-
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2022Cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, irrespective of the level of human development. Globally, it was estimated that there were 19.3...
Cancer is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, irrespective of the level of human development. Globally, it was estimated that there were 19.3 million new cases of cancer and almost 10 million deaths from cancer in 2020. The importance of prevention, early detection as well as effective cancer therapies cannot be over-emphasized. One of the important strategies in cancer therapy is targeted drug delivery to the specific tumor sites. Nanogels are among the several drug delivery systems (DDS) being explored as potential candidates for targeted drug delivery in cancer therapy. Nanogels, which are new generation, versatile DDS with the possession of dual characteristics of hydrogels and nanoparticles have shown great potential as targeted DDS in cancer therapy. Nanogels are hydrogels with a three-dimensional (3D) tunable porous structure and a particle size in the nanometre range, from 20 to 200 nm. They have been visualized as ideal DDS with enormous drug loading capacity, and high stability. Nanogels can be modified to achieve active targeting and enhance drug accumulation in disease sites. They can be designed to be stimulus-responsive, and react to internal or external stimuli such as pH, temperature, light, redox, thus resulting in the controlled release of loaded drug. This prevents drug accumulation in non-target tissues and minimizes the side effects of the drug. Drugs with severe adverse effects, short circulation half-life, and easy degradability by enzymes, such as anti-cancer drugs, and proteins, are suitable for delivery by chemically cross-linked or physically assembled nanogel systems. This systematic review summarizes the evolution of nanogels for targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy over the last decade. On-going clinical trials and recent applications of nanogels as targeted DDS for cancer therapy will be discussed in detail. The review will be concluded with discussions on safety and regulatory considerations as well as future research prospects of nanogel-targeted drug delivery for cancer therapy.
PubMed: 36160424
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.874510 -
Current Rheumatology Reviews Jun 2023To investigate injection site pain (ISP) and other injection site outcomes caused by biologics administered alongside citrate-free (CF) and citrate-containing (CC)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
To investigate injection site pain (ISP) and other injection site outcomes caused by biologics administered alongside citrate-free (CF) and citrate-containing (CC) formulations.
METHODS
Electronic literature databases (Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library) were systematically searched for clinical trials and observational studies reporting on injection site outcomes after subcutaneous administration of biologics. Studies with unknown excipient formulations were excluded. The primary outcome was ISP, and secondary outcomes included any other reported injection site reactions (ISRs). Meta-analysis approaches were used to aggregate evidence identified via the conducted systematic literature review.
RESULTS
A total of two observational studies, two cross-over/sequential trials, and three head-tohead comparison trials directly comparing CF with CC biologics were identified, as well as seven placebo-controlled trials. Evidence from five of the seven direct comparison studies suggested reduced pain perception at the injection site when CF formulations were applied. Findings for other ISRs were balanced between both formulations, with slightly favorable results for preparations without citrate. A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials found no significant difference between arms with CF formulations and placebo regarding the proportion of patients experiencing ISP (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.30-1.28).
CONCLUSION
Excipient formulations are rarely specified in studies assessing pain and other ISRs of subcutaneously administered biologics. The available data indicate that subcutaneous administration of biologic agents without citrate may be associated with lower pain perception outcomes compared with treatment using CC formulations. Importantly, ISP is influenced by many factors which may have affected the results. More research is needed to assess how formulation excipients influence ISRs.
