-
Acta Gastro-enterologica Belgica 2021Intestinal pseudo obstruction both acute and chronic is an uncommon severe motility disorder that affect both children and adults, can lead to significant morbidity... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Intestinal pseudo obstruction both acute and chronic is an uncommon severe motility disorder that affect both children and adults, can lead to significant morbidity burden and have no standard management strategy. Prucalopride a highly selective serotonin receptor agonist is an effective laxative with reported extra colon action. We aim to report our experience in children with acute and chronic intestinal pseudo obstruction who responded to prucalopride and systemically review the use of prucalopride in intestinal pseudo obstruction.
METHODS
A report of clinical experience and systemic review of the relevant medical databases to identify the outcome of usage of prucalopride in patients with acute and chronic intestinal pseudo obstruction. Studies meeting the selection criteria were reviewed including abstract only and case reports.
RESULTS
All reported cases showed clinical response to prucalopride. There were three full text, two abstracts only and three case reports all reporting clinical improvement with prucalopride.
CONCLUSION
Prucalopride appears to show promising results in children and adults with acute and chronic intestinal pseudo obstruction.
Topics: Adult; Benzofurans; Child; Colon; Humans; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Laxatives
PubMed: 34599567
DOI: 10.51821/84.3.002 -
Urology Journal Jul 2020We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy (LTU) and laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy (LRU) in the... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy between Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Approach of Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy for the Treatment of Large (>10mm) and Proximal Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
PURPOSE
We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy between laparoscopic transperitoneal ureterolithotomy (LTU) and laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy (LRU) in the treatment of large (>10mm) and proximal ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched through December 2019. Comparative studies comparing the two approaches were included. The primary outcome was a single-procedure success rate; the secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital duration, and complications (according to the Clavien-Dindo Grade). Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) and the modified Jadad scale were used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The Egger's test estimated publication bias. The meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 15.0.
RESULTS
Seven studies, involving 125 participants in LTU group and 128 in LRU group, were included in the study. The results suggested that both single-procedure success rate and the rate of postoperative paralytic ileus were significantly higher in the LTU group than in the LRU group (95.2% vs 87.5%, 95% CI: .00-.16, RD = .08, P = .04; 10.4% vs 0, 95% CI: .02- .19, RD = .10, P = .02, respectively). No publication bias of the primary outcome was observed with the Egger's test (P = .117). No significant differences were noted in terms of operative time and hospital duration (95% CI: -18.95-8.80, MD = -5.08, P = .47; 95% CI: -.98- .58, MD = -.20, P = .61, respectively). Additionally, according to Clavien-Dindo Grade, the rates of major complications (>= Grade 3a) including open conversion (.8% vs 5.5%, 95%CI: -.11- .01, RD = -.05, P = .12), stone migration (8.1% vs 6.7%, 95% CI: -.08- .11, RD = .02, P = .76), vascular injury (5.4% vs 0, 95%CI: -.03- .14, RD = .05, P = .21) and ureteral stricture (1.3% vs 5.3%, 95% CI: -.11- .02, RD = -.04, P = .20), were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
In the treatment of large and proximal ureteral calculi, LTU has a significantly higher single-procedure success rate and a higher rate of postoperative paralytic ileus than LRU. However, the complication was well-tolerated. The small sample size and limited, including studies, were the main limitations.
Topics: Humans; Laparoscopy; Peritoneum; Retroperitoneal Space; Treatment Outcome; Ureteral Calculi; Urologic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 33786809
DOI: 10.22037/uj.v16i7.5588 -
Medicine Oct 2020In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the procedural and post-operative complications (POC) associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Procedural and post-operative complications associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
In this analysis, we aimed to systematically compare the procedural and post-operative complications (POC) associated with laparoscopic versus open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, and Google scholar for English studies comparing the POC in patients who underwent laparoscopic versus open surgery (OS) for right colonic cancer. Data were assessed by the Cochrane-based RevMan 5.4 software (The Cochrane Community, London, UK). Mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to represent the results for continuous variables, whereas risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs were used for dichotomous data.
