-
JAMA Ophthalmology Dec 2022Dry eye is a common clinical manifestation, a leading cause of eye clinic visits, and a significant societal and personal economic burden in the United States. Meibomian... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Dry eye is a common clinical manifestation, a leading cause of eye clinic visits, and a significant societal and personal economic burden in the United States. Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is a major cause of evaporative dry eye.
OBJECTIVE
To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to obtain updated estimates of the prevalence and incidence of dry eye and MGD in the United States.
DATA SOURCES
Ovid MEDLINE and Embase.
STUDY SELECTION
A search conducted on August 16, 2021, identified studies published between January 1, 2010, and August 16, 2021, with no restrictions regarding participant age or language of publication. Case reports, case series, case-control studies, and interventional studies were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
The conduct of review followed a protocol registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021256934). PRISMA guidelines were followed for reporting. Joanna Briggs Institute and Newcastle Ottawa Scale tools were used to assess risk of bias. Data extraction was conducted by 1 reviewer and verified by another for accuracy. Prevalence of dry eye and MGD were combined in separate meta-analyses using random-effects models.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Prevalence and incidence of dry eye and MGD in the United States. Summary estimates from meta-analysis of dry eye and MGD prevalence with 95% CI and 95% prediction intervals (95% PI).
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included in the systematic review. Dry eye prevalence was reported by 10 studies, dry eye incidence by 2 studies, and MGD prevalence by 3 studies. Meta-analysis estimated a dry eye prevalence of 8.1% (95% CI, 4.9%-13.1%; 95% PI, 0%-98.9%; 3 studies; 9 808 758 participants) and MGD prevalence of 21.2% (95% CI, 7.2%-48.3%; 95% PI, 0%-100%; 3 studies; 19 648 participants). Dry eye incidence was 3.5% in a population 18 years and older and 7.8% in a population aged 68 years and older. No studies reported MGD incidence.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated uncertainty about the prevalence and incidence of dry eye and MGD in the United States. Population-based epidemiological studies that use consistent and validated definitions of dry eye and MGD are needed for higher-certainty estimates of dry eye and MGD prevalence and incidence in the United States.
Topics: Humans; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Incidence; Prevalence; Dry Eye Syndromes; Case-Control Studies; Meibomian Glands
PubMed: 36301551
DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.4394 -
Eye & Contact Lens Oct 2022This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in patients harboring dry eye disease caused by meibomian gland dysfunction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to systematically evaluate the effect of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in patients harboring dry eye disease caused by meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) based on qualified studies.
METHODS
The electronic databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase, were searched using keywords to identify available publications updated to November 2021. Relative risk or weighted mean difference combined with 95% confidence interval was used to synthesize the outcomes of included studies. The meta-analysis included 15 randomized controlled trials with 1,142 patients (2,284 eyes).
RESULTS
The results revealed that IPL could significantly decrease the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), standard patient evaluation of eye dryness (SPEED), artificial tear usage, tear film lipid layer, meibomian gland quality (MGQ), meibomian gland expression (MGX), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) while increase tear break-up time (TBUT) and noninvasive tear break-up time (NIBUT) compared with sham. Compared with MGX, IPL+MGX markedly decreased the SPEED, CFS, and tear meniscus height (TMH), but with increased TBUT. Compared with MGX, IPL showed significant effect in increasing the OSDI and TBUT, but decreasing the TMH and NIBUT. However, no significant differences were seen between IP+MGX and MGX in OSDI, MGQ, and MGX, nor between IPL and MGX in OSDI, SPEED, and TBUT.
CONCLUSION
We identified that the application of IPL alone or IPL combined with MGX elicited superior clinical effect for improving the eye function and symptoms in the treatment of MGD-related dry eye disease, which is considered available for wide clinical application.
Topics: Dry Eye Syndromes; Fluorescein; Humans; Intense Pulsed Light Therapy; Lipids; Lubricant Eye Drops; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Meibomian Glands; Tears
PubMed: 36044829
DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000934 -
The Ocular Surface Jul 2022Dry eye disease (DED) is a common age-related ocular surface disease. However, it is unknown how aging influences the ocular surface microenvironment. This systematic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
Dry eye disease (DED) is a common age-related ocular surface disease. However, it is unknown how aging influences the ocular surface microenvironment. This systematic review aims to investigate how the aging process changes the ocular surface microenvironment and impacts the development of DED.
