-
Journal of Medical Virology Jan 2023We reviewed the literature on the importance of selected anti-high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) antibodies (namely, 16/18 and early oncoproteins E6 and E7) as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
We reviewed the literature on the importance of selected anti-high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) antibodies (namely, 16/18 and early oncoproteins E6 and E7) as potential serological markers for early detection of individuals at high risk of cervical cancer. We searched for studies in PubMed and Embase databases published from 2010 to 2020 on antibodies against HR-HPV E6 and E7 early proteins and cervical cancer. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for HPV16 and HPV18 antibodies were calculated using a bivariate hierarchical random-effects model. A total of 69 articles were identified; we included three studies with 1550 participants. For the three HPV16/18 E6 and E7 antibody tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based assays had a sensitivity of 18% for detecting CIN2+ (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15-21) and a specificity of 96% (95% CI: 92-98), for slot-blot, sensitivity was 28.9% (95% CI: 23.3-35.1) and specificity was 72% (95% CI: 66.6-77.0) for detecting CIN2+, and for multiplex HPV serology assay based on a glutathione S-transferase, sensitivity was 16% (95% CI: 8.45-28.6) and specificity was 98% (95% CI: 97-99) for detecting invasive cervical cancer. HR-HPV16/18 E6 and E7 serological markers showed high specificity, but sensitivity was suboptimal for the detection of cervical cancer in either population screening settings or as point-of-care screening tests.
Topics: Female; Humans; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Papillomavirus Infections; Human papillomavirus 16; Human papillomavirus 18; Oncogene Proteins, Viral; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Papillomavirus E7 Proteins; Papillomaviridae
PubMed: 35641882
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27900 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2022With the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic, new technologies are being implemented for more rapid, scalable, and sensitive diagnostics. The implementation of... (Review)
Review
With the progression of the COVID-19 pandemic, new technologies are being implemented for more rapid, scalable, and sensitive diagnostics. The implementation of microfluidic techniques and their amalgamation with different detection techniques has led to innovative diagnostics kits to detect SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, antigens, and nucleic acids. In this review, we explore the different microfluidic-based diagnostics kits and how their amalgamation with the various detection techniques has spearheaded their availability throughout the world. Three other online databases, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar, were referred for articles. One thousand one hundred sixty-four articles were determined with the search algorithm of microfluidics followed by diagnostics and SARS-CoV-2. We found that most of the materials used to produce microfluidics devices were the polymer materials such as PDMS, PMMA, and others. Centrifugal force is the most commonly used fluid manipulation technique, followed by electrochemical pumping, capillary action, and isotachophoresis. The implementation of the detection technique varied. In the case of antibody detection, spectrometer-based detection was most common, followed by fluorescence-based as well as colorimetry-based. In contrast, antigen detection implemented electrochemical-based detection followed by fluorescence-based detection, and spectrometer-based detection were most common. Finally, nucleic acid detection exclusively implements fluorescence-based detection with a few colorimetry-based detections. It has been further observed that the sensitivity and specificity of most devices varied with implementing the detection-based technique alongside the fluid manipulation technique. Most microfluidics devices are simple and incorporate the detection-based system within the device. This simplifies the deployment of such devices in a wide range of environments. They can play a significant role in increasing the rate of infection detection and facilitating better health services.
PubMed: 35629317
DOI: 10.3390/life12050649 -
BMJ Global Health May 2022The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 has been carefully measured and analysed in high-income countries, whereas there has been no systematic analysis of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The infection fatality rate (IFR) of COVID-19 has been carefully measured and analysed in high-income countries, whereas there has been no systematic analysis of age-specific seroprevalence or IFR for developing countries.
METHODS
We systematically reviewed the literature to identify all COVID-19 serology studies in developing countries that were conducted using representative samples collected by February 2021. For each of the antibody assays used in these serology studies, we identified data on assay characteristics, including the extent of seroreversion over time. We analysed the serology data using a Bayesian model that incorporates conventional sampling uncertainty as well as uncertainties about assay sensitivity and specificity. We then calculated IFRs using individual case reports or aggregated public health updates, including age-specific estimates whenever feasible.
