-
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy May 2024Utilizing expanded endoscopic approaches to the maxillary sinus for the endonasal management of a variety of tumors is increasing in popularity. The nasolacrimal duct...
BACKGROUND
Utilizing expanded endoscopic approaches to the maxillary sinus for the endonasal management of a variety of tumors is increasing in popularity. The nasolacrimal duct (NLD) may be injured inadvertantly or need to be removed during tumor resection or to augment visualization. Management of the NLD can take the form of transection alone, transection with stenting, or performing a formal dacryocystorhinostomy to avoid postoperative sequelae of injury. The purpose of this study was to review the literature and determine the optimal management of the NLD during expanded maxillary sinus approaches.
METHODS
A systematic review of Ovid, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies involving expanded approaches to the maxillary sinus and that explicitly reported the status of the NLD and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS
Nineteen studies were included in the analysis and divided into two groups: NLD-preserving (n = 9 studies; n = 191 patients in aggregate) and NLD-involving (n = 10 studies; n = 296 patients in aggregate). In the NLD-preserving subgroup, one patient out of a subgroup aggregate of 191 patients (0.5%) developed epiphora. In the NLD-involving subgroup, sharp transection alone was the most common method of NLD removal and was associated with a low rate of epiphora (study rates: 0 to 18.2%; aggregated subgroup rate: 7.0%, 21 / 296). Spontaneous resolution of symptoms was common (60%-100% cases).
CONCLUSIONS
The NLD should be preserved when feasible from an exposure and tumor-control perspective. When pathology or approach requires the removal of the NLD, rates of persistent epiphora are very low, regardless of surgical technique. When expanded maxillary approaches are employed, particularly for benign tumors, and require removal of the NLD, sharp transection is the simplest method of removal, provides a low rate of postoperative epiphora, and is supported by the available literature.
PubMed: 38803159
DOI: 10.1177/19458924241249802 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024Complex urogenital malformations are clinically highly relevant; thus, they must be appropriately diagnosed and classified before initiating treatment. This study aimed... (Review)
Review
Complex urogenital malformations are clinically highly relevant; thus, they must be appropriately diagnosed and classified before initiating treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the applicability and suitability of the embryological-clinical classification of female genital malformations. A systematic review of cases of genital malformations reported in the literature from 2000 to 2020 was conducted. Case reports and series with the following combinations: "female genital tract" AND (malformation OR anomaly OR müllerian anomaly OR uterine anomaly OR cervical anomaly OR vaginal anomaly OR cloacal anomaly OR urogenital sinus); and "female genital tract" AND (renal agenesis OR ectopic ureter) were searched. A total of 3124 articles were identified, of which 824 cases of genital malformation were extracted. The characteristics of each malformation were included in a database for further analyses. : Using the embryological-clinical classification, 89.9% of the published cases and 86.5% of the 52 cases defined as unclassifiable by their authors have been classified in this review. In 73 cases (72.2%), the classification of the malformation using the AFS system was incomplete because although the type of uterine anomaly of the AFS classification matched that of the embryological-clinical classification, characteristics of the urinary system or the vagina were overlooked when using the AFS system. Following a dispersion matrix, we have been able to show that the embryological-clinical classification system is able to classify and subclassify the genitourinary malformations more accurately. The applicability of the embryological-clinical classification has been confirmed after classifying most of the cases of genital malformation previously published. This system also provides a more complete and accurate classification than other classifying systems exclusively based on Müllerian duct development or uterovaginal parameters, demonstrating its suitability.
PubMed: 38792529
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13102988 -
World Journal of Surgical Oncology May 2024Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are generally derived from the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium, accounting for 38% and 24.5% of mortality in pediatric and adult patients,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach improves endocrine function and surgical outcome in primary craniopharyngioma resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) are generally derived from the craniopharyngeal duct epithelium, accounting for 38% and 24.5% of mortality in pediatric and adult patients, respectively. At present, the widespread application of the endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EEA) has led to controversy between the traditional microscopic transcranial approach (TCA) and EEA in relation to the surgical management of CPs.