METHODS
An article search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. 44 studies reporting on age-related ocular changes and 14 large epidemiological studies involving the prevalence of DED were identified. 8 out of 14 epidemiological studies were further analyzed with meta-analysis. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed. Study-specific estimates (impact of aging on the prevalence of DED) were combined using one-group meta-analysis in a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Meta-analysis revealed the prevalence of DED in the elderly aged 60 years old or older was 5519 of 60107 (9.2%) and the odds ratio of aging compared to younger age was 1.313 (95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.107, 1.557). With increasing age, the integrity of the ocular surface and tear film stability decreased. Various inflammatory cells, including senescent-associated T-cells, infiltrated the ocular surface epithelium, lacrimal gland, and meibomian gland, accompanied by senescence-related changes, including accumulation of 8-OHdG and lipofuscin-like inclusions, increased expression of p53 and apoptosis-related genes, and decreased Ki67 positive cells.
CONCLUSIONS
The aging process greatly impacts the ocular surface microenvironment, consequently leading to DED.
Topics: Aged; Aging; Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Lacrimal Apparatus; Meibomian Glands; Middle Aged; Tears
PubMed: 35753664
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2022.06.004 -
Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology Jun 2022To examine the effects of systemic isotretinoin treatment on the eye using several ocular examination parameters. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To examine the effects of systemic isotretinoin treatment on the eye using several ocular examination parameters.
METHODS
We conducted a systemic review for literature published up to June 2021 in both PubMed and Web of Science databases. We included prospective observational or interventional studies evaluating ocular manifestations of isotretinoin in acne patients. The primary outcome measures were anaesthetized and non-anaesthetized Schirmer test, tear break-up time (TBUT), central corneal thickness (CCT), average retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IP) thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness, axial length, ocular surface disease index (OSDI), meibomian gland expression (MGE) and conjunctival stain. The National Institute of Health (NIH) quality assessment tools were used to assess the data quality. The effect size used to analyse the included studies was the weighted mean difference (WMD) and its related confidence intervals (95%CIs).
RESULTS
Twenty-one publications involving 1105 eyes of 842 participants met the inclusion criteria. Isotretinoin use was significantly associated with reduction in the scores of anaesthetized Schirmer (WMD = -2.23, 95%CI: -3.28 to -1.18), non-anaesthetized Schirmer (WMD = -3.74, 95%CI: -4.23 to -3.25), TBUT (WMD = -3.47, 95%CI: -5.09 to -1.86), and CCT (WMD= -7.39, 95%CI: -13.91 to -0.88). Isotretinoin use was significantly associated with increase of OSDI (WMD = 18.29, 95%CI: 7.54-29.03), MGE (WMD = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.70-1.33) and conjunctival stain scores (WMD = 0.61, 95%CI: 0.47-0.76). No significant change was noted in RNFL thickness (WMD = -0.64, 95%CI: -1.80 to 0.51); GC-IP thickness (WMD = 0.42, 95%CI: -1.08 to 1.92); subfoveal choroidal thickness (WMD = -1.80, 95%CI: -6.69 to 3.09), and axial length (WMD = 0.08, 95%CI: -0.19 to 0.35). A significant heterogeneity was found between the study estimates in each of anaesthetized Schirmer, TBUT, MGE, OSDI, and conjunctival stain tests.
CONCLUSION
Isotretinoin use results in a statistically significant reduction of the central corneal thickness, TBUT, and Schirmer test scores. A statistically significant increase in MGE, OSDI and conjunctival stain scores was found. No statistically significant change of average RNFL, GC-IP thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness, or axial length was observed. Further well-designed studies should evaluate the long-term effect of isotretinoin on the eye and reach a firmer conclusion.
Topics: Acne Vulgaris; Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Isotretinoin; Meibomian Glands; Observational Studies as Topic; Tears
PubMed: 35296199
DOI: 10.1080/15569527.2022.2050747 -
Survey of Ophthalmology 2022The human tear film is at the interface between the ocular surface and the external environment. Although investigation has been hindered by its small volume,... (Review)
Review
The human tear film is at the interface between the ocular surface and the external environment. Although investigation has been hindered by its small volume, improvements in preanalytical and analytical methods have allowed the omics approach to represent an innovative biomarker search strategy. There is still a significant lack of standardization, representing a barrier for performing between-studies comparisons and transferring experimental findings into clinical use and trials. We summarize the preanalytical and analytical procedures, describe the biomarkers that can be found using the metabo-lipidomics approach, and provide our expert opinion for omics investigations in human tears. For this systematic review of 38 studies, we searched PubMed by combining Boolean operators with the following keywords: tear, metabolomic, lipidomic, -omics. The human tear metabo-lipidome has been well-characterized in normal individuals using high-resolution liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Lipid and metabolite profiles were influenced by ocular (e.g., dry eye disorders; Meibomian gland dysfunction; contact lens wear; glaucoma; keratoconus; pterygium) and systemic conditions (e.g., multiple sclerosis). Investigating the tear metabo-lipidome could improve our understanding of the pathogenesis of both ocular and systemic diseases, but also provide diagnostic as well as prognostic biomarkers.
