-
Frontiers in Microbiology 2024Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is an acute infectious disease comprising five stages: fever, hypotension, oliguria, diuresis (polyuria), and convalescence....
INTRODUCTION
Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) is an acute infectious disease comprising five stages: fever, hypotension, oliguria, diuresis (polyuria), and convalescence. Increased vascular permeability, coagulopathy, and renal injury are typical clinical features of HFRS, which has a case fatality rate of 1-15%. Despite this, a comprehensive meta-analyses of the clinical characteristics of patients who died from HFRS is lacking.
METHODS
Eleven Chinese- and English-language research databases were searched, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure Database, Wanfang Database, SinoMed, VIP Database, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Proquest, and Ovid, up to October 5, 2023. The search focused on clinical features of patients who died from HFRS. The extracted data were analyzed using STATA 14.0.
RESULTS
A total of 37 articles on 140,295 patients with laboratory-confirmed HFRS were included. Categorizing patients into those who died and those who survived, it was found that patients who died were older and more likely to smoke, have hypertension, and have diabetes. Significant differences were also observed in the clinical manifestations of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, shock, occurrence of overlapping disease courses, cerebral edema, cerebral hemorrhage, toxic encephalopathy, convulsions, arrhythmias, heart failure, dyspnea, acute respiratory distress syndrome, pulmonary infection, liver damage, gastrointestinal bleeding, acute kidney injury, and urine protein levels. Compared to patients who survived, those who died were more likely to demonstrate elevated leukocyte count; decreased platelet count; increased lactate dehydrogenase, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase levels; prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time; and low albumin and chloride levels and were more likely to use continuous renal therapy. Interestingly, patients who died received less dialysis and had shorter average length of hospital stay than those who survived.
CONCLUSION
Older patients and those with histories of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, central nervous system damage, heart damage, liver damage, kidney damage, or multiorgan dysfunction were at a high risk of death. The results can be used to assess patients' clinical presentations and assist with prognostication.https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, (CRD42023454553).
PubMed: 38638893
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1329683 -
Stem Cells Translational Medicine Apr 2024In preclinical studies, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), including umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), demonstrate the ability to modulate numerous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
In preclinical studies, mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), including umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs), demonstrate the ability to modulate numerous pathophysiological processes related to sepsis; however, a systematic synthesis of the literature is needed to assess the efficacy of UC-MSCs for treating sepsis.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the effects of UC-MSCs on overall mortality (primary outcome) as well as on organ dysfunction, coagulopathy, endothelial permeability, pathogen clearance, and systemic inflammation (secondary outcomes) at prespecified time intervals in preclinical models of sepsis.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted on Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and Web of Science up to June 20, 2023. Preclinical controlled studies using in vivo sepsis models with systemic UC-MSC administration were included. Meta-analyses were conducted and expressed as odds ratios (OR) and ratios of the weighted means with 95% CI for categorical and continuous data, respectively. Risk of bias was assessed with the SYRCLE tool.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies (34 experiments, n = 1258 animals) were included in this review. Overall mortality was significantly reduced with UC-MSC treatment as compared to controls (OR: 0.26, 95% CI: 0.18-0.36). At various prespecified time intervals, UC-MSCs reduced surrogate measures of organ dysfunction related to the kidney, liver, and lung; reduced coagulopathy and endothelial permeability; and enhanced pathogen clearance from multiple sites. UC-MSCs also modulated systemic inflammatory mediators. No studies were rated as low risk across all SYCLE domains.
CONCLUSIONS
These results demonstrate the efficacy of UC-MSC treatment in preclinical sepsis models and highlight their potential as a therapeutic intervention for septic shock.
Topics: Animals; Multiple Organ Failure; Umbilical Cord; Mesenchymal Stem Cells; Sepsis; Shock, Septic; Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation
PubMed: 38381583
DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szae003 -
European Journal of Trauma and... Feb 2024Plasma is a critical element in hemostatic resuscitation post-injury, and its prompt administration within the prehospital setting may reduce the complications resulting... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE
Plasma is a critical element in hemostatic resuscitation post-injury, and its prompt administration within the prehospital setting may reduce the complications resulting from hemorrhage and shock. Our objective is to assess the efficacy and safety of prehospital plasma infusion in patients susceptible to hemorrhagic shock.
