-
Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive &... Jan 2024Perineural spread (PNS) of breast cancer to the brachial plexus is rare, with reports limited to cases only in female patients. This study aimed to determine the...
BACKGROUND
Perineural spread (PNS) of breast cancer to the brachial plexus is rare, with reports limited to cases only in female patients. This study aimed to determine the incidence of PNS in male compared with female patients.
METHODS
Adult breast cancer patients referred to a single institution between 1994 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for imaging or biopsy-confirmed cases of PNS to the brachial plexus. Two independent reviewers of articles published in any language between 1990 and 2022 in PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar performed a systematic literature review.
RESULTS
Of the 10,466 patients with breast cancer (10,355 female, 111 male) referred to a single institution, there were 42 female patients with PNS to the brachial plexus for an estimated incidence of 0.4%. In the same time period, there were 111 male patients treated for breast cancer, including 88 patients with Klinefelter's syndrome (KS); however, there were no cases of male patients with PNS. A systematic review of the world's literature did not identify male patients with PNS to the brachial plexus.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a lack of any reported cases of PNS of breast cancer to the brachial plexus in men or patients with KS, who have a much higher incidence of breast cancer. This may reflect either the compounding rarity of these two events or point toward a distinct hormonally-driven link between breast cancer and PNS, highlighted by the disparity in PNS incidence in men and women.
Topics: Adult; Animals; Humans; Male; Female; Breast Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Equidae; Brachial Plexus; Brachial Plexus Neuropathies
PubMed: 37992580
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.10.139 -
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) Oct 2023(1) Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the prognostic role of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with... (Review)
Review
(1) Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to summarize current evidence regarding the prognostic role of perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). (2) Methods: We searched Cochrane Central, ProQuest, PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, and Web of Science, using relevant keywords to identify eligible articles. Two independent reviewers conducted two-stage screening, data extraction, and quality assessment. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) criteria. All analyses were performed using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA; version 3.3.070) software. (3) Results: The study included 101 published articles encompassing 26,062 patients. The pooled analyses showed that PNI was associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS; HR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.32-1.58; < 0.001), worse disease-specific survival (DSS; HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.65-2.12; < 0.001), and worse disease-free survival (DFS; HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.65-2.12; < 0.001). Similarly, both local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS) were worse in patients with PNI (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.72-3.10, < 0.001; and HR = 2.04, 95% CI: 1.51-2.74, < 0.001), respectively. The random-effect estimate of three studies demonstrated that the presence of PNI was associated with worse failure-free survival (FFS; HR = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.12-5.98, < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The current evidence suggests that PNI can be used as an independent predictor of the prognosis for patients with OSCC. The presence of PNI was associated with worse OS, DFS, DSS, FFS, and with recurrence. Asian patients and patients with extra-tumoral or peripheral PNI invasion were associated with worse prognosis.
PubMed: 37958235
DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13213339 -
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Oct 2023Breast implant capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma is exceedingly rare, with only eleven previously published cases. The present study systematically reviews the... (Review)
Review
Breast implant capsule-associated squamous cell carcinoma is exceedingly rare, with only eleven previously published cases. The present study systematically reviews the current literature and describes an additional case in a 56-year-old patient who had undergone previous breast implant augmentation with textured silicone implants 22 years prior. Systematic review of the literature demonstrated a scarcity of reported cases, yielding only eleven other incidences. Symptomatology for this patient involved pain, swelling, and erythema of the right breast prior to eventual surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging reporting extensive oedema and a large periprosthetic effusion with lobulated changes. The patient proceeded with bilateral capsulectomies and histology demonstrated moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, areas of squamous metaplasia, and a chronic inflammatory cell infiltrate. Postoperatively, a positron-emission tomography scan showed no concerning uptake of fluorodeoxyglucose and no evidence of metastatic disease. The patient proceeded to a right-sided total mastectomy and axillary lymph node biopsy. Final histology demonstrated remnant well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, whilst five lymph nodes were negative of disease. The patient received postoperative radiation therapy. A clinical history of swelling and pain appears to be a common presentation for this condition. Aspirations of periprosthetic collections containing squamous cells should be considered concerning for neoplasm. The presence of squamous metaplasia within the specimen provides some credence for transformation to invasive carcinoma mediated through chronic inflammation. The presence of perineural invasion would be worth reporting in future cases as it may confer similar risk characteristics as in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. A finding of remnant carcinoma during completion mastectomy provides support for an aggressive approach to surgical resection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
PubMed: 37798500
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03693-5 -
Cancers Aug 2023The outcomes of orbital exenteration (OE) in patients with craniofacial lesions (CFLs) remain unclear. The present review summarizes the available literature on the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The outcomes of orbital exenteration (OE) in patients with craniofacial lesions (CFLs) remain unclear. The present review summarizes the available literature on the clinical outcomes of OE, including surgical outcomes and overall survival (OS).