RESULTS
Twenty-six studies involving a total number of 3410 participants with right colonic carcinoma were included in this analysis. One thousand five hundred and fifteen participants were assigned to undergo invasive laparoscopic surgery whereas 1895 participants were assigned to the open abdominal surgery. Our results showed that the open resection was associated with a shorter length of surgery (MD: 48.63, 95% CI: 30.15-67.12; P = .00001) whereas laparoscopic intervention was associated with a shorter hospital stay [MD (-3.09), 95% CI [-5.82 to (-0.37)]; P = .03]. In addition, POC such as anastomotic leak (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.60-1.55; P = .88), abdominal abscess (RR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.52-2.49; P = .75), pulmonary embolism (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.09-1.69; P = .21) and deep vein thrombosis (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.39-2.28; P = .89) were not significantly different. Paralytic ileus (RR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.67-1.11; P = .26), intra-abdominal infection (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.15-4.48; P = .82), pulmonary complications (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.57-1.20; P = .32), cardiac complications (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.42-1.27; P = .27) and urological complications (RR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.52-1.33; P = .44) were also similarly manifested. Our analysis also showed 30-day re-admission and re-operation, and mortality to be similar between laparoscopic versus OS for right colonic carcinoma resection. However, surgical wound infection (RR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50-0.86; P = .002) was significantly higher with the OS.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, laparoscopic surgery was almost comparable to OS in terms of post-operative outcomes for right-sided colonic cancer resection and was not associated with higher unwanted outcomes. Therefore, laparoscopic intervention should be considered as safe as the open abdominal surgery for right-sided colonic cancer resection, with a decreased hospital stay.
Topics: Aged; Colectomy; Colonic Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Operative Time; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 33019422
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022431 -
Colorectal Disease : the Official... Dec 2020The aim of this work was to compare the outcomes of extended right hemicolectomy (ERH), left hemicolectomy (LH) and segmental colectomy (SC) for the surgical management... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIM
The aim of this work was to compare the outcomes of extended right hemicolectomy (ERH), left hemicolectomy (LH) and segmental colectomy (SC) for the surgical management of splenic flexure tumours.
METHOD
In compliance with PRISMA statement standards, a systematic review was performed to identify all studies comparing outcomes of ERH, LH and SC for the surgical management of splenic flexure tumours. Primary outcomes included anastomotic leakage and all postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes included operative time, R0 resection, number of harvested lymph nodes, > 12 harvested lymph nodes, severe complications, postoperative mortality, paralytic ileus, wound infection, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival. The ROBINS-I tool and GRADE system were used to assess the risk of bias and certainty of evidence, respectively.
RESULTS
Analysis of 956 patients from seven observational studies showed that ERH was associated with more paralytic ileus than LH (OR 2.74, P = 0.002) and SC (OR 6.67, P < 0.0001) and the operative time was shorter in SC than in ERH (mean difference 25.48, P < 0.0001) and LH (mean difference -17.94, P = 0.0002). There were no differences between ERH, LH and SC in terms of anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, R0 resection, severe complications, postoperative mortality, wound infection, pancreatic fistula, intra-abdominal abscess, need for reoperation, length of hospital stay, > 12 harvested lymph nodes, 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival.
CONCLUSIONS
The available evidence, limited to observational studies, suggests that there is no difference between ERH, LH and SC in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality, lymph node yield and cancer survival. Randomized controlled trials are required for definite conclusions.
Topics: Anastomotic Leak; Colectomy; Colon, Transverse; Colonic Neoplasms; Humans; Laparoscopy; Postoperative Complications; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32757361
DOI: 10.1111/codi.15292 -
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Sep 2020Congenital short bowel syndrome (CSBS) is a rare gastrointestinal disorder caused by intrauterine reduction of small bowel length whose etiology is still unknown....
BACKGROUND
Congenital short bowel syndrome (CSBS) is a rare gastrointestinal disorder caused by intrauterine reduction of small bowel length whose etiology is still unknown. Chronic diarrhea, vomiting, and failure to thrive are the most important complications, arising from less absorptive intestinal surface. This review examines clinical features and outcomes of CSBS patients.
METHODS
A PubMed and EMBASE research on CSBS was performed. Inclusion criterion was congenital short bowel diagnosis in a range of ages between 33 weeks of gestational age and 15 years old (IQR 38 days). Exclusion criteria were history of atresia of any part of the gastrointestinal tract and extensive surgical bowel resections. Qualitative and quantitative variables were collected and analyzed. Data were expressed in mean and IQR.
RESULTS
Sixty-one patients were identified (38 males, 23 females) from 1969 to date. Mean bowel length was 58.24 cm (IQR 37.5). Malrotation of the midgut was seen in 98.4% of cases. Our data showed an interesting trend in improving the survival rate of these patients (from 28.5% before 2008 to 75% in the period after 2008). Sepsis was the most frequent cause of death reported (57.9%). Interestingly, 18 patients were genetically analyzed, finding mutations either in FLNA gene (38.8%) or in CLMP gene (61.1%).
