-
Acta Ophthalmologica May 2024Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy and the ongoing verteporfin shortage restricts current treatment possibilities. Topical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC) is a prevalent exudative maculopathy and the ongoing verteporfin shortage restricts current treatment possibilities. Topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) have previously been proposed as a treatment for CSC, although its exact efficacy remains unclear. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we outlined the efficacy of topical NSAIDs for the treatment of CSC. We searched 11 literature databases on 13 December 2022, for any study describing topical NSAID treatment for CSC. Thirteen eligible studies were included with a total of 1001 eyes of 994 patients with CSC. Six studies were case reports, two were cohort studies and five were non-randomized comparative studies. Where specified, topical NSAIDs used were bromfenac 0.09%, diclofenac 0.1%, ketorolac 0.4% and 0.5%, pranoprofen 0.1%, and nepafenac 0.1% and 0.3%. Studies were predominantly of cases with acute CSC and several case studies reported treatment outcomes simultaneously with discontinuation of corticosteroid use, which complicated treatment evaluation. Meta-analyses of comparative studies revealed a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant best-corrected visual acuity improvement of -0.04 logMAR (95% CI: -0.07 to -0.01 logMAR; p = 0.01) at 1-month follow-up, which became statistically insignificant at 3-month follow-up (-0.03 logMAR; 95% CI: -0.06 to 0.003 logMAR; p = 0.08). Further, we found no benefit in complete subretinal fluid resolution at 1-month follow-up (OR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.81-1.76; p = 0.37) or 3-month follow-up (OR: 1.17; 95% CI: 0.86 to 1.59; p = 0.33). Taken together, available evidence does not support the use of topical NSAIDs for the treatment of CSC.
Topics: Humans; Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Treatment Outcome; Verteporfin; Photochemotherapy; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Tomography, Optical Coherence; Fluorescein Angiography
PubMed: 37551858
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15743 -
Oral Diseases May 2024This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the research and potential applications of carbon dots (CDs) for oral health purposes. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVES
This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the research and potential applications of carbon dots (CDs) for oral health purposes.
DESIGN
Systematic literature searches were performed on PubMed and Web of Science databases (up to February 2023). Two co-authors selected the published works independently and extracted the data in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Studies with the application of CDs for oral health purposes were included.
RESULTS
Among 152 articles, 19 articles were finally selected. Eight studies investigated the anti-microbial effects of CDs against, for example, oral pathogens, eight studies explored the applicability of CDs in relation to oral cancer, and three studies investigated CDs in relation to cell differentiation and tissue regeneration in oral health. The studies showed the promising potential of CDs in oral health, particularly for inducing bacterial killing by increasing reactive oxygen species, killing oral cancer cells via photodynamic therapeutic effects, and inducing dental pulp and periodontal bone regeneration.
CONCLUSION
The findings show that CDs have the potential to be utilized in the future for various oral health purposes. Besides, these results underline the broad-spectrum applicability of CDs, crossing the borders of oral health.
Topics: Humans; Carbon; Oral Health; Mouth Neoplasms; Quantum Dots; Dental Pulp; Photochemotherapy; Bone Regeneration
PubMed: 37530494
DOI: 10.1111/odi.14702 -
Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and... Aug 2023This systematic review aimed to assess the influence of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to mechanical debridement (MD) on peri-implant clinical... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Adjunctive Photodynamic Therapy for Treating Peri-Implant Mucositis Among Cigarette Smokers and Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
This systematic review aimed to assess the influence of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) as an adjunct to mechanical debridement (MD) on peri-implant clinical and radiographic outcomes among cigarette smokers and diabetics with peri-implant mucositis (piM). Randomized controlled trials, assessing the clinical and radiographic parameters of aPDT versus MD alone among smokers and diabetics with piM, were included in the study. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate the standard mean difference with a 95% confidence interval. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed utilizing the modified Jadad quality scale. The meta-analyses found statistically significant differences between the impact of adjunct aPDT and MD alone on the peri-implant plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), and bleeding on probing among smokers and diabetics with piM at the final follow-up visit. However, no significant differences were found between the impact of adjunct aPDT and MD alone on the peri-implant crestal bone loss among smokers and diabetics with piM at the final follow-up. The application of aPDT as an adjunctive to MD demonstrated improved scores of the peri-implant clinical parameters among smokers and diabetics with piM in comparison with MD alone.
