-
JACC. Advances Feb 2024
PubMed: 38939393
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100764 -
Cureus May 2024Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a prevalent and aggressive form of lung cancer, with a poor prognosis for metastatic disease. Immunotherapy, particularly immune... (Review)
Review
Non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) is a prevalent and aggressive form of lung cancer, with a poor prognosis for metastatic disease. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has revolutionized the management of NSCLC, but response rates are highly variable. Identifying reliable predictive biomarkers is crucial to optimize patient selection and treatment outcomes. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications in predicting the response to immunotherapy in NSCLC. A comprehensive literature search identified 19 studies that met the inclusion criteria. The studies employed diverse AI/ML techniques, including deep learning, artificial neural networks, support vector machines, and gradient boosting methods, applied to various data modalities such as medical imaging, genomic data, clinical variables, and immunohistochemical markers. Several studies demonstrated the ability of AI/ML models to accurately predict immunotherapy response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in NSCLC patients. However, challenges remain in data availability, quality, and interpretability of these models. Efforts have been made to develop interpretable AI/ML techniques, but further research is needed to improve transparency and explainability. Additionally, translating AI/ML models from research settings to clinical practice poses challenges related to regulatory approval, data privacy, and integration into existing healthcare systems. Nonetheless, the successful implementation of AI/ML models could enable personalized treatment strategies, improve treatment outcomes, and reduce unnecessary toxicities and healthcare costs associated with ineffective treatments.
PubMed: 38939246
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61220 -
Frontiers in Nutrition 2024The controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) has been widely used for ascertaining the prognosis of various cancers. However, its use in patients with hematological... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
The controlling nutritional status score (CONUT) has been widely used for ascertaining the prognosis of various cancers. However, its use in patients with hematological malignancies remains unclear. This review examined evidence on the utility of CONUT as a prognostic marker for patients with hematological malignancies.
METHODS
All cohort studies that examined the association between CONUT and outcomes of hematological malignancies and were published on the databases of Embase, Scopus, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched from the inception of the databases to 30 January 2024. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies were available for review. A meta-analysis of 22 studies showed that high CONUT was significantly associated with poor OS in patients with hematological malignancies (HR: 1.95 95% CI: 1.62, 2.35 = 89%). The results remained unchanged on sensitivity and subgroup analyses based on study location, sample size, diagnosis, CONUT cutoff, and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale score. Only six studies reported data on PFS, and the pooled analysis found that high CONUT was a significant marker for poor PFS in patients with hematological malignancies [hazards ratio (HR): 1.64 95% CI: 1.21, 2.20 = 70%]. These results, too, maintained significance in the sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSION
CONUT is an independent predictor of poor OS in patients with hematological malignancies. The results appear to be valid across different cancer types and with different CONUT cutoffs. Scarce data also suggest that CONUT could predict PFS.
PubMed: 38938670
DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1402328 -
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine 2024This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between serum uric acid levels and the efficacy of uric acid-lowering therapies on clinical outcomes among patients...
Relationship between serum uric acid levels and uric acid lowering therapy with the prognosis of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.
AIMS
This meta-analysis aimed to explore the association between serum uric acid levels and the efficacy of uric acid-lowering therapies on clinical outcomes among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
METHODS
A comprehensive literature search was conducted through October 21, 2023, across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. The pooled effect sizes were estimated and presented with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Subgroup analyses were conducted based on various factors, including sample size (<1,000 vs. ≥1,000), follow-up duration (<2 years vs. ≥2 years), study quality (assessed by a score of <7 vs. ≥7), ethnicity (Non-Asian vs. Asian), study design (prospective vs. retrospective), type of heart failure (HF) (acute vs. chronic), presence of hyperuricemia (yes or no), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) thresholds (≥45% vs. ≥50%), and the type of uric acid-lowering therapy (traditional vs. novel).
