyze the efficacy (CMV DNAemia), safety (BK virus DNAemia, neutropenia, graft loss, and death), and cost savings associated with this change. We retrospectively compared the above outcomes between CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients who received low-dose and standard-dose valganciclovir, transplanted within our institution, between 1/19/2014 and 7/15/2019, using propensity score-adjusted competing risk analyses. We also compared cost estimates between the two dosing regimens, for 3 months of prophylaxis, and for different percentage of patient-weeks with normal renal function, using the current average wholesale price of valganciclovir. We studied 179 CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients, of whom 55 received low-dose and 124 standard-dose valganciclovir. The majority received nonlymphocyte depleting induction (basiliximab). Low-dose valganciclovir was at least as effective and safe as, and more cost-saving than standard-dose valganciclovir. This single-center study contributes to mounting evidence for future guidelines to be adjusted in favor of low-dose valganciclovir prophylaxis in CMV-seropositive kidney transplant recipients.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Ganciclovir; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Retrospective Studies; Transplant Recipients; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 34839729
DOI: 10.1177/15269248211046037 -
Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Sep 2001Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and serious CMV disease. CMV infection is an important cause of morbidity among patients... (Review)
Review
Immunocompromised hosts are at increased risk of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and serious CMV disease. CMV infection is an important cause of morbidity among patients infected with HIV and after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and may cause life-threatening disease in allogeneic stem cell transplant (SCT) recipients. The introduction into clinical use of potent antiviral compounds and of rapid detection assays for CMV during the past two decades has allowed development of strategies for the prevention and treatment of disease caused by CMV in these groups of immunocompromised patients. At present, the antiviral drugs ganciclovir, foscarnet and cidofovir are commonly used in the treatment of CMV infection and disease. However, these agents have a poor oral bioavailability and, for systemic use, require iv. administration for most indications. Valganciclovir is an oral prodrug of ganciclovir, with a 10-fold greater bioavailability than oral ganciclovir. Studies of the pharmacokinetics of valganciclovir among HIV-infected CMV-seropositive patients and liver transplant recipients suggest that this oral compound has the potential to replace both oral and iv. ganciclovir in many situations if it is shown to be as efficacious and safe as those ganciclovir formulations in immunodeficient patients. In the first part of this review, currently established approaches to the management of CMV infection and disease in SCT and SOT recipients and HIV-infected patients are discussed to highlight possible indications for future valganciclovir use; in the second part, data from human studies of valganciclovir are presented.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Ganciclovir; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 11772283
DOI: 10.1517/13543784.10.9.1745 -
Pediatric Transplantation Sep 2021Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection post-transplant and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no FDA...
BACKGROUND
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common opportunistic infection post-transplant and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Currently, there are no FDA dosing recommendations for the use of valganciclovir for the treatment of CMV infections in pediatric patients. This case series describes the use of valganciclovir for the treatment of CMV infections in nine pediatric intestinal transplant recipients (pITR).
METHODS
Retrospective review of pITR between January 2004 and December 2016. The primary outcome was resolution of CMV viremia. Secondary outcomes included time-to-resolution of viremia, relapse rate, incidence of resistance, hematologic adverse effects, rejection, graft loss, and death.
RESULTS
Of 214 pITR, ten CMV infections were treated with valganciclovir. One patient was lost to follow-up while on treatment and was not included. Eight (89%) patients had resolution of CMV viremia. The average dose of valganciclovir was 14.3mg/kg (SD 0.82) twice daily. CMV resistance testing was completed in three (33.3%) patients; one patient had a documented mutation requiring leflunomide to clear viremia. Three (33.3%) patients experienced rejection within one month prior to or during treatment for CMV. Six (66.6%) experienced hematologic side effects. No patients died or experienced graft loss.
