-
Journal of Clinical Oncology : Official... May 2024To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
PURPOSE
To guide the vaccination of adults with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies.
METHODS
A systematic literature review identified systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nonrandomized studies on the efficacy and safety of vaccines used by adults with cancer or their household contacts. This review builds on a 2013 guideline by the Infectious Disease Society of America. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 1, 2013, to February 16, 2023. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations.
RESULTS
A total of 102 publications were included in the systematic review: 24 systematic reviews, 14 RCTs, and 64 nonrandomized studies. The largest body of evidence addressed COVID-19 vaccines.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The goal of vaccination is to limit the severity of infection and prevent infection where feasible. Optimizing vaccination status should be considered a key element in the care of patients with cancer. This approach includes the documentation of vaccination status at the time of the first patient visit; timely provision of recommended vaccines; and appropriate revaccination after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, or B-cell-depleting therapy. Active interaction and coordination among healthcare providers, including primary care practitioners, pharmacists, and nursing team members, are needed. Vaccination of household contacts will enhance protection for patients with cancer. Some vaccination and revaccination plans for patients with cancer may be affected by the underlying immune status and the anticancer therapy received. As a result, vaccine strategies may differ from the vaccine recommendations for the general healthy adult population vaccine.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/supportive-care-guidelines.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Vaccination; Adult; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 38498792
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00032 -
Journal of Geriatric Oncology May 2024The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
INTRODUCTION
The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly transformed the treatment landscape for advanced malignancies. These inhibitors bolster the immune system's capacity to detect and destroy cancer cells. ICIs used in cancer immunotherapy are primarily categorized into two groups: anti-PD-1/L1 and anti-CTLA-4. The application of combination ICI therapy (ICI doublets) in older patients prompts questions about their relative efficacy compared to standard therapies, particularly in comparison to younger patient cohorts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This study involved an extensive review of literature from databases including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Our primary aim was to assess overall survival (OS) outcomes in a cohort of older patients, specifically those aged 65 and above, undergoing treatment for advanced cancers. The treatment modalities considered included ICI doublets, ICI monotherapy (alone or in combination with non-ICI drugs), and non-ICI therapies. The study aimed to compare the OS outcomes across these different therapeutic approaches.
RESULTS
The analysis incorporated data from 18 trials, indicating that patients treated with ICI doublets exhibited a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-0.96; P < 0.01). The addition of CTLA-4 inhibitors did not show significant advantages over anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy (HR = 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.02; P = 0.13). When compared to non-ICI therapies, such as chemotherapy alone, ICI doublets demonstrated improved OS outcomes (HR = 0.89, 95% CI 0.82-0.97; P < 0.01).
DISCUSSION
Our findings suggest that ICI doublets may offer a modest improvement in the outcomes of older cancer patients compared to non-ICI-based treatments. Consequently, the use of ICI doublets in older patients should be considered on an individual basis, prioritizing cases where there are clear advantages over conventional therapy. This study underscores the importance of developing personalized treatment strategies for older patients, necessitating a cautious and individualized approach in medication selection.
Topics: Aged; Humans; Age Factors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; CTLA-4 Antigen; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Immunotherapy; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen
PubMed: 38462434
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101741 -
Journal of Infection and Public Health Apr 2024Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is a severe condition resulting from the dengue virus, with four serotypes known as DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4. Genetic variations... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) is a severe condition resulting from the dengue virus, with four serotypes known as DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3, and DEN-4. Genetic variations play a crucial role in influencing susceptibility to DHF. Therefore, this investigation conducted a meta-analysis to uncover genetic changes that might have remained undetected in individual studies due to small sample sizes or methodological differences. Among 2212 initially identified studies, 23 were deemed suitable for analysis based on PRISMA guidelines. Toll-like receptors (TLR) and CD209 showed significant association with DHF (odds ratios: TLR=0.56, CD209 =0.55), indicating protective effects. However, tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) did not exhibit a statistically significant relationship with DHF. This study emphasizes the relevance of TLR and CD209 in DHF susceptibility and resistance across diverse geographical locations.
Topics: Humans; Severe Dengue; Dengue Virus; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Serogroup; Case-Control Studies; Dengue
PubMed: 38368646
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.02.001 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer....
Immunotherapy treatments aim to modulate the host's immune response to either mitigate it in inflammatory/autoimmune disease or enhance it against infection or cancer. Among different immunotherapies reaching clinical application during the last years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) immunotherapy has emerged as an effective treatment for cancer where different CAR T cells have already been approved. Yet their use against infectious diseases is an area still relatively poorly explored, albeit with tremendous potential for research and clinical application. Infectious diseases represent a global health challenge, with the escalating threat of antimicrobial resistance underscoring the need for alternative therapeutic approaches. This review aims to systematically evaluate the current applications of CAR immunotherapy in infectious diseases and discuss its potential for future applications. Notably, CAR cell therapies, initially developed for cancer treatment, are gaining recognition as potential remedies for infectious diseases. The review sheds light on significant progress in CAR T cell therapy directed at viral and opportunistic fungal infections.