Topics: Humans; Adult; Biological Factors; Citric Acid; Excipients; Injection Site Reaction; Pain; Biological Products; Pain Perception
PubMed: 36043729
DOI: 10.2174/1573397118666220829123713 -
Critical Reviews in Food Science and... Nov 2023Essential oil nanoemulsion may have improved antibacterial properties over pure oil and can be used for food preservation. Ultrasonic cavitation is the most common... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Essential oil nanoemulsion may have improved antibacterial properties over pure oil and can be used for food preservation. Ultrasonic cavitation is the most common mechanism for producing nanoemulsions, and the impact of processing parameters on droplet properties needs to be elucidated. A systematic literature search was performed in four databases (Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus and PubMed), and 987 articles were found, 16 of which were eligible for the present study. A meta-analysis was performed to qualitatively assess which process parameters (power, sonication time, essential oil, and tween 80 concentration) can influence the final droplet size and polydispersity and how droplet size is associated with antibacterial activity. We observed that power, essential oil, and tween 80 concentrations added during processing are the critical variables for forming smaller droplets. Ratios of up to 3:1 (surfactant:oil) can produce droplets smaller than 180 nm with antibacterial properties superior to pure oil or isolated compounds. The improved properties of nanoemulsions are associated with the size and chemical composition of the droplet since the proportion of the hydrophobic core (EO) and the hydrophilic outer layer (Tween 80) directly influences the antibacterial mechanism of action.
Topics: Oils, Volatile; Polysorbates; Emulsions; Surface-Active Agents; Anti-Bacterial Agents
PubMed: 35900149
DOI: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2103089 -
Carbohydrate Polymers Sep 2022Paclitaxel, a clinical chemotherapy drug commonly used in the past few years, is greatly limited by its low therapeutic index. Starch and its derivatives have gained... (Review)
Review
Paclitaxel, a clinical chemotherapy drug commonly used in the past few years, is greatly limited by its low therapeutic index. Starch and its derivatives have gained wide interest from researchers owing to their unique hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties resulting from their various modifications, which exert the effect-enhancing and toxicity-reducing activity to paclitaxel in vivo and in vitro. This review summarizes the research progress toward different kinds of starch-based carriers, whether oral or injectable. In addition, we discuss the complex properties of starch derivatives toward physically complexed or chemically conjugated paclitaxel. The corresponding complex configurations are suggested. Starch-based carriers can act as permeability enhancers because they may interact with the unstirred water layer that separates hydrophobic drugs from biological membranes, even altering the barrier properties of the membrane. The information presented in this review may be used as a reference for future hydrophobic drug carrier studies.
Topics: Drug Carriers; Excipients; Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; Paclitaxel; Starch
PubMed: 35698420
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119628 -
AAPS PharmSciTech May 2022Aqueous colloidal dispersions of water-insoluble polymers (APDs) avoid hassles associated with the use of organic solvents and offer processing advantages related to... (Review)
Review
Aqueous colloidal dispersions of water-insoluble polymers (APDs) avoid hassles associated with the use of organic solvents and offer processing advantages related to their low viscosity and short processing times. Therefore, they became the main vehicle for pharmaceutical coating of tablets and multiparticulates, a process commonly employed using pan and fluidized-bed machinery. Another interesting although less common processing approach is co-spray drying APDs with drugs in aqueous systems. It enables the manufacture of capsule- and matrix-type microspheres with controllable size and improved processing characteristics in a single step. These microspheres can be further formulated into different dosage forms. This systematic review is based on published research articles and aims to highlight the applicability and opportunities of co-spray drying drugs with APDs in drug delivery.
Topics: Drug Compounding; Excipients; Polymers; Solubility; Spray Drying; Tablets; Water
PubMed: 35538248
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-022-02293-x -
Vaccine May 2022There is an urgent need for improved influenza vaccines especially for older adults due to the presence of immunosenescence. It is therefore highly relevant to compare... (Review)
Review
Importance and value of adjuvanted influenza vaccine in the care of older adults from a European perspective - A systematic review of recently published literature on real-world data.
BACKGROUND
There is an urgent need for improved influenza vaccines especially for older adults due to the presence of immunosenescence. It is therefore highly relevant to compare enhanced influenza vaccines with traditional influenza vaccines with respect to their effectiveness.
OBJECTIVE
To compare vaccine efficacy and effectiveness of adjuvanted influenza vaccines (aTIV/aQIV) vs. non-adjuvanted standard-dose (TIV/QIV) and high-dose (TIV-HD/QIV-HD) influenza vaccines regarding influenza-related outcomes in older adults, complementing findings from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)'s systematic review of enhanced seasonal influenza vaccines from February 2020.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase and MEDLINE to identify randomised controlled trials, observational studies and systematic reviews, published since ECDC's systematic review (between 7 February 2020 and 6 September 2021). Included studies were appraised with either the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool, ROBINS-I or AMSTAR 2.