RESULTS
In most locations in developing countries, seroprevalence among older adults was similar to that of younger age cohorts, underscoring the limited capacity that these nations have to protect older age groups.Age-specific IFRs were roughly 2 times higher than in high-income countries. The median value of the population IFR was about 0.5%, similar to that of high-income countries, because disparities in healthcare access were roughly offset by differences in population age structure.
CONCLUSION
The burden of COVID-19 is far higher in developing countries than in high-income countries, reflecting a combination of elevated transmission to middle-aged and older adults as well as limited access to adequate healthcare. These results underscore the critical need to ensure medical equity to populations in developing countries through provision of vaccine doses and effective medications.
Topics: Aged; Bayes Theorem; COVID-19; Developing Countries; Health Services Accessibility; Humans; Middle Aged; Public Policy; Seroepidemiologic Studies
PubMed: 35618305
DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-008477 -
Zeitschrift Fur Rheumatologie Feb 2024The objectives of this study are to analyze the association between anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) and cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this study are to analyze the association between anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) and cardiac involvement in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) and to evaluate the diagnostic value of AMA for cardiac involvement in IIM patients.
METHODS
We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify English-language studies published before November 19, 2021. Stata 12.0 software (Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. We used the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve to evaluate the diagnostic value of AMA for cardiac involvement in IIM patients. Statistical heterogeneity of studies was assessed using the I statistic with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
RESULTS
Seven studies were included in the final analyses, with a total of 2308 IIM patients (including 171 AMA-positive and 2137 AMA-negative patients). The pooled sensitivity of AMA for cardiac involvement in IIM patients was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.19-0.43) and specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.88-0.96). The pooled PLR was 3.9 (95% CI: 2.82-5.38), NLR was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 5 (95% CI: 3-7). The area under the SROC curve was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.79).
CONCLUSION
The overall diagnostic value of AMA may not be very high for cardiac involvement in IIM patients.
Topics: Humans; ROC Curve; Myositis; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35575829
DOI: 10.1007/s00393-022-01216-2 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Jun 2022To determine the impact of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) antigen-specific immunoassays in the stratification of patients at-risk for anti-neutrophil... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To determine the impact of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and proteinase 3 (PR3) antigen-specific immunoassays in the stratification of patients at-risk for anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitides (AAV) at diagnosis.
METHODS
A Medline search was conducted to identify diagnostic accuracy studies using PR3-ANCA or MPO-ANCA for the evaluation of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA). Studies estimates were pooled using the bivariate method.
RESULTS
Diagnostic accuracy varied by analyte and AAV subtype. PR3-ANCA had greater sensitivity than MPO-ANCA for GPA (74% vs 11%, p < 0.001) and MPO-ANCA greater sensitivity for MPA (73% vs 7%, p < 0.001). Specificities of both MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA were consistently high (mean 97%, range: 93-99%) for both AAV subtypes. There was insufficient data to perform meta-analysis for the diagnostic accuracy of EPGA.
CONCLUSION
These results validate the use of high quality MPO-ANCA and PR3-ANCA immunoassays to screen patients at-risk for AAV as well as to categorize disease as GPA or MPA subtype. However, caution must be exercised in doing so, since some assays may not have optimal performance. Each laboratory should validate appropriate algorithms based on the tests used and testing population.
Topics: Anti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis; Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Churg-Strauss Syndrome; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Humans; Immunoassay; Microscopic Polyangiitis; Myeloblastin; Peroxidase
PubMed: 35452854
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103100 -
Autoimmunity Reviews Jun 2022Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) sera are considered to be a biomarker for JIA-related uveitis. There is an unclear consensus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) detected in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) sera are considered to be a biomarker for JIA-related uveitis. There is an unclear consensus on the screening dilutions of ANA as detected by the HEp-2 indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) that should be used when predicting the risk of uveitis in JIA. The primary aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the evidence regarding ANA prevalence and performance in JIA and JIA-associated uveitis.
METHODS
A search of five databases identified 1766 abstracts, using the search terms juvenile idiopathic arthritis; pediatric; sensitivity or diagnostic; and ANA. Studies that met inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed for the proportion of JIA patients with a positive ANA. Forest plots and pooled estimates were generated for the proportion of JIA patients and those with uveitis who were positive for ANA stratified by screening dilution. Study heterogeneity was also assessed.