OBJECT AND METHOD
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the complications, surgical outcomes, and endocrine functions of patients with CPs to provide evidence-based decision-making in their surgical management.
RESULT
Overall, 11 observational studies with 12,212 participants were included in the meta-analysis, in which five of them only included an adult population, three of them only included a child population, and the other three studies included a mixed population (adult and child). In pediatric patients, the EEA achieved a higher gross total resection (GTR) rate (odds ratio (OR) = 5.25, 95%CI: 1.21-22.74), lower recurrence rate (OR = 0.54, 95%CI: 0.31-0.94, p = 0.030), and less hypopituitarism (OR = 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12-0.97, p = 0.043). In adult patients, EEA significantly improved mortality (OR = 0.09, 95%CI: 0.06-0.15, p < 0.001) and visual outcomes (visual improvement: OR = 3.42, 95%CI: 1.24-9.40, p = 0.017; visual deficit: OR = 0.30, 95%CI: 0.26-0.35) with decreases in postoperative stroke (OR = 0.58, 95%CI: 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001), hydrocephalus, and infections (OR = 0.32, 95%CI: 0.24-0.42, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Compared with the traditional TCA in primary CP resection, the development and wide application of EEA optimistically decreased the recurrence rate of CP, alleviated hypopituitarism with improvement in the GTR rate of pediatric patients, and significantly improved the visual outcomes, hydrocephalus, postoperative stroke, survival, and infection rates of the patients. Therefore, EEA is an optimal approach for primary CP resection.
Topics: Humans; Craniopharyngioma; Pituitary Neoplasms; Postoperative Complications; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Endoscopy
PubMed: 38790064
DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03411-8 -
Obesity Surgery Jul 2024We conducted a systematic review to examine perioperative outcomes for adults undergoing minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with and without concurrent... (Review)
Review
We conducted a systematic review to examine perioperative outcomes for adults undergoing minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) with and without concurrent cholecystectomy (CCE). We reviewed the literature using OVID MEDLINE(R), Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and medRxiv and identified studies published between 1946 and May 2023. We identified a total of 2402 studies with 11 included in the final analysis (combined 149,356 patients). Studies suggested increased operative time associated with RYGB-CCE, with mixed results regarding length of stay and rates of bile duct injury. Presently available data is not robust enough to conclude whether minimally invasive RYGB with CCE harms or benefits patients compared to RYGB alone.
Topics: Humans; Gastric Bypass; Obesity, Morbid; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Length of Stay; Treatment Outcome; Postoperative Complications; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Female; Operative Time; Adult; Male
PubMed: 38767785
DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07270-w -
Seminars in Ophthalmology May 2024Acute dacryocystitis is a common condition occurring secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We aim to assess the efficacy of primary dacryocystorhinostomy for the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Acute dacryocystitis is a common condition occurring secondary to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. We aim to assess the efficacy of primary dacryocystorhinostomy for the management of acute dacryocystitis.
METHODS
A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was performed to December 2023. Data extraction and risk of bias analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
Fourteen articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. The results demonstrated that for the treatment of acute dacryocystitis, primary dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is anatomically and functionally efficacious, with low complication rates and minimal risk of recurrence. The anatomical success rates for primary endonasal DCR (EnDCR) were 81.8-100%, 83.8-87.5% in delayed EnDCR and 66-100% in delayed external DCR (ExDCR). Functional success was generally defined as a subjective absence of epiphora, which was achieved in 86.4-92.0% of primary EnDCR, and 0-89.5% of the delayed ExDCR cohorts. Two randomized controlled trials established equivalent rates of functional success between primary versus delayed EnDCR (87.5% vs 87.5% and 91.3% vs 92.3%). Increased perioperative bleeding was recorded in 27.8% of primary EnDCR cases in 1 study. ExDCR was infrequently associated with postoperative fistula and scar formation and cicatricial punctal ectropion. The mean length of admission trended to be shorter when the procedure was performed closer to the acute presentation. The admission time for all primary EnDCR cases varied between 1 and 7 days.
CONCLUSION
Primary dacryocystorhinostomy is an efficacious and safe management option for acute dacryocystitis. Further analyses of health-economics are required.
