-
American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Nov 2022Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disease affecting 1 in 5000 individuals. Epistaxis is seen in more than 90% of patients with HHT.... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) is an autosomal dominant disease affecting 1 in 5000 individuals. Epistaxis is seen in more than 90% of patients with HHT. Severe recurrent epistaxis can significantly decrease quality of life and may be resistant to standard treatment measures. Dysregulation of angiogenesis has been shown to cause the proliferation of abnormal blood vessels. As such, antiangiogenic treatments have been investigated including beta-blockers.
OBJECTIVE
A systematic review of the efficacy of beta-blockers in topical treatment of epistaxis in patients with HHT based on epistaxis duration, frequency, and severity.
METHODS
A systematic search was performed using the PubMed, Embase via Ovid, and Cochrane databases. The Preferred Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Studies that measured the efficacy of beta-blocker treatment of epistaxis in patients with HHT were included for qualitative analysis.
RESULTS
Five studies (3 randomized controlled trials and 2 case series) with a total of 132 patients were included. Administration (systemically or topically via a spray or gel) of timolol and propranolol showed mixed evidence of improvement in epistaxis frequency, severity, and duration when compared with control groups. The evidence for propranolol appears more promising than timolol.
CONCLUSION
There are significant limitations in the included studies, and further investigation with larger longitudinal or randomized prospective trials is recommended. The available evidence suggests that beta-blocker treatment may have a positive effect on HHT-related epistaxis.
Topics: Humans; Epistaxis; Propranolol; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic; Timolol
PubMed: 35929049
DOI: 10.1177/19458924221118131 -
Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Jul 2022To present a case of refractory medication-induced tremor successfully treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) and... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To present a case of refractory medication-induced tremor successfully treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) and to propose a medical and surgical treatment algorithm based on a systematical review of the literature.
METHODS
Patient data were retrospectively collected. A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Subjective and objective data were pooled for analysis by classifying them into 5 predefined categories(no, minimal, moderate, good, and excellent effects).
RESULTS
The patient presented with lithium-induced bilateral progressive hand tremor lasting 25 years. After DBS, he reported excellent tremor suppression until the last follow-up (36 months after Vim-DBS). For the review, 34 of 140 studies were included and evaluated (178 unique subjects, 31 different treatments). A good-to-excellent tremor suppression (50%-100%) in at least 50% of subjects was achieved using propranolol (12 studies, 50% of 56 subjects), tetrabenazine (5 studies, 51% of 13 subjects), and metoprolol (4 studies, 75% of 8 subjects). The effect of benztropine and diphenhydramine was none or only minimal to moderate (up to 50% improvement; both: 3 studies, 50% of 4 patients). One article reported minimal-to-moderate effectiveness after DBS of the ventral oral posterior nucleus of the thalamus. Methods were highly heterogeneous. All studies scored grade III or IV quality of evidence, which was insufficient for recommendations (level U).
CONCLUSION
Treatment decision making should be performed on a case-by-case basis considering the low level of evidence, and we propose a practically oriented treatment algorithm. Propranolol, tetrabenazine, and metoprolol might be effective. For selected and refractory cases, DBS might be considered.
PubMed: 35844282
DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13463 -
Journal of Indian Association of... 2022Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign vascular tumor of infancy. Propranolol is considered first-line therapy for IH. However, it is associated with side...
BACKGROUND
Infantile hemangioma (IH) is the most common benign vascular tumor of infancy. Propranolol is considered first-line therapy for IH. However, it is associated with side effects. Therefore, there was a need for alternative therapy. Atenolol, a selective b1-blocker may be free from such side effects. Hence, the present study aims to develop a more accurate estimate of the safety and efficacy of atenolol compared to propranolol in the treatment of IH.
METHODOLOGY
A search of various literature databases (PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Scopus, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) was done to identify studies which compared propranolol versus atenolol in the treatment of IH. The combined odds ratio along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using a fixed-effects model.
RESULTS
A total of 300 articles were screened of which five studies including 116 patients in atenolol arm and 138 patients in the propranolol arm were analyzed. Atenolol was comparable to propranolol in terms of efficacy as no significant difference was seen between both the treatment arms in terms of hemangioma activity score (mean difference 0.25 [95% CI;‒0.21, 0.71]) and complete response (odds ratio [OR] =0.43; 95% CI; 0.17, 1.11; = 0.08,). Atenolol therapy was better than propranolol in terms of safety, i.e., serious/potentially serious side effect, (OR = 0.11; 95% CI; 0.02, 0.51; = 0.005) and wheezing/bronchial hyperreactivity (OR = 0.11; 95% CI; 0.02, 0.51; = 0.005).
CONCLUSION
The present meta-analysis provides evidence that atenolol has got a comparable efficacy and better safety profile with propranolol.
PubMed: 35733601
DOI: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_3_21 -
Ageing Research Reviews Sep 2022Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder manifested by rest tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability. Recent pharmaco-epidemiological... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Parkinson's Disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder manifested by rest tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability. Recent pharmaco-epidemiological studies evaluating beta-adrenergic drug use and risk of PD have reported conflicting findings.