RESULTS
Eleven analyses from nine real-world evidence (RWE) studies comprising ∼53 million participants and assessing the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of aTIV vs. TIV, QIV and/or TIV-HD in adults aged ≥65 years over the 2006/07-2008/09 and 2011/12-2019/20 influenza seasons were identified. Nine analyses found that aTIV was significantly more effective than TIV and QIV in reducing influenza-related outcomes by clinical setting and suspected influenza outbreaks (rVE ranging from 7.5% to 25.6% for aTIV vs. TIV and 7.1% to 36.3% for aTIV vs. QIV). Seven analyses found similar effectiveness of aTIV vs. TIV-HD in reducing influenza-related medical encounters, inpatient stays and hospitalisations/emergency room visits. In three analyses, aTIV was significantly more effective than TIV-HD in reducing influenza-related medical encounters and office visits (rVE ranging from 6.6% to 16.6%). Risk of bias of identified studies was moderate to high.
CONCLUSIONS
Our study suggests that both adjuvanted and high-dose vaccines are effective alternatives for vaccination programmes in older adults and preferable over conventional standard-dose vaccines.
Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Aged; Humans; Influenza Vaccines; Influenza, Human; Polysorbates; Squalene
PubMed: 35459556
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.019 -
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy =... May 2022Dexketoprofen is an enantiomer of ketoprofen (S+) that belongs to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic properties.... (Review)
Review
Dexketoprofen is an enantiomer of ketoprofen (S+) that belongs to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and has analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and antipyretic properties. Dexketoprofen has a stronger effect than ketoprofen, which makes it a readily used preparation. The review aims to find in recent original publications data about dexketoprofen and its comparison with other painkilling medications. The systematic literature review was conducted in November 2021 (2018 onwards). We selected 12 articles from PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline Complete databases. In the last 4 years, there have been many publications that shed a new light on dexketoprofen. The article is a comparative analysis of dexketoprofen's action vs other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and the combination of dexketoprofen with tramadol vs paracetamol with tramadol. The findings of the review confirm that dexketoprofen is a very good pain reliever more potent than paracetamol. Dexketoprofen produces similar effects to lidocaine and dexmedetomidine. Complex preparations containing dexketoprofen and tramadol are very effective painkilling tandem and are more effective than tramadol and paracetamol therapy in the treatment of acute pain.
Topics: Acetaminophen; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Ketoprofen; Tramadol; Tromethamine
PubMed: 35299123
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112819 -
Journal of Stomatology, Oral and... Oct 2022Temporomandibular-joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) management is a major challenge. Minimally invasive therapies (based mainly on injections) have been developed to increase... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Temporomandibular-joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA) management is a major challenge. Minimally invasive therapies (based mainly on injections) have been developed to increase local efficacy and limit adverse systemic effects. However, the requirement for repeat injections due to a short duration of action and expensive healthcare costs have pushed researchers to develop, via tissue engineering, drug-delivery systems (DDSs). In this literature systematic review, we aim to provide an overview of studies that tested DDSs on a TMJOA model.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We searched on PubMed for articles published from November 1965 to March 2021 on DDSs using a TMJOA model. We highlighted the different DDSs and the active molecule employed. Route of drug administration, model type, test duration, and efficacy duration were assessed. To evaluate the quality of each study, a protocol bias was tested using QUADAS-2™.
RESULTS
Of the 10 studies that were full text-screened, four used a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based delivery system. The other DDSs employed chitosan-based hydrogels, microneedles patches, nanostructured lipid carriers, or poloxamer micelles. Hyaluronic acid, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and analgesics were used as active molecules in five studies. The main way to administer DDSs was intra-articular injection and the most used model was the rat.
