-
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jul 2024Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative disorder of the synovial joints and is usually an age-related disease that occurs due to continuous wear and tear of the... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common degenerative disorder of the synovial joints and is usually an age-related disease that occurs due to continuous wear and tear of the cartilage in the joints. Presently, there is no proven medical management to halt the progression of the disease in the early stages. The purpose of our systematic review is to analyze the possible metabolites and metabolic pathways that are specifically involved in OA pathogenesis and early treatment of the disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The articles were collected from PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, Embase, and Scopus databases. "Knee", "Osteoarthritis", "Proteomics", "Lipidomics", "Metabolomics", "Metabolic Methods", and metabolic* were employed for finding the articles. Only original articles with human or animal OA models with healthy controls were included.
RESULTS
From the initial screening, a total of 458 articles were identified from the 5 research databases. From these, 297 articles were selected in the end for screening, of which 53 papers were selected for full-text screening. Finally, 50 articles were taken for the review based on body fluid: 6 urine studies, 15 plasma studies, 16 synovial fluid studies, 11 serum studies, 4 joint tissue studies, and 1 fecal study. Many metabolites were found to be elevated in OA. Some of these metabolites can be used to stage the OA Three pathways that were found to be commonly involved are the TCA cycle, the glycolytic pathway, and the lipid metabolism.
CONCLUSION
All these studies showed a vast array of metabolites and metabolic pathways associated with OA. Metabolites like lysophospholipids, phospholipids, arginine, BCCA, and histidine were identified as potential biomarkers of OA but a definite association was not identified, Three pathways (glycolytic pathway, TCA cycle, and lipid metabolic pathways) have been found as highly significant in OA pathogenesis. These metabolic pathways could provide novel therapeutic targets for the prevention and progression of the disease.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01169-5.
PubMed: 38948380
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01169-5 -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jul 2024The knee is the most commonly affected joint in osteoarthritis (OA), affecting millions of people worldwide. Knee OA significantly impacts the activities of daily living... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
The knee is the most commonly affected joint in osteoarthritis (OA), affecting millions of people worldwide. Knee OA significantly impacts the activities of daily living (ADL) along with affecting overall quality of life of patients (QoL), thereby leading to substantial socio-economic burden. Conservative therapies are prioritized, resorting to surgery only when needed. However, these traditional approaches have limitations. Regenerative medicine, involving the use of orthobiologics, including autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics such as growth factor concentrate (GFC), has evolved and shown potential for managing knee OA. The primary goal of this review is to summarize the results of in vitro, preclinical and clinical studies involving GFC for the management of knee OA.
METHODS
Multiple databases (PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, Web of Science and Embase) were searched applying terms for the intervention 'GFC' and treatment 'knee OA' for the studies published in the English language to March 10, 2024.
RESULTS
Only three clinical studies met our pre-defined criteria and were included in this review.
CONCLUSION
Intra-articular administration of GFC is safe and potentially efficacious to manage OA of the knee. More, adequately powered, multi-center, prospective, RCTs are warranted to demonstrate the long-term effectiveness of GFC in patients suffering from mild-to-moderate knee OA and to justify its routine clinical use. Further studies evaluating the efficacy of GFC compared to other orthobiologics are also required to allow physicians/surgeons to choose the optimal orthobiologic for the treatment of OA of the knee.
PubMed: 38948375
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01172-w -
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Jul 2024Meniscal injuries frequently require surgical intervention to restore knee joint function and stability. Intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has emerged... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Meniscal injuries frequently require surgical intervention to restore knee joint function and stability. Intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has emerged as a potential adjunctive therapy to enhance tissue healing post-meniscal repair. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of PRP in terms of pain relief, functional recovery, and overall success rates in patients undergoing meniscal repair procedures
METHODS
A comprehensive search strategy was employed to identify relevant studies across Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases. The inclusion criteria encompassed human studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohorts, and case-control studies, focusing on intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) use post-meniscal repair and reporting outcomes related to pain, functionality, and cure rates. Exclusion criteria comprised animal studies, non-English publications, studies lacking relevant outcome measures, and those with insufficient data. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, resolving disagreements through consensus or consultation with a third reviewer, followed by a full-text assessment for potentially eligible studies. Data extraction was conducted independently by two reviewers using a standardized form. The reliability of observational studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Subgroup analyses and pooled effect estimates for main outcomes were computed using RevMan 5.3, a meta-analysis tool.