METHODS
Relevant articles were retrieved from Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on the clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of 33 articles containing 957 patients who underwent OE for CFLs were included (weighted mean age: 64.3 years [95% CI: 59.9-68.7]; 58.3% were male). The most common lesion was squamous cell carcinoma (31.8%), and the most common symptom was disturbed vision/reduced visual acuity (22.5%). Of the patients, 302 (31.6%) had total OE, 248 (26.0%) had extended OE, and 87 (9.0%) had subtotal OE. Free flaps (33.3%), endosseous implants (22.8%), and split-thickness skin grafts (17.2%) were the most used reconstructive methods. Sino-orbital or sino-nasal fistula (22.6%), flap or graft failure (16.9%), and hyperostosis (13%) were the most reported complications. Regarding tumor recurrences, 38.6% were local, 32.3% were distant, and 6.7% were regional. The perineural invasion rate was 17.4%, while the lymphovascular invasion rate was 5.0%. Over a weighted mean follow-up period of 23.6 months (95% CI: 13.8-33.4), a weighted overall mortality rate of 39% (95% CI: 28-50%) was observed. The 5-year OS rate was 50% (median: 61 months [95% CI: 46-83]). The OS multivariable analysis did not show any significant findings.
CONCLUSIONS
Although OE is a disfiguring procedure with devastating outcomes, it is a viable option for carefully selected patients with advanced CFLs. A patient-tailored approach based on tumor pathology, extension, and overall patient condition is warranted.
PubMed: 37686561
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174285 -
Updates in Surgery Jan 2024Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a dismal prognosis. While neoadjuvant therapy has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, its role remains a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pancreatic cancer is a malignant disease with a dismal prognosis. While neoadjuvant therapy has shown promise in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, its role remains a subject of controversy among physicians. We aimed to evaluate the benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Eligible studies were identified from MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Studies comparing neoadjuvant therapy with upfront surgery (with or without adjuvant therapy) in resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer were included. The primary endpoint assessed was overall survival. A total of 10,022 studies were identified, and the meta-analysis finally enrolled 50 revealed studies. The meta-analysis suggested that neoadjuvant therapy significantly improved the overall survival (HR 0.74, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.75, p = 0.006) compared to the upfront surgery approach. Furthermore, neoadjuvant therapy leads to favorable postoperative outcomes, with an enhanced R0 resection rate (OR 1.90, p < 0.001) and reduced lymph node metastasis (OR 0.36, p < 0.001) and perineural invasion (OR 0.42, p < 0.001), although it is associated with a reduced resection rate (OR 0.42, p < 0.001). In addition, patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy experience superior survival benefits compared to those undergoing adjuvant therapy (HR 0.87, p = 0.019). These results are further corroborated by the subgroup analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neoadjuvant therapy has the potential to provide survival benefits and improve postoperative long-term outcomes for patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, to validate and reinforce these findings, further well-designed and large trials are required.
Topics: Humans; Adenocarcinoma; Combined Modality Therapy; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prognosis
PubMed: 37639177
DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01626-0 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023Interscalene block (ISB) is widely regarded as the gold standard treatment for acute pain following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, a single injection of a local...
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone as adjuvants to the ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve block in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
INTRODUCTION
Interscalene block (ISB) is widely regarded as the gold standard treatment for acute pain following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, a single injection of a local anesthetic for ISB may not offer sufficient analgesia. Various adjuvants have been demonstrated to prolong the analgesic duration of the block. Hence, this study aimed to assess the relative efficacy of dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine as adjuncts to prolong the analgesic duration for a single- shot ISB.
METHODS
The efficacy of adjuvants was compared using a network meta-analysis. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted with a search deadline of March 1, 2023. Various adjuvant prevention randomized controlled trials have been conducted in patients undergoing interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder arthroscopic surgery.