Topics: Biomarkers; Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Lipidomics; Meibomian Glands; Metabolomics; Tears
PubMed: 35093405
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.01.010 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Jan 2022To investigate the efficacy and safety of a vectored thermal pulsation system (Lipiflow®) in the treatment of dry eye disease resulting from meibomian gland dysfunction... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy and safety of a vectored thermal pulsation system (Lipiflow®) in the treatment of dry eye disease resulting from meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD).
METHODS
We searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PubMed, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to 4 January 2021. The subjective symptoms, objective tests of dry eye, meibomian gland function, and the incidence of adverse events were evaluated.
RESULTS
Ten qualified RCTs incorporating 761 patients were analyzed. In the comparison of Lipiflow® treatment and lid hygiene, the subgroup with inconsistent units of randomization and analysis showed that the Lipiflow® treatment brought slight improvement in corneal fluorescein staining (mean difference (MD), - 0.42; 95% CI, - 0.75 to - 0.1), significant improvements in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score (MD, - 7.4; 95% CI, - 11.06 to - 3.74), Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score (MD, - 2.7; 95% CI, - 3.95 to - 1.45), meibomian glands yielding liquid secretion (MGYLS) (MD, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.82), and meibomian glands yielding secretion score (MGYSS) (MD, 4.09; 95% CI, 1.18 to 6.99). Meanwhile, significant improvements were detected in OSDI score, SPEED score, MGYLS, and MGYSS with patients who received Lipiflow® treatment compared with those who received nontreatment. The adverse events were comparable in the two control groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Lipiflow® treatment can improve the subjective and objective outcomes of MGD and does not increase the incidence of adverse events. The improper choice of units of analysis may be the leading cause of heterogeneity, which should be noted in the design of future ophthalmology research. Additional well-designed, large-scale RCTs are required to reach a firmer conclusion.
Topics: Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Meibomian Glands; Tears; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34374808
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05363-1 -
Ophthalmic Epidemiology Aug 2022To review and summarize information on meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) epidemiology in Africa. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
To review and summarize information on meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) epidemiology in Africa.
METHODS
A systematic search of online databases was conducted for literature/studies on MGD in Africa. Meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of MGD in Africa. Meta-regression was used to explore sources of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Twelve studies conducted in five countries were included in the review. All studies were hospital-based studies. Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis; the total sample size was 4963 and participants' age range was 17-96 years. The overall prevalence estimate of MGD in Africa was 45.9% (95% CI: 27.6-64.1%). Prevalence of MGD among males and females were each pooled from three studies and in urban and rural setting from 6 and 3 studies, respectively. Prevalence of MGD among males and females were 56.0% (95% CI: 22.4-89.5%) and 58.9% (95% CI: 28.5-89.4%) respectively; in urban and rural settings were 42.8% (95% CI: 21.1-64.5%) and 65.7% (95% CI: 25.7-95.7%), respectively. There was no association of MGD with sex ( = .872) and with study setting ( = .231).
CONCLUSION
There is a paucity of evidence on MGD prevalence in Africa, emphasizing the need for epidemiological studies to enhance our understanding of region-specific differences in MGD in Africa. The pooled estimate from hospital-based studies, however, suggests a substantial MGD burden in Africa. Epidemiological studies are needed to assess if this translates to a high disease burden within the general African population.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dry Eye Syndromes; Eyelid Diseases; Female; Humans; Male; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Meibomian Glands; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Rural Population; Tears; Young Adult
PubMed: 34338611
DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2021.1958351 -
Endocrine Journal Sep 2020Androgen regulates the function of lacrimal and meibomian glands, and its deficiency is a pathological factor underlying dry eye disease (DED). However, no androgen has...
