-
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Aug 2015Neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage, is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This may reflect improved diagnosis, or it may be due to increased incidence of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Neuropathic pain, which is caused by nerve damage, is increasing in prevalence worldwide. This may reflect improved diagnosis, or it may be due to increased incidence of diabetes-associated neuropathy, linked to increasing levels of obesity. Other types of neuropathic pain include post-herpetic neuralgia, trigeminal neuralgia, and neuralgia caused by chemotherapy. Antidepressant drugs are sometimes used to treat neuropathic pain; however, their analgesic efficacy is unclear. A previous Cochrane review that included all antidepressants for neuropathic pain is being replaced by new reviews of individual drugs examining chronic neuropathic pain in the first instance. Venlafaxine is a reasonably well-tolerated antidepressant and is a serotonin reuptake inhibitor and weak noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Although not licensed for the treatment of chronic or neuropathic pain in most countries, it is sometimes used for this indication.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the analgesic efficacy of, and the adverse effects associated with the clinical use of, venlafaxine for chronic neuropathic pain in adults.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via The Cochrane Library, and MEDLINE and EMBASE via Ovid up to 14 August 2014. We reviewed the bibliographies of any randomised trials identified and review articles, contacted authors of one excluded study and searched www.clinicaltrials.gov to identify additional published or unpublished data. We also searched the meta-Register of controlled trials (mRCT) (www.controlled-trials.com/mrct) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (apps.who.int/trialsearch/) for ongoing trials but did not find any relevant trials.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised, double-blind studies of at least two weeks' duration comparing venlafaxine with either placebo or another active treatment in chronic neuropathic pain in adults. All participants were aged 18 years or over and all included studies had at least 10 participants per treatment arm. We only included studies with full journal publication.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Three review authors independently extracted data using a standard form and assessed study quality. We intend to analyse data in three tiers of evidence as described by Hearn 2014, but did not find any first-tier evidence (ie evidence meeting current best standards, with minimal risk of bias) or second-tier evidence, that was considered at some risk of bias but with adequate participant numbers (at least 200 in the comparison). Third-tier evidence is that arising from studies with small numbers of participants; studies of short duration, studies that are likely to be of limited clinical utility due to other limitations, including selection bias and attrition bias; or a combination of these.
MAIN RESULTS
We found six randomised, double-blind trials of at least two weeks' duration eligible for inclusion. These trials included 460 participants with neuropathic pain, with most participants having painful diabetic neuropathy. Four studies were of cross-over design and two were parallel trials. Only one trial was both parallel design and placebo-controlled. Mean age of participants ranged from 48 to 59 years. In three studies (Forssell 2004, Jia 2006 and Tasmuth 2002), only mean data were reported. Comparators included placebo, imipramine, and carbamazepine and duration of treatment ranged from two to eight weeks. The risk of bias was considerable overall in the review, especially due to the small size of most studies and due to attrition bias. Four of the six studies reported some positive benefit for venlafaxine. In the largest study by Rowbotham, 2004, 56% of participants receiving venlafaxine 150 to 225 mg achieved at least a 50% reduction in pain intensity versus 34% of participants in the placebo group and the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was 4.5. However, this study was subject to significant selection bias. Known adverse effects of venlafaxine, including somnolence, dizziness, and mild gastrointestinal problems, were reported in all studies but were not particularly problematic and, overall, adverse effects were equally prominent in placebo or other active comparator groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found little compelling evidence to support the use of venlafaxine in neuropathic pain. While there was some third-tier evidence of benefit, this arose from studies that had methodological limitations and considerable risk of bias. Placebo effects were notably strong in several studies. Given that effective drug treatments for neuropathic pain are in current use, there is no evidence to revise prescribing guidelines to promote the use of venlafaxine in neuropathic pain. Although venlafaxine was generally reasonably well tolerated, there was some evidence that it can precipitate fatigue, somnolence, nausea, and dizziness in a minority of people.
Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Carbamazepine; Humans; Imipramine; Middle Aged; Neuralgia; Off-Label Use; Patient Dropouts; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 26298465
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011091.pub2 -
Pain Medicine (Malden, Mass.) Oct 2017To investigate the efficacy of venlafaxine for neuropathic pain and review literature to determine if the medication provides adequate neuropathic pain relief. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the efficacy of venlafaxine for neuropathic pain and review literature to determine if the medication provides adequate neuropathic pain relief.
METHODS
Literature was reviewed on MEDLINE using various key words. These key words include: "venlafaxine and pain," "venlafaxine ER and pain," "venlafaxine XR and pain," "venlafaxine and neuropathic pain," "venlafaxine and neuropathy," "SSRI and neuropathic pain," "SSRI and neuropathy," "SNRI and neuropathic pain," "SNRI and neuropathy," "serotonin reuptake inhibitor and neuropathic pain," "serotonin reuptake inhibitor and neuropathy," "serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and neuropathic pain" and "serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor and neuropathy." Using this guideline, 13 articles were reviewed.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies reviewed, which are organized by date and diagnosis. It is evident that in the majority of studies, when compared with a placebo, there was a clinical significant reduction in neuropathic pain relief when using venlafaxine. Additionally, one study showed even more significant pain relief when using higher doses of venlafaxine (at least 150 mg). However, when compared with alternative neuropathic medications, venlafaxine for the most part did not perform any better in terms of efficacy.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, venlafaxine is a safe and well-tolerated analgesic drug for the symptomatic treatment of neuropathic pain, and there is limited evidence that high-dose venlafaxine (150 mg/day) can be even more beneficial. While the present evidence is quite encouraging regarding venlafaxine's use for neuropathic pain, further research is needed to continue to expand on these findings, particularly when in consideration with other possible pharmacological agents.
Topics: Analgesics; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Humans; Neuralgia; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 27837032
DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnw261 -
Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) Apr 2022Venlafaxine (VEN) is considered to be one of the most effective antidepressants. It belongs to the group of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitors... (Review)
Review
Venlafaxine (VEN) is considered to be one of the most effective antidepressants. It belongs to the group of serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). NA and 5-HT have receptors on the surface of platelets and are involved in platelet aggregation. In this case study, we present the case of a patient treated for one of the types of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), essential thrombocythemia (ET), in whom VEN was added to pharmacotherapy during the treatment of a severe episode of depression with psychotic symptoms. We observed a gradual reduction in platelet count when increasing the dose of VEN. We also present a narrative review of literature about the effect of VEN on platelet counts and activity. We conclude that, in the group of patients taking VEN, attention should be paid to the rare adverse effect of a decrease in the number of platelets.
Topics: Cyclohexanols; Humans; Platelet Count; Serotonin; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 35630043
DOI: 10.3390/medicina58050626 -
Journal of Clinical PsychopharmacologyThis systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and characteristics of venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis.
PURPOSE
This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical manifestations and characteristics of venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Elsevier, Science Direct, Embase, Springer Link, Wiley Online Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases from the date of database inception to January 2023. Previously reported cases of venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis were identified, and relevant data from these cases were collected for descriptive statistical analysis. Cases that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated to determine the correlation between adverse reactions and venlafaxine.
RESULTS
A total of 12 patients with venlafaxine-associated rhabdomyolysis were included. None of these patients had a history of muscle pain or discomfort. Of the 12 patients, 5 patients received venlafaxine at doses of ≤225 mg/d, whereas the remaining 7 patients received doses exceeding 225 mg/d. The main clinical symptoms included myalgia, muscle weakness, and renal injury. All 12 patients discontinued venlafaxine and received symptomatic care.
CONCLUSIONS
Venlafaxine, used either as a monotherapy or in combination with other drugs, may be associated with rhabdomyolysis. Creatine kinase levels may normalize or significantly decrease after discontinuation of venlafaxine and symptomatic treatment.
