-
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Apr 2024EBV is a necessary but not sufficient factor in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). EBV antibodies to the nuclear antigen (EBNA1) and viral capsid antigen... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
EBV is a necessary but not sufficient factor in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS). EBV antibodies to the nuclear antigen (EBNA1) and viral capsid antigen (VCA) rise rapidly prior to MS disease manifestations, and their absence has clinical utility with a high negative predictive value. It remains unclear whether EBV levels act as prognostic, monitoring, or pharmacodynamic/response biomarkers. Substantial literature on this topic exists but has not been systematically reviewed. We hypothesized that EBV levels against EBNA1 and VCA are potential prognostic and monitoring biomarkers in MS, and that patient population, MS clinical phenotype, and EBV assay method may play important roles in explaining variation among study outcomes.
METHODS
We systematically searched PubMed and EMBASE from inception to April 1, 2022. After removal of duplicates, records were screened by abstract. Remaining full-text articles were reviewed. Clinical and MRI data were extracted from full-text articles for comparison and synthesis.
RESULTS
Searches yielded 696 unique results; 285 were reviewed in full, and 36 met criteria for data extraction. Heterogeneity in sample population, clinical outcome measures, assay methods and statistical analyses precluded a meta-analysis. EBV levels were not consistently associated with clinical disease markers including conversion from CIS to RRMS, neurological disability, or disease phenotype. Studies using repeated-measures design suggest that EBNA1 levels may temporarily reflect inflammatory disease activity as assessed by gadolinium-enhancing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) lesions. Limited data also suggest a decrease in EBV levels following initiation of certain disease-modifying therapies.
CONCLUSION
Heterogeneous methodology limited generalization and meta-analysis. EBV antibody levels are unlikely to represent prognostic biomarkers in MS. The areas of highest ongoing promise relate to diagnostic exclusion and pharmacodynamic/disease response. Use of EBV antibodies as biomarkers in clinical practice remains additionally limited by lack of methodological precision, reliability, and validation.
Topics: Humans; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Epstein-Barr Virus Infections; Reproducibility of Results; Multiple Sclerosis; Antigens, Viral; Antibodies, Viral; Biomarkers; Capsid Proteins; Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens
PubMed: 38401201
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105410 -
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases Feb 2024Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency in arylsulfatase A (ASA) activity arising primarily from ASA...
BACKGROUND
Metachromatic leukodystrophy (MLD) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disease caused by deficiency in arylsulfatase A (ASA) activity arising primarily from ASA gene (ARSA) variants. Late-infantile, juvenile and adult clinical subtypes are defined by symptom onset at ≤ 2.5, > 2.5 to < 16 and ≥ 16 years, respectively. Epidemiological data were sought to address knowledge gaps and to inform decisions regarding the clinical development of an investigational drug.
METHODS
To synthesize all available estimates of MLD incidence and birth prevalence worldwide and in selected countries, Ovid MEDLINE and Embase were searched systematically (March 11, 2022) using a population, intervention, comparator, outcome, time and setting framework, complemented by pragmatic searching to reduce publication bias. Where possible, results were stratified by clinical subtype. Data were extracted from non-interventional studies (clinical trials, non-clinical studies and case reports were excluded; reviews were used for snowballing only).
RESULTS
Of the 31 studies included, 14 reported birth prevalence (13 countries in Asia-Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, North America and South America), one reported prevalence and none reported incidence. Birth prevalence per 100,000 live births ranged from 0.16 (Japan) to 1.85 (Portugal). In the three European studies with estimates stratified by clinical subtypes, birth prevalence was highest for late-infantile cases (0.31-1.12 per 100,000 live births). The distribution of clinical subtypes reported in cases diagnosed over various time periods in 17 studies varied substantially, but late-infantile and juvenile MLD accounted for at least two-thirds of cases in most studies.
