-
Lymphology 2023Acupuncture is a potential therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Despite a recent meta-analysis on efficacy, data on acupuncture safety in BCRL are...
Acupuncture is a potential therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Despite a recent meta-analysis on efficacy, data on acupuncture safety in BCRL are lacking. Current clinical guidelines recommend avoiding needling in the upper extremity affected by lymph node dissection. We undertook a systematic review focusing on acupuncture safety and treatment protocols in clinical trials for BCRL. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Ovid, CINAHL, and Cochrane library. Eight clinical trials on acupuncture for BCRL were analyzed. The Standards of Acupuncture intervention (STRICTA 2010) and Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2 2019) were applied to assess methods for acupuncture interventions within Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. Quantity and severity of adverse events (AE) were reviewed. A total of 189 subjects participated in 8 clinical trials with 2965 acupuncture treatments. No serious adverse events (SAE) were reported regardless of treatment laterality or protocol, with only a single grade 2 skin infection in 2,965 total treatments (0.034%), including 1,165 bilateral and 225 ipsilateral treatments. Our comprehensive review of clinical trials of acupuncture for BCRL demonstrated no significant adverse events in 2,965 treatments, including 1,390 in the affected limb. An approach for routine integration of acupuncture into BCRL maintenance therapy is proposed.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Acupuncture Therapy; Upper Extremity; Lymphedema
PubMed: 38019877
DOI: No ID Found -
Handchirurgie, Mikrochirurgie,... Dec 2023Lipoedema is a symmetrically localised, painful hypertrophy of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the extremities with marked disproportion to the trunk, and almost...
BACKGROUND
Lipoedema is a symmetrically localised, painful hypertrophy of subcutaneous adipose tissue in the extremities with marked disproportion to the trunk, and almost exclusively affects females. Despite being first described over 80 years ago, the aetiology and pathogenesis of the disease are largely unknown and are currently the subject of intensive research efforts.
METHODS
To summarise the current evidence-based literature on the cellular pathologies and aetiology of lipoedema, a PRISMA-based systematic review was conducted within the National Library of Medicine and Cochrane databases.
RESULTS
A total of 53 studies were identified and included in this review. The results were classified and summarised into categories.
CONCLUSION
Although there has been a significant increase in research activity and recent publication of extensive studies with a histological and molecular genetic focus, the fundamental aetiology and pathology of lipoedema remains largely unclear. The current data shows discrepancies across studies, particularly with regard to the "oedematous" component of lipoedema. The frequently present comorbidities "lymphoedema" and "obesity", primarily in advanced stages of lipoedema, complicate the diagnostic differentiation and clear definition of study cohorts in scientific research.
Topics: United States; Female; Humans; Lipedema; Lymphedema; Obesity; Extremities; Pain
PubMed: 37984363
DOI: 10.1055/a-2183-7414 -
Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) Sep 2023Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper limb is a very common condition in women undergoing breast cancer treatment; it can cause considerable alterations... (Review)
Review
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) of the upper limb is a very common condition in women undergoing breast cancer treatment; it can cause considerable alterations in the daily life of patients and a decrease in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Currently, there are many conservative therapies that try to palliate the symptoms, but the results are still controversial and there are still no globally accepted treatments. The purpose of this article is to determine the effect, according to the current available evidence, on HRQoL of different conservative interventions in the rehabilitation of BCRL in the upper limb in women. Eighteen articles that compared the effects of standard treatments, such as manual lymphatic drainage-based decongestive therapy or compression measures, and other newer treatments, including new technologies and other types of treatment programs, were reviewed. According to the results of this review, the most recommended modality for the improvement of HRQoL would be a complex decongestive technique without manual lymphatic drainage. Although there are clinical trials that have demonstrated the effectiveness of various treatments, the results of the positive effects on HRQoL remain highly controversial. There is a need to continue to develop studies to help guide therapeutic decisions that can promote HRQoL in women affected by upper limb BCRL.
PubMed: 37761765
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11182568 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery. Venous and... Jan 2024Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by impaired lymphatic fluid drainage, resulting in progressive edema. The current mainstay of lymphedema therapy consists of... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Lymphedema is a chronic condition caused by impaired lymphatic fluid drainage, resulting in progressive edema. The current mainstay of lymphedema therapy consists of conservative therapy and surgical therapy. In this systematic review, we investigated the novel role of biomaterials in clinical lymphedema therapy and assessed their objective outcomes and the complication rate associated with their use.