CONCLUSION
This is the first study to assess the use of valganciclovir for the treatment of CMV in pITR. Based on these results, weight-based dosing of valganciclovir seems to be an appropriate option for the treatment of CMV in pITR. Given limited number of patients reviewed in this case series and the high incidence of hematologic side effects, further investigation is warranted.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Humans; Infant; Intestines; Male; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Transplant Recipients; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 34081375
DOI: 10.1111/petr.14034 -
Blood Advances Oct 2023Lymphomas are not infrequently associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and EBV positivity is linked to worse outcomes in several subtypes. Nanatinostat is a...
Lymphomas are not infrequently associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and EBV positivity is linked to worse outcomes in several subtypes. Nanatinostat is a class-I selective oral histone deacetylase inhibitor that induces the expression of lytic EBV BGLF4 protein kinase in EBV+ tumor cells, activating ganciclovir via phosphorylation, resulting in tumor cell apoptosis. This phase 1b/2 study investigated the combination of nanatinostat with valganciclovir in patients aged ≥18 years with EBV+ lymphomas relapsed/refractory to ≥1 prior systemic therapy with no viable curative treatment options. In the phase 1b part, 25 patients were enrolled into 5 dose escalation cohorts to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for phase 2 expansion. Phase 2 patients (n = 30) received RP2D (nanatinostat 20 mg daily, 4 days per week with valganciclovir 900 mg orally daily) for 28-day cycles. The primary end points were safety, RP2D determination (phase 1b), and overall response rate (ORR; phase 2). Overall, 55 patients were enrolled (B-non-Hodgkin lymphoma [B-NHL], [n = 10]; angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma-NHL, [n = 21]; classical Hodgkin lymphoma, [n = 11]; and immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorders, [n = 13]). The ORR was 40% in 43 evaluable patients (complete response rate [CRR], 19% [n = 8]) with a median duration of response of 10.4 months. For angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma-NHL (n = 15; all refractory to the last prior therapy), the ORR/CRR ratio was 60%/27%. The most common adverse events were nausea (38% any grade) and cytopenia (grade 3/4 neutropenia [29%], thrombocytopenia [20%], and anemia [20%]). This novel oral regimen provided encouraging efficacy across several EBV+ lymphoma subtypes and warrants further evaluation; a confirmatory phase 2 study (NCT05011058) is underway. This phase 1b/2 study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03397706.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Adult; Valganciclovir; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Lymphoma; Thrombocytopenia; Lymphoma, T-Cell
PubMed: 37530631
DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010330 -
The Journal of Infectious Diseases Jul 2017Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes infectious mononucleosis and can lead to lymphoproliferative diseases. We evaluated the effects of valganciclovir on oral EBV shedding in... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) causes infectious mononucleosis and can lead to lymphoproliferative diseases. We evaluated the effects of valganciclovir on oral EBV shedding in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Twenty-six men received oral valganciclovir or daily placebo for 8 weeks, followed by a 2-week "washout period" and then 8 weeks of the alternative treatment. Valganciclovir reduced the proportion of days with EBV detected from 61.3% to 17.8% (relative risk, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], .21-.41; P < .001), and quantity of virus detected by 0.77 logs (95% CI, .62-.91 logs; P < .001). Further investigations into the impact of valganciclovir on EBV-associated diseases are needed.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Double-Blind Method; Ganciclovir; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Humans; Infectious Mononucleosis; Male; Middle Aged; Valganciclovir; Viral Load; Virus Replication; Virus Shedding; Washington; Young Adult
PubMed: 28838145
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jix263 -
Medicina Clinica Oct 2020
Topics: Castleman Disease; HIV Infections; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Valganciclovir
PubMed: 31488261
DOI: 10.1016/j.medcli.2019.06.028 -
The Journal of Pediatrics May 2024To assess the efficacy of valganciclovir in infants with hearing loss and clinically inapparent congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV), as there is no consensus on...
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy of valganciclovir in infants with hearing loss and clinically inapparent congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMV), as there is no consensus on treatment of this group.