Androgen regulates the function of lacrimal and meibomian glands, and its deficiency is a pathological factor underlying dry eye disease (DED). However, no androgen has been approved for treating DED due to lack of definite evidence regarding its efficacy and safety in clinics. In this systematic review, we have summarized the clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of androgen replacement therapy (ART) for DED. Medline (via Pubmed), Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Wanfang and Chinese Clinical Trials Registry Database were searched for the relevant prospective studies, and 7 studies wherein androgen was applied topically via eye drops or systemically via oral or transdermal administration were included. The quality of these studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias and methodological index for non-randomized studies. Most studies showed that androgen effectively improved dry eye-related symptoms and increased tear secretion. Furthermore, elderly men and peri-menopausal women with lower levels of circulating androgens responded better to ART. However, one study involving patients with Sjögren's syndrome showed no improvement in the ART group compared to the placebo control, or to the baseline level. Adverse effects were also common but limited to mild skin problems. In conclusion, androgen is a potential treatment for dry eye disease, especially for people with primary androgen deficiency. Short-term application is relatively safe.
Topics: Androgens; Dry Eye Syndromes; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32814731
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ20-0178 -
Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine Aug 2020Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is frequently encountered by eye care practitioners. It is characterised by obstruction of the Meibomian glands and/or alterations in...
Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) is frequently encountered by eye care practitioners. It is characterised by obstruction of the Meibomian glands and/or alterations in the consistency of glandular secretions. At present, no definitive treatment exists for this condition. The present meta-analysis was performed to assess the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy in the management of MGD. Databases including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central, MEDLINE and Google Scholar were systematically searched to identify clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of IPL in the treatment of MGD. Outcome measures were described as the standardized mean difference (SMD). The fixed- or random-effects model was selected for analysis based on the Cochrane I values representing heterogeneity. Publication bias was visually inspected using Begg's funnel plot. Data were synthesized from four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 122 subjects in the IPL group and 120 subjects in the control group. Pooled analysis indicated no statistically significant difference in the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores between the two groups [SMD -0.16 (95% CI, -0.41 to 0.10)] but a significant increase in Non-Invasive Tear Break-Up Time (NIBUT) scores in the IPL group (SMD, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.40-1.40). To conclude, the results of the present study did not provide any conclusive evidence for the efficacy of IPL therapy in the management of MGD. The analysis indicated that IPL therapy may result in an improvement of objective NIBUT scores but has no effect on subjective SPEED scores. Given the limited number of studies performed to date, there is a requirement for more well-designed prospective RCTs with a larger sample size to provide further evidence on the efficacy of IPL therapy.
PubMed: 32765683
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8838 -
Graefe's Archive For Clinical and... Jan 2021Intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) is a new method being used to treat meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) globally. With an increasing number of studies being published,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) is a new method being used to treat meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) globally. With an increasing number of studies being published, it is necessary to consider additional factors related to treatment. This review aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of IPL for the treatment of MGD.
METHODS
The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, VIP, and SinoMed databases were searched through February 24, 2020. Randomized clinical trials and cohort studies comparing IPL+ meibomian gland expression (MGX) or IPL alone with control groups were included. The weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated to analyze the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score and Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) score, and the standard mean difference (SMD) was calculated to analyze the tear breakup time (TBUT). Heterogeneity was quantified by the I statistic ranging from 0 to 100%, and a random effects model was used in this meta-analysis. All analyses were performed by RevMan 5.3. All p values were calculated by the t test, and p values were regarded as statistically significant at p < 0.05. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias was used to identify and evaluate bias in the literature.
RESULTS
Nine studies with a total of 539 patients were included. Eight studies examined TBUT, six examined OSDI scores, and four examined SPEED scores. IPL combined with MGX showed superiority regarding the TBUT (SMD 2.33, 95% CI 1.04-3.61), and OSDI scores (WMD 11.93, 95% CI - 17.10 to - 6.77), with high heterogeneity. The SPEED scores were not significantly different.
CONCLUSIONS
IPL combined with MGX may be an effective and safe treatment for MGD, but it cannot improve all symptoms. IPL alone is not superior to MGX. The efficacy is also affected by the number and average frequency of treatments. The efficacy of IPL may decrease within 6 months after the last treatment, so it should be considered a long-term adjuvant therapy combined with MGX. When patients receive 3 or 4 treatments (once every 3-4 weeks), a return visit at 6 months after the last treatment is required.
Topics: Dry Eye Syndromes; Humans; Intense Pulsed Light Therapy; Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; Meibomian Glands; Tears
PubMed: 32725403
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04834-1