-
Orthopaedic Surgery Jul 2024Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgery for osteoarthritis, with increasing prevalence expected in the near future. This systematic review and meta-analysis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study Review
Computerized Versus Traditional Approaches for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Quantitative Analysis of Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgery for osteoarthritis, with increasing prevalence expected in the near future. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the effectiveness of computerized TKA versus traditional TKA, focusing on postoperative outcomes measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and the Knee Society score (KSS). A search on PubMed and Cochrane databases on November 14, 2023 for retrospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) yielded data on WOMAC and KSS. The search strategy was predefined, and methodological quality of studies was critically appraised. Two researchers extracted data. Unpaired t-testing assessed the mean monthly changes in KSS and WOMAC for computer-aided versus traditional TKA. Review Manager 5.3 was used for data synthesis and analysis. Out of 729 records, five RCTs enrolling 339 patients were eligible and analyzed using a random effects meta-analysis. The mean monthly ΔKSS score differed significantly between the traditional and computerized groups (11.47 ± 8.76 vs. 9.26 ± 6.05, respectively; p < 0.01). However, the pooled mean difference estimate showed no significant differences (D = 0.20, 95% CI = -0.53 to 0.93, p = 0.59), with high heterogeneity (I = 85%, p < 0.001). The mean monthly ΔWOMAC score also differed significantly (-14.18 ± 21.54 vs. -18.43 ± 20.65, respectively; p < 0.05), but again, no significant differences were found in the pooled estimate (D = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.46 to 0.79, p = 0.60), with moderate heterogeneity (I = 28%, p = 0.24).There is no significant difference in KSS or WOMAC outcomes between traditional and computerized TKA. The study suggests the need for further research with longer follow-up periods, more timepoints, and a broader range of patient outcome measures to fully evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of each method.
Topics: Humans; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Surgery, Computer-Assisted
PubMed: 38798039
DOI: 10.1111/os.14103 -
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism Aug 2024The concept of treat-to-target (T2T), a treatment strategy in which treatment is directed to reach and maintain a defined goal such as remission or low disease activity... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The concept of treat-to-target (T2T), a treatment strategy in which treatment is directed to reach and maintain a defined goal such as remission or low disease activity (LDA), has been explored for several diseases including rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, a comprehensive review of T2T in all rheumatic diseases has not recently been undertaken.
OBJECTIVE
To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of a T2T strategy in the management of adult patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases.
METHODS
PUBMED, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from January 1990 to December 2023 using key words related to a T2T strategy and rheumatic diseases; T2T strategy clinical trials or observational studies were included. Clinical, physical function and radiologic outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and adverse events (AEs) of the T2T strategies were investigated and a random-effect meta-analysis was conducted for the most commonly used outcomes in RA studies.
RESULTS
The search identified 7896 studies, of which 66 fit inclusion criteria, including 50 in RA, 3 in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 1 in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and 12 in gout. For the studies comparing a T2T strategy with usual care (UC) in RA, 83.3% (20/24) showed a T2T strategy could achieve significantly better clinical outcomes, and the meta-analysis showed that patients treated with a T2T strategy were more likely to be in remission (pooled RR: 1.68 (1.47-1.92), p<0.001] and achieve DAS-28 response (pooled standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.47 (0.26-0.69), P<0.001] at 1 year than patients treated with UC. Sensitivity analyses showed that a T2T strategy with a predefined treatment protocol had better clinical efficacy than that without protocol. In terms of improving physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), 11/19 (57.9%) studies found a T2T strategy was significantly more likely to achieve these than UC, with the meta-analysis for the mean change of HAQ score supporting this conclusion (pooled SMD: 1.48 (0.46-2.51), p=0.004). Five out of 9 studies (55.6%) demonstrated greater benefit regarding radiographic progression from a T2T strategy. In terms of cost-effectiveness and AEs, 2/2 studies found a T2T strategy was more cost-effective than UC and 8/8 studies showed no tendency for AEs to occur more often with a T2T strategy. For the studies in PsA and SpA, a T2T strategy was also demonstrated to be more effective than UC in clinical and functional benefits, but not in radiologic outcomes. All gout studies showed that sUA level could be controlled more effectively with a T2T strategy, and 2 studies revealed that the T2T strategy could inhibit erosion development or crystal deposition.
