-
Clinical Anatomy (New York, N.Y.) Jan 2024This study aimed to investigate the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior cervical triangle, especially in relation to adjacent anatomical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
This study aimed to investigate the anatomy of the spinal accessory nerve (SAN) in the posterior cervical triangle, especially in relation to adjacent anatomical landmarks, along with a systematic review of the current literature with a meta-analysis of the data. Overall, 22 cadaveric and three prospective intraoperative studies, with a total of 1346 heminecks, were included in the analysis. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the posterior border of the SCM muscle (PBSCM) were found to be the mastoid apex, the great auricular point (GAP), the nerve point (NP), and the point where the PBSCM meets the upper border of the clavicle. The SAN was reported to enter the posterior cervical triangle above GAP in 100% of cases and above NP in most cases (97.5%). The mean length of the SAN along its course from the entry point to its exit point from the posterior triangle of the neck was 4.07 ± 1.13 cm. The SAN mainly gave off 1 or 2 branches (32.5% and 31%, respectively) and received either no branches or one branch in most cases (58% and 23%, respectively) from the cervical plexus during its course in the posterior cervical triangle. The major landmarks relevant to the entry of the SAN at the anterior border of the TPZ muscle (ABTPZ) were found to be the point where the ABTPZ meets the upper border of the clavicle and the midpoint of the clavicle, along with the mastoid apex, the acromion, and the transverse distance of the SAN exit point to the PBSCM. The results of the present meta-analysis will be helpful to surgeons operating in the posterior cervical triangle, aiding the avoidance of the iatrogenic injury of the SAN.
Topics: Humans; Accessory Nerve; Prospective Studies; Cadaver; Neck; Neck Muscles
PubMed: 37767816
DOI: 10.1002/ca.24119 -
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy : SRA Sep 2023Morphological variations of the brachial artery are quite commonly discovered in routine dissection and have been the subject of many studies. However, there is a need...
PURPOSE
Morphological variations of the brachial artery are quite commonly discovered in routine dissection and have been the subject of many studies. However, there is a need for a clear classification. This work presents morphological variations of the brachial artery, based on numerous case reports and studies created for the appropriate classification and interpretation among surgeons and radiologists. It also discusses the most important clinical aspects of the given varieties.
METHODS
The research method is based on the combined interpretation of the researches based on numerous publications concerning both the principles of correctly classifying the described morphological variations of the brachial artery and the resulting clinical implications. This work considers atypical variations such as the presence of the superficial brachial artery, brachoradial artery, accessory brachial artery and absence of the brachial artery. Variations of the brachial artery in relation to the external and internal diameter of the vessel have also been discussed.
RESULTS
After conducting a complex analysis of the collected data, the fundamental principles for classifying such variability as superficial brachial artery, brachioradial artery and accessory brachial artery were defined. Additionally, clinical implications resulting from the above like the impact of the superficial brachial artery on the median nerve neuropathy and the positive correlation between the brachioradial artery and increased danger of incorrect transradial catheterization were demonstrated.
CONCLUSIONS
The clinical implications of the atypical arterial pattern within the upper limb are crucial during the angiography and surgical procedures so the variations affect the appropriate diagnosis and surgical intervention. Hence, the knowledge about the morphological variations of the brachial artery should be constantly broadened by radiologists and surgeons to improve the accuracy and effectiveness of the treatment process.
Topics: Humans; Brachial Artery; Upper Extremity; Arm; Radial Artery; Axillary Artery
PubMed: 37530816
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-023-03198-5 -
Biomedicines Mar 2023Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS) is an inflammatory disorder of the brachial plexus. Hypothesized underlying causes focus on immune-mediated processes, as more than half... (Review)
Review
Parsonage-Turner syndrome (PTS) is an inflammatory disorder of the brachial plexus. Hypothesized underlying causes focus on immune-mediated processes, as more than half of patients present some antecedent event or possible predisposing condition, such as infection, vaccination, exercise, or surgery. Recently, PTS was reported following the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. We aimed to investigate data on PTS triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection to provide an extensive perspective on this pathology and to reveal what other, more specific, research questions can be further addressed. In addition, we aimed to highlight research gaps requiring further attention. We systematically reviewed two databases (LitCOVID and the World Health Organization database on COVID-19) to January 2023. We found 26 cases of PTS in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The clinical and paraclinical spectrum was heterogeneous, ranging from classical PTS to pure sensory neuropathy, extended neuropathy, spinal accessory nerve involvement, and diaphragmatic palsy. Also, two familial cases were reported. Among them, 93.8% of patients had severe pain, 80.8% were reported to present a motor deficit, and 53.8% of patients presented muscle wasting. Paresthesia was noted in 46.2% of PTS individuals and a sensory loss was reported in 34.6% of patients. The present systematic review highlights the necessity of having a high index of suspicion of PTS in patients with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, as the clinical manifestations can be variable. Also, there is a need for a standardized approach to investigation and reporting on PTS. Future studies should aim for a comprehensive assessment of patients. Factors including the baseline characteristics of the patients, evolution, and treatments should be consistently assessed across studies. In addition, a thorough differential diagnosis should be employed.