PubMed: 38752365
DOI: 10.1080/08820538.2024.2344714 -
Cancers Apr 2024Clinical guidelines include monitoring blood test abnormalities to identify patients at increased risk of undiagnosed cancer. Noting blood test changes over time may... (Review)
Review
Clinical guidelines include monitoring blood test abnormalities to identify patients at increased risk of undiagnosed cancer. Noting blood test changes over time may improve cancer risk stratification by considering a patient's individual baseline and important changes within the normal range. We aimed to review the published literature to understand the association between blood test trends and undiagnosed cancer. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched until 15 May 2023 for studies assessing the association between blood test trends and undiagnosed cancer. We used descriptive summaries and narratively synthesised studies. We included 29 articles. Common blood tests were haemoglobin (24%, n = 7), C-reactive protein (17%, n = 5), and fasting blood glucose (17%, n = 5), and common cancers were pancreatic (29%, n = 8) and colorectal (17%, n = 5). Of the 30 blood tests studied, an increasing trend in eight (27%) was associated with eight cancer types, and a decreasing trend in 17 (57%) with 10 cancer types. No association was reported between trends in 11 (37%) tests and breast, bile duct, glioma, haematological combined, liver, prostate, or thyroid cancers. Our review highlights trends in blood tests that could facilitate the identification of individuals at increased risk of undiagnosed cancer. For most possible combinations of tests and cancers, there was limited or no evidence.
PubMed: 38730644
DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091692 -
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Jun 2024Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a pediatric disorder with a wide range of pathology. If untreated, the condition may end up with serious... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
OBJECTIVE
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) is a pediatric disorder with a wide range of pathology. If untreated, the condition may end up with serious complications. Multiple treatment options for CNLDO exist throughout the literature, and there is an ongoing debate on the best intervention for each disease subgroup and the best timing of such interventions. This study compares the success and failure rates of silicone tube intubation (STI) against probing and balloon dilation (BD).
METHODS
The authors searched the literature for relevant articles using PubMed, Scopus, web of Science, and Cochrane Library until January 2024. Using RevMan 5.4, the authors compared STI's success and failure rates to probing and BD using risk ratios (RRs) and a random-effect model. In addition, the complication rate of monocanalicular intubation (MCI) versus bicanalicular intubation (BCI) was investigated. The authors used the leave-one-out method to check for influential studies and to resolve heterogeneity.
RESULTS
The screening process resulted in 23 eligible articles for inclusion in the authors' review. Silicone tube intubation had a higher chance of resolving the symptoms of CNLDO than probing (RR = 1.11; 95% CI: 1.04, 1.20; P = 0.004) while having less risk of surgical failure (RR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.30, 0.76; P = 0.002]. Monocanalicular intubation showed no statistically significant difference when compared with BCI in terms of surgical success and failure; however, MCI had a lower risk of complications (RR = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.97; P = 0.04). In addition, STI did not demonstrate any significant difference from BD.
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference in success/failure between MCI and BCI; monocanalicular had fewer complications. Silicone tube intubation did better in terms of surgical success than probing, especially in children over 12 months, suggesting that it is the preferred intervention for older patients with CNLDO.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Dilatation; Intubation; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction; Nasolacrimal Duct; Silicones; Treatment Outcome; Child, Preschool
PubMed: 38727216
DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010273 -
European Journal of Radiology Jul 2024This study aimed to characterise the normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations, through a systematic review and meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This study aimed to characterise the normal morphometry of the biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.
METHODS
This study, conducted using the PRISMA guidelines and registered with PROSPERO, searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Web of Science databases up to October 2022, and updated to August 2023. Studies that reported extractable data on diameter and length of the right, left and common hepatic ducts (LHD, RHD and CHD), and common bile duct (CBD) were included. Quality of the included studies were assessed using the Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA) tool. Statistical analysis included subgroup analyses according to sex, age, geographical location, and imaging modality.
