-
International Journal of Molecular... Jun 2024The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has... (Review)
Review
The gold standard in the non-surgical treatment of periodontitis is scaling and root planing (SRP). In recent years, the use of autogenous platelet concentrates has spread over many specialties in dentistry and, thus, has also been gaining popularity in periodontal treatment. Its two main fractions are platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), which, since 2014, can also be used via injection as injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). The authors conducted a comprehensive systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. It involved searching PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the phrases ("Root Planing" OR "Subgingival Curettage" OR "Periodontal Debridement") AND ("Platelet-Rich Plasma"). Based on the authors' inclusion and exclusion criteria, 12 results were included in the review, out of 1170 total results. The objective of this review was to ascertain the impact of utilizing PRP and i-PRF in SRP. The results revealed that both the incorporation of PRP and i-PRF were found to be significantly associated with are duction in gingival pocket depth and again in clinical attachment level; however, i-PRF demonstrated superiority in improving clinical parameters. Furthermore, i-PRF demonstrated notable bactericidal efficacy against . On the other hand, PRP proved inferior to an Nd:YAG laser in clinical parameter improvement; however, it demonstrated significant efficiency as well. This literature review led the authors to the conclusion that autologous platelet concentrates might be competent agents for improving the therapeutic outcomes of SRP.
Topics: Humans; Platelet-Rich Plasma; Platelet-Rich Fibrin; Periodontitis; Root Planing; Injections
PubMed: 38928026
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126319 -
World Neurosurgery Jun 2024Endoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that has been shown to relieve intradiscal pressure, irrigation of inflammatory factors, and visual debridement... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Endoscopic surgery is a minimally invasive procedure that has been shown to relieve intradiscal pressure, irrigation of inflammatory factors, and visual debridement which are crucial for the successful treatment of spondylodiscitis. This study proposes a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic treatment of thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched for studies involving thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis treated by endoscopic disc drainage with or without additional posterior fixation over the last twenty years. Studies that met the inclusion criteria, which included outcomes related to the percentage of cured infections, patient satisfaction, regression of inflammatory markers, and/or the percentage of adverse event rates, were included in the analysis. For each study, the percentage of patients who showed improvement or experienced an adverse event was abstracted and pooled in a meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Based on the search strategy and inclusion criteria, our systematic review and meta-analysis included 20 studies with 546 participants. The success rate was 89.4% (95% CI 83.1%-94.5%). The rate of major adverse events was 0.3%, while that of postoperative transient paresthesia 2.6% (95% CI 0.8%-5.1%). The recurrence rate was 1.7% (95% CI 0.3%-4.0%), and revision surgery was 8.5% (95% CI 3.8%-14.6%). The causative pathogen diagnosis rate was 73.9% (95% CI 67.7%-79.8%), while progression of deformity was 3.7% (95% CI 0.2%-9.8%), and spontaneous fusion was 40.1% (95% CI 11.0%-73.3%).
CONCLUSIONS
Endoscopic discectomy for thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis has been shown to be a safe technique with satisfactory clinical outcomes and a high causative pathogen identification rate.
PubMed: 38901480
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.06.051 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024The primary aim of this literature review is to delineate the key inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of pulp inflammation. By elucidating the roles... (Review)
Review
The primary aim of this literature review is to delineate the key inflammatory cytokines involved in the pathophysiology of pulp inflammation. By elucidating the roles of these cytokines, a deeper comprehension of the distinct stages of inflamed pulp can be attained, thereby facilitating more accurate diagnostic strategies in endodontics. The PRISMA statement and Cochrane handbook were used for the search strategy. The keywords were created based on the review question using the PICO framework. The relevant studies were meticulously assessed according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria for this systematic review. A rigorous quality checklist was implemented to evaluate each included study, ensuring scrutiny for both quality and risk-of-bias assessments. The initial pilot search conducted on PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, and WoS databases yielded 9 pertinent articles. Within these articles, multiple cytokines were identified and discussed as potential candidates for use in endodontic diagnosis, notably including IL-8, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-2. These cytokines have been highlighted due to their significant roles in the inflammatory processes associated with pulp pathology. The identification of specific inflammatory cytokines holds promise for enhancing endodontic diagnostic procedures and exploring diverse treatment modalities. However, the current body of research in this area remains limited. Further comprehensive studies are warranted to fully elucidate the potential of cytokines in refining diagnostic techniques in endodontics.
PubMed: 38893626
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111099 -
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Jul 2024to provide a comprehensive overview of all the surgical techniques published in the literature for repairing meniscal ramp lesions focusing on the technical aspects and... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
to provide a comprehensive overview of all the surgical techniques published in the literature for repairing meniscal ramp lesions focusing on the technical aspects and the pros and cons of every procedure. Such lesions can be managed using various approaches, each of this with its specific advantages and disadvantages.
METHODS
Pubmed Central, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were systematically reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines for studies on surgical techniques for repairing meniscal ramp lesions through May 2023. Overall, 32 articles matched the selection criteria and were included in the study.