PubMed: 36979815
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11030837 -
ANZ Journal of Surgery Mar 2023Neck dissection is a commonly performed procedure for oncologic control of head and neck malignancy. With contemporary modified radical and selective neck dissections,... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Neck dissection is a commonly performed procedure for oncologic control of head and neck malignancy. With contemporary modified radical and selective neck dissections, haematoma, wound infection, tissue necrosis, chyle leak and injury involving the marginal mandibular, hypoglossal, vagus or accessory nerves are commonly described complications. Although the phrenic nerve courses within the surgical planes explored during a neck dissection and has a vital function in innervating the diaphragm, few studies have been performed to investigate the exact incidence of post-operative phrenic nerve paresis. This study aims to review the literature as to the rate of phrenic nerve injury following neck dissection.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted from 2000 to 2022 including studies reporting on phrenic nerve paresis following neck dissection.
RESULTS
In total, 11 studies were included. The reported rate of immediate post-operative phrenic nerve paresis ranged from 0% to 5.3%, with an average rate of 0.613% (12/1959). The reported rate of phrenic nerve paresis at follow-up (1 month-127 months) ranged from 0% to 4.7%, with an average rate of 1.035% (5/483). There were no cases of bilateral phrenic nerve paresis reported in this period.
CONCLUSIONS
Phrenic nerve paresis is an uncommon complication following neck dissection, often asymptomatic and potentially underreported. Bilateral phrenic nerve paresis is exceedingly rare. Injury can be avoided by staying superficial to the prevertebral fascia when dissecting around the anterior scalene muscle. Routine phrenic nerve integrity monitoring is not commonly utilized but may aid intra-operative phrenic nerve identification or confirmation of function.
Topics: Humans; Phrenic Nerve; Neck Dissection; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Paresis
PubMed: 36792555
DOI: 10.1111/ans.18322 -
Facial Plastic Surgery & Aesthetic... 2023Facial palsy patients face significant challenges. Gracilis free flap transfer is a key procedure in facial reanimation. This study aims to analyze oral commissure... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Facial palsy patients face significant challenges. Gracilis free flap transfer is a key procedure in facial reanimation. This study aims to analyze oral commissure excursion improvement after gracilis free flap transfer and the differences regarding donor nerve: cross-facial nerve graft (CFNG), hypoglossal or spinal accessory nerves, motor nerve to masseteric (MNTM), and most recently, double anastomosis using both the MNTM and CFNG. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted of studies reporting oral commissure excursion improvement after free gracilis muscle transfer. Pooled proportions were calculated using a random-effects model. Eighteen studies, 453 patients, and 488 free gracilis flaps were included. The mean change in perioperative oral commissure excursion was 7.0 mm, for CFNG 7.2 mm, for MNTM 7.7, and for double anastomoses 5.5 mm. There is a significant improvement in oral commissure excursion after gracilis muscle-free flap. Unfortunately, we could not make definitive conclusions regarding the optimal choice of donor nerve.