CONCLUSIONS
This review provides a foundation for further analysis of the regional epidemiology of MLD. Data gaps indicate the need for better global coverage, increased use of epidemiological measures (e.g. prevalence estimates) and more stratification of outcomes by clinical and genetic disease subtype.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Cerebroside-Sulfatase; Europe; Leukodystrophy, Metachromatic; Lysosomal Storage Diseases; Prevalence
PubMed: 38383398
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03044-w -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Feb 2024Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP) causes progressive or relapsing weakness and numbness of the limbs, which lasts for at least two months. Uncontrolled studies have suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) could help to reduce symptoms. This is an update of a review first published in 2002 and last updated in 2013.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the efficacy and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin in people with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and two trials registers on 8 March 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that tested any dose of IVIg versus placebo, plasma exchange, or corticosteroids in people with definite or probable CIDP.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was significant improvement in disability within six weeks after the start of treatment, as determined and defined by the study authors. Our secondary outcomes were change in mean disability score within six weeks, change in muscle strength (Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score) within six weeks, change in mean disability score at 24 weeks or later, frequency of serious adverse events, and frequency of any adverse events. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for our main outcomes.
MAIN RESULTS
We included nine RCTs with 372 participants (235 male) from Europe, North America, South America, and Israel. There was low statistical heterogeneity between the trial results, and the overall risk of bias was low for all trials that contributed data to the analysis. Five trials (235 participants) compared IVIg with placebo, one trial (20 participants) compared IVIg with plasma exchange, two trials (72 participants) compared IVIg with prednisolone, and one trial (45 participants) compared IVIg with intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP). We included one new trial in this update, though it contributed no data to any meta-analyses. IVIg compared with placebo increases the probability of significant improvement in disability within six weeks of the start of treatment (risk ratio (RR) 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.72 to 3.36; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 4, 95% CI 3 to 5; 5 trials, 269 participants; high-certainty evidence). Since each trial used a different disability scale and definition of significant improvement, we were unable to evaluate the clinical relevance of the pooled effect. IVIg compared with placebo improves disability measured on the Rankin scale (0 to 6, lower is better) two to six weeks after the start of treatment (mean difference (MD) -0.26 points, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.05; 3 trials, 90 participants; high-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with placebo probably improves disability measured on the Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) scale (1 to 10, lower is better) after 24 weeks (MD 0.80 points, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.37; 1 trial, 117 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and placebo in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.36 to 1.87; 3 trials, 315 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The trial comparing IVIg with plasma exchange reported none of our main outcomes. IVIg compared with prednisolone probably has little or no effect on the probability of significant improvement in disability four weeks after the start of treatment (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.68; 1 trial, 29 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and little or no effect on change in mean disability measured on the Rankin scale (MD 0.21 points, 95% CI -0.19 to 0.61; 1 trial, 24 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). There is probably little or no difference between IVIg and prednisolone in the frequency of serious adverse events (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.04 to 4.69; 1 cross-over trial, 32 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably increases the likelihood of significant improvement in disability two weeks after starting treatment (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.40 to 5.38; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). IVIg compared with IVMP probably has little or no effect on change in disability measured on the Rankin scale two weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.24 points, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.63; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) or on change in mean disability measured with the Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale (ONLS, 1 to 12, lower is better) 24 weeks after the start of treatment (MD 0.03 points, 95% CI -0.91 to 0.97; 1 trial, 45 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The frequency of serious adverse events may be higher with IVIg compared with IVMP (RR 4.40, 95% CI 0.22 to 86.78; 1 trial, 45 participants, moderate-certainty evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Evidence from RCTs shows that IVIg improves disability for at least two to six weeks compared with placebo, with an NNTB of 4. During this period, IVIg probably has similar efficacy to oral prednisolone and IVMP. Further placebo-controlled trials are unlikely to change these conclusions. In one large trial, the benefit of IVIg compared with placebo in terms of improved disability score persisted for 24 weeks. Further research is needed to assess the long-term benefits and harms of IVIg relative to other treatments.
Topics: Male; Humans; Immunoglobulins, Intravenous; Polyradiculoneuropathy, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Methylprednisolone
PubMed: 38353301
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001797.pub4 -
Frontiers in Neurology 2024Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disease that affects almost 0.8-1.9 cases per 100,000 people worldwide every year. This is the most prevalent cause of subacute... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is a rare disease that affects almost 0.8-1.9 cases per 100,000 people worldwide every year. This is the most prevalent cause of subacute flaccid paralyzing illness today. It is a subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy; the typical scenario involves ascending symmetrical flaccid paralysis, but in some circumstances, sensory, autonomic, and cranial neuropathy may also be involved. Several vaccines have been found to have complications since the previous century. Numerous case reports of GBS in the literature have been reported following COVID-19 vaccines in recent times.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive examination of GBS cases that have been reported after COVID-19 vaccines; to analyze the descriptive statistical analysis of data gathered regarding clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological characteristics; to discuss, based on the available evidence, whether the disease has a preference for a particular vaccine type; and to speculate on the potential pathogenesis.