Topics: Humans; Smokers; Combined Modality Therapy; Mucositis; Debridement; Photochemotherapy; Peri-Implantitis; Anti-Infective Agents; Tobacco Products; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 37506360
DOI: 10.1089/photob.2023.0046 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Dec 2023Optimal endodontic disinfection by means of conventional root canal treatment of primary teeth remains a challenge. Recently, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Optimal endodontic disinfection by means of conventional root canal treatment of primary teeth remains a challenge. Recently, antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT) has been proposed as an adjunct to conventional endodontic treatment for microbial disinfection. The purpose of this review is to critically appraise and synthesize the currently-available evidence about the antimicrobial efficacy of aPDT (antimicrobial photodynamic therapy) when used as an adjunct to traditional root canal therapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The focused question was ''In primary teeth needing root canal treatment (participants), is adjunct aPDT (intervention) more effective in disinfecting coronal and radicular dentine (outcomes) than root canal treatment alone (control)?'. The electronic research databases PubMED/Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, Embase and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) using relevant keyword phrases including 'antimicrobial photodynamic therapy', 'primary teeth', 'deciduous teeth', and 'endodontic treatment'. Original studies that described endodontic treatment of primary teeth or dentine using aPDT in comparison to conventional endodontic treatment were included. Case reports, reviews and other non-comparative studies were excluded. The literature search and quality assessment were carried out by two reviewers independently.
RESULTS
Ultimately, 9 studies were included in this review. Overall, majority of the studies concluded that adjunct aPDT improves the antimicrobial efficacy of conventional root canal therapy. However, several sources of bias were found in the studies.
CONCLUSION
Within the limitations of the studies, it is concluded that aPDT is a suitable adjunct to improve the disinfection of conventional root canal treatment. However, future studies should focus on the clinical outcomes, in relation to the reduction of microbial counts to ascertain the efficacy of aPDT in disinfection of primary dentine.
Topics: Humans; Photochemotherapy; Disinfection; Photosensitizing Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Tooth, Deciduous; Dentin; Dental Pulp Cavity
PubMed: 37473792
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103697 -
Lasers in Medical Science Jun 2023Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been suggested as an adjunctive therapeutic approach for peri-implantitis. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of adjunctive photodynamic therapy for treating peri-implantitis among diabetics and cigarette smokers: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been suggested as an adjunctive therapeutic approach for peri-implantitis. This systematic review aimed to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of adjunctive PDT (aPDT) for the treatment of peri-implantitis among diabetics and cigarette smokers. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which assessed the clinical and radiographic outcomes of aPDT versus other intervention(s) and/or MD alone among diabetics and smokers with peri-implantitis, were considered eligible for the review. Meta-analysis was performed for calculating the standard mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the modified Jadad quality scale. The meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between the influence of aPDT and other intervention/MD alone on the peri-implant PI among diabetics at the final follow-up. However, statistically significant improvements in the peri-implant PD, BOP, and CBL were observed after the application of aPDT among diabetics. Similarly, no significant differences were found between the influence of aPDT and other interventions/MD alone on the peri-implant PD among smokers with peri-implant diseases at the final follow-up. However, statistically significant improvements in the peri-implant PI, BOP, and CBL were observed after the application of aPDT among smokers. Significant improvements in the peri-implant PD, BOP, and CBL among diabetics and the peri-implant PI, BOP, and CBL among smokers after the application of aPDT at the final follow-up. However, large-scale, well-designed, and long-term RCTs are recommended in this domain.
Topics: Humans; Diabetes Mellitus; Peri-Implantitis; Photochemotherapy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Smokers; Tobacco Products
PubMed: 37335369
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-023-03807-0 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Sep 2023To systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL). (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL).