RESULTS
The demographic analysis revealed that the PRP group had an average age of 41.39 years, while the control group had an average age of 42.1 years. In terms of gender distribution, the PRP group consisted of 61 men and 29 women, while the control group had 62 men and 34 women. Pain ratings showed a preference for PRP with a mean difference of 4.83 ( = 0.13). However, there was no significant difference in Lysholm scores (mean difference: - 0.44, p = 0.91) or IKDC scores (mean difference: 2.80, = 0.14) between the PRP and control groups. Similarly, ROM measures did not show a statistically significant difference, with a mean difference of 2.80 ( = 0.18). Additionally, there was no significant distinction in failure rates between the PRP and control groups, as indicated by a weighted mean difference of 0.71 ( = 0.52). These findings suggest that while PRP may offer some benefits in pain relief, its impact on functional recovery, range of motion, and failure rates following meniscal repair procedures is inconclusive.
CONCLUSION
The current evidence regarding the effect of intraoperative platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on patients undergoing meniscal repair remains inconclusive. While some studies suggest potential benefits in terms of pain relief and functional recovery, others show no significant differences compared to control groups. The impact of PRP therapy on overall success rates, including rates of re-tear and revision surgery, is also uncertain. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes are needed to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice in orthopedic surgery.
PubMed: 38948373
DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01155-x -
PeerJ 2024The methods previously proposed in the literature to assess patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, based on special orthopedic tests to precisely identify the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The methods previously proposed in the literature to assess patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain, based on special orthopedic tests to precisely identify the structure causing the shoulder symptoms have been recently challenged. This opens the possibility of a different way of physical examination.
OBJECTIVE
To analyze the differences in shoulder range of motion, strength and thoracic kyphosis between rotator cuff related shoulder pain patients and an asymptomatic group.
METHOD
The protocol of the present research was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) (registration number CRD42021258924). Database search of observational studies was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, WOS and CINHAL until July 2023, which assessed shoulder or neck neuro-musculoskeletal non-invasive physical examination compared to an asymptomatic group. Two investigators assessed eligibility and study quality. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the methodology quality.
RESULTS
Eight studies ( = 604) were selected for the quantitative analysis. Meta-analysis showed statistical differences with large effect for shoulder flexion (I2 = 91.7%, < 0.01, HG = -1.30), external rotation (I2 = 83.2%, < 0.01, HG = -1.16) and internal rotation range of motion (I2 = 0%, < 0.01, HG = -1.32). Regarding to shoulder strength; only internal rotation strength showed statistical differences with small effect (I2 = 42.8%, < 0.05, HG = -0.3).
CONCLUSIONS
There is moderate to strong evidence that patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain present less shoulder flexion, internal and external rotation range of motion and less internal rotation strength than asymptomatic individuals.
Topics: Humans; Range of Motion, Articular; Shoulder Pain; Rotator Cuff; Muscle Strength; Rotator Cuff Injuries; Shoulder Joint; Kyphosis
PubMed: 38948223
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17604 -
World Journal of Orthopedics Jun 2024Cheilectomy of the 1 metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus. However, there is no consensus regarding...
BACKGROUND
Cheilectomy of the 1 metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is one of the most common procedures for the management of hallux rigidus. However, there is no consensus regarding outcomes following minimally invasive dorsal cheilectomy (MIDC) for the management of hallux rigidus.
AIM
To evaluate outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.
METHODS
During November 2023, the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies examining outcomes following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. In total, 348 patients (370 feet) underwent MIDC for hallux rigidus at a weighted mean follow-up of 37.9 ± 16.5 months. The distribution of patients by Coughlin and Shurna's classification was recorded in 4 studies as follows: I (58 patients, 27.1%), II (112 patients, 52.3%), III (44 patients, 20.6%). Three studies performed an additional 1 MTPJ arthroscopy and debridement following MIDC. Retained intra-articular bone debris was observed in 100% of patients in 1 study. The weighted mean American orthopedic foot and ankle society score improved from a preoperative score of 68.9 ± 3.2 to a postoperative score of 87.1. The complication rate was 8.4%, the most common of which was persistent joint pain and stiffness. Thirty-two failures (8.7%) were observed. Thirty-three secondary procedures (8.9%) were performed at a weighted mean time of 8.6 ± 3.2 months following the index procedure.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review demonstrated improvements in subjective clinical outcomes together with a moderate complication rate following MIDC for the management of hallux rigidus at short-term follow-up. A moderate re-operation rate at short-term follow-up was recorded. The marked heterogeneity between included studies and paucity of high quality comparative studies limits the generation of any robust conclusions.