RESULTS
Debridement alone may be sufficient for small stable meniscal ramp lesions but, for tears in the menisco-capsular junction that affect the stability of the medial meniscus, it seems reasonable to repair it, even though the clinical results available in literature are contrasting. All-inside sutures through anterior portals seems to be an effective solution for meniscal ramp lesions with MTL tears. All-inside sutures through posteromedial portals are particularly useful for large meniscal ramp lesions, in which an inside-out suture can also be performed.
CONCLUSION
Meniscal ramp lesions can be managed using various approaches, each of this with its specific advantages and disadvantages. Further research is required to determine the optimal technique that can be considered as the gold standard and can provide the better results.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level III, systematic review.
PubMed: 38887657
DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.12037 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jun 2024Chronic osteomyelitis is a debilitating bone infection, characterized by a persistent infection over months to years, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Chronic osteomyelitis is a debilitating bone infection, characterized by a persistent infection over months to years, poses diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to its insidious nature and potential for severe bone and soft tissue destruction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to review the literature on the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis in long bones and assess cure rates in single versus two-stage surgery.
METHODS
Following the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021231237), this review included studies that reported on the management of chronic osteomyelitis in long bones using either a planned one-stage or two-stage surgical approach in adult patients. Databases searched included Medline, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, HMIC, and AMED, using keywords related to osteomyelitis, long bones, and surgical management. Eligibility criteria focused on adults with chronic osteomyelitis in long bones, with outcomes reported after a minimum follow-up of 12 months. The meta-analysis utilized the random-effects model to pool cure rates.
RESULTS
The analysis included 42 studies with a total of 1605 patients. The overall pooled cure rate was 91% (CI 95%) with no significant difference observed between single-stage and two-stage surgeries (X2 = 0.76, P > 0.05). Complications were reported in 26.6% of cases in single-stage procedures and 27.6% in two-stage procedures, with prolonged wound drainage noted as a common issue. Dead space management techniques varied across studies, with antibiotic-loaded calcium sulphate beads used in 30.4% of cases.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis reveals no significant difference in cure rates between single and two-stage surgical treatments for chronic osteomyelitis in long bones, supporting the efficacy of both approaches. The current treatment strategy should include a combination of debridement, dead space management using local and systematic antibiotics and soft tissue reconstruction if necessary.
Topics: Osteomyelitis; Humans; Chronic Disease; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Debridement
PubMed: 38877562
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04832-7 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024Calcaneal osteomyelitis (CO) still poses great challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to unique anatomic and functional features of the calcaneus. This study summarized...
BACKGROUND
Calcaneal osteomyelitis (CO) still poses great challenges to orthopaedic surgeons due to unique anatomic and functional features of the calcaneus. This study summarized the current data regarding clinical characteristics, treatment and efficacy of CO, based on an analysis of literature-reported cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases to find English and Chinese studies reporting on CO patients between 2000 and 2021, with available data for synthesis analysis. The quality of the included studies was evaluated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) assessment scale. Effective data were extracted and pooled for analysis.
RESULTS
Altogether 198 studies involving 1118 patients were included, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.3 (724 males and 310 females). The median age at CO diagnosis was 46 years, with a median symptom duration of 3 months. Injury-related infections (524 cases) and diabetic foot infections (336 cases) were the two most common causes, with ulcer (468 cases) and wound sinus or exudation (209 cases) being the predominant symptoms. The overall positive culture rate was 80.2%, with polymicrobial infections accounting for 18.1%. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently detected pathogen (42.7%), with fungal-related infections isolated in 17 cases. Although most patients received surgical interventions (96.9%), the recurrence rate was 20.1%. The incidence of infection relapse following partial calcanectomy, total calcanectomy, debridement with implantation of local antibiotics, and debridement with or without flap or skin coverage were 31.7%, 45.0%, 16.8%, and 15.1%, respectively. The overall incidence of limb amputation was 12.4%, with all-cause and CO-related mortalities of 2.8% and 0.2%, separately.
CONCLUSIONS
CO shared similar characteristics with extremity chronic osteomyelitis, primarily affecting young males, with trauma and diabetic foot as the leading causes and Staphylococcus aureus as the most frequently detected pathogen. Despite surgery being the primary treatment modality, clinical outcomes remained unsatisfactory, marked by high rates of infection recurrence and limb amputation.
PubMed: 38869983
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001815 -
The Journal of Oral Implantology Jun 2024Peri-implantitis is an infectious disease that causes inflammation of the tissue surrounding an implant. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to assess...
BACKGROUND
Peri-implantitis is an infectious disease that causes inflammation of the tissue surrounding an implant. The aim of this systematic review of the literature is to assess the effect of the use of lasers in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis in order to estimate its benefits compared to conventional therapies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
the review's protocol has been registered on PROSPERO international prospective register. The research strategy was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The inclusion criteria were: in vivo studies, written in English, measurements of clinical parameters, minimum follow-up at 6 months and with nonsurgical control group, studies about photodynamic therapy, randomized clinical trial, and clinical trial. Electronic (on Pubmed, Cochrane, LILACS and EPC databases) and manual searches (in articles' referencies) were conducted until July 2021. Risk of bias was assessed for each reference thanks to the Cochrane Collaboration's tool.