RESULTS
The analysis included a total of 12 studies. Elevated serum uric acid levels were significantly linked to an increased risk of all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR): 1.21, 95% CI: 1.06-1.37, = 0.004] and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.42-2.04, < 0.001) in HFpEF patients. Subgroup analyses confirmed this association, particularly in non-Asian populations, those with chronic HFpEF, and studies with a follow-up duration of two years or more. Additionally, higher uric acid levels were associated with an increased risk of HF-related hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR): 1.61, 95% CI: 1.12-2.34, = 0.011]. Regarding treatment, uric acid-lowering therapy did not show a significant effect on reducing mortality in HFpEF patients. However, it was associated with a decreased risk of hospitalization due to HF (RR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79-0.91, < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The findings of this study highlight the prognostic significance of serum uric acid levels in HFpEF and suggest that uric acid-lowering therapy may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of HF hospitalizations. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms by which uric acid-lowering therapy confers its potential benefits.
PubMed: 38938653
DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1403242 -
Renal Failure Dec 2024To estimate the predictors, prevalence and prognostic role of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using meta-analysis. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
To estimate the predictors, prevalence and prognostic role of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) using meta-analysis.
METHODS
The PubMed, EmBase, and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for eligible studies from inception till May 2024. All of pooled analyses were performed using the random-effects model.
RESULTS
Fifty observational studies involving 17,558 CKD patients were selected. The prevalence of PH in CKD patients was 38% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 33%-43%), and the prevalence according to CKD status were 31% (95% CI: 20%-42%) for CKD (I-V), 39% (95% CI: 25%-54%) for end stage kidney disease (ESKD) (predialysis), 42% (95% CI: 35%-50%) for ESKD (hemodialysis), and 26% (95% CI: 19%-34%) for renal transplant. We noted the risk factors for PH in CKD included Black individuals (relative risk [RR]: 1.39; 95% CI: 1.18-1.63; < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.21-1.82; < 0.001), cardiovascular disease history (RR: 1.62; 95% CI: 1.05-2.51; = 0.030), longer dialysis (RR: 1.70; 95% CI: 1.18-2.46; = 0.005), diastolic dysfunction (RR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.38-2.55; < 0.001), systolic dysfunction (RR: 3.75; 95% CI: 2.88-4.87; < 0.001), and grade 5 CKD (RR: 5.64; 95% CI: 3.18-9.98; < 0.001). Moreover, PH in CKD patients is also associated with poor prognosis, including all-cause mortality, major cardiovascular events, and cardiac death.
CONCLUSION
This study systematically identified risk factors for PH in CKD patients, and PH were associated with poor prognosis. Therefore, patients with high prevalence of PH should be identified for treatment.
Topics: Humans; Hypertension, Pulmonary; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Prevalence; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Renal Dialysis; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38938193
DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2368082 -
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Jun 2024The Latarjet procedure (LP) is performed as a primary stabilization procedure (primary LP) and a salvage procedure when an earlier shoulder stabilization procedure has... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
Salvage Latarjet may provide worse outcomes in terms of recurrent instability and returning to sports compared to primary Latarjet: a systematic review of comparative studies.
BACKGROUND
The Latarjet procedure (LP) is performed as a primary stabilization procedure (primary LP) and a salvage procedure when an earlier shoulder stabilization procedure has failed (salvage LP). However, whether primary LP or salvage LP provides better outcomes for anterior shoulder instability remains unknown.
METHODS
Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on the PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, web of science and Cochrane Library was performed from their inception date to December 4, 2023. Inclusion criteria mainly included the comparison of postoperative outcomes between primary and salvage LP, English language, and full text availability. Two reviewers independently examined the literature, collected data, and evaluated the methodological robustness of the included studies. The Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was used to evaluate the quality of nonrandomized studies. Recurrent instability, complications, reoperations, return to sports, patient-reported outcomes, and range of motion were assessed. Statistical evaluations were conducted using Manager V.5.4.1 (The Cochrane Collaboration, Software Update, Oxford, UK).