PubMed: 38947256
DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i6.585 -
Orthopedic Reviews 2024Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) on Full Limb Radiographs (FLRs) is the gold standard for coronal knee alignment assessment. Despite the widespread utilization of the more...
Femorotibial angle on short knee radiographs fails to accurately predict the lower limb mechanical alignment. A systematic review and meta-analysis on different femorotibial angle definitions and short knee radiograph types.
INTRODUCTION
Hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) on Full Limb Radiographs (FLRs) is the gold standard for coronal knee alignment assessment. Despite the widespread utilization of the more convenient femorotibial angle (FTA) on either antero-posterior (AP) or postero-anterior (PA) short knee radiographs (SKRs), its definition and correlation with HKA remains controversial. This review is the first to systematically investigate FTA-HKA correlation and the effect of different FTA methods and SKRs.
METHODS
Systematic literature search (Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane Library) followed PRISMA guidelines, to evaluate studies examining the FTA-HKA correlation. Meta-analyses compared the 3 most common FTA methods, knee center determination method and SKR types.
RESULTS
17 studies (2597 patients, 3234 knees) were included. The strongest correlation with HKA (r = 0.78) was found for FTA Method 1 (angle formed by lines drawn from the midpoint of tibial spines to points 10 cm above and below the joint line). No significant differences were observed when grouping the FTA methods by knee center assessment (Group I, r = 0.78; Group II, r = 0.77). AP SKRs showed a trend towards stronger FTA-HKA correlation compared to PA SKRs, in both Method 1 (r = 0.79 vs 0.75) and Method 3 (r = 0.80 vs 0.66).
CONCLUSION
Irrespective of its definition or type of SKR used, FTA lacks reliable accuracy in predicting the HKA in most knees. FLRs should be used whenever precise estimation of the patient's alignment is necessary. Caution is warranted in interpreting studies investigating knee alignment or knee arthroplasty outcomes based on FTA.
PubMed: 38947178
DOI: 10.52965/001c.120053 -
Cureus Jun 2024Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disease affecting the skin, nails, and/or joints. It is associated with systemic inflammation and may also be linked to an... (Review)
Review
Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disease affecting the skin, nails, and/or joints. It is associated with systemic inflammation and may also be linked to an increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The objectives of this study were to determine the overall risk of ASCVD in patients with psoriasis and to evaluate the risk according to ASCVD type and the severity of psoriasis. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies reporting the association between psoriasis and one or more of the clinical types of ASCVD. We searched Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) via PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Scopus, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), and Google Scholar for relevant studies in the English language from the beginning of their records to July 2023. Study selection and data extraction were conducted by four independent reviewers. A total of 21 observational studies (three cross-sectional, one case-control, and 17 cohort) were included in this review, representing a total of 778,049 patients with psoriasis and 16,881,765 control subjects without psoriasis. The included studies had varying degrees of covariate adjustment, and thus, their findings may have been subject to residual confounding. All the meta-analyses used the adjusted effect sizes and were based on the random-effects model. However, the cohort studies were analysed separately from the non-cohort studies (the case-control and cross-sectional studies). There was a significant association between psoriasis and ASCVD (cohort studies: hazard ratio (HR), 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.14 to 1.28; I = 63%; p < 0.001; non-cohort studies: odds ratio (OR), 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.92; I = 31%; p = 0.23). Psoriasis was also significantly associated with myocardial infarction (cohort studies: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.31; I = 60%; p < 0.001; non-cohort studies: OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.15 to 2.15; I = 74%; p = 0.05), coronary artery disease (cohort studies: HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.28; I = 67%; p < 0.001; non-cohort studies: OR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.34 to 1.92; I = 31%; p = 0.23), aortic aneurysm (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.02; I = 67%; p = 0.08) but not with ischaemic stroke (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.36; I = 44%; p = 0.17). Pooled analysis in terms of the severity of psoriasis showed that both mild (cohort studies: HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.26; I = 74%; p < 0.001; non-cohort studies: OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.90; I = 0%; p = 0.50) and severe (cohort studies: HR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.65; I = 65%; p < 0.001; non-cohort studies: OR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.12; I = 25%; p = 0.26) psoriasis were significantly associated with ASCVD. Psoriasis (including mild and severe disease) is associated with an increased risk of ASCVD, including coronary artery disease (CAD) and aortic aneurysm (AA). ASCVD risk assessment and prevention should be prioritised in all adult psoriasis patients. Future observational studies investigating the association between psoriasis and ASCVD should conduct a more comprehensive adjustment of covariates.