CONCLUSIONS
For patients with active RA, a T2T strategy has been shown in mulitple studies to increase the likelihood of achieving clinical response and improving HRQoL without increasing economic costs and AEs. Limited studies have shown clinical and functional benefits from T2T strategies in active PsA and SpA. A T2T strategy has also been found to improve clinical and radiologic outcomes in gout. T2T trials in other rheumatic diseases are lacking.
Topics: Humans; Antirheumatic Agents; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Remission Induction; Rheumatic Diseases; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38796922
DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2024.152465 -
Modern Rheumatology May 2024This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA).
METHODS
Studies were searched using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ichushi-Web, and clinical trial registries (from 2000 to 2021). The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias version 2 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the manual for development clinical practice guidelines by Minds, a project promoting evidence-based medicine in Japan, for observational studies.
RESULTS
One RCT and 22 observational studies were included. In the RCT on infliximab, the American College of Rheumatology pediatric (ACR Pedi) 30/50/70 responses at 14 weeks were 63.8%/50.0%/22.4%, with relative risks of 1.30 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-1.79)/1.48 (95% CI: 0.95-2.29)/1.89 (95% CI: 0.81-4.40), respectively. In the observational studies, ACR Pedi 30/50/70 responses for etanercept at 12 months were 76.7%/64.7%/46.4%, respectively. Infliximab treatment caused anaphylaxis in 17% and an infusion reaction in 23% of patients. The incidence of macrophage activation syndrome, serious infection and malignancy caused by TNF inhibitors was 0%-4%.
CONCLUSIONS
Thus, although TNF inhibitors were relatively safe, they were unlikely to be preferentially administered in patients with systemic JIA because of their inadequate efficacy. Further studies, particularly well-designed RCTs, are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of TNF inhibitors for systemic JIA.
PubMed: 38795057
DOI: 10.1093/mr/roae050 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024: Although osteoarthritis (OA) development is epidemiologically multifactorial, a primary underlying mechanism is still under debate. Understanding the pathophysiology... (Review)
Review
: Although osteoarthritis (OA) development is epidemiologically multifactorial, a primary underlying mechanism is still under debate. Understanding the pathophysiology of OA remains challenging. Recently, experts have focused on autophagy as a contributor to OA development. : To better understand the pathogenesis of OA, we survey the literature on the role of autophagy and the molecular mechanisms of OA development. To identify relevant studies, we used controlled vocabulary and free text keywords to search the MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, and SCOPUS database. Thirty-one studies were included for data extraction and systematic review. Among these studies, twenty-five studies investigated the effects of autophagy in aging and OA chondrocytes, six studies examined the effects of autophagy in normal human chondrocytes, and only one study investigated the effects of mechanical stress-induced autophagy on the development of OA in normal chondrocytes. : The studies suggest that autophagy activation prevents OA by exerting cell-protective effects in normal human chondrocytes. However, in aging and osteoarthritis (OA) chondrocytes, the role of autophagy is intricate, as certain studies indicate that stimulating autophagy in these cells can have a cytotoxic effect, while others propose that it may have a protective (cytoprotective) effect against damage or degeneration. : Mechanical stress-induced autophagy is also thought to be involved in the development of OA, but further research is required to identify the precise mechanism. Thus, autophagy contributions should be interpreted with caution in aging and the types of OA cartilage.
PubMed: 38792546
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13103005 -
BMJ Evidence-based Medicine Jun 2024To synthesise the available evidence on the effects of interventions designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of...
OBJECTIVE
To synthesise the available evidence on the effects of interventions designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of healthcare.
DESIGN
Systematic review and structured synthesis.
SEARCH SOURCES
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Web of Science and Embase from inception to 3 May 2023.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised, quasi-randomised and non-randomised controlled trials, interrupted time series and controlled or uncontrolled before-after studies that assessed interventions primarily designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces the GHG emissions of healthcare initiated by clinicians or healthcare services within any setting.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
Primary outcome was GHG emissions. Secondary outcomes were financial costs, effectiveness, harms, patient-relevant outcomes, engagement and acceptability.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Paired authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using a modified checklist for observational studies and the certainty of the evidence using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Data could not be pooled because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity, so we synthesised results in a structured summary of intervention effects with vote counting based on direction of effect.