STUDY DESIGN
A nationwide, nonrandomized controlled trial, comparing 6 weeks of oral valganciclovir to no treatment in infants with cCMV, recruited after newborn hearing screening resulted in referral to an audiologist. The choice whether to treat was left to parents of subjects. Eligible subjects were full term infants aged <13 weeks with sensorineural hearing loss and diagnosed with cCMV through dried blood spot testing. The primary outcome, measured by linear and ordinal logistic regression, was change in best-ear hearing from baseline to follow-up at 18-22 months of age.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven participants were included in the final analysis, of whom 25 were in the treatment group and 12 in the control group. The majority of subjects in both groups had neuroimaging abnormalities, which were mostly mild. Hearing deterioration was more likely in the control group compared with the treatment group (common OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.02-0.45, P = .003). Mean best-ear hearing deteriorated by 13.7 dB in the control group, compared with improvement of 3.3 dB in the treatment group (difference 17 dB, 95% CI 2.6 - 31.4, P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS
We investigated treatment in children with hearing loss and clinically inapparent cCMV. Although our study was nonrandomized, it is the first prospective and controlled trial in this population. Valganciclovir-treated children with hearing loss and inapparent cCMV had less hearing deterioration at 18 through 22 months of age than control subjects.
EUDRACT REGISTRY NUMBER
2013-003068-30.
Topics: Humans; Valganciclovir; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Antiviral Agents; Male; Female; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Hearing Loss, Sensorineural; Treatment Outcome; Ganciclovir; Neonatal Screening; Prospective Studies; Follow-Up Studies; Administration, Oral
PubMed: 38336204
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.113945 -
Clinical and Experimental Nephrology May 2021There are two approaches for treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurring after kidney transplantation (KTx). One is preemptive therapy in which treatment is...
BACKGROUND
There are two approaches for treating cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurring after kidney transplantation (KTx). One is preemptive therapy in which treatment is started after confirming positive CMV antigenemia using periodic antigenemia assay. The other approach is prophylactic therapy in which oral valganciclovir (VGCV) is started within 10 days after KTx and continued for 200 days. The Transplantation Society guidelines recommend prophylactic therapy for high-risk (donor's CMV-IgG antibody positive and recipient's negative) pediatric recipients. However, the adequate dose and side effects of VGCV are not clear in children, and there is no sufficient information about prophylaxis for Japanese pediatric recipients.
METHODS
A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted on case series of high-risk pediatric patients who underwent KTx and received oral VGCV prophylaxis at the Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, between August 2018 and March 2019. Data were collected using medical records.
RESULTS
The dose of administration was 450 mg in all the study patients (n = 5). Reduction or discontinuation was required in four of five patients due to adverse events, which included neutropenia in one patient, anemia in two patients, and neutropenia and digestive symptoms in one patient. Late-onset CMV disease occurred in all patients. No seroconversion was observed during prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS
Our preliminary study suggests that the dosage endorsed by The Transplantation Society may be an overdose for Japanese pediatric recipients. Further studies are required to examine the safety and efficacy of VGCV prophylaxis in Japanese pediatric recipients.