METHODS
We conducted our study by aggregating randomized controlled trials (RCTs) sourced from PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL up to January 29, 2023. Quality assessment was implemented using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Our study protocol is registered in PROSPERO under ID: CRD42023397325.
RESULTS
Three RCTs with 760 individuals were included. There was no difference between plasma infusion and standard care groups in 24-h mortality (P = 0.11), 30-day mortality (P = 0.12), and multiple organ failure incidences (P = 0.20). Plasma infusion was significantly better in the total 24-h volume of PRBC units (P = 0.03) and INR on arrival (P = 0.009). For all other secondary outcomes evaluated (total 24-h volume of packed FFP units, total 24-h volume of platelets units, massive transfusion, vasopressor need during the first 24 h, any adverse event, acute lung injury, transfusion reaction, and sepsis), no significant differences were observed between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
Plasma infusion in trauma patients at risk of hemorrhagic shock does not significantly affect mortality or the incidence of multiple organ failure. However, it may lead to reduced packed red blood cell transfusions and increased INR at hospital arrival.
PubMed: 38367091
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02461-7 -
Frontiers in Pediatrics 2024In refractory respiratory failure (RF), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a salvage therapy that seeks to reduce lung injury induced by mechanical... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In refractory respiratory failure (RF), extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a salvage therapy that seeks to reduce lung injury induced by mechanical ventilation. The parameters of optimal mechanical ventilation in children during ECMO are not known. Pulmonary ventilatory management during this therapy may impact mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association between ventilatory parameters in children during ECMO therapy and in-hospital mortality.
METHODS
A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar from January 2013 until May 2022 (PROSPERO 450744), including studies in children with ECMO-supported RF assessing mechanical ventilation parameters, was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale; heterogeneity, with absence <25% and high >75%, was assessed using I. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model were performed to explore the impact of methodological quality on effect size.
RESULTS
Six studies were included. The median age was 3.4 years (IQR: 3.2-4.2). Survival in the 28-day studies was 69%. Mechanical ventilation parameters associated with higher mortality were a very low tidal volume ventilation (<4 ml/kg; OR: 4.70; 95% CI: 2.91-7.59; < 0.01; : 38%), high plateau pressure (mean Dif: -0.70 95% CI: -0.18, -0.22; < 0.01), and high driving pressure (mean Dif: -0.96 95% CI: -1.83, -0.09: = 0.03). The inspired fraction of oxygen ( = 0.09) and end-expiratory pressure ( = 0.69) were not associated with higher mortality. Patients who survived had less multiple organ failure ( < 0.01).
CONCLUSION
The mechanical ventilation variables associated with higher mortality in children with ECMO-supported respiratory failure are high plateau pressures, high driving pressure and very low tidal volume ventilation. No association between mortality and other parameters of the mechanical ventilator, such as the inspired fraction of oxygen or end-expiratory pressure, was found.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023450744, PROSPERO 2023 (CRD42023450744).
PubMed: 38292212
DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1302049 -
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN Feb 2024Severe burns lead to metabolic changes, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Omege-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND & AIMS
Severe burns lead to metabolic changes, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Omege-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have anti-inflammatory properties. In the absence of substantial evidence for use on major burns, we systematically reviewed the efficacy of omega-3 PUFAs for patients with severe burns.
METHODS
We comprehensively searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Internet, Wang Fang Data, Chinese Biomedicine Database, and Science Direct databases to collect randomised controlled trials of omega-3 PUFAs administered to patients with burns from January 2000 to June 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literatures, extracted the data, and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. The outcomes were mortality, the risk of severe sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Data synthesis was conducted using Review Manager. Trial sequential analyses (TSA) for outcomes were performed.
RESULTS
Three randomised controlled trials involving 140 patients were included. Of these, 71 patients received omega-3 PUFAs. The results showed that omega-3 PUFAs significantly reduced the incidence of severe sepsis, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (RR = 0.38, 95 % CI [0.19, 0.75], P = 0.005), C-reactive protein levels (MD = -39.70[-81.63, 2.23], P = 0.06), and improved respiratory outcomes. However, there was no difference in 14-day mortality (RR = 1.10, 95%CI [0.59, 2.05], P = 0.75). TSA showed that the results for the incidence of severe sepsis, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome are insufficient and inconclusive.