RESULTS
21 observational studies were included. Interventions targeted delivery of anaesthesia (12 of 21), waste/recycling (5 of 21), unnecessary test requests (3 of 21) and energy (1 of 21). The primary intervention type was clinician education. Most (20 of 21) studies were judged at unclear or high risk of bias for at least one criterion. Most studies reported effect estimates favouring the intervention (GHG emissions 17 of 18, costs 13 of 15, effectiveness 18 of 20, harms 1 of 1 and staff acceptability 1 of 1 studies), but the evidence is very uncertain for all outcomes (downgraded predominantly for observational study design and risk of bias). No studies reported patient-relevant outcomes other than death or engagement with the intervention.
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions designed to improve the delivery of healthcare that reduces GHG emissions may reduce GHG emissions and costs, reduce anaesthesia use, waste and unnecessary testing, be acceptable to staff and have little to no effect on energy use or unintended harms, but the evidence is very uncertain. Rigorous studies that measure GHG emissions using gold-standard life cycle assessment are needed as well as studies in more diverse areas of healthcare. It is also important that future interventions to reduce GHG emissions evaluate the effect on beneficial and harmful patient outcomes.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022309428.
PubMed: 38782560
DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112707 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2024An estimated one-quarter to one-half of people diagnosed with haematological malignancies experience anaemia. There are different strategies for red blood cell (RBC)... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Restrictive versus liberal red blood cell transfusion strategies for people with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without haematopoietic stem cell support.
BACKGROUND
An estimated one-quarter to one-half of people diagnosed with haematological malignancies experience anaemia. There are different strategies for red blood cell (RBC) transfusions to treat anaemia. A restrictive transfusion strategy permits a lower haemoglobin (Hb) level whereas a liberal transfusion strategy aims to maintain a higher Hb. The most effective and safest strategy is unknown.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the efficacy and safety of restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategies for people diagnosed with haematological malignancies treated with intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without a haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT).
SEARCH METHODS
We searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies (NRS) in MEDLINE (from 1946), Embase (from 1974), CINAHL (from 1982), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2023, Issue 2), and eight other databases (including three trial registries) to 21 March 2023. We also searched grey literature and contacted experts in transfusion for additional trials. There were no language, date or publication status restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included RCTs and prospective NRS that evaluated restrictive versus liberal RBC transfusion strategies in children or adults with malignant haematological disorders receiving intensive chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or both, with or without HSCT.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two authors independently screened references, full-text reports of potentially relevant studies, extracted data from the studies, and assessed the risk of bias. Any disagreement was discussed and resolved with a third review author. Dichotomous outcomes were presented as a risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Narrative syntheses were used for heterogeneous outcome measures. Review Manager Web was used to meta-analyse the data. Main outcomes of interest included: all-cause mortality at 31 to 100 days, quality of life, number of participants with any bleeding, number of participants with clinically significant bleeding, serious infections, length of hospital admission (days) and hospital readmission at 0 to 3 months. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.
MAIN RESULTS
Nine studies met eligibility; eight RCTs and one NRS. Six hundred and forty-four participants were included from six completed RCTs (n = 560) and one completed NRS (n = 84), with two ongoing RCTs consisting of 294 participants (260 adult and 34 paediatric) pending inclusion. Only one completed RCT included children receiving HSCT (n = 6); the other five RCTs only included adults: 239 with acute leukaemia receiving chemotherapy and 315 receiving HSCT (166 allogeneic and 149 autologous). The transfusion threshold ranged from 70 g/L to 80 g/L for restrictive and from 80 g/L to 120 g/L for liberal strategies. Effects were reported in the summary of findings tables only for the trials that included adults to reduce indirectness due to the limited evidence contributed by the prematurely terminated paediatric trial. Evidence from RCTs Overall, there may be little to no difference in the number of participants who die within 31 to 100 days using a restrictive compared to a liberal transfusion strategy, but the evidence is very uncertain (three studies; 451 participants; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.27 to 3.70, P=0.99; very low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in quality of life at 0 to 3 months using a restrictive compared to a liberal transfusion strategy, but the evidence