RESULTS
Twenty-eight studies met inclusion criteria yielding 6250 unique patients; 5902 had JIA and 348 were healthy controls or were known to have other autoimmune diseases. The most reported IFA serum screening dilution was ≥1:80, representing 41.9% of patients and this screening dilution had the highest proportion of JIA ANA positivity (41.0%; 95% CI 25.0%-57.0%). ANA screening for JIA uveitis had a sensitivity and specificity of ANA at ≥1:40 of 75% (95% CI 46%-100%) and 66% (95% CI 39%-93%), respectively. There was significant study heterogeneity across both JIA subtypes and ANA titres.
CONCLUSIONS
Although there was a large variation of ANA IFA screening dilutions used for investigation of JIA, the most common dilution was 1:80. The current literature has several important deficiencies that are identified in this review requiring additional studies to inform the ANA screening dilutions of clinical value in JIA and JIA-associated uveitis.
Topics: Antibodies, Antinuclear; Arthritis, Juvenile; Child; Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect; Humans; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Uveitis
PubMed: 35398272
DOI: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103086 -
Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology 2022Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is an infection of the lung usually caused by Aspergillus fumigatus in patients with pre-existing pulmonary diseases. Its diagnosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
LDBio Aspergillus immunochromatographic test lateral flow assay for IgG/IgM antibody detection in chronic pulmonary aspergillosis: Single-centre evaluation and meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) is an infection of the lung usually caused by Aspergillus fumigatus in patients with pre-existing pulmonary diseases. Its diagnosis hinges on demonstrating IgG antibodies against A. fumigatus. Herein, we evaluated the performance of a newly introduced point of care test (POCT) kit, the LDBio Aspergillus IgG/IgM lateral flow assay (LFA) in India with the standard ImmunoCAP kit for diagnosing CPA.
METHODS
A total of 60 serum samples (30 CPA cases and 30 controls) were evaluated by the Aspergillus immunochromatographic test (ICT) IgG/IgM LFA. Fluorescent-enzyme immunoassay was used to determine specific A. fumigatus-IgG concentrations (positive >27 mgA/L). Further, a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies (up to August 26, 2021) reporting the performance of LDBio ICT for the diagnosis of CPA was performed.
RESULT
A sensitivity of 86.7%, specificity of 90%, negative predictive value of 87.1%, positive predictive value of 89.7%, negative likelihood ratio of 0.15, positive likelihood ratio of 8.67, and was observed for the LDBio IC. There was good agreement between LDBio ICT and ImmunoCAP (88.3%) with a Cohen's Kappa score of 0.77. Our systematic review identified four studies and the pooled sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 91%, area under the curve of 0.94 and diagnostic odds ratio of 57.2, for CPA diagnosis by LDBio ICT.
CONCLUSION
Aspergillus LDBio ICT assay exhibits good sensitivity and can be used to screen CPA cases.
Topics: Antibodies, Fungal; Aspergillus; Chronic Disease; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; Persistent Infection; Pulmonary Aspergillosis; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35370006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2022.03.002 -
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Feb 2022Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) causes febrile illnesses and has always been misdiagnosed as other viral infections, such as dengue and Zika; thus, a laboratory test is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) causes febrile illnesses and has always been misdiagnosed as other viral infections, such as dengue and Zika; thus, a laboratory test is needed. Serological tests are commonly used to diagnose CHIKV infection, but their accuracy is questionable due to varying degrees of reported sensitivities and specificities. Herein, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serological tests currently available for CHIKV.
METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
A literature search was performed in PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and Scopus databases from the 1st December 2020 until 22nd April 2021. Studies reporting sensitivity and specificity of serological tests against CHIKV that used whole blood, serum, or plasma were included. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability, while R software was used for statistical analyses. Thirty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis; 72 index test data were extracted and analysed. Rapid and ELISA-based antigen tests had a pooled sensitivity of 85.8% and 82.2%, respectively, and a pooled specificity of 96.1% and 96.0%, respectively. According to our meta-analysis, antigen detection tests serve as a good diagnostic test for acute-phase samples. The IgM detection tests had more than 90% diagnostic accuracy for ELISA-based tests, immunofluorescence assays, in-house developed tests, and samples collected after seven days of symptom onset. Conversely, low sensitivity was found for the IgM rapid test (42.3%), commercial test (78.6%), and for samples collected less than seven of symptom onset (26.2%). Although IgM antibodies start to develop on day 2 of CHIKV infection, our meta-analysis revealed that the IgM detection test is not recommended for acute-phase samples. The diagnostic performance of the IgG detection tests was more than 93% regardless of the test formats and whether the test was commercially available or developed in-house. The use of samples collected after seven days of symptom onset for the IgG detection test suggests that IgG antibodies can be detected in the convalescent-phase samples. Additionally, we evaluated commercial IgM and IgG tests for CHIKV and found that ELISA-based and IFA commercial tests manufactured by Euroimmun (Lübeck, Germany), Abcam (Cambridge, UK), and Inbios (Seattle, WA) had diagnostic accuracy of above 90%, which was similar to the manufacturers' claim.