METHODOLOGY
This review has been carried out by recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.
RESULT
Reviewing 60 case reports illustrated that most of them are from the USA (18.1%) and the majority of affected individuals were males (60%). The results favored the association between vector-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, particularly AstraZeneca vaccine, and the GBS. The mean of symptoms onset is 11.4 days. The results of diagnostic tests such as LP are consistent mostly with albumin-cytological dissociation (81.81%), where brain and spine MRI was unremarkable in 59.52%. Regarding electrodiagnostic tests, AIDP is the most common variant (61.81%). The management was not consistent among the case reports. However, IVIG is the most frequent way of treating these patients (68.33%). The functional outcome was documented in 47 patients; 65% improved with medical management.
CONCLUSION
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of reported cases of GBS following COVID-19 vaccines and descriptive statistical analysis of collected data on clinical, laboratory, electrophysiological, and radiological features, to discuss, based on available results, whether the disease has a predilection to a specific vaccine type and to speculate the potential pathogenesis.
PubMed: 38352138
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1332364 -
Endocrine Regulations Jan 2023Hyperglycemia in diabetes mediates the release of angiogenic factors, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and inflammation, which in turn stimulate angiogenesis. Excessive...
Hyperglycemia in diabetes mediates the release of angiogenic factors, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and inflammation, which in turn stimulate angiogenesis. Excessive angiogenesis can cause diabetic retinopathy, diabetic neuropathy, and diabetic nephropathy. All of these complications are debilitating, which may lead to an increased susceptibility to lower-limb amputations due to ulcerations and infections. In addition, microvascular alterations, segmental demyelination, and endoneurial microangiopathy may cause progressive deterioration ultimately leading to kidney failure and permanent blindness. Some medicinal plants have potent anti-angiogenic, antioxidant or anti-inflammatory properties that can ameliorate angiogenesis in diabetes. The purpose of this systematic review is to demonstrate the potential of medicinal plants in ameliorating the neovascularization activities in diabetes. Manuscripts were searched from PubMed, Science Direct, and Scopus databases, and Google Scholar was used for searching additional papers. From 1862 manuscripts searched, 1854 were excluded based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and 8 were included into this systematic review, whereas the required information was extracted and summarized. All identified medicinal plants decreased the high blood glucose levels in diabetes, except the aqueous extract of Lonicerae japonicae flos (FJL) and Vasant Kusumakar Ras. They also increased the reduced body weight in diabetes, except the aqueous extract of FL and total lignans from Fructus arctii. However, methanolic extract of Tinospora cordifolia and Vasant Kusumakar Ras were not tested for their ability to affect the body weight. Besides, all medicinal plants identified in this systematic review decreased the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein expression and vasculature activity demonstrated by histopathological examination indicating promising anti-angiogenic properties. All medicinal plants identified in this systematic review have a potential to ameliorate neovascularization activities in diabetes by targeting the mechanistic pathways related to oxidative stress, inflammation, and angiogenesis.
Topics: Plants, Medicinal; Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A; Diabetic Nephropathies; Hyperglycemia; Inflammation; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38345496
DOI: 10.2478/enr-2024-0004 -
Current Pharmaceutical Design 2024Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively...
BACKGROUND
Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively regulate the interaction between a T cell receptor with its cognate antigen, presented by the major histocompatibility complex.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review on the effects of High Efficacy Disease Modifying Drugs (HEDMDs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on the co-signaling and adhesion molecules that form the immune synapse.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other sources to identify clinical or preclinical reports on the effects of HEDMDs on co-signaling and adhesion molecules that participate in the formation of immune synapses in patients with MS or other autoimmune disorders. We included reports on cladribine tablets, anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, S1P modulators, inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and natalizumab.
