-
HPB : the Official Journal of the... Jul 2016Hepatic-artery and para-aortic lymph node metastases (LNM) may be detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic (PDAC) or periampullary cancer. Some surgeons will... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hepatic-artery and para-aortic lymph node metastases (LNM) may be detected during surgical exploration for pancreatic (PDAC) or periampullary cancer. Some surgeons will continue the resection while others abort the exploration.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library for studies investigating survival in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery or para-aortic LNM. Survival was stratified for node positive (N1) disease.
RESULTS
After screening 3088 studies, 13 studies with 2045 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy were included. No study reported survival data after detection of LNM and aborted surgical exploration. In 110 patients with hepatic-artery LNM, median survival ranged between 7 and 17 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 84 patients with hepatic-artery LNM was 15 [95%CI 12-18] months (13 months in PDAC), compared to 19 [16-22] months in 270 patients with N1-disease without hepatic-artery LNM (p = 0.020). In 192 patients with para-aortic LNM, median survival ranged between 5 and 32 months. Estimated pooled mean survival in 169 patients with para-aortic LNM was 13 [8-17] months (11 months in PDAC), compared to 17 (6-27) months in 506 patients with N1-disease without para-aortic LNM (p < 0.001). Data on the impact of (neo)adjuvant therapy on survival were lacking.
CONCLUSION
Survival after pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with intra-operatively detected hepatic-artery and especially para-aortic LNM is inferior to patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy with other N1 disease. It remains unclear what the consequence of this should be since data on (neo-)adjuvant therapy and survival after aborted exploration are lacking.
Topics: Ampulla of Vater; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms; Hepatic Artery; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lymph Node Excision; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27346135
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.05.001 -
European Journal of Gastroenterology &... Feb 2016The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic role of extranodal extension (ENE) of lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) and papilla... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The aim of the study was to investigate the prognostic role of extranodal extension (ENE) of lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas (PDAC) and papilla [cancer of the papilla of Vater (CPV)]. A PubMed and SCOPUS search from database inception until 5 January 2015 without language restrictions was conducted. Eligible were prospective studies reporting data on prognostic parameters in individuals with PDAC and/or CPV, comparing participants with the presence of ENE (ENE+) with those with intranodal extension (ENE-). Data were summarized using risk ratios for number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios for time-dependent risk related to ENE+, adjusted for potential confounders. ENE was found to be very common in these tumors (up to about 60% in both N1-PDAC and CPV), leading to a significant increased risk for all-cause mortality [risk ratio=1.20; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.35, P=0.003, I(2)=44%; hazard ratio=1.415, 95% CI: 1.215-1.650, P<0.0001, I(2)=0%] and recurrence of disease (risk ratio=1.20, 95% CI: 1.03-1.40, P=0.02, I(2)=0%). On the basis of our results, in PDAC and CPV, ENE should be considered mandatorily from the gross sampling and pathology report to the oncologic staging and therapeutic approach.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Ampulla of Vater; Common Bile Duct Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Lymph Nodes; Lymphatic Metastasis; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Odds Ratio; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 26566063
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000520