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles published by November 16, 2022, with no time restrictions. 'Cutaneous leishmaniasis' and 'photodynamic therapy' were searched using predefined search strings.
INCLUSION CRITERIA
(i) Randomized control trials; (ii) controlled clinical trials; (iii) case series; (iv) case reports; (v) participants were humans; (vi) clinical diagnosis was CL; (vii) treatment method used was PDT; and (viii) articles published in English.
RESULTS
In total, 303 articles were identified, including 14 papers meeting the criteria. The number of patients in each study ranged from 1 to 60 and the age ranged from 1 to 82 years. Aminolevulinic acid and methyl aminolevulinate were used as photosensitizers. Red light and sunlight were used as light sources. All reported satisfactory clinical effects. Side effects of treatment included burning sensation, pain and pigmentation after treatment. However, they were tolerable and temporary. The follow-up time ranged between 9 weeks and 24 months. A total of two patients recurred, but one did not recur after another round of PDT during the follow-up period.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study suggests that PDT is a safe and effective method for the treatment of CL, with tolerable side effects and good efficacy. As an alternative treatment method of CL, PDT has great potential. However, to verify the efficacy and specific mechanism of PDT for the optimal treatment strategy of CL, further research with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up times are needed.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Child, Preschool; Child; Adolescent; Young Adult; Adult; Middle Aged; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Photosensitizing Agents; Photochemotherapy; Aminolevulinic Acid; Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 37245683
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103627 -
Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Jun 2023A smile is considered one of the most important soft skills in social interaction. And discolored teeth may effect this. It is known that some photosensitizer agents... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
A smile is considered one of the most important soft skills in social interaction. And discolored teeth may effect this. It is known that some photosensitizer agents (PS) used in photodynamic therapy (PDT) during root canal treatment could play a significant role in tooth color change, and thus the main objective of this systematic review is to address whether performing PDT can influence tooth color change and to synthesize the most effective methods to remove PS from the root canal system.
METHODS
This study followed the PRISMA 2020 statement, and the protocol was registered at the Open Science Framework. Two blinded reviewers searched five databases up to November 20th, 2022: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The eligibility criteria were studies that investigated tooth color change after PDT in endodontics.
RESULTS
A total of 1695 studies were retrieved, and 7 were included in the qualitative analysis. All the included studies were in vitro evidence and investigated five different PS: methylene blue, toluidine blue O, malachite green, indocyanine green, and curcumin. Besides curcumin and indocyanine green, the remaining agents all caused tooth color change, and no method employed was effective in fully removing these PS from inside the root canal system CONCLUSIONS: Even though the findings showed that curcumin and indocyanine green did not influence tooth color change, the present evidence should be interpreted with caution since it is based on laboratory studies with questionable methods, and all efforts should be employed to avoid this undesirable side effect during clinical practice.
Topics: Photosensitizing Agents; Photochemotherapy; Indocyanine Green; Curcumin; Endodontics
PubMed: 37217014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103626 -
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology May 2023Corneal cross-linking (CXL), a corneal strengthening procedure, is known to alter anterior stroma swelling behavior and is one of the treatment modalities of bullous... (Review)
Review
Corneal cross-linking (CXL), a corneal strengthening procedure, is known to alter anterior stroma swelling behavior and is one of the treatment modalities of bullous keratopathy (BK). There are multiple studies published on the role of CXL in the treatment of BK. These articles had heterogeneous study population, different protocols used, and variable conclusions. This systematic review aimed to determine the role of CXL in the treatment of BK. The primary outcomes considered were changes in central corneal thickness (CCT) after 1, 3, and 6 months of CXL. The secondary outcome measures were changes in visual acuity, corneal clarity, subjective symptoms, and complications after CXL. We included randomized control trials (RCTs), observational and interventional studies, and case series with reports of more than 10 cases in this review. In RCTs, the mean pre-CXL CCT (794.0 ± 178.5 μm) in the intervention group (n = 37), decreased at 1 month (750.9 ± 154.3 μm) followed by a subsequent increase, but this difference was not significant during the 6-month follow-up (P- value 0.28, 0.82, and 0.82 at 1, 3, and 6 months, respectively). In noncomparative clinical studies (n = 188), the mean pre-CXL CCT (794.0 ± 178.5 μm) decreased at 1 month (710.9 ± 127.2 μm, P < 0.0001). Seven of the 11 articles included in the review reported no significant improvement in vision with CXL. The initial improvement in corneal clarity and clinical symptoms was not sustained. Current evidence suggests that CXL has short-term efficacy in the treatment of BK. More RCTs with high-quality evidence are needed.