METHODS
Studies were identified through systematic review using the Embase and PubMed/MEDLINE databases. Only original articles reporting the use of biomaterials for clinical lymphedema therapy were included. The primary outcome measure was the objective reduction in limb volume after biomaterial use. The secondary outcome measure was the assessment of biomaterial safety.
RESULTS
A total of 354 articles were identified in the first search, of which 10 met our inclusion criteria. These articles described the use of two biomaterials, nanofibrillar collagen scaffolds (NCSs) and silicone tubes (STs), for the treatment of lymphedema. NCS implantation showed an average excess limb volume reduction of 1% to 10.7% and clear evidence of lymphangiogenesis on imaging. No complications were 7documented after NCS implantation. ST implantation showed an average limb volume reduction of 700 to 887 mL and limb circumference reduction of 3.1 to 8 cm in patients with advanced stage lymphedema. Of 177 patients treated with ST implantation, only 11 (6.2%) developed local inflammation.
CONCLUSIONS
Both NCS and ST implantation showed promising limb volume reduction; however, with the scarce literature available, additional research is needed to determine their effectiveness. Both demonstrated good safety profiles, with no complications after NCS implantation and a complication rate equivalent to other similar implants for ST implantation.
Topics: Humans; Biocompatible Materials; Lymphedema; Edema; Extremities; Prostheses and Implants
PubMed: 37696416
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.08.015 -
Psycho-oncology Oct 2023Cancer-related lymphoedema is a common side effect of cancer, affecting 24%-49% of people with cancer. Body image contributes to the well-being of individuals with this... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Cancer-related lymphoedema is a common side effect of cancer, affecting 24%-49% of people with cancer. Body image contributes to the well-being of individuals with this condition. This systematic review aimed to explore, for the first time, the state of the science concerning body image in cancer-related lymphoedema, including how body image is measured and variables associated with body image concerns.
METHODS
Six databases were systematically searched for peer-reviewed articles describing empirical quantitative studies where body image was measured with a reliable and valid measurement tool in adults with cancer-related lymphoedema.
RESULTS
Nine studies with 977 participants were included. The studies involved individuals who had experienced breast, head and neck, melanoma, and urogenital cancers and developed lymphoedema. There was considerable heterogeneity in body image measures used, precluding meta-analysis. The following variables were associated with increased body image concern: higher body integrity beliefs, experience of physical changes (e.g. pain) and differences in sensation and function, including changes in appearance related thoughts, feelings and emotions. Several studies described behavioural and psychological interventions which positively impacted body image outcomes in individuals with lymphoedema relating to specific cancers.
CONCLUSION
Regular screening for body image concerns could encourage more positive body image awareness in individuals with cancer-related lymphoedema and lessen some of its associated negative consequences. Future longitudinal and individual differences research in this area is important to inform intervention development. There is also need for a more standardised approach to the study and measurement of body image in people with cancer-related lymphoedema.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Body Image; Emotions; Lymphedema; Melanoma; Quality of Life
PubMed: 37681525
DOI: 10.1002/pon.6215 -
Microsurgery Jan 2024Lymphedema constitutes a major unsolved problem in plastic surgery. To identify novel lymphedema treatments, preclinical studies are vital. The surgical mouse lymphedema... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Lymphedema constitutes a major unsolved problem in plastic surgery. To identify novel lymphedema treatments, preclinical studies are vital. The surgical mouse lymphedema model is popular and cost-effective; nonetheless, a synthesis and overview of the literature with evidence-based guidelines is needed. The aim of this review was to perform a systematic review to establish best practice and support future high-quality animal studies exploring lymphedema treatments.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, searching four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) from inception-September 2022. The Animals in Research Reporting In Vivo Experiments 2.0 (ARRIVE 2.0) guidelines were used to evaluate reporting quality. Studies claiming to surgically induce lymphedema in the hindlimb of mice were included.
RESULTS
Thirty-seven studies were included. Four main models were used. (1) Irradiation+surgery. (2) A variation of the surgery used by (1) + irradiation. (3) Surgery only (SPDF-model). (4) Surgery only (PLND-model). Remaining studies used other techniques. The most common measurement modality was the caliper. Mean quality coefficient was 0.57. Eighteen studies (49%) successfully induced sustained lymphedema. Combination of methods seemed to yield the best results, with an overrepresentation of irradiation, the removal of two lymph nodes, and the disruption of both the deep and superficial lymph vessels in the 18 studies.