CONCLUSIONS
Omega-3 PUFAs may reduce inflammatory response and risk of sepsis, septic shock, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in severe burns patients and may shorten hospital stay but cannot reduce risk of death. Due to the limitation of the quantity and quality of the included studies, the evidence level is low, and the conclusions need to be verified by larger scale and higher quality randomised controlled trials.
Topics: Humans; Burns; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Fatty Acids, Unsaturated; Multiple Organ Failure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sepsis; Shock, Septic
PubMed: 38220365
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2023.11.019 -
Critical Care (London, England) Jan 2024The impact of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction remains uncertain. The objective of the... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Influence of therapeutic plasma exchange treatment on short-term mortality of critically ill adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The impact of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on short-term mortality in adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction remains uncertain. The objective of the study is to assess the effect of adjunct TPE in this setting through a comprehensive literature review.
METHODS
The National Library of Medicine's Medline, Ovid (Embase), the Cochrane Library database and clinicaltrial.gov from January 01, 1966, until October 01, 2022, were searched for terms: therapeutic plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, sepsis, and septic shock. We reviewed, selected and extracted data from relevant randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and matched cohort studies (MCSs) comparing short-term mortality in critically ill adult septic patients treated with standard therapy versus those receiving adjunct TPE. Risk of bias was assessed in the RCTs using Cochrane Collaboration tool and in MCSs using ROBINS-I tool. Summary statistics, risk ratios (RRs), and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random effects model.
RESULTS
This systematic review included 937 adult critically ill septic patients from five RCTs (n = 367) and fifteen MCSs (n = 570). Of these total, 543 received treatment with TPE in addition to standard care. The meta-analysis includes all five RCTs and only six MCSs (n = 627). The adjunct TPE treatment (n = 300) showed a significant reduction in short-term mortality (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.74, I2 3%) compared to standard therapy alone (n = 327). The systematic review of all 20 trials revealed that adding TPE to the standard therapy of critically ill septic patients resulted in faster clinical and/or laboratory recovery.
CONCLUSIONS
Our comprehensive and up-to-date review demonstrates that adjunct TPE may provide potential survival benefits when compared to standard care for critically ill adult patients with sepsis-induced organ dysfunction. While results of this meta-analysis are encouraging, large well-designed randomized trials are required to identify the optimal patient population and TPE procedure characteristics prior to widespread adoption into practice.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Plasma Exchange; Critical Illness; Multiple Organ Failure; Sepsis; Shock, Septic
PubMed: 38178170
DOI: 10.1186/s13054-023-04795-x -
Medicine Dec 2023This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in conjunction with early enteral nutrition for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of probiotics in conjunction with early enteral nutrition for the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). This study focused on multiple clinical endpoints, including mortality rate, risk of organ failure, and duration of hospital stay.
METHODS
In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The study adhered to the Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome framework and utilized randomized controlled trials to examine the impact of probiotics on patients with SAP. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted independently by 2 evaluators, with discrepancies resolved collaboratively, or by a third adjudicator. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square statistics, I2 metrics, and both fixed- and random-effects models, as dictated by heterogeneity levels.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis covered 6 randomized controlled trials. Compared to control groups (placebo or standard care without probiotics), probiotics did not significantly reduce mortality rates or organ failure risk. However, they notably shortened hospital stays by a weighted mean difference of -5.49 days (95% confidence interval: -10.40 to -0.58; P = .010). The overall bias risk was low to moderate.
CONCLUSIONS
Probiotics combined with early enteral nutrition did not significantly improve mortality rates or reduce the risk of organ failure in patients with SAP, but shortened hospital stays. Further studies are required to corroborate these findings.
Topics: Humans; Acute Disease; Pancreatitis; Probiotics; Enteral Nutrition; Length of Stay
PubMed: 38115294
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000036454 -
International Journal of Medical... Feb 2024Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous machine and deep learning (MDL) methods have been proposed in the literature to analyze patient physiological...
INTRODUCTION
Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous machine and deep learning (MDL) methods have been proposed in the literature to analyze patient physiological data. The objective of this review is to summarize various aspects of these methods and assess their practical utility for predicting various clinical outcomes.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, screened and selected the studies matching the inclusion criteria. The clinical analysis focused on the characteristics of the patient cohorts in the studies included in this review, the specific tasks in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic that machine and deep learning methods were used for, and their practical limitations. The technical analysis focused on the details of specific MDL methods and their performance.