Topics: Humans; Gracilis Muscle; Facial Paralysis; Smiling; Plastic Surgery Procedures; Free Tissue Flaps
PubMed: 36787475
DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0283 -
Neurological Research May 2023Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Dual nerve transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve (SAN-SSN) and the radial nerve to the axillary nerve is considered to be the most feasible method of restoration of shoulder abduction in brachial plexus injuries. Supraspinatus muscle plays an important role in the initiation of abduction and its functional restoration is crucial for shoulder movements. There are two possible approaches for the SAN-SSN transfer: the more conventional anterior approach and the posterior approach in the area of scapular spine, which allows more distal neurotization. Although the dual nerve transfer is a widely used method, it is unclear which approach for the SAN-SSN transfer results in better outcomes. We conducted a search of English literature from January 2001 to December 2021 using the PRISMA guidelines. Twelve studies with a total 142 patients met our inclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups depending on the approach used: Group A included patients who underwent the anterior approach, and Group B included patients who underwent the posterior approach. Abduction strength using the Medical Research Scale (MRC) and range of motion (ROM) were assessed. The average MRC grade was 3.57 ± 1.08 in Group A and 4.0 ± 0.65 (p = 0.65) in Group B. The average ROM was 114.6 ± 36.7 degrees in Group A and 103.4 ± 37.2 degrees in Group B (p = 0.247). In conclusion, we did not find statistically significant differences between SAN-SSN transfers performed from the anterior or posterior approach in patients undergoing dual neurotization technique for restoration of shoulder abduction.
Topics: Humans; Nerve Transfer; Accessory Nerve; Radial Nerve; Axilla; Scapula; Shoulder; Brachial Plexus
PubMed: 36526442
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2022.2156721 -
World Neurosurgery Feb 2023Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is an entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve throughout the carpal tunnel. It is the most common entrapment... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is an entrapment neuropathy caused by compression of the median nerve throughout the carpal tunnel. It is the most common entrapment neuropathy, with an estimated prevalence of 4%-7%. Surgical management is more effective in moderate to severe and severe CTS. CTS recurs in approximately 20% of patients, and up to 12% of these patients require reoperation. Knowledge of normal anatomy and variations would improve the success rate of the index surgery. Atypical causes of CTS were reported, including ganglion cysts, synovial hypertrophy, lipomas, bone fracture, bone fragments, tumor of soft tissues or bones, neurofibromas, neuromas, vascular malformations, and accessory muscles. Accessory muscles are commonly detected in upper limbs. However, their concomitant presentation with CTS has rarely been reported. We aimed to present different accessory muscles diagnosed during CTS surgery through a systematic review of the literature with our exemplary case.
METHODS
A systematic review/meta-analysis was performed concomitant with a case presentation.
RESULTS
Accessory muscles associated with CTS were as follows: palmaris longus, 28.6%; lumbrical muscles, 19.3%; palmaris profundus, 17.8%; flexor digitorum superficialis, 16.1%; transverse carpal muscle, 5%; flexor digitorum indicis, 4.2%; flexor superficialis indicis, 4.2%; flexor sublimis, 0.8%; accessory superficialis longus, 0.8%; flexor pollicis longus, 0.8%; abductor digiti minimi, 0.8%; abductor digiti quinti, 0.8%; and flexor digitorum superficialis brevis, 0.8%. Accessory muscles were mostly noticed during CTS surgery (88.2%).
CONCLUSIONS
Knowledge of possible variations within the carpal tunnel would improve the surgeon's capability during CTS surgery.
Topics: Humans; Carpal Tunnel Syndrome; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Muscle, Skeletal; Hand; Nerve Compression Syndromes; Ligaments, Articular
PubMed: 36379360
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.11.045 -
Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Feb 2023Scapular winging is a rare condition of the shoulder girdle that presents challenging treatment decisions for clinicians. To inform clinical practice, clinicians need... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Scapular winging is a rare condition of the shoulder girdle that presents challenging treatment decisions for clinicians. To inform clinical practice, clinicians need guidance on what the best treatment decision is for their patients, and such recommendations should be based on the total evidence available. Therefore, the purpose of this review was to systematically review the evidence regarding nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery of patients with neurologic scapular winging due to serratus anterior (SA) or trapezius (TP) palsy.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Emcare, and Academic Search Premier were searched up to April 5, 2022, for studies reporting on clinical outcomes after nonsurgical management and tendon transfer surgery of scapular winging due to weakness of the SA or TP muscle. The Integrated quality Criteria for Review Of Multiple Study (ICROMS) tool was used to classify the quality of the studies. Primary outcomes were the fraction of patients with spontaneous recovery after nonsurgical management and improvement in shoulder function, pain scores, and shoulder scores after tendon transfer surgery. Data were pooled if data on the same outcome were available for at least 3 studies, using random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-three (10 moderate-quality [MQ] and 13 low-quality) studies were included. Six studies (3 MQ; 234 shoulders) reported on outcomes after nonsurgical management of SA palsy, whereas 12 (6 MQ; 221 shoulders) and 6 studies (1 MQ; 80 shoulders) evaluated the outcomes of tendon transfer for SA or TP palsy (1 study addressed both). Spontaneous recovery of scapular winging with nonsurgical management varied between 21% and 78% across studies after a median follow-up of 72 months. For surgical management of SA palsy, pooling data in a meta-analysis showed that patients on average improved by 47° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 34-61, P ≤ .001) in active forward flexion, had lower visual analog scale scores for pain (mean difference [MD]: -3.0, 95% CI: -4.9 to -1.0, P = .003), and had substantial improvements in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (MD: 24, 95% CI: 9-39, P = .002) and Constant scores (MD: 45, 95% CI: 39-51, P ≤ .001). Patients with TP palsy on average improved by 36° (95% CI: 21-51, P ≤ .001) in active forward flexion after tendon transfer. Statistical pooling was not possible for other outcome measures as insufficient data were available.