RESULTS
In total, 60 studies were included, of which 44 studies reported adequate data for meta-analysis on 23,796 subjects. Overall, the pooled mean diameter of the CBD was 4.69 mm (95 % CI: 4.28-5.11). Significant differences were found between pediatric (1.32 mm, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.61) and adult (4.97 mm, 95 % CI: 4.67-5.27) subjects, as well as US (3.82 mm, 95 % CI: 3.15-4.49) and other imaging modalities, including MRI (6.21 mm, 95 % CI: 4.85-7.57) and ERCP (7.24 mm, 95 % CI: 6.08-8.40). The CBD diameter measured significantly larger distally (5.20 mm, 95 % CI: 4.60-5.80) than proximally (4.01 mm, 95 % CI: 3.51-4.51).
CONCLUSIONS
The results obtained from this evidence-based study may guide the establishment of standardised reference values and ranges of the normal biliary tree in pediatric and adult populations and aid clinical understanding.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Child; Biliary Tract; Reference Values
PubMed: 38718450
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111472 -
Journal of Robotic Surgery May 2024To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted resection and open surgery for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of robot-assisted resection and open surgery for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase databases for studies comparing treatment for CCA, covering the period from database inception to January 30, 2024. Two researchers will independently screen literature and extract data, followed by meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 software. A total of 5 articles with 513 patients were finally included. Among them, 231 in the robotic group, and 282 in the open group. The Meta-analysis revealed that the robotic group had a significant advantage in terms of intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 101.44, 95% CI - 135.73 to - 67.15, P < 0.05), lymph node harvest(MD = 1.03, 95% CI 0.30- 1.76, P < 0.05) and length of hospital stay(MD = - 1.92, 95% CI - 2.87 to- 0.97, P < 0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of transfusion rate (OR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.31-1.23, P > 0.05), R0 resection (OR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.89- 2.50, P > 0.05), 30-day mortality (OR = 1.68, 95% CI 0.43-6.65, P > 0.05) and complications (OR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.30- 1.95, P > 0.05). Robotic-assisted radical resection for CCA is feasible and safe, and its long-term efficacy and oncological outcomes need to be confirmed by further studies.
Topics: Humans; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Transfusion; Cholangiocarcinoma; Length of Stay; Postoperative Complications; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38713337
DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01966-y -
Digestive Diseases and Sciences May 2024Therapeutic endoscopy and gastroenterology fellows often participate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during their training period. However, it...
BACKGROUND
Therapeutic endoscopy and gastroenterology fellows often participate in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during their training period. However, it is generally feared that trainee involvement may increase ERCP-related complications, mainly because of the side-viewing nature of the endoscope and the higher risk of pancreatic duct cannulation. There is no concrete evidence to support this notion. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the resultsof trainee participation on adverse events related to ERCP.
METHODS
PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to 31 May 2023 for studies evaluating the ERCP outcomes defined as success rates, procedure time, failed attempts, and adverse events with and without trainee participation. A random effect model was used to perform the meta-analysis, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistics.
RESULTS
Seven studies were included in the final analysis, including 17,088 ERCPs. The pooled odds ratio (pOR) of success rate, incomplete/failed attempts in the trainee and no trainee groups were 0.466 (95% CI 0.13 to 1.66, I = 97.8%, p = 0.239) and 3.2 (95% CI 0.70 to 14.55), I = 98.5%, p = 0.134), respectively. The pOR of post-ERCP pancreatitis and bleeding in the trainee vs. no trainee groups was 0.97 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.23, I = 0%, p = 0.78) and 1.3 (95% CI 0.59 to 2.83, I = 49%, p = 0.54). The pOR of all adverse events in both groups was 1.028 (95% CI 0.917 to 1.152, I = 0%, p = 0.636). Surprisingly, the pooled std mean difference for the procedure time was 0.217 (95% - 0.093 to 0.05, I = 98.5%, p = 0.17).
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis comprising of 17,088 ERCPs in seven studies demonstrated comparable ERCP outcomes related to trainee participation regarding success rates, procedure time, and adverse events. Trainees' involvement in ERCP within a proper teaching setting appears safe and does not compromise the overall procedure's success.
PubMed: 38713275
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08452-3