RESULTS
Twenty-five studies enrolling a total of 2,194 patients reported duration of analgesia. Combined dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone (MD = 22.13, 95% CI 16.67, 27.58), dexamethasone administered perineurally (MD = 9.94, 95% CI 7.71, 12.17), high-dose intravenous dexamethasone (MD = 7.47, 95% CI 4.41, 10.53), dexmedetomidine administered perineurally (MD = 6.82, 95% CI 3.43, 10.20), and low-dose intravenous dexamethasone (MD = 6.72, 95% CI 3.74, 9.70) provided significantly longer analgesic effects compared with the control group.
DISCUSSION
The combination of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine provided the greatest effect in terms of prolonged analgesia, reduced opioid doses, and lower pain scores. Furthermore, peripheral dexamethasone in prolonging the analgesic duration and lowering opioid usage was better than the other adjuvants when used a single medication. All therapies significantly prolonged the analgesic duration and reduced the opioid dose of a single-shot ISB in shoulder arthroscopy compared with the placebo.
PubMed: 37396910
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1159216 -
Head & Neck Aug 2023Sialoblastoma is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor. The aim of this study was to review the available published data on sialoblastoma in a comprehensive analysis of... (Review)
Review
Sialoblastoma is a rare malignant salivary gland tumor. The aim of this study was to review the available published data on sialoblastoma in a comprehensive analysis of its clinicopathologic characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. An unrestricted electronic search was performed in the following databases: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of science, and gray literature databases. Eligibility criteria included publications with sufficient clinical, imaging, and histopathological information to confirm the diagnosis of sialoblastoma. Data were evaluated descriptively and analytically. A total of 52 studies met the eligibility criteria. In total, 62 patients were evaluated. There was no gender predilection, with the parotid being the most affected primary site (n = 28; 45.2%). In the log-rank test, there was a significant increase in disease-associated survival in patients younger than 1 year of age (82.8% vs. 44.4%; p = 0.003), individuals with lesions in major salivary glands (79.4% vs. 38.5%; p = 0.005), patients without metastases (77.8% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.011), encapsulated lesions (85.7% vs. 0%; p < 0.0001), congenital lesions (83.3% vs. 25.0%; p < 0.0001), and lesions that do not show perineural invasion (89.5% vs. 40%; p = 0.035). Kaplan-Meier curves estimated overall survival and disease-free survival at 5 years of 95.5% and 68.1%, respectively. In the multivariate Cox regression model, only the presence of metastasis was identified as an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] = 9.81; p = 0.010). Although sialoblastoma presents good prognosis, the tumor has a high recurrence rate.
Topics: Humans; Salivary Gland Neoplasms; Salivary Glands; Parotid Gland; Disease-Free Survival; Progression-Free Survival; Prognosis
PubMed: 37357912
DOI: 10.1002/hed.27440 -
European Journal of Anaesthesiology Sep 2023Peripheral regional anaesthesia is frequently used for upper extremity surgery. To prolong the duration of analgesia, adjuvants can be added to single-injection local... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effect of adjuvants added to local anaesthetics for single-injection upper extremity peripheral regional anaesthesia: A systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomised trials.
BACKGROUND
Peripheral regional anaesthesia is frequently used for upper extremity surgery. To prolong the duration of analgesia, adjuvants can be added to single-injection local anaesthetics. Despite attempts to compare several adjuvants in pairwise meta-analyses, a comprehensive comparison is still missing.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this network meta-analysis was to determine the effectiveness of adjuvants in upper extremity peripheral nerve blocks.
DESIGN
A systematic review of randomised controlled trials with network meta-analyses.
DATA SOURCES
A literature search in Embase, CENTRAL, MEDLINE and Web of Science was performed up to March 2023.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Randomised trials comparing different adjuvants injected perineurally in peripheral upper extremity nerve blocks were eligible. Frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted using a random effects model with physiological saline as the comparator. The primary endpoint was the ratio of means (ROM) of the duration of analgesia.
RESULTS
The review included 242 randomised controlled trials with a total of 17 391 patients. Twenty-eight adjuvants were compared in the largest networks. Most network estimations consisted of a high proportion of direct evidence. Fourteen adjuvants increased the duration of analgesia significantly by the following factors, ROM [95% confidence interval (CI)]: dexamethasone 1.95 (1.79 to 2.13), buprenorphine 1.83 (1.51 to 2.24), butorphanol 1.84 (1.41 to 2.39), potassium chloride 1.89 (1.15 to 3.11), dexmedetomidine 1.70 (1.59 to 1.81), sufentanil 1.70 (1.27 to 2.29), ketorolac 1.68 (1.24 to 2.27), midazolam 1.55 (1.24 to 1.94), tramadol 1.52 (1.32 to 1.75), nalbuphine 1.50 (1.30 to 1.72), morphine 1.43 (1.09 to 1.88), magnesium sulfate 1.42 (1.20 to 1.67), clonidine 1.36 (1.24 to 1.50) and fentanyl 1.23 (1.08 to 1.40). Inconsistency in network meta-analysis was substantial. Overall side effect rates were low with all adjuvants.