RESULTS
Analysis of the 48 selected studies revealed that the majority (∼54 %) of them examined the application of MDL methods for the prediction of survival/mortality-related patient outcomes, while a smaller fraction (∼13 %) of studies also examined applications to the prediction of patients' physiological outcomes and hospital resource utilization. 21 % of the studies examined the application of MDL methods to multiple clinical tasks. Machine and deep learning methods have been shown to be effective at predicting several outcomes of COVID-19 patients, such as disease severity, complications, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, and mortality. MDL methods also achieved high accuracy in predicting the required number of ICU beds and ventilators.
CONCLUSION
Machine and deep learning methods have been shown to be valuable tools for predicting disease severity, organ dysfunction and failure, patient outcomes, and hospital resource utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic. The discovered knowledge and our conclusions and recommendations can also be useful to healthcare professionals and artificial intelligence researchers in managing future pandemics.
Topics: Humans; Artificial Intelligence; COVID-19; Deep Learning; Pandemics; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 38091862
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105308 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Routine anticoagulation therapy in acute pancreatitis (AP) is not recommended by the guidelines in the field, although it is frequently used in clinical practice.
BACKGROUND
Routine anticoagulation therapy in acute pancreatitis (AP) is not recommended by the guidelines in the field, although it is frequently used in clinical practice.
OBJECTIVES
We aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of adding anticoagulants therapy to AP management.
METHODS
The systematic search was performed in three databases on the 14th of October 2022 without restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that reported the differences in the outcomes of AP for patients receiving anticoagulants (intervention group) in addition to the standard of care (SOC), compared to patients managed by SOC alone (control group), were eligible. A random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with the corresponding 95%-confidence intervals (CI). We performed subgroup analysis for study design and disease severity, among other criteria.
RESULTS
Of the 8,223 screened records, we included eight in the meta-analysis. Except one, all studies reported on low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). Both RCTs and observational studies reported results in favor of the LMWH group. Subgroup RCTs' analysis revealed significantly decreased odds of mortality [OR 0.24; 95%CI 0.17-0.34] and multiple organ failure [OR 0.32; 95%CI 0.17-0.62] in the intervention group. Moreover, the need for endoscopic or surgical interventions [OR 0.41; 95%CI 0.28-0.61] were significantly reduced by LMWH. The subgroup analyzes for moderate and severe cases, respectively, yielded similar results. Due to limited data, we could no perform subgroup analysis for mild cases.
CONCLUSION
LMWH therapy reduces major complication rates in moderate and severe AP. Across all identified RCTs, LMWH were initiated early after AP diagnosis and improved its prognosis.
PubMed: 38020092
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1241301 -
Przeglad Gastroenterologiczny 2023Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with major complications such as necrosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) often leads to high mortality rates despite...
INTRODUCTION
Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) with major complications such as necrosis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) often leads to high mortality rates despite intensive treatment.
AIM
To evaluate the effect of symbiotics (probiotics) on septic complications in patients with SAP.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We searched the PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science databases for relevant clinical trials and excluded observational studies. Quality appraisal was evaluated according to GRADE, and we assessed the risk of bias using Cochrane's risk of bias tool. We included the following outcomes: C-reactive protein (CRP), APACHE II score, hospital stay, multiorgan failure (MOF), systemic inflammatory response syndrome, infected pancreatic necrosis, septicaemia, need for operation, and death. We performed the analysis of homogeneous data under a fixed-effects model, while analysis of heterogeneous data were analysed under a random-effects model. We performed the analysis of dichotomous outcomes using the risk ratio (RR) and relative 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
We included a total of 7 clinical trials. We found that there was no significant difference between both groups regarding MOF (RR = 0.60 (0.25, 1.44), = 0.26), septicaemia (RR = 0.66 (0.29, 1.50), = 0.32), death (RR = 0.66 (0.19, 2.26), = 0.51), infected pancreatic necrosis (RR = 0.50 (0.18, 1.38), = 0.18), SIRS (RR = 0.81 (0.29, 2.23), = 0.68), CRP, APACHE II score, and hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS
Contrary to some published trials, our meta-analysis concludes that the use of probiotics in patients with SAP is not effective in reducing the mortality rate, septic complications, and need for operation.
PubMed: 37937109
DOI: 10.5114/pg.2022.118164