CONCLUSIONS
CSBS is a condition that seems to be related to an autosomal recessive (CLMP) or an X linked (FLNA) type of inheritance. Advance in medical management seems to have improved survival of these children in recent years. Further genetic studies can better understand the causes of this disease aiming to create personalized treatment.
TYPE OF STUDY
Systematic review.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level IV.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Coxsackie and Adenovirus Receptor-Like Membrane Protein; Female; Filamins; Humans; Infant; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Intestines; Male; Sepsis
PubMed: 32278545
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.03.009 -
Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing :... Apr 2020To investigate the efficacy of providing coffee to elective abdominal surgery patients, immediately postoperatively, to lessen postoperative ileus. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
To investigate the efficacy of providing coffee to elective abdominal surgery patients, immediately postoperatively, to lessen postoperative ileus.
DESIGN
A systematic review with meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials published since 2012.
METHODS
Methodological quality was evaluated using the Cochrane guidelines. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations assessment tool evaluated the quality of the evidence. Subgroup analyses were completed if the I statistic demonstrated heterogeneity (greater than 50%).
FINDINGS
Coffee was statistically significant in shortening the time between surgery and the first passage of stool (mean difference, -9.38; 95% confidence interval, -17.60 to -1.16; P = .03). Although not statistically significant (P = .20), the overall effect favored shorter hospital stays for those patients receiving coffee.
CONCLUSIONS
The current systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that coffee given as early as 2 hours postoperatively decreases time to first bowel movement. In addition, patients tolerated solid food faster and were discharged sooner when given coffee immediately postoperatively.
Topics: Central Nervous System Stimulants; Coffee; Humans; Incidence; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Period; Time Factors
PubMed: 31859206
DOI: 10.1016/j.jopan.2019.07.004 -
Veterinary Surgery : VS Jan 2020To determine the efficacy of lidocaine at reducing incidence of postoperative reflux (POR) in horses by using quantitative statistical analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy of lidocaine at reducing incidence of postoperative reflux (POR) in horses by using quantitative statistical analysis.
STUDY DESIGN
Systematic meta-analytical review.
SAMPLE POPULATION
Studies on horses undergoing gastrointestinal surgery for small intestinal lesions, identified by systematic search between 2001 and 2017.
METHODS
A search with PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was performed, followed by secondary searches of veterinary trade journals and bibliographies of relevant articles. The primary outcome measure for this study was the effect of lidocaine therapy on the odds of POR. Subgroup analysis assessed included the timing of lidocaine therapy, incidence of mortality, and incidence of repeat celiotomy. A meta-analysis was performed with a random effects model, with the effect size calculated as an odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical significance was set at P < .05.
RESULTS
Among 1933 peer reviewed publications that met the initial search criteria, 12 relevant studies were available for analysis. Lidocaine was associated with an increased incidence of diagnosis of POR (OR 6.3, 95% CI [1.4, 27.0], P = .01). Horses treated with lidocaine were more likely to survive to discharge (OR 6.8, 95% CI [3.9, 11.7], P < .01).
CONCLUSION
Lidocaine was associated with an increased survival rate in horses undergoing exploratory celiotomy for small intestinal disease according to this meta-analysis of the recent literature.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
This body of published evidence provides support to administer lidocaine in horses to improve survival rather than preventing POR.
Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anesthetics, Local; Animals; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Horse Diseases; Horses; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Intestine, Small; Intraoperative Care; Laparoscopy; Lidocaine; Postoperative Complications; Survival Analysis
PubMed: 31290164
DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13286 -
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Jul 2019Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction or Ogilvie's syndrome (OS) is a rare form of postsurgical or posttraumatic complication. OS rarely occurs in the postoperative course of...
BACKGROUND
Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction or Ogilvie's syndrome (OS) is a rare form of postsurgical or posttraumatic complication. OS rarely occurs in the postoperative course of gynecologic and obstetric patients and is difficult to diagnose.
CASE PRESENTATION
We present the case of an 83-years-old patient with carcinosarcoma of the uterus who developed OS with non-obstructive dilation of the right hemicolon and intraabdominal compression after total abdominal hysterectomy, omentectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Laparotomy with colonic decompression and abdominal dressing was performed. Subsequently, the patient developed pneumonia and peritonitis and died due to septic shock.
SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
We identified 49 case reports and 10 case series describing 17 gynecologic (cervical cancer, n = 2; carcinosarcoma of the uterus, n = 1; benign gynecologic condition, n = 14) and 76 obstetric patients (cesarean section, n = 66; OS during pregnancy or after vaginal delivery, n = 10). Outcome data were available for 59 patients. First-line treatment was conservative in 22/59 (37%) cases, laparotomy with decompression or colon resection was performed in 20/59 (34%) cases, endoscopic decompression in 12/59 (20%) cases, and i.v. neostigmine in 4/59 (7%) cases. Resolution was achieved in 22/59 (37%) of patients. The most common second-line treatment was right hemicolectomy. Adverse events grade 3 and 4 were observed in 8/59 and 31/59 patients (together 66%), respectively, mortality was 3/59 (5%).
CONCLUSION
OS is a rare postoperative complication of gynecologic and obstetric patients with a good prognosis, but a high morbidity. Pregnancy seems to be a predisposing factor for OS. Conservative treatment is a successful first-line approach.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged, 80 and over; Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans
PubMed: 31093741
DOI: 10.1007/s00404-019-05170-4 -
Nutrition in Clinical Practice :... Apr 2020The aim of this study was to systematically review effects of nutrition interventions on outcomes in patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders....
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to systematically review effects of nutrition interventions on outcomes in patients with chronic gastrointestinal (GI) motility disorders. There is currently a lack of evidence-based guidelines for nutrition management in this group, likely a result of the rarity of the conditions.
METHODS
A systematic review of all study types to evaluate current evidence-based nutrition interventions was performed using Medline, Embase, and CINAHL databases. Two independent reviewers participated in the process of this systematic review. A total of 15 studies and a total of 524 subjects were included.
RESULTS
Best treatment of this population group was found to include a stepwise process, progressing from oral nutrition to jejunal nutrition and lastly to parenteral nutrition. Small particle, low-fat diets were significantly better tolerated than the converse, with jejunal nutrition prior to consuming oral food significantly improving oral intake and motility. In more progressive cases, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension nutrition had lower reported symptoms than other enteral routes. Exclusive long-term parenteral nutrition is a feasible option for advanced cases, with a 68% survival rate at 15 years duration, though oral intake with parenteral nutrition is associated with higher survival rates.
CONCLUSION
Treatment of patients with GI motility disorders should first trial oral nutrition. For patients who progress to jejunal or parenteral feeds, the primary aim should be to maintain or reinstate oral intake to reduce morbidity and mortality risk. Higher-quality studies are still required in this area, particularly in the areas of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction and systemic sclerosis.
Topics: Chronic Disease; Enteral Nutrition; Evidence-Based Practice; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Jejunostomy; Nutrition Therapy; Nutritional Support; Parenteral Nutrition; Risk Factors
PubMed: 30989698
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10273 -
Current Medical Science Feb 2019The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
The aim of this review was to systematically compare the outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) with standard care (SC) after radical cystectomy. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies published until September 2017 which involved a comparison of ERAS and SC. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the outcomes of ERAS versus SC. Sixteen studies including 8 prospective and 8 retrospective trials met the eligibility criteria. A total of 2100 participants were assigned to ERAS (1258 cases) or SC (842 cases). The time to first flatus passage {WMD=-0.95 days, 95% CI (-1.50,-0.41), P=0.0006}, time until return to a regular diet {WMD=-2.15 days, 95% CI (-2.86,-1.45), P<0.00001} and the length of hospital stay {WMD=-3.75 days, 95% CI (-5.13,-2.36), P<0.00001} were significantly shorter, and the incidence of postoperative complications {OR=0.60, 95% CI (0.44, 0.83), P=0.002}, especially postoperative paralytic ileus {OR=0.43, 95% CI (0.30, 0.62), P<0.00001} and cardiovascular complications {OR=0.28, 95% CI (0.09, 0.90), P=0.03} was significantly lower in the ERAS group than those in the SC group. This meta-analysis demonstrated that ERAS was associated with a shorter time to first flatus passage, return of bowel function, and the length of hospital stay than SC in patients undergoing radical cystectomy, as well as a lower rate of postoperative complications, especially paralytic ileus and cardiovascular complications.
Topics: Cystectomy; Humans; Length of Stay; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Recovery of Function; Retrospective Studies; Standard of Care; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
PubMed: 30868498
DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2006-6