RESULTS
Twelve studies were included in the systematic review, with 940 shoulders undergoing primary LP and 631 shoulders undergoing salvage LP. Statistically significant differences in favor of primary LP were found in 2 of the 11 and 2 of 4 included studies in terms of recurrent instability and returning to the same sports (RTS) at preinjury level, respectively. In terms of the visual analog scale, subjective shoulder value and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 2 of the 4, 1 of the 3 and 1 of the 3 included studies reported statistically significant differences in favor of primary LP. Differences were not noticed regarding complications, reoperations, the time to RTS, the Rowe score, the Athletic Shoulder Outcome Scoring System, and forward flexion.
CONCLUSION
Current evidence suggests that compared with primary LP, salvage LP may provide inferior postoperative outcomes in terms of recurrent instability and the rate of RTS at preinjury level. Primary and salvage LP may yield comparable efficacy in terms of complications, reoperations, the rate of RTS, the time to RTS, pain, shoulder function, and range of motion.
PROSPERO ID
CRD42023492027.
Topics: Humans; Joint Instability; Return to Sport; Salvage Therapy; Recurrence; Shoulder Joint; Treatment Outcome; Range of Motion, Articular; Shoulder Dislocation; Reoperation; Orthopedic Procedures
PubMed: 38937741
DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07593-w -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024Colorectal cancer (CRC) stands as the third most prevalent cancer globally, projecting 3.2 million new cases and 1.6 million deaths by 2040. Accurate lymph node... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) stands as the third most prevalent cancer globally, projecting 3.2 million new cases and 1.6 million deaths by 2040. Accurate lymph node metastasis (LNM) detection is critical for determining optimal surgical approaches, including preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery, which significantly influence CRC prognosis. However, conventional imaging lacks adequate precision, prompting exploration into radiomics, which addresses this shortfall by converting medical images into reproducible, quantitative data.
METHODS
Following PRISMA, Supplemental Digital Content 1 (http://links.lww.com/JS9/C77) and Supplemental Digital Content 2 (http://links.lww.com/JS9/C78), and AMSTAR-2 guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 3 (http://links.lww.com/JS9/C79), we systematically searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases until 11 January 2024, to evaluate radiomics models' diagnostic precision in predicting preoperative LNM in CRC patients. The quality and bias risk of the included studies were assessed using the Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) and the modified Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. Subsequently, statistical analyses were conducted.
RESULTS
Thirty-six studies encompassing 8039 patients were included, with a significant concentration in 2022-2023 (20/36). Radiomics models predicting LNM demonstrated a pooled area under the curve (AUC) of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85), featuring sensitivity and specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.78), respectively. Subgroup analyses revealed similar AUCs for CT and MRI-based models, and rectal cancer models outperformed colon and colorectal cancers. Additionally, studies utilizing cross-validation, 2D segmentation, internal validation, manual segmentation, prospective design, and single-center populations tended to have higher AUCs. However, these differences were not statistically significant. Radiologists collectively achieved a pooled AUC of 0.659 (95% CI: 0.627, 0.691), significantly differing from the performance of radiomics models (P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
Artificial intelligence-based radiomics shows promise in preoperative lymph node staging for CRC, exhibiting significant predictive performance. These findings support the integration of radiomics into clinical practice to enhance preoperative strategies in CRC management.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Lymph Nodes; Radiomics
PubMed: 38935817
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001239 -
Lasers in Medical Science Jun 2024We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of endovenous laser ablation utilizing a 980 nm device versus a 1470 nm device in the treatment of lower limb venous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of endovenous laser ablation utilizing a 980 nm device versus a 1470 nm device in the treatment of lower limb venous insufficiency. We performed a systematic review adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 statement. A research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of science for articles published by January 2024 was conducted. The primary endpoint was great saphenous vein (GSV) and truncal vein occlusion. Eleven studies encompassing 3061 patients and 3193 truncal veins, were included. The 1470 nm device demonstrated superior truncal vein and GSV occlusion outcomes compared to the 980 nm device at the early, one-year, and medium to long-term follow-up intervals. Odds ratios (OR) were 2.79(95%CI:1.31-5.94), 2.22(95%CI:1.21-4.07), and 2.02(95%CI:1.24-3.29) for truncal veins and 2.54(95%CI:1.119-5.41), 2.06(95%CI:1.07-3.95) and 2.04(95%CI:1.25-3.33) for GSV, across the respective intervals. While both devices demonstrated minimal, deep vein thrombosis (DVT), endovenous heat-induced thrombosis (EHIT) ≥ 2, and burn estimates, the 1470 nm device exhibited improved paresthesia, risk ratio (RR), 0.51(95%CI:0.34-0.77) and pain outcomes, standardized mean difference (SMD), -0.62(95%CI:-0.99to-0.25). Subgroup analysis displayed enhanced occlusion outcomes with the 1470 nm device for the six-month and one-year intervals, irrespective of fiber type. Radial fibers were associated with improved paresthesia outcomes (β=-0.9520,p = 0.03). This review emphasized the enhanced efficacy of the 1470 nm device over the 980 nm device, regardless of fiber type. Radial fibers showed promise for improved paresthesia outcomes, suggesting similar safety profiles for both systems. Conclusive remarks on pain outcomes were impeded by data limitations.