CONCLUSION
A substantial part of nonsurgically managed patients with scapular winging seem to have persistent complaints, which should be part of the information provided to patients. Data pooling demonstrated significant improvements in shoulder function, pain scores, and shoulder scores after tendon transfer surgery, but higher quality evidence is needed to allow for more robust recommendations and guide clinical decision-making on when to perform such functional surgery.
Topics: Humans; Tendon Transfer; Scapula; Shoulder; Paralysis; Pain
PubMed: 36252782
DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.09.009 -
Muscle & Nerve Sep 2022Ultrasonography of the cranial nerves has recently gained attention for assessment of inflammatory, compressive, or degenerative neuropathies. However, sonographic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION/AIMS
Ultrasonography of the cranial nerves has recently gained attention for assessment of inflammatory, compressive, or degenerative neuropathies. However, sonographic reference values of cranial nerves have received less attention than those of peripheral nerves. In this systematic review and meta-analysis we aimed to provide current evidence of sonographic reference values for cranial nerve size.
METHODS
By searching Medline (via PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported ultrasound measurements of the facial, spinal accessory, and hypoglossal nerves in healthy adults. We included studies that reported either the sonographic cross-sectional area (CSA) or the nerve diameter; the included nerves were subgrouped according to the site of nerve measurement.
RESULTS
Fourteen studies with a total of 661 participants and 1437 ultrasound nerve measurements met the inclusion criteria. The anatomical sites for each nerve were combined to provide single-nerve mean measurements. We found an overall mean nerve diameter of 0.80 mm for the facial nerve, 0.63 mm for the spinal accessory nerve, and 1.82 mm for hypoglossal nerve CSA.
DISCUSSION
This meta-analysis provides reference values for the diameter and cross-sectional area of the facial, spinal accessory, and hypoglossal nerves at different sites, which can be used as guidance in clinical practice to detect pathological changes in cranial nerve size in cranial neuropathies. We recommend further validation in large-scale studies as well as standardization of the scanning protocols.
Topics: Accessory Nerve; Adult; Humans; Hypoglossal Nerve; Peripheral Nerves; Reference Values; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35765722
DOI: 10.1002/mus.27670 -
International Journal of Oral and... Jan 2023The relationship between the spinal accessory nerve and internal jugular vein is important for modified neck dissection surgery. Therefore, the aim of this review was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The relationship between the spinal accessory nerve and internal jugular vein is important for modified neck dissection surgery. Therefore, the aim of this review was to investigate variations in this relationship. Through a search of the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, LILACS, and SciELO databases, the review authors collected anatomical data for inclusion in a meta-analysis, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Four relationship patterns were identified and classified: type 1, the nerve lies superficial to the vein; type 2, the nerve lies deep to the vein; type 3, the nerve crosses the branches of the vein; type 4, the nerve splits and its branches pass around the vein. The last pattern was not included in the meta-analysis. Eighteen studies were included (useful sample of 1491 hemi-necks). Type 1 variation had a prevalence of 79.7% (95% CI 77.6-81.7%), type 2 had a prevalence of 19.6% (95% CI 17.7-21.7%), and the type 3 had a prevalence of 0.7% (95% CI 0.0-1.4%). Significant differences were found among geographical subgroups. Normally, the spinal accessory nerve passes superficial to the internal jugular vein, but anatomical variations are common and there is a geographical influence. These findings are important for the safety of modified radical neck dissections.
Topics: Humans; Accessory Nerve; Jugular Veins; Neck Dissection; Neck; Prevalence
PubMed: 35367117
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.03.008