-
Diagnostic Pathology Nov 2019Sex cord-like elements are rarely observed in uterine lesions, but these morphological patterns could appear in a variety of uterine tumors and non-tumorous lesions. In...
BACKGROUND
Sex cord-like elements are rarely observed in uterine lesions, but these morphological patterns could appear in a variety of uterine tumors and non-tumorous lesions. In this review, we collected the literatures regarding the uterine tumorous and non-tumorous lesions containing sex cord-like elements and summarized these lesions in terms of clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features in order to further understand these lesions and provide some new ideas for differential diagnosis.
MAIN BODY
This section provides a comprehensive overview of the clinicopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of uterine lesions with sex cord-like architectures including uterine tumors resembling ovarian sex cord tumors, endometrial stromal tumors, adenomyosis, endometrial polyps, leiomyoma, epithelioid leiomyosarcoma, adenosarcoma, sertoliform endometrioid carcinoma, corded and hyalinized endometrioid carcinoma, mesonephric adenocarcinoma, and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. The differential diagnosis based on morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular alterations has also been discussed.
CONCLUSION
The sex cord-like areas in these lesions show heterogeneous but similar morphological features. Additionally, immunohistochemical staining plays a limited role in differential diagnosis. Furthermore, it is of significance for pathologists to better understand these lesions in order to avoid confusion and mistakes during pathological diagnosis, especially in a biopsy/curettage specimen.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Carcinoma, Endometrioid; Female; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Sex Cord-Gonadal Stromal Tumors; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms; Uterine Neoplasms
PubMed: 31739799
DOI: 10.1186/s13000-019-0909-y -
International Journal of Gynecological... Mar 2018Literature published between 1975 and 2015 was systematically reviewed to conduct a case-comparator study of tissue based, immunohistochemical biomarker expression among... (Review)
Review
Literature published between 1975 and 2015 was systematically reviewed to conduct a case-comparator study of tissue based, immunohistochemical biomarker expression among malignant glandular histotypes of the uterine cervix so as to identify differences that could have diagnostic utility. Of the 902 abstracts, 154 articles had a full review, and 52 were included. Biomarker positivity in cases of adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) were compared with atypical lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia and invasive histotypes grouped as mucinous, endometrioid, adenosquamous, serous clear cell, minimal deviation-gastric type, and mesonephric carcinomas (7 AIS case-comparators). The invasive histotypes were compared with each other (30 adenocarcinoma case-comparators). Biomarker positivity in all 37 case-comparators was calculated as weighted averages of histotype-specific estimates. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering examined differences in expression and were visualized via heatmaps and dendrograms. Of the 56 biomarkers tested, 1 or more of 15 showed a 50% or more difference in positive expression in 6 (86%) of the AIS and 21 (70%) of the adenocarcinoma case-comparators. There was no data on the comparison of serous clear cell to mesonephric carcinoma. AIS case-comparator biomarkers were HIK1083, alpha SMA, PAX8, VIL1, CEA, p53, p16, and CD10, and only alpha SMA had a difference of 100%. The adenocarcinoma case-comparator biomarkers were CEA, p53, Claudin18, HIK1083, p16, Calretinin, CD10, PR, Chromogranin, MUC6, Vimentin and p63, and none had a difference of 100%. Biomarker expression in the discrimination of AIS from invasive adenocarcinoma, and the invasive histotypes from each other is understudied. One or more of 15 biomarkers could have diagnostic utility.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma in Situ; Biomarkers; Cervix Uteri; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 28582347
DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000406 -
International Journal of Gynecological... Jul 2017Immunohistochemistry is widely used to support a pathology diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma despite the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Tissue-based Immunohistochemical Biomarker Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Malignant Glandular Lesions of the Uterine Cervix: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.
Immunohistochemistry is widely used to support a pathology diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma despite the absence of a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published data. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry biomarkers in the tissue-based diagnosis of cervical adenocarcinoma histotypes compared with normal endocervix and benign glandular lesions. The systematic review and meta-analysis used a PICOT framework and QUADAS-2 to evaluate the quality of included studies. The literature search spanned 40 years and ended June 30, 2015. Abstracts of identified records were independently screened by 2 of the authors who then conducted a full-text review of selected articles. Sensitivity and specificity of immunohistochemistry expression in malignant glandular lesions of the cervix classified per WHO 2003 compared with 5 benign comparators (normal/benign endocervix, and benign endocervical, endometrioid, gastric, and mesonephric lesions) were calculated. Of 902 abstracts screened, 154 articles were selected for full review. Twenty-five articles with results for 36 biomarkers were included. The only biomarker with enough studies for a meta-analysis was p16 and the definition of positive p16 staining among them was variable. Nevertheless, any positive p16 expression was sensitive, ranging from 0.94 to 0.98 with narrow confidence intervals (CIs), for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical and endometrioid lesions. Specificity for AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas was also high with narrow CIs compared with benign endocervical lesions. The specificity was high for AIS, 0.99 (0.24, 1.0), and mucinous adenocarcinoma, 0.95 (0.52, 1.0), compared with normal/benign endocervix but with wider CIs, and low with very wide CIs compared with benign endometrioid lesions: 0.31 (0.00, 0.99) and 0.34 (0.00, 0.99), respectively. Results from single studies showed that p16, p16/Ki67 dual stain, ProExC, CEA, ESA, HIK1083, Claudin 18, and ER loss in perilesional stromal cells were useful with high (≥0.75) sensitivity and specificity estimates in ≥1 malignant versus benign comparisons. None of the biomarkers had highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for AIS, mucinous adenocarcinomas, or minimal deviation adenocarcinoma/gastric adenocarcinoma compared with benign gastric or mesonephric lesions or for mesonephric carcinoma compared with normal/benign endocervix, benign endocervical, endometrial, or mesonephric lesions. Any expression of p16 supports a diagnosis of AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas in comparison with normal/benign endocervix and benign endocervical lesions. The majority of studies did not separate mosaic/focal p16 staining from diffuse staining as a distinct pattern of p16 overexpression and this may have contributed to the poor performance of p16 in distinguishing AIS and mucinous adenocarcinomas from benign endometrioid lesions. Single studies support further investigation of 8 additional biomarkers that have highly useful sensitivity and specificity estimates for ≥1 malignant glandular lesions compared with ≥1 of the 5 benign comparators.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma in Situ; Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cervix Uteri; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16; Female; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Ki-67 Antigen; Sensitivity and Specificity; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
PubMed: 27801764
DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000345