Topics: Humans; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Immunotherapy; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Neoplasms; Communicable Diseases
PubMed: 38352878
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1289303 -
Current Pharmaceutical Design 2024Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively...
BACKGROUND
Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively regulate the interaction between a T cell receptor with its cognate antigen, presented by the major histocompatibility complex.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review on the effects of High Efficacy Disease Modifying Drugs (HEDMDs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on the co-signaling and adhesion molecules that form the immune synapse.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other sources to identify clinical or preclinical reports on the effects of HEDMDs on co-signaling and adhesion molecules that participate in the formation of immune synapses in patients with MS or other autoimmune disorders. We included reports on cladribine tablets, anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, S1P modulators, inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and natalizumab.
RESULTS
In 56 eligible reports among 7340 total publications, limited relevant evidence was uncovered. Not all co-signaling and adhesion molecules have been studied in relation to every HEDMD, with more data being available on the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (that affect CD80, CD86, GITR and TIGIT), cladribine tablets (affecting CD28, CD40, ICAM-1, LFA-1) and the S1P modulators (affecting CD86, ICAM-1 and LFA-1) and less on Natalizumab (affecting CD80, CD86, CD40, LFA-1, VLA-4) and Alemtuzumab (affecting GITR and CTLA-4).
CONCLUSION
The puzzle of HEDMD effects on the immune synapse is far from complete. The available evidence suggests that distinguishing differences exist between drugs and are worth pursuing further.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Immunological Synapses; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 38343058
DOI: 10.2174/0113816128288102240131053205 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2024Recent evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Recent evidence suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy improves outcomes in patients with brain metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
METHODS
Records were searched electronically on MEDLINE, Embase and BIOSIS. Hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for overall survival and progression free survival, and treatment-related adverse events data were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed in included studies using the Cochrane Collaboration's revised tool to assess risk of bias in randomized trials.
RESULTS
PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy increased overall survival by 33% and progression free survival by 47% compared with chemotherapy. Two studies had a high risk of bias. Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 95%, 89% and 65% of patients receiving chemoimmunotherapy,chemotherapy and single agent immunotherapy, respectively.
CONCLUSION
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors alone or in addition to chemotherapy increase overall and progression free survival when compared with chemotherapy alone. Chemoimmunotherapy and chemotherapy patients experienced the most treatment-related adverse events.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; B7-H1 Antigen; Immunotherapy; Brain
PubMed: 38331301
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104288 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2023Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is considered an aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Studies investigating CNSL have shown that chimeric antigen receptor...
Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is considered an aggressive lymphoma with a poor prognosis. Studies investigating CNSL have shown that chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated an effective response in limited sample sizes. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the sustained efficacy and factors associated with the sustained efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment of CNSL. We searched studies from PubMed, Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials up to July 2023. Studies that included individual data on the duration of response (DoR) after receiving CAR T-cell therapy were enrolled. Pooled response rates were calculated using fixed-effects or random-effects models. Subgroup analysis was performed to analyze the heterogeneity, and a Cox regression model was performed to identify the factors associated with sustained efficacy. In total, 12 studies including 69 patients were identified and included in this meta-analysis. The pooled relapse rate was 45% [95% CI 35, 56]. Subgroup analyses of relapse rates revealed that CAR T-cells using the CD28/4-1BB domain (CD28/4-1BB vs. CD28 vs. 4-1BB, = 0.0151), parenchymal or leptomeningeal involvement (parenchymal or leptomeningeal vs. both parenchymal and leptomeningeal, < 0.0001), and combined treatment with CAR T-cell therapy [Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) plus CAR T-cell therapy vs. CAR T cells with maintenance therapy vs. CAR T-cell therapy alone, = 0.003] were associated with lower relapse rates in patients. Time-to-event endpoints were assessed using reconstructed individual patient survival data to explore key modulators of DoR. Partial response status at CAR-T infusion and the use of ASCT plus CAR T-cell therapy were associated with longer DoR at the multivariate level, with hazard ratios of 0.25 and 0.26, respectively. CAR T-cell therapy shows promising and sustained efficacy in CNSL patients. However, further prospective large-scale studies are needed to assess these effect modifiers to optimize patient selection and improve the sustained efficacy of CAR T-cell therapy in the treatment of CNSL. https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier PROSPERO CRD42023451856.
PubMed: 38328579
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1331844 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (ARMCC) and identify the population that may benefit the most.
METHODS
We conducted a search of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Collaboration Library from their inception to September 2023. We extracted and analyzed the results related to the efficacy and safety of PD-1 in patients with ARMCC. The primary endpoints included the overall objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs), while the secondary endpoints encompassed the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate, as well as OS and PFS. We used a random effects model to conduct a meta-analysis on single-group rates, and the Mantel-Haenszel method was utilized to compare the ORR and the incidence of AEs.