CONCLUSION
Based on our meta-analysis, antigen or antibody-based serological tests can be used to diagnose CHIKV reliably, depending on the time of sample collection. The antigen detection tests serve as a good diagnostic test for samples collected during the acute phase (≤7 days post symptom onset) of CHIKV infection. Likewise, IgM and IgG detection tests can be used for samples collected in the convalescent phase (>7 days post symptom onset). In correlation to the clinical presentation of the patients, the combination of the IgM and IgG tests can differentiate recent and past infections.
Topics: Antigens, Viral; Chikungunya Fever; Chikungunya virus; Humans; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; Sensitivity and Specificity; Serologic Tests
PubMed: 35120141
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010152 -
Carcinogenesis Apr 2022Clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC) is a rare type of epithelial cancer often resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of CCOC, and targets...
Clear cell ovarian cancer (CCOC) is a rare type of epithelial cancer often resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy. Biomarkers for the diagnosis of CCOC, and targets for immunotherapy, both have the potential to improve outcomes for patients. Our review aims to determine whether any antigens already identified in the literature could fulfil this remit. PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, CINAHL and EMBASE were searched and included all reported studies up until August 2021. Primary research articles on human adult females including at least 10 CCOC patients were included. Quality assurance was carried out using a modified version of the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity, specificity and area under the curve were extracted from each included study by two independent reviewers. Twenty-three articles were included which identified 19 gene transcripts/proteins and one antibody, with reported sensitivities between 21% and 100% and specificities between 0% and 100% for expression in CCOC and differentiation from other epithelial ovarian cancer subtypes, benign gynaecological disease or normal tissue. Twelve studies identified biomarkers with a sensitivity and specificity above 80%. A panel of biomarkers consisting of IMP3, napsin A and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta achieved the highest area under the curve of 0.954. This review demonstrates that there are promising candidate biomarkers for the diagnosis of CCOC, some of which are highly specific, and have the potential to act as targets for therapy. However, larger cohort studies are needed to validate these biomarkers and their potential use in clinical practice.
Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35104328
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgac012 -
Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine :... Mar 2022The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to critically evaluate the available data on sensitivity and specificity of IHC compared with molecular... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to critically evaluate the available data on sensitivity and specificity of IHC compared with molecular tests in the detection of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review was performed based on the PRISMA statement and registered in Prospero (CRD42021259117). PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for observational studies to answer the question "What is the diagnostic accuracy of immunohistochemistry compared with molecular tests for the diagnosis of BRAF V600E mutation in ameloblastomas?". Methodological quality and risk of bias assessment of the selected studies were based on the QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis based on hierarchical SROC curve model and summary measures for sensitivity and specificity were computed.
RESULTS
A total of 226 records were found, but only 05 articles met the inclusion criteria, with 277 FFPE specimens of ameloblastoma included in the quantitative analysis. The sensitivity of the IHC compared to molecular tests ranged from 0.71 to 1.00, while all of the included studies showed perfect specificity (1.00). Pooled measures for sensitivity and specificity were 0.95 [95% CI 0.89, 1.00] and 1.00 [95% CI 0.95, 1.00], respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 4.05, and the AUC for SROC curve was calculated as 0.979.
CONCLUSIONS
BRAF V600E-specific IHC using VE1 antibody showed extremely high sensitivity and specificity when compared with molecular tests in the detection of the mutation in ameloblastomas.
Topics: Ameloblastoma; Biomarkers, Tumor; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35090195
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13278