CONCLUSION
Surgical mouse hindlimb lymphedema models are challenged by two related problems: (1) retaining lymphedema for an extended period, that is, establishing a (chronic) lymphedema model (2) distinguishing lymphedema from post-operative edema. Most studies failed to induce lymphedema and used error-prone measurements. We provide an overview of studies claiming to induce lymphedema and advocate improved research via five evidence-based recommendations to use: (1) a proven lymphedema model; (2) sufficient follow-up time, (3) validated measurement methods; (4) ARRIVE-guidelines; (5) contralateral hindlimb as control.
Topics: Mice; Animals; Lymphedema; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Vessels; Hindlimb; Lower Extremity; Disease Models, Animal
PubMed: 37665032
DOI: 10.1002/micr.31088 -
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer... Jul 2023To review and analyze critically the available evidence for Complete Decongestive Therapy Effect on Breast Cancer Related to Lymphedema. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To review and analyze critically the available evidence for Complete Decongestive Therapy Effect on Breast Cancer Related to Lymphedema.
DATA SOURCES
Publications were retrieved from the major database search engines, included Google scholar, EBSCO host, and PubMed database. The search terms including: "Complete decongestive therapy (CDT)", "breast cancer", "Breast cancer related to lymphedema (BCRL)" "breast surgery" and "mastectomy".
STUDY SELECTION
The studies were initially selected based on keywords associated with inclusion criteria. Then, articles were chosen based on their titles. Then, based on the fill text and design, randomized control with a comprehensive description of the outcomes. The authors analyzed 3,181 articles, of which 15 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria with no publication date constraint.
DATA EXTRACTION
Each article's authors, nations, participants, outcomes variables, measuring instruments, intervention technique and follow-up, outcomes, and results were retrieved. After reaching consensus among authors, study quality was evaluated using the Jadad scale, and risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane Rob2 tool.
DATA SYNTHESIS
The levels of evidence were of excellent quality. The retrieved articles were of "high" methodological caliber. The major outcome variables were in QOL, pain, ROM and edema. The effect size of CDT on QOL was 2.347 (95% CI: -1.41, 6.11) (p=0.22). Pain was -0.068 (95% CI: -35.21) (p=0.64). ROM was 0.324 (95% CI: -0.44,0.09) (p=0.41) and edema was -2.9 (95% -1.53,1.11) (p=0.76).
CONCLUSIONS
The CDT is still recommended as the primary therapy for BCRL and is regarded the most practical and cost-effective treatment for BCRL. This result recommends patients to perform CDT to improve their QOL, ROM, and to lessen pain and edema volume. To improve the body of evidence supporting the effectiveness of the CDT on BCRL, additional trials with bigger sample sizes, longer follow-ups, blindness outcomes, and patient compliance evaluations are required.
Topics: Female; Humans; Breast Cancer Lymphedema; Breast Neoplasms; Edema; Lymphedema; Pain; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37505751
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.7.2225 -
Disability and Rehabilitation Jun 2024The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of using heat and cold therapy for adults with lymphoedema. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of using heat and cold therapy for adults with lymphoedema.
METHODS
A multi-database search was undertaken. Only studies which included adults with lymphoedema who were treated with heat or cold therapy reporting any outcome were included. Screening, data extraction, and assessment of bias were undertaken by a single reviewer and verified by a second. Due to the substantial heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was undertaken.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies were included. All nine studies which assessed the effects of heat-therapy on changes in limb circumference reported a point estimate indicating some reduction from baseline to end of study. Similarly, the five studies evaluating the use of heat-therapy on limb volume demonstrated a reduction in limb volume from baseline to end-of-study. Only four studies reported adverse events of which all were deemed to be minor. Only two studies explored the effects of cold therapy on lymphoedema.
CONCLUSIONS
Tentative evidence suggests heat-therapy may have some benefit in treating lymphoedema with minimal side effects. However, further high-quality randomised controlled trials are required, with a particular focus on moderating factors and assessment of adverse events.Implications for rehabilitationThis review highlights the potential benefit that heat therapy may have on reducing limb circumference and volume for adults with lymphoedema.There was no evidence that controlled localised heat therapy was unsafe.The current evidence-base is at a point where no specific clinical recommendations can be made.The use of heat therapy should only be applied as part of a methodologically robust study to treat lymphoedema.