Topics: Humans; Endovascular Procedures; Laser Therapy; Treatment Outcome; Venous Insufficiency
PubMed: 38935309
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-04112-0 -
The clinical significance of neopterin and NT-pro BNP in chronic heart failure: a systematic review.Acta Cardiologica Jun 2024Biomarkers emerged as powerful adjuncts to conventional clinical care in heart failure (HF). The aim of this study is to evaluate neopterin and NT-pro BNP as diagnostic...
BACKGROUND
Biomarkers emerged as powerful adjuncts to conventional clinical care in heart failure (HF). The aim of this study is to evaluate neopterin and NT-pro BNP as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in HF.
METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in six electronic databases from inception to July 24th, 2022. Independent reviewers screened the title, abstract and full text then data extraction and critical appraisal of included studies were performed.
RESULTS
A total of eleven studies were included. Neopterin and NT-pro BNP levels were elevated in HF patients as compared to control. Moreover, within HF patients, levels of biomarkers were significantly higher in patients with advanced HF and more severe disease state. Patients who suffered cardiovascular adverse events had high levels of biomarkers. Two studies assessed the effect of treatment on biomarkers levels, showed that levels of neopterin and/or NT-pro BNP decreased with treatment. Studies confirmed the potential of relying on neopterin and NT-pro BNP as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in HF in addition to assessing disease severity.
CONCLUSION
Biomarkers levels correlate with disease severity and could be used as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in HF. Further research is needed for a definitive conclusion about using these biomarkers to determine the efficacy of therapy.
PubMed: 38934779
DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2024.2371628 -
Archivio Italiano Di Urologia,... Jun 2024Erectile dysfunction can cause self-withdrawal and decreased quality of life. Patients who do not respond to pharmacological therapy and other conservative treatments... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
Erectile dysfunction can cause self-withdrawal and decreased quality of life. Patients who do not respond to pharmacological therapy and other conservative treatments are urged to undergo penile prosthesis implantation. Malleable penile prosthesis was the first prosthesis developed, but then inflatable penile prosthesis was developed to give a more natural erection. There is no meta-analysis comparing inflatable and malleable penile prostheses in terms of safety and efficacy. This study is conducted to evaluate patient and partner satisfaction, ease of use, mechanical failure, and infection rate in patients who underwent penile prosthesis implantation.
METHOD
This meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) protocols. Five eligible studies were included from Pubmed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and SemanticScholar databases.
RESULT
In this study, patient and partner satisfaction are significantly better (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.66-6.93, p = 0.0008) (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.75-3.08, p < 0.00001). Mechanical failure is also significantly higher in inflatable penile prostheses (OR 5.60, 95% CI 2.02-15.53, p = 0.0009). There is no significant difference in terms of ease of use and infection rate in inflatable or malleable penile prostheses.
CONCLUSIONS
This study concluded that inflatable penile prosthesis is better in terms of patient and partner satisfaction, but mechanical failures occur more frequently in this type of prosthesis.
Topics: Humans; Male; Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Prosthesis; Patient Satisfaction; Prosthesis Design; Penile Implantation; Treatment Outcome; Quality of Life; Prosthesis Failure
PubMed: 38934528
DOI: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12353