Topics: Adolescent; Anemia; Antibodies, Viral; Antiviral Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Digestive System Diseases; Female; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Neutropenia; Retrospective Studies; Valganciclovir; Young Adult
PubMed: 33506359
DOI: 10.1007/s10157-021-02020-z -
Transplantation Apr 2024Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may... (Review)
Review
Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common infections occurring after solid organ transplantation. This high burden of disease, which incurs sizeable morbidity, may be worsening with the proportion of high-risk D+/R- solid organ transplantation recipients increasing in some regions globally. Cohort studies continue to support either universal prophylaxis or preemptive therapy as effective prevention strategies. Letermovir prophylaxis was noninferior to valganciclovir in adult high-risk D+/R- kidney transplant recipients with fewer drug-related adverse events in a recent clinical trial and has now been approved for such use in some regions. Maribavir preemptive therapy failed to demonstrate noninferiority when compared with valganciclovir in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients but looked promising for safety. Donor matching could be useful in prevention CMV disease with a survival advantage demonstrated in seronegative recipients waiting up to 30 mo for a seronegative kidney. Immune-guided prophylaxis resulted in fewer CMV infection episodes in lung transplant recipients when compared with fixed-duration prophylaxis in a recent clinical trial. For treatment of refractory or resistant CMV infection, maribavir was more efficacious and better tolerated when compared with investigator-initiated therapy in its registration trial for this condition. Further research regarding best treatment and prophylaxis of resistant or refractory CMV infection is needed to reflect best clinical practice choices. Optimal use of immune globulin or CMV-specific T cells for prevention or treatment of CMV disease remains undefined. Standardized definitions for the design of CMV clinical trials have been developed. In this review, we highlight recent updates in the field from data published since 2018.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Organ Transplantation; Valganciclovir; Clinical Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37899366
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004855 -
JAMA Apr 2020Despite the use of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention strategy of antiviral prophylaxis for high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of Preemptive Therapy vs Antiviral Prophylaxis on Cytomegalovirus Disease in Seronegative Liver Transplant Recipients With Seropositive Donors: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
IMPORTANCE
Despite the use of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) prevention strategy of antiviral prophylaxis for high-risk CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors, high rates of delayed-onset postprophylaxis CMV disease occur. An alternate approach, preemptive therapy (initiation of antiviral therapy for early asymptomatic CMV viremia detected by surveillance testing), has not previously been directly compared with antiviral prophylaxis in these patients.
OBJECTIVE
To compare preemptive therapy with antiviral prophylaxis in CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors for the prevention of CMV disease.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
Randomized clinical trial of preemptive therapy vs antiviral prophylaxis in 205 CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors aged older than 18 years. The trial was conducted at 6 academic transplant centers in the United States between October 2012 and June 2017, with last follow-up in June 2018.
INTERVENTIONS
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either preemptive therapy (valganciclovir, 900 mg, twice daily until 2 consecutive negative tests a week apart) for viremia detected by weekly plasma CMV polymerase chain reaction for 100 days (n = 100) or valganciclovir, 900 mg, daily for 100 days as antiviral prophylaxis (n = 105).
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was incidence of CMV disease by 12 months, defined as CMV syndrome (CMV viremia and clinical or laboratory findings) or end-organ disease. Secondary outcomes included acute allograft rejection, opportunistic infections, graft and patient survival, and neutropenia.
RESULTS
Among 205 patients who were randomized (mean age, 55 years; 62 women [30%]), all 205 (100%) completed the trial. The incidence of CMV disease was significantly lower with preemptive therapy than antiviral prophylaxis (9% [9/100] vs 19% [20/105]; difference, 10% [95% CI, 0.5% to 19.6%]; P = .04]). The incidence of allograft rejection (28% vs 25%; difference, 3% [95% CI, -9% to 15%]), opportunistic infections (25% vs 27%; difference, 2% [95% CI, -14% to 10%]), graft loss (2% vs 2%; difference, <1% [95% CI, -4% to 4%]), and neutropenia (13% vs 10%; difference, 3% [95% CI, -5% to 12%]) did not differ significantly for the preemptive therapy vs antiviral prophylaxis group, respectively. All-cause mortality at last follow-up was 15% in the preemptive therapy vs 19% in the antiviral prophylaxis group (difference, 4% [95% CI, -14% to 6%]; P = .46).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Among CMV-seronegative liver transplant recipients with seropositive donors, the use of preemptive therapy, compared with antiviral prophylaxis, resulted in a lower incidence of CMV disease over 12 months. Further research is needed to replicate these findings and assess long-term outcomes.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552369.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antiviral Agents; Cytomegalovirus; Cytomegalovirus Infections; Female; Humans; Incidence; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Polymerase Chain Reaction; Tissue Donors; Valganciclovir; Viral Load; Viremia
PubMed: 32286644
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.3138