Topics: Rhabdomyolysis; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Humans; Male; Adult; Female; Middle Aged; Creatine Kinase; Myalgia
PubMed: 38506608
DOI: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001838 -
Biomedical Chromatography : BMC Jan 2021Venlafaxine (VFX) is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor chiral drug used in therapy as an antidepressant in the form of a racemate consisting of R- and... (Review)
Review
Venlafaxine (VFX) is a serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor chiral drug used in therapy as an antidepressant in the form of a racemate consisting of R- and S-VFX. The two enantiomers of VFX exhibit different pharmacological activities: R-VFX inhibits both norepinephrine and serotonin synaptic reuptake, whereas S-VFX inhibits only the serotonin one. R- and S-VFX are metabolized in the liver to the respective R- and S-O-desmethylvenlafaxine (ODVFX), R- and S-N-desmethylvenlafaxine (NDVFX), and R- and S-N,O-didesmethylvenlafaxine (NODVFX). The pharmacological profile of ODVFX is close to that of VFX, whereas the other two chiral metabolites (NDVFX and NODVFX) have lower affinity for the receptor sites. The pharmacokinetics of the VFX enantiomers appear stereoselective, including the metabolism process. In the past 20 years, several studies describing the enantioselective analysis of R- and S-VFX in pharmaceutical formulations and its chiral metabolites in biological matrices were published. These methods encompass liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection, mass spectrometry, or tandem mass spectrometry, and capillary electrophoresis. This paper reviews the published methods used for the determination of the individual enantiomers of VFX and its chiral metabolites in different matrices.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Chromatography, Liquid; Cyclohexanols; Desvenlafaxine Succinate; Electrophoresis, Capillary; Humans; Stereoisomerism; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 32367587
DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4874 -
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy 2023Mental health disorders, especially depressive and anxiety disorders, are associated with substantial health-related burden. While the second-generation antidepressants... (Review)
Review
Moving from serotonin to serotonin-norepinephrine enhancement with increasing venlafaxine dose: clinical implications and strategies for a successful outcome in major depressive disorder.
INTRODUCTION
Mental health disorders, especially depressive and anxiety disorders, are associated with substantial health-related burden. While the second-generation antidepressants are widely accepted as first-line pharmacological treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), patient response to such treatment is variable, with more than half failing to achieve complete remission, and residual symptoms are frequently present.
AREAS COVERED
Here, the pharmacodynamics of venlafaxine XR are reviewed in relation to its role as both a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and a serotonin-norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), and we look at how these pharmacodynamic properties can be harnessed to guide clinical practice, asking the question 'is it possible to develop a symptom-cluster-based approach to the treatment of MDD with comorbid anxiety utilizing venlafaxine XR?.' Additionally, three illustrative clinical cases provide practical examples of the utility of venlafaxine-XR in real-world clinical practice. The place of venlafaxine XR in managing fatigue/low energy, a frequent residual symptom in MDD, is explored using pooled data from clinical trials of venlafaxine XR.
EXPERT OPINION
Venlafaxine XR should be considered as a first-line treatment for MDD with or without comorbid anxiety, and there are clear pharmacodynamic signals supporting a symptom cluster-based treatment paradigm for venlafaxine XR.