RESULTS
Our study included a total of 21 trials involving 2,097 patients. The ORR of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with chemotherapy was 56.36%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents was 38.72%, the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 inhibitors was 25.60%, and PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy was 15.99%. The subgroup analysis showed that the group of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the non-SCC group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitors combined with other anti-tumor drugs (Odds Ratio =2.43, P=0.002). Additionally, the group of patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score (PD-L1 CPS) ≥1 exhibited a significantly higher ORR compared to the PD-L1 CPS <1 group in patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (OR=4.14, P=0.02). PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy did not significantly increase the incidence of all grades of adverse events (Relative Risk=0.99, p=0.788) or the incidence of serious adverse events (RR=0.99, p=0.788) compared to chemotherapy alone.
CONCLUSION
PD-1 inhibitors demonstrate outstanding efficacy in the treatment of patients with ARMCC. Patients with SCC may benefit more from treatments including PD-1 inhibitors in combination with other anti-tumor drugs, and PD-L1 CPS ≥1 can be considered a favorable indicator of immune therapy response. Importantly, the use of PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy or PD-1 inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy did not lead to an increased incidence of AEs compared with chemotherapy alone, indicting safety during treatment.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO (CRD42023457945).
Topics: Humans; Female; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; B7-H1 Antigen; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38327524
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1305810 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiovascular toxicities related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to investigate the risk of cardiovascular toxicities related to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in solid tumors.
METHODS
A literature search was performed following the participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study design (PICOS) principles, and the study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Data analysis was conducted using Review Manager version 5.4.
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 69 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) divided into five groups based on the treatment regimens: PD-1/PD-L1 + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus chemotherapy, PD-1/PD-L1 versus placebo, PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus PD-1/PD-L1 and PD-1/PD-L1 + CTLA-4 versus chemotherapy. Compared to chemotherapy treatment alone, PD-1/PD-L1 +chemotherapy significantly increased the risk of hypertension [all-grade (OR = 1.27, 95% CI [1.05, 1.53], p = 0.01); grade 3-5 (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [1.04, 1.79], p = 0.03)], hypotension [all-grade (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.19, 3.45], p = 0.009); grade 3-5 (OR = 3.60, 95% CI [1.22, 10.60], p = 0.02)], arrhythmia [all-grade (OR = 1.53, 95% CI [1.02, 2.30], p = 0.04); grade 3-5 (OR = 2.91, 95% CI [1.33, 6.39], p = 0.008)] and myocarditis [all-grade (OR = 2.42, 95% CI [1.06, 5.54], p = 0.04)]. The risk of all-grade hypotension (OR = 2.87, 95% CI [1.26, 6.55], p = 0.01) and all-grade arrhythmia (OR = 2.03, 95% CI [1.13, 3.64], p = 0.02) significantly increased when treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors compared to the placebo. The risks of cardiovascular toxicities are significantly higher with PD-1+CTLA-4 compared to PD-1 alone (OR = 2.02, 95% CI [1.12, 3.66], p = 0.02).
CONCLUSION
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor leads to an increased risk of cardiovascular toxicities, especially hypertension, hypotension, arrhythmia, and myocarditis.
Topics: Humans; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; B7-H1 Antigen; CTLA-4 Antigen; Hypertension; Hypotension; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Myocarditis; Neoplasms; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor
PubMed: 38318172
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1255825 -
Critical Reviews in Oncology/hematology Apr 2024To summarize and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line systematic therapies after first-line androgen-receptor targeting therapies (ARTs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Second-line treatment options in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after progression on first-line androgen-receptor targeting therapies: A systematic review and Bayesian network analysis.
OBJECTIVE
To summarize and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line systematic therapies after first-line androgen-receptor targeting therapies (ARTs) for biomarker-unselected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients.
METHODS
Studies published in English up to May 2023 were identified in PubMed, Web of Science and ASCO-GU 2023. Studies accessing the efficacy and safety of second-line systematic therapies after first-line ARTs for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients were eligible for current systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).
RESULTS
Thirty-two studies with 5388 patients and 10 unique treatment modalities met our inclusion criteria. Current evidence suggested that docetaxel (DOC) combined with the same ART as first-line (ART1) (ART1 + DOC) were associated with significantly improved PSA response, PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical or radiographic PFS (rPFS) compared with other reported second-line systematic therapies, including DOC. An increase in toxicity was observed with ART1 + DOC. Our NMA indicated that DOC monotherapy was only inferior to ART1 + DOC in improvement disease outcomes. The incidence of toxicity between patients received second-line DOC and an alternative ART (ART2) was similar.
CONCLUSION
The available evidence reviewed in our work suggested a clinical benefit of DOC nomotherapy and DOC plus ART1 as the second-line systematic therapy for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients progressed on a first-line ART. More studies and RCTs are needed to evaluate the optimal second-line treatments for mCRPC patients with one prior first-line ART.
Topics: Male; Humans; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Androgens; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Treatment Outcome; Bayes Theorem; Docetaxel; Biomarkers; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
PubMed: 38316286
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104286