is very uncertain (three studies; 431 participants; analysis unable to be completed due to heterogeneity; very low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in the number of participants who suffer from any bleeding at 0 to 3 months using a restrictive compared to a liberal transfusion strategy (three studies; 448 participants; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06, P = 0.22; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in the number of participants who suffer from clinically significant bleeding at 0 to 3 months using a restrictive compared to a liberal transfusion strategy (four studies; 511 participants; RR: 0.94, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.19, P = 0.60; low-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference in the number of participants who experience serious infections at 0 to 3 months using a restrictive compared to a liberal transfusion strategy (three studies, 451 participants; RR: 1.20, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.55, P = 0.17; low-certainty evidence). A restrictive transfusion strategy likely results in little to no difference in the length of hospital admission at 0 to 3 months compared to a liberal strategy (two studies; 388 participants; analysis unable to be completed due to heterogeneity in reporting; moderate-certainty evidence). There may be little to no difference between hospital readmission using a restrictive transfusion strategy compared to a liberal transfusion strategy (one study, 299 participants; RR: 0.89, 95% CI 0.52 to 1.50; P = 0.65; low-certainty evidence). Evidence from NRS The evidence is very uncertain whether a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy: reduces the risk of death within 100 days (one study, 84 participants, restrictive 1 death; liberal 1 death; very low-certainty evidence); or decreases the risk of clinically significant bleeding (one study, 84 participants, restrictive 3; liberal 8; very low-certainty evidence). No NRS reported on the other eligible outcomes.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Findings from this review were based on seven studies and 644 participants. Definite conclusions are challenging given the relatively few included studies, low number of included participants, heterogeneity of intervention and outcome reporting, and overall certainty of evidence. To increase the certainty of the true effect of a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy on clinical outcomes, there is a need for rigorously designed and executed studies. The evidence is largely based on two populations: adults with acute leukaemia receiving intensive chemotherapy and adults with haematologic malignancy requiring HSCT. Despite the addition of 405 participants from three RCTs to the previous review's results, there is still insufficient evidence to answer this review's primary outcome. If we assume a mortality rate of 3% within 100 days, we would need a total of 1492 participants to have an 80% chance of detecting, at a 5% level of significance, an increase in all-cause mortality from 3% to 6%. Further RCTs are needed overall, particularly in children.
Topics: Humans; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Hematologic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation; Anemia; Adult; Child; Bias; Quality of Life; Hemoglobin A; Non-Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Hemoglobins
PubMed: 38780066
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011305.pub3 -
F1000Research 2024Previous studies have linked genetics to knee osteoarthritis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene I/D polymorphism may cause OA. However, evidence remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Previous studies have linked genetics to knee osteoarthritis. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene I/D polymorphism may cause OA. However, evidence remains inconsistent. This study examines knee OA risk and ACE gene I/D polymorphism.
METHODS
We explored Europe PMC, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library using keywords. Three assessment bias factors were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Criteria for inclusion: (1) Split the study population into knee OA patients and healthy controls; (2) Analysed the ACE gene I/D polymorphism; (3) Case-control or cross-sectional surveys. Studies with non-knee OA, incomplete data, and no full-text were excluded. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using random-effect models.
RESULTS
A total of 6 case-control studies consist of 1,226 patients with knee OA and 1,145 healthy subjects as controls were included. Our pooled analysis revealed that a significant association between ACE gene I/D polymorphism and risk of knee OA was only seen in the dominant (DD + ID vs. II) [OR 1.69 (95% CI 1.14 - 2.50), p = 0.009, I2 = 72%], and ID vs. II [OR 1.37 (95% CI 1.01- 1.86), p = 0.04, I2 = 43%] genotype models. Other genotype models, including recessive (DD vs. ID + II), alleles (D vs. I), DD vs. ID, and DD vs. II models did not show a significant association with knee OA risk. Further regression analysis revealed that ethnicity and sex may influence those relationships in several genotype models.
CONCLUSIONS
Dominant and ID vs. II ACE gene I/D polymorphism models increased knee OA risk significantly. More research with larger samples and different ethnic groups is needed to confirm our findings. After ethnicity subgroup analysis, some genetic models in our study showed significant heterogeneities, and most studies are from Asian countries with Asian populations, with little evidence on Arabs.