CONCLUSION
The best interventions to prolong the duration of analgesia were dexamethasone, followed by dexmedetomidine, opioids, electrolytes, ketorolac and midazolam. There are general concerns about the quality of underlying studies and the risk of publication bias.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
PROSPERO 2018 CRD42018115722.
Topics: Humans; Anesthetics, Local; Network Meta-Analysis; Midazolam; Dexmedetomidine; Ketorolac; Anesthesia, Conduction; Pain; Upper Extremity; Dexamethasone; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37337656
DOI: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001860 -
European Review For Medical and... May 2023We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. intravenous dexmedetomidine as local anesthetic adjuvant. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to compare the efficacy of perineural vs. intravenous dexmedetomidine as local anesthetic adjuvant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Two researchers searched MEDLINE, OVID, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central, Web of Science and Wanfang data for randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of intravenous vs. perineural injection of dexmedetomidine as a local anesthetic adjuvant in prolongation of analgesia for peripheral nerve block, without any language restrictions.
RESULTS
We identified 14 randomized controlled trials. The results revealed that the duration of analgesia [Standard mean difference (SMD): -0.55, 95% CI, (-1.05, -0.05) p=0.032, I2=85.4%] and the duration of sensory block [SMD: -2.68, 95% CI, (-4.53, -0.83) p=0.004, I2=97.3%], were significantly longer, the onset time of motor block [SMD: 0.65, 95% CI, (0.02, 1.27) p=0.043, I2=85.0%] was shorter in the perineural dexmedetomidine group, when compared with the systematic dexmedetomidine group. There was no significant difference in the duration of motor block [SMD: -0.32, 95% CI, (-1.11, -0.46) p=0.416, I2=89.8%] and the onset time of sensory block [SMD: 0.09, 95% CI, (-0.33, 0.52) p=0.668, I2=59.9%] between the two groups. Meanwhile, perineural dexmedetomidine reduced analgesic consumption in 24 hours [SMD: 0.43, 95% CI, (0.06, 0.80) p=0.022, I2=58.7%] compared with the intravenous dexmedetomidine group.
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis currently generates the evidence that perineural dexmedetomidine administration offers advantages not only in prolonging the duration of analgesia and sensory block, but also in shortening the onset time of motor block, when compared with the intravenous administration.
Topics: Dexmedetomidine; Adjuvants, Anesthesia; Anesthetics, Local; Analgesia; Administration, Intravenous; Peripheral Nerves
PubMed: 37203838
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202305_32321 -
Skin Health and Disease Apr 2023Malignant Chondroid Syringomas (MCS) are very rare malignant tumours arising from cutaneous sweat glands, with only 51 reported cases in the literature. These tumours...
Malignant Chondroid Syringomas (MCS) are very rare malignant tumours arising from cutaneous sweat glands, with only 51 reported cases in the literature. These tumours can metastasize and cause death if not treated adequately. While there are histological criteria to diagnose MCS tumours, there are no established criterion to determine which tumours are more or less likely to metastasize. A systematic review was performed to establish if any features of the primary MCS tumour are associated with risk of metastasis or patient mortality, as well as the efficacy of common treatment options. The literature search was performed using the Ovid Medline and Web of Science databases from inception through March 2020. This yielded 47 case reports corresponding to 51 unique patients. Statistical analysis of the collected data revealed none of the commonly accepted malignant histopathologic findings (including nuclear atypia and/or pleomorphism, mitotic figures, an infiltrative growth pattern, presence of satellite nodules, necrosis, and vascular and/or perineural invasion) of the primary tumour to be significantly more associated with metastatic risk or death. However, gross characteristics of the tumour, including size (greater than 5 cm) and truncal location of the primary lesion, were found to be associated with a higher risk of metastasis. The most effective treatment modality was wide local excision. Overall, primary MCS tumours, especially those greater than 5 cm or located on the trunk, should be treated with a wide local excision and followed closely to confirm no lesion recurrence or distant metastasis.
PubMed: 37013126
DOI: 10.1002/ski2.144