RESULTS
A total of 12 randomized clinical trials, with a high level of evidence, were selected and investigated in this systematic review. A table summarizes data extracted from these articles. It appears that the parameters improve favorably by using lasers, but without any significant difference.
CONCLUSION
in accordance with the analysis of studies, our results show that laser therapy with specific characteristics allows to obtain beneficial therapeutic effects on wound healing in the short and the medium-term concerning the clinical parameters in the nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Concerning its long-term usefulness, it has yet to be confirmed. However, its benefits remains limited since the results agree that the effects of the laser are similar to those obtained by using conventional therapy.
PubMed: 38867374
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-23-00028 -
Oral Diseases Jun 2024In order to enhance clinical improvement of periodontal defects, the addition of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) to open flap debridement (OFD) has been investigated.... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
In order to enhance clinical improvement of periodontal defects, the addition of enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) to open flap debridement (OFD) has been investigated. The aim of this systematic review is to figure out whether such a combination, in comparison to the treatment with OFD alone has some effects on the following outcomes: clinical attachment level gain, probing depth reduction, and gingival recessions increase.
METHODS
Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane) were searched for randomized controlled trials in humans addressing the use of a combination of OFD and EMD versus a control group with OFD alone for the treatment of periodontal defects, with a minimum of 6 months of follow-up; meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis were then performed.
RESULTS
From a total of 204 records screened by title and abstract, 13 studies were read full-text and eight out of them included in the meta-analysis. Some significant differences have been demonstrated both for clinical attachment level gain and probing depth reduction between test and control groups.
CONCLUSIONS
In the treatment of periodontal defects, the addition of EMD to OFD seems to be beneficial in terms of clinical attachment level gain, probing depth reduction, promoting periodontal regeneration. However, such results should be considered with caution because of the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis and their heterogeneity.
PubMed: 38852154
DOI: 10.1111/odi.15029 -
The Japanese Dental Science Review Dec 2024Peri-implant diseases, characterized by inflammatory conditions affecting peri-implant tissues, encompass peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant... (Review)
Review
Peri-implant diseases, characterized by inflammatory conditions affecting peri-implant tissues, encompass peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis is an inflammatory lesion limited to the mucosa around an implant, while peri-implantitis extends from the mucosa to the supporting bone, causing a loss of osseointegration. For non-surgical treatments, we tested the null hypothesis that the presence or absence of air-polishing made no difference. The study focused on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing air-polishing with mechanical or ultrasonic debridement, evaluating outcomes such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), plaque index/plaque score (PI/PS), clinical attachment level (CAL), bone loss, and mucosal recession (MR). Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and quality assessments, considering short-term (<6 months) and long-term (≥6 months) follow-up periods. After screening, ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. In nonsurgical peri-implant disease management, air-polishing moderately mitigated short-term PI/PS for peri-implant mucositis and showed a similar improvement in long-term BOP and bone loss for peri-implantitis compared to the control group. The Egger test found no evidence of publication bias except for the long-term PI/PS of peri-implant mucositis. Leave-one-out analysis confirmed the stability of the results. The findings highlight the need for future research with longer-term follow-up and high-quality, multi-center, large-sample RCTs.
PubMed: 38828461
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.05.003 -
Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) May 2024Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision,... (Review)
Review
Periprosthetic shoulder infection (PSI) remains a challenging complication after shoulder arthroplasty. Therapeutic options include one- or two-stage revision, irrigation and debridement, and resection arthroplasty. With our systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to compare one- and two-stage revisions for periprosthetic shoulder joint infections and determine the most appropriate therapeutic procedure. We performed an extensive literature search in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL and filtered out all relevant studies. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model, heterogeneity was analyzed using I, and publication bias was assessed using the Egger's test. A total of 8 studies with one-stage revisions, 36 studies with two-stage revisions, and 12 studies with both one-stage and two-stage revisions were included. According to the random-effects model, the reinfection rate for the entirety of the studies was 12.3% (95% Cl: 9.6-15.3), with a low-to-moderate heterogeneity of I = 47.72%. The reinfection rate of the one-stage revisions was 10.9%, which was significantly lower than the reinfection rate of the two-stage revisions, which was 12.93% ( = 0.0062). The one-stage revision rate was significantly lower with 1.16 vs. 2.25 revisions in the two-stage revision group ( < 0.0001). The postoperative functional outcome in one-stage-revised patients was comparable but not statistically significant ( = 0.1523). In one- and two-stage revisions, most infections were caused by . In summary, our systematic review and meta-analysis show the superiority of single-stage revision regarding reinfection and revision rates in periprosthetic shoulder joint infection.
PubMed: 38786168
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050440