Topics: Humans; Lymphedema; Adult; Cryotherapy; Treatment Outcome; Hot Temperature; Hyperthermia, Induced
PubMed: 37431170
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2231842 -
Current Oncology Reports Sep 2023Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating progressive disease resulting in various impairments and dysfunctions. Complete decongestive therapy embodies... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW
Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating progressive disease resulting in various impairments and dysfunctions. Complete decongestive therapy embodies conservative rehabilitation treatments for BCRL. Surgical procedures performed by plastic and reconstructive microsurgeons are available when conservative treatment fails. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate which rehabilitation interventions contribute to the highest level of pre- and post-microsurgical outcomes.
RECENT FINDINGS
Studies published between 2002 and 2022 were grouped for analysis. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022341650) and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Levels of evidence were based upon study design and quality. The initial literature search yielded 296 results, of which, 13 studies met all inclusion criteria. Lymphovenous bypass anastomoses (LVB/A) and vascularized lymph node transplant (VLNT) emerged as dominant surgical procedures. Peri-operative outcome measures varied greatly and were used inconsistently. There is a dearth of high quality literature leading to a gap in knowledge as to how BCRL microsurgical and conservative interventions complement each other. Peri-operative guidelines are needed to bridge the knowledge and care gap between lymphedema surgeons and therapists. A core set of outcome measures for BCRL is vital to unify terminological differences in the multidisciplinary care of BCRL. Complete decongestive therapy embodies conservative rehabilitation treatments for breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Surgical procedures performed by microsurgeons are available when conservative treatment fails. This systematic review investigated which rehabilitation interventions contribute to the highest level of pre- and post-microsurgical outcomes. Thirteen studies met all inclusion criteria and revealed that there is a dearth of high quality literature leading to a gap in knowledge as to how BCRL microsurgical and conservative interventions complement each other. Furthermore, peri-operative outcome measures were inconsistent. Peri-operative guidelines are needed to bridge the knowledge and care gap between lymphedema surgeons and therapists.
Topics: Humans; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Lymphedema; Outcome Assessment, Health Care
PubMed: 37402044
DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01439-9 -
JAMA Otolaryngology-- Head & Neck... Aug 2023Head and neck cancer-associated lymphedema (HNCaL) affects up to 90% of survivors of head and neck cancer and is a substantial contributor to disability following head...
IMPORTANCE
Head and neck cancer-associated lymphedema (HNCaL) affects up to 90% of survivors of head and neck cancer and is a substantial contributor to disability following head and neck cancer treatment. Despite the prevalence and morbidity associated with HNCaL, rehabilitation interventions are not well studied.
OBJECTIVE
To identify and appraise the current evidence for rehabilitation interventions in HNCaL.
EVIDENCE REVIEW
Five electronic databases were searched systematically from inception to January 3, 2023, for studies on HNCaL rehabilitation interventions. Study screening, data extraction, quality rating, and risk of bias assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers.
FINDINGS
Of 1642 citations identified, 23 studies (1.4%; n = 2147 patients) were eligible for inclusion. Six studies (26.1%) were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 17 (73.9%) were observational studies. Five of the 6 RCTs were published during 2020 to 2022. Most studies had fewer than 50 participants (5 of 6 RCTs; 13 of 17 observational studies). Studies were categorized by intervention type, including standard lymphedema therapy (11 studies [47.8%]) and adjunct therapy (12 studies [52.2%]). Lymphedema therapy interventions included standard complete decongestive therapy (CDT) (2 RCTs, 5 observational studies), modified CDT (3 observational studies), therapy setting (1 RCT, 2 observational studies), adherence (2 observational studies), early manual lymphatic drainage (1 RCT), and inclusion of focused exercise (1 RCT). Adjunct therapy interventions included advanced pneumatic compression devices (APCDs) (1 RCT, 5 observational studies), kinesio taping (1 RCT), photobiomodulation (1 observational study), acupuncture/moxibustion (1 observational study), and sodium selenite (1 RCT, 2 observational studies). Serious adverse events were either not found (9 [39.1%]) or not reported (14 [60.9%]). Low-quality evidence suggested the benefit of standard lymphedema therapy, particularly in the outpatient setting and with at least partial adherence. High-quality evidence was found for adjunct therapy with kinesio taping. Low-quality evidence also suggested that APCDs may be beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
The results of this systematic review suggest that rehabilitation interventions for HNCaL, including standard lymphedema therapy with kinesio taping and APCDs, appear to be safe and beneficial. However, more prospective, controlled, and adequately powered studies are needed to clarify the ideal type, timing, duration, and intensity of lymphedema therapy components before treatment guidelines can be established.
Topics: Humans; Lymphedema; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Exercise; Survivors; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 37382963
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1473