DISCUSSION
Various DDSs and active molecules have been studied on a TMJOA model that could aid TMJOA management. Further works using longer test durations are necessary to validate these advances.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chitosan; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Hyaluronic Acid; Hydrogels; Lipids; Micelles; Osteoarthritis; Poloxamer; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer; Rats; Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
PubMed: 34400376
DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2021.08.003 -
Systematic Reviews Aug 2021Celiac disease (CD) is one of the most common gluten-related disorders. Although the only effective treatment is a strict gluten-free diet, doubts remain as to whether... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Celiac disease (CD) is one of the most common gluten-related disorders. Although the only effective treatment is a strict gluten-free diet, doubts remain as to whether healthcare professionals take this restriction into consideration when prescribing and dispensing medicines to susceptible patients. This scoping review aimed to find out the current evidence for initiatives that either describe the gluten content of medicines or intend to raise awareness about the risk of prescribing and dispensing gluten-containing medicines in patients with CD and other gluten-related disorders.
METHODS
A scoping review was conducted using three search strategies in PubMed/MEDLINE, TripDatabase and Web of Science in April 2021, following the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR). References from included articles were also examined. Two researchers screened the articles and results were classified according to their main characteristics and outcomes, which were grouped according to the PCC (Population, Concept and Context) framework. The initiatives described were classified into three targeted processes related to gluten-containing medicines: prescription, dispensation and both prescription and dispensation.
RESULTS
We identified a total of 3146 records. After the elimination of duplicates, 3062 articles remained and ultimately 13 full texts were included in the narrative synthesis. Most studies were conducted in the US, followed by Canada and Australia, which each published one article. Most strategies were focused on increasing health professional's knowledge of gluten-containing/gluten-free medications (n = 8), which were basically based on database development from manufacturer data. A wide variability between countries on provided information and labelling of gluten-containing medicines was found.
CONCLUSION
Initiatives regarding the presence of gluten in medicines, including, among others, support for prescribers, the definition of the role of pharmacists, and patients' adherence problems due to incomplete labelling of the medicines, have been continuously developed and adapted to the different needs of patients. However, information is still scarce, and some aspects have not yet been considered, such as effectiveness for the practical use of solutions to support healthcare professionals.
Topics: Celiac Disease; Diet, Gluten-Free; Glutens; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Pharmacists
PubMed: 34364399
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-021-01772-9 -
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical... Oct 2021Concerns for anaphylaxis may hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunization efforts. We convened a multidisciplinary group of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
The Risk of Allergic Reaction to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines and Recommended Evaluation and Management: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, GRADE Assessment, and International Consensus Approach.
Concerns for anaphylaxis may hamper severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) immunization efforts. We convened a multidisciplinary group of international experts in anaphylaxis composed of allergy, infectious disease, emergency medicine, and front-line clinicians to systematically develop recommendations regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immediate allergic reactions. Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, the World Health Organizstion (WHO) global coronavirus database, and the gray literature (inception, March 19, 2021) were systematically searched. Paired reviewers independently selected studies addressing anaphylaxis after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, polyethylene glycol (PEG) and polysorbate allergy, and accuracy of allergy testing for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine allergy. Random effects models synthesized the data to inform recommendations based on the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, agreed upon using a modified Delphi panel. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine anaphylaxis is 7.91 cases per million (n = 41,000,000 vaccinations; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 4.02-15.59; 26 studies, moderate certainty), the incidence of 0.15 cases per million patient-years (95% CI 0.11-0.2), and the sensitivity for PEG skin testing is poor, although specificity is high (15 studies, very low certainty). We recommend vaccination over either no vaccination or performing SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient screening allergy testing for individuals without history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient, and a shared decision-making paradigm in consultation with an allergy specialist for individuals with a history of a severe allergic reaction to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/excipient. We recommend further research to clarify SARS-CoV-2 vaccine/vaccine excipient testing utility in individuals potentially allergic to SARS-CoV2 vaccines or their excipients.
Topics: Anaphylaxis; COVID-19; COVID-19 Vaccines; Consensus; GRADE Approach; Humans; RNA, Viral; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 34153517
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.06.006