PubMed: 38947134
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63379 -
The Bone & Joint Journal Jul 2024Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
AIMS
Proximal humeral fractures are the third most common fracture among the elderly. Complications associated with fixation include screw perforation, varus collapse, and avascular necrosis of the humeral head. To address these challenges, various augmentation techniques to increase medial column support have been developed. There are currently no recent studies that definitively establish the superiority of augmented fixation over non-augmented implants in the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or bone-graft augmentation versus those who underwent locking-plate fixation without augmentation for proximal humeral fractures.
METHODS
The search was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Articles involving patients with complex proximal humeral fractures treated using open reduction with locking-plate fixation, with or without augmentation, were considered. A meta-analysis of comparative studies comparing locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation or with bone-graft augmentation versus locking-plate fixation without augmentation was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 19 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and six comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, 120 patients received locking-plate fixation with bone-graft augmentation, 179 patients received locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation, and 336 patients received locking-plate fixation without augmentation. No statistically relevant differences between the augmented and non-augmented cohorts were found in terms of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score and Constant-Murley Score. The cement-augmented group had a significantly lower rate of complications compared to the non-augmented group.
CONCLUSION
While locking-plate fixation with cement augmentation appears to produce a lower complication rate compared to locking-plate fixation alone, functional outcomes seem comparable between augmented and non-augmented techniques.
Topics: Humans; Bone Plates; Shoulder Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Bone Cements; Bone Transplantation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38945543
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.106B7.BJJ-2023-1113.R1 -
The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery :... Jun 2024Ankle arthrodesis is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage arthritis or severe ankle joint deformity. Both internal (IF) and external fixation (EF) techniques... (Review)
Review
Ankle arthrodesis is an effective surgical intervention for end-stage arthritis or severe ankle joint deformity. Both internal (IF) and external fixation (EF) techniques are valid options, but there is controversy regarding the most effective technique. This study compares the safety and efficacy of EF and IF fixation techniques for ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. A literature search of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), was performed to identify all studies directly comparing the two techniques. Both fixed and random effects models of analysis were used depending on heterogeneity. Odds of union in the EF and IF groups were comparable (OR=0.60, CI 0.36-1.02, p=0.06) however, EF was associated with greater odds of deep hardware infections (OR=3.67, 1.97-6.83, p <0.05) and amputations (OR=3.17, CI 1.06-9.54, p =0.04). Odds of revision surgery and superficial wound complications were similar between groups. EF techniques had significantly longer operation times (MD=31.23, CI-25.11-37.34, p <0.05) and intraoperative blood loss (MD=46.31, CI-24.93-67.69, p <0.05). No significant difference was noted in pain and functionality scores. IF and EF techniques have reasonable union rates with similar postoperative outcomes. However, IF patients are more likely to achieve primary union and less likely to have deep infections, being mindful that EF techniques were usually indicated for more complex cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
PubMed: 38944233
DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2024.05.010 -
Journal of Evidence-based Medicine Jun 2024The effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and all-cause mortality remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Impact of hormone replacement therapy on all-cause and cancer-specific mortality in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and dose‒response meta-analysis of observational studies.
OBJECTIVE
The effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality and all-cause mortality remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to determine the effects of HRT on CRC mortality and all-cause mortality.
METHODS
We searched the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for all relevant studies published until January 2024 to investigate the effects of HRT exposure on survival rates for patients with CRC. Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated the risk of bias between the studies using the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale. We performed a two-stage random-effects dose-response meta-analysis to examine a possible nonlinear relationship between the year of HRT use and CRC mortality.
RESULTS
Ten cohort studies with 480,628 individuals were included. HRT was inversely associated with the risk of CRC mortality (hazard ratios (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI (0.68, 0.87), I = 69.5%, p < 0.05). The pooled results of seven cohort studies revealed a significant association between HRT and the risk of all-cause mortality (HR = 0.71, 95% CI (0.54, 0.92), I = 89.6%, p < 0.05). A linear dose-response analysis (p for nonlinearity = 0.34) showed a 3% decrease in the risk of CRC for each additional year of HRT use; this decrease was significant (HR = 0.97, 95% CI (0.94, 0.99), p < 0.05). An additional linear (p for nonlinearity = 0.88) dose-response analysis showed a nonsignificant decrease in the risk of all-cause mortality for each additional year of HRT use.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that the use of HRT is inversely associated with all-cause and colorectal cancer mortality, thus causing a significant decrease in mortality rates over time. More studies are warranted to confirm this association.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Observational Studies as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Cause of Death
PubMed: 38943605
DOI: 10.1111/jebm.12622