Topics: Humans; Corneal Cross-Linking; Photosensitizing Agents; Riboflavin; Ultraviolet Rays; Collagen; Cross-Linking Reagents; Corneal Stroma; Keratoconus; Corneal Topography
PubMed: 37203022
DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1942_22 -
International Journal of Paediatric... Mar 2024Dental caries is the most common oral disease worldwide, and it is estimated to affect 2.3 billion people, with at least 530 million of them being schoolchildren with... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Dental caries is the most common oral disease worldwide, and it is estimated to affect 2.3 billion people, with at least 530 million of them being schoolchildren with decayed primary teeth. This condition can rapidly evolve into irreversible pulp inflammation and pulp necrosis and thus requiring endodontic intervention. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a supplementary method to conventional pulpectomy and is used to improve the protocol used for disinfection.
AIM
The main objective of this study was to evaluate through a systematic review the efficacy of supplementary PDT on the pulpectomy of primary teeth. This review was registered a priori on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022310581).
DESIGN
Two independent and blinded reviewers carried out a comprehensive search in five databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science. Eligible studies were randomized and nonrandomized clinical trials that evaluated in vivo microbiological load or clinical outcomes after using supplementary PDT in infected primary teeth.
RESULTS
After the selection process, four studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Data regarding the sample characteristics and PDT protocols were retrieved. All included trials used phenothiazinium salts as photosensitizer agents. Only one study observed a significant difference in the in vivo microbiological load reduction outcome when performing PDT on primary teeth. The remaining studies all discussed the possible benefits of this intervention; however, none observed a significant difference in this outcome.
CONCLUSION
In this systematic review, moderate-to-low certainty of the available evidence was observed, and thus, no significant conclusions can be drawn from the findings.
Topics: Humans; Child; Dental Pulp Cavity; Dental Caries; Root Canal Therapy; Photochemotherapy; Tooth, Deciduous
PubMed: 37195228
DOI: 10.1111/ipd.13088 -
Photodynamic therapy for infected foot ulcers in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.Sao Paulo Medical Journal = Revista... 2023Ulceration of the feet in patients with diabetes is a frequent complication that increases morbidity, mortality, hospitalization, treatment costs, and non-traumatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Ulceration of the feet in patients with diabetes is a frequent complication that increases morbidity, mortality, hospitalization, treatment costs, and non-traumatic amputations.
OBJECTIVE
To present a systematic review of the treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus and infected foot ulcers using photodynamic therapy.
DESIGN AND SETTING
A systematic review was performed in the postgraduate program in nursing at the Universidade da Integração Internacional da Lusofonia Afro-Brasileira, Ceará, Brazil.
METHODS
PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and LILACS databases were screened. The methodological quality, risk of bias, and quality of evidence of each study were assessed. Review Manager was used for the meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Four studies were included. They highlighted significantly better outcomes in patient groups treated with photodynamic therapy than those in the control groups that were treated with topical collagenase and chloramphenicol (P = 0.036), absorbent (P < 0.001), or dry covers (P = 0.002). Significant improvements were noted in terms of the microbial load in the ulcers and tissue repair, with a reported reduction in the need for amputation by up to 35 times. Photodynamic therapy resulted in significantly better outcomes between the experimental and control groups (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSION
Photodynamic therapy is significantly more effective in treating infected foot ulcers than standard therapies.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) - CRD42020214187, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=214187.
Topics: Humans; Brazil; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Foot; Photochemotherapy; Wound Healing
PubMed: 37194764
DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2022.0476.27022023