RESULTS
In 56 eligible reports among 7340 total publications, limited relevant evidence was uncovered. Not all co-signaling and adhesion molecules have been studied in relation to every HEDMD, with more data being available on the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (that affect CD80, CD86, GITR and TIGIT), cladribine tablets (affecting CD28, CD40, ICAM-1, LFA-1) and the S1P modulators (affecting CD86, ICAM-1 and LFA-1) and less on Natalizumab (affecting CD80, CD86, CD40, LFA-1, VLA-4) and Alemtuzumab (affecting GITR and CTLA-4).
CONCLUSION
The puzzle of HEDMD effects on the immune synapse is far from complete. The available evidence suggests that distinguishing differences exist between drugs and are worth pursuing further.
Topics: Animals; Humans; Cell Adhesion Molecules; Immunological Synapses; Multiple Sclerosis
PubMed: 38343058
DOI: 10.2174/0113816128288102240131053205 -
Nitric Oxide : Biology and Chemistry Apr 2024Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and immune-mediated disease of unknown etiology and leading to a physical and cognitive disability. Different studies suggest that... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic and immune-mediated disease of unknown etiology and leading to a physical and cognitive disability. Different studies suggest that nitrosative stress may play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis and disability in MS. Besides, reports evaluated NO and their metabolites, expressed by nitrite and nitrate (NOx) levels of MS patients compared with other pathologies, but did not evaluate disability and relapse/remission phases.
OBJECTIVE
Thus, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of NOx levels in MS patients in relapse/remission phases and its involvement in patient disability.
METHODS
The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022327161). We used GRADE to estimate the articles' quality and evaluated the publication bias using Egger's and Begg's tests.
RESULTS
Here, through a search in the Pubmed, Scopus, and EMBASE databases, 5.276 studies were found, and after the selection process, 20 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The studies included data from 1.474 MS patients and 1.717 healthy controls, 1.010 RRMS and 221 primary progressive MS (PPMS).
CONCLUSION
NOx levels are increased in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in the relapse phase. Also, NOx levels were increased in MS patients with higher disability. However, further studies are still needed to control lifestyle habits, pain, and MS treatment effects in biased NOx levels.
Topics: Humans; Multiple Sclerosis; Nitric Oxide; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Nitrates; Recurrence
PubMed: 38331311
DOI: 10.1016/j.niox.2024.01.006 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Apr 2024It is uncommon for individuals with demyelinating disease, notably multiple sclerosis (MS), to be diagnosed with intracranial gliomas. It has been debated whether or not... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
It is uncommon for individuals with demyelinating disease, notably multiple sclerosis (MS), to be diagnosed with intracranial gliomas. It has been debated whether or not the concurrence of these two disorders is accidental. Clinically, it may be challenging to diagnose someone who has MS and an intracranial tumor simultaneously. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the glioma patients following MS.
METHODS
We collected 63 studies from 1672 databases from January 1990 to February 2023, and our inclusion criteria involved peer-reviewed case reports/series studies reporting concurrent MS and glioma in patients, considering various types of gliomas.
RESULTS
We included 145 cases, 51% were women and 49 % were men, with an average age of 47.4 years. Common symptoms of glioma at admission included seizures (31.2 %), hemiparesis (15.6 %), and headache (14.3 %). 75 % of patients had primarily with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). MS treatments included interferon(IFN)-ß (44.6 %), glatiramer acetate (GA) (21.4 %), fingolimod (19.6 %), and natalizumab (19.6 %). The average time between MS and glioma diagnosis was 12.1 years, with various timeframes. Among the 59 reported cases, 45.8 % led to patient fatalities, while the remaining 54.2 % managed to survive.
CONCLUSION
This co-occurrence, though rare, suggests potential underlying shared mechanisms or vulnerabilities, possibly at a genetic or environmental level. An interdisciplinary approach, combining the expertise of neurologists, oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, is vital to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal management of affected individuals. Nonetheless, there is still a significant lack of information regarding this phenomenon, necessitating large-scale population-based studies and experimental research.
Topics: Male; Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Glatiramer Acetate; Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting; Natalizumab; Fingolimod Hydrochloride; Glioma; Multiple Sclerosis; Immunosuppressive Agents
PubMed: 38330723
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105455 -
Drug Safety Apr 2024Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) was first described among patients affected by hematological or solid tumors. Following the human immunodeficiency virus... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) was first described among patients affected by hematological or solid tumors. Following the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, people living with HIV have represented most cases for more than a decade. With the diffusion of highly active antiretroviral therapy, this group progressively decreased in favor of patients undergoing treatment with targeted therapy/immunomodulators. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the objective was to assess which drugs are most frequently related to PML development, and report the incidence of drug-induced PML through a meta-analytic approach.