Topics: Humans; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride; Depressive Disorder, Major; Serotonin; Norepinephrine; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Cyclohexanols; Treatment Outcome; Delayed-Action Preparations
PubMed: 37501324
DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2242264 -
Chemosphere Jun 2022Venlafaxine (denoted as VFX), a member of the most extensively prescribed antidepressants, is used to handle major depressive disorder, panic disorder and anxiety. This... (Review)
Review
Venlafaxine (denoted as VFX), a member of the most extensively prescribed antidepressants, is used to handle major depressive disorder, panic disorder and anxiety. This medication affects brain chemistry, which could cause an imbalance in depressed people. VFX and its metabolites, on the other hand, are pollutants in the water environment. Through movement and transformation in several procedures like adsorption, photolysis, hydrolysis and biodegradation, they have harmed living creatures, resulting in the enhancement of diverse active chemicals found in the environment. As a result, determining VFX at modest concentrations with excellent sensitivity, specificity and repeatability are critical. To quantify VFX, various analytical methodologies have been developed. Electroanalytical processes, on the other hand, have piqued interest because of their superior benefits over traditional techniques such as speed, sensitivity, directness and affordability. Subsequently, the purpose of this article is to show how to determine VFX electrochemically using a wide range of electrodes, including CPE, GCE, MCE, SPE, PGE and ISE.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Humans; Nanostructures; Photolysis; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 35227745
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134116 -
Clinical Therapeutics Jun 2017The prevalence of neuropathic pain is high in the general population, and high priority is given to the management of this pain condition. The treatment of neuropathic... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The prevalence of neuropathic pain is high in the general population, and high priority is given to the management of this pain condition. The treatment of neuropathic pain remains challenging, despite the publication of national and international recommendations. The purpose of this narrative review of venlafaxine (VLX) is to provide a better knowledge of the pharmacology of this drug and a clearer view of its efficacy and tolerability in neuropathic pain.
METHODS
Two independent reviewers searched PubMed with the following search terms: serotonin and noradrenalin reuptake inhibitors OR VLX hydrochloride AND pain. The reviewers included all clinical studies that investigated VLX in neuropathic pain conditions and excluded animal studies, studies on fibromyalgia, studies that focused on the prevention of neuropathic pain, case reports, and studies that did not clearly describe neuropathic pain in the included patients. We describe the 13 studies that we analyzed.
FINDINGS
Eleven were randomized clinical trials, and the comparator was placebo in 8 studies. Nine studies reported that VLX was effective against neuropathic pain. However, among the trials, only one against placebo included a large number of patients with >200 participants and one against prégabaline and carbamazepine had >200 patients. Most of the adverse events reported in the selected studies were consistent with known adverse events of VLX, and most were mild to moderate. However, most studies were of very short duration.
IMPLICATIONS
Most of the clinical studies found that VLX was effective and well tolerated. However, given the limited number of study and the limitations of all these studies, further large clinical trials are needed. Currently, considering the limited therapeutic options for treating neuropathic pain and the highly variable nature of responses to all drugs, VLX has a place as a treatment option for neuropathic pain.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Humans; Neuralgia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 28554532
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.05.347 -
Drug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy Mar 2015Venlafaxine (VEN) is an antidepressant agent widely used nowadays as an alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly for the treatment of... (Review)
Review
Venlafaxine (VEN) is an antidepressant agent widely used nowadays as an alternative to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), particularly for the treatment of SSRI-resistant depression. As the co-administration of antidepressant drugs with other medications is very common in clinical practice, the potential risk for pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic drug interactions that may be clinically meaningful increases. Bearing in mind that VEN has exhibited large variability in antidepressant response, besides the individual genetic background, several other factors may contribute to those variable clinical outcomes, such as the occurrence of significant drug-drug interactions. Indeed, the presence of drug interactions is possibly one of the major reasons for interindividual variability, and their anticipation should be considered in conjugation with other specific patients' characteristics to optimize the antidepressant therapy. Hence, a comprehensive overview of the pharmacokinetic- and pharmacodynamic-based drug interactions involving VEN is herein provided, particularly addressing their clinical relevance.
Topics: Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Depressive Disorder; Drug Interactions; Humans; Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 24964257
DOI: 10.1515/dmdi-2014-0011 -
Revista de Neurologia May 2015
Review
Topics: Aged; Antidepressive Agents; Comorbidity; Confusion; Delirium; Depressive Disorder, Major; Dopamine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Drug Synergism; Female; Humans; Lorazepam; Models, Neurological; Norepinephrine; Polypharmacy; Psychotropic Drugs; Recurrence; Sertraline; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride
PubMed: 25952604
DOI: No ID Found