Topics: Humans; Case-Control Studies; Genetic Association Studies; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; INDEL Mutation; Osteoarthritis, Knee; Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A; Polymorphism, Genetic; Risk Factors
PubMed: 38779312
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.140233.1 -
Rheumatology International Aug 2024Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have higher rates of mental health conditions compared to the general population. It is believed that affective distress and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis have higher rates of mental health conditions compared to the general population. It is believed that affective distress and rheumatoid arthritis have a bi-directional relationship. This review will examine the associations between affective distress and rheumatoid arthritis outcomes over time. Several disease outcomes are included covering disease activity, function, and disability to provide a broad picture of the various ways patients are impacted. A quality assessment was also conducted. There were 71 studies included in the review. Three measures (disease activity, disability, and mortality) had enough data to complete meta-analyses of odds ratios or hazard ratios. The outcomes included were disease activity, tender joint count, swollen joints, pain, physician global assessment, patient global assessment, physical disability, acute phase reactants, stiffness, fatigue, work disability, and mortality. Numerous measures were included for most of the outcomes due to the variability across studies of measures used. Patients with affective distress had lower rates of remission according to the DAS-28, greater disability, and higher mortality. All of the outcomes covered had studies with mixed results, but swollen joint count, tender joint count, patient global assessment, and physician global assessment had the strongest evidence that they were associated with mental health longitudinally. The relationships between affective distress and disease outcomes are complex and vary depending on the measures. Overall, the effects fade over time. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the differing manifestations of the relationship between affective distress and rheumatoid arthritis outcomes.
Topics: Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Humans; Severity of Illness Index; Disability Evaluation; Psychological Distress; Mental Health
PubMed: 38775824
DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05574-9 -
Prosthetics and Orthotics International May 2024Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) results structural changes on wrist-hand joints, which can have negative impact on daily activities. Splints are commonly used to reduce pain...
BACKGROUND
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) results structural changes on wrist-hand joints, which can have negative impact on daily activities. Splints are commonly used to reduce pain and improve function of people with RA. The research shows that usage of dynamic splints improves wrist-hand function of people with other conditions.
OBJECTIVE
This systematic review aims to understand impact of dynamic wrist-hand splints on daily activity functioning of people with RA.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review.
METHODS
Search criteria were applied to PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Scopus electronic databases. Only papers, January 1980 to January 2024, conducted use of dynamic wrist-hand splint for people with RA were included. Quality assessment was completed using the Jovell and Navarro-Rubio classification.
RESULTS
Five papers that evaluated the use of dynamic wrist-hand splint for people with RA were included. All the papers showed that use of dynamic wrist-hand splints have positive effect on people with RA, but further research is required to show effect of them on daily activity functioning.
CONCLUSION
Use of dynamic wrist-hand splints improves function and preferred to be used more commonly by the people with RA; however, there is not enough research to show its effect on daily activities as most of the research conducted had limitations. Therefore, further research is required to show the impact of dynamic wrist-hand splint of daily activities for people with RA.
PubMed: 38775748
DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000355 -
Rheumatology (Oxford, England) May 2024Still's disease is a rare autoinflammatory disorder characterized by systemic inflammation, fever, rash, and arthritis. The term "Still's disease" covers the pediatric...
OBJECTIVES
Still's disease is a rare autoinflammatory disorder characterized by systemic inflammation, fever, rash, and arthritis. The term "Still's disease" covers the pediatric subtype systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (sJIA) and adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD), which affects adults. Biological drugs, including anti-interleukin-1 agents anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, and the interleukin-6 antagonist tocilizumab, are used in the management of Still's disease.
METHODS
We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, and the study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023450442). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were screened from inception until September 17, 2023. We included patients with Still's disease who received placebo or biological drugs: anakinra, canakinumab, rilonacept, or tocilizumab. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were achievement of ACR50 response and occurrence of serious adverse events, respectively. The interventions were ranked using rankograms and SUCRA values.
RESULTS
Nine trials with 430 patients were included. All biological drugs were associated with greater odds of ACR50 response compared with placebo. There was no statistically significant association between biological drugs and serious adverse events. The multivariate meta-analysis found no difference between biological drugs. As per SUCRA rankings, anakinra was the most effective and safe option with respect to ACR50 response and occurrence of serious adverse events.
CONCLUSION
This is the first systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of biological drugs in pediatric and adult patients with Still's disease. Biological drugs were effective in achieving ACR response and demonstrated a low adverse event profile in the management of Still's disease.
PubMed: 38775654
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keae295