METHODS
The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Web of Science and the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Database (CADTH) were searched up to May 10, 2022. Articles that reported the risk of PML development after treatment with immunomodulatory drugs, including patients of both sexes under the age of 80 years, affected by any pathology except HIV, primary immunodeficiencies or malignancies, were included in the review. The incidence of drug-induced PML was calculated based on PML cases and total number of patients observed per 100 persons and the observation time. Random-effect metanalyses were conducted for each drug reporting pooled incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and median (interquartile range [IQR]) of the observation time. Heterogeneity was measured by I statistics. Publication bias was examined through funnel plots and Egger's test.
RESULTS
A total of 103 studies were included in the systematic review. In our analysis, we found no includible study reporting cases of PML during the course of treatment with ocrelizumab, vedolizumab, abrilumab, ontamalimab, teriflunomide, daclizumab, inebilizumab, basiliximab, tacrolimus, belimumab, infliximab, firategrast, disulone, azathioprine or danazole. Dalfampridine, glatiramer acetate, dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod show a relatively safe profile, although some cases of PML have been reported. The meta-analysis showed an incidence of PML cases among patients undergoing rituximab treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) of 0.01 cases/100 persons (95% CI - 0.08 to 0.09; I = 20.4%; p = 0.25) for a median observation period of 23.5 months (IQR 22.1-42.1). Treatment of MS with natalizumab carried a PML risk of 0.33 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.29-0.37; I = 50%; p = 0.003) for a median observation period of 44.1 months (IQR 28.4-60) and a mean number of doses of 36.3 (standard deviation [SD] ± 20.7). When comparing data about patients treated with standard interval dosing (SID) and extended interval dosing (EID), the latter appears to carry a smaller risk of PML, that is, 0.08 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.0-0.15) for EID versus 0.3 cases/100 persons (95% CI 0.25-0.34) for SID.
CONCLUSIONS
A higher risk of drug-related PML in patients whose immune system is not additionally depressed by means of neoplasms, HIV or concomitant medications is found in the neurological field. This risk is higher in MS treatment, and specifically during long-term natalizumab therapy. While this drug is still routinely prescribed in this field, considering the efficacy in reducing MS relapses, in other areas it could play a smaller role, and be gradually replaced by other safer and more recently approved agents.
Topics: Male; Female; Humans; Aged, 80 and over; Natalizumab; Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal; Canada; Immunologic Factors; Multiple Sclerosis; HIV Infections
PubMed: 38321317
DOI: 10.1007/s40264-023-01383-4 -
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Mar 2024A large body of evidence has tested the effect of exercise interventions on mental health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with multiple... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
A large body of evidence has tested the effect of exercise interventions on mental health and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).
OBJECTIVE
To determine the effect of exercise interventions on mental health and HRQoL in PwMS.
METHODS
We searched four databases up to April 2023, and included randomized controlled trials that: 1) involved PwMS ≥18 years old; 2) delivered an exercise intervention; 3) measured subjective well-being, psychological well-being, social well-being, or HRQoL as outcomes. We reported standardized differences in means (d) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI), for continuous outcomes and an incidence rate ratio (IRR) with a 95 % CI for dichotomous outcomes.
RESULTS
Forty-nine studies (n = 2,057 participants) were included. Exercise improved overall well-being (d = 0.78; 95 % CI 0.483, 1.077; moderate certainty evidence), subjective well-being (d = 0.666; 95 % CI 0.405, 0.928; moderate certainty evidence), social well-being (d = 1.046; 95 % CI 0.569, 1.523; low certainty evidence), and HRQoL (d = 0.568; 95 % CI 0.396, 0.74; moderate certainty evidence).
CONCLUSION
Exercise interventions can improve well-being and HRQoL in PwMS. Future studies should focus on PwMS ≥ 65 years or with higher level of impairments.
Topics: Humans; Adolescent; Quality of Life; Mental Health; Multiple Sclerosis; Exercise
PubMed: 38320418
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2024.105473