OBJECTIVES
This systematic review and meta-analyses evaluate the association between beta-adrenergic (agonists and antagonists) drugs' use and PD.
METHODS
An electronic literature search of eight databases was performed from inception to July 2021 to identify pharmaco-epidemiological studies (case-control and cohort) reporting the risk of PD in beta-adrenergic users compared to non-users. We used the generic inverse variance method and RevMan (5.3.5) to estimate pooled adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of PD using a random-effects model.
RESULTS
Of 3168 records, 15 studies (10 case-control; five cohort) with 6508,877 participants, including 87,011 PD cases, were included. In the pooled analysis (n = 10) including any beta-antagonist users, compared with non-users, the aRR for PD was 1.19 (CI: 1.05,1.35); for any beta-agonist users (n = 8) aRR for PD was 0.87 (CI: 0.78,0.97). Propranolol users had a significantly increased risk of PD (aRR:1.91; CI:1.20,3.06), whereas salbutamol use was associated with reduced risk of PD (aRR:0.95; CI:0.92,0.99). Significant heterogeneity (I >87%) was observed, but the majority (n = 13) of the studies were of high quality, based on the JBI tool.
CONCLUSIONS
Beta-antagonist use was associated with a modestly increased risk of PD, whereas beta-agonist use was associated with a modest decreased risk of PD. Future epidemiological studies should address the issues of protopathic bias and indirect association using appropriate epidemiological methods.
Topics: Adrenergic Agents; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Humans; Parkinson Disease
PubMed: 35718329
DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101670 -
Kidney Medicine May 2022There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable...
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE
There is conflicting evidence regarding the type of β-blockers to use in dialysis patients. This systematic review seeks to determine whether highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with higher rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in hemodialysis patients than poorly dialyzable β-blockers.
STUDY DESIGN
A systematic review of the existing literature was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed using data from the selected studies.
SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS
Participants were from the United States, Canada, and Taiwan. The mean ages of participants ranged from 55.9-75.7 years.
SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES
We searched the Ovid MEDLINE database from 1990 to September 2020. Studies without adult hemodialysis participants and without comparisons of at least 2 β-blockers of different dialyzability were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION
Baseline and adjusted outcome data were extracted from each study.
ANALYTICAL APPROACH
Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled risk ratios using fully adjusted models from individual studies.
RESULTS
Four cohort studies were included. Pooling fully adjusted models, highly dialyzable β-blockers did not influence mortality (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.08; I = 0.84) compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers but were associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.83-0.93). There was significant heterogeneity between studies (I = 0.35). Only 1 study reported on adverse events. Intradialytic hypotension was more common in those on carvedilol (a poorly dialyzable β-blocker) compared with those on metoprolol (a highly dialyzable β-blocker; adjusted incidence rate ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.09-1.11).
LIMITATIONS
No randomized controlled trials were identified. Each study used different analytic methods and different definitions for outcomes. Classifications of β-blockers varied. Only 1 study reported on adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS
Pooled data suggest highly dialyzable β-blockers are associated with similar mortality events and fewer cardiovascular events compared with poorly dialyzable β-blockers.
PubMed: 35539430
DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100460 -
Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Nov 2022Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common benign tumors of childhood. Timely diagnosis and management of higher-risk IH is key in avoiding permanent disfigurement,...
Infantile hemangiomas (IH) are the most common benign tumors of childhood. Timely diagnosis and management of higher-risk IH is key in avoiding permanent disfigurement, visual impairment, and life-threatening airway compromise. Here, we identify and critically appraise existing clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for IH diagnosis and management. A systematic search of MEDLINE, SCOPUS, and EMBASE was conducted until August 2021. Four independent reviewers assessed each CPG utilizing the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation, 2 edition (AGREE II). An scaled domain score of ≥60% demonstrated adequacy in a given domain. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) assessed agreement and scoring consistency between the reviewers. Eight CPGs were eligible and included for critical appraisal. Only one CPG was classified as 'high quality', with the remaining seven guidelines being 'average' ( = 3) or 'low' ( = 4) quality. Six guidelines (75.0%) were conducted via nonsystematic literature searches. The 'Applicability' (40.4%±14.0) and 'Rigor of development' (46.9%±17.3) domains achieved the lowest scores, while the highest average scores were in 'Scope and purpose' (76.7%±11.3) and 'Editorial independence' (90.8%±13.0). We found high consistency between the four independent reviewers, with 'very good' ( = 5) or 'good' ( = 1) interrater reliability in all six AGREE II domains. Based on the AGREE II instrument, there is only one available high-quality consensus statement on the diagnosis and management of IH. Low scores in 'Rigor of development' and 'Applicability' suggest notable weaknesses in the development process and reporting quality of existing IH CPGs. Future guidelines should be backed by systematic literature searches and focus on guideline clinical translation.
Topics: Hemangioma; Humans; Infant; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reproducibility of Results
PubMed: 35468033
DOI: 10.1080/08880018.2022.2062502 -
The Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and... Mar 2023Although propranolol has been established as the gold standard when treatment is sought for infantile hemangioma, concerns over its side effect profile have led to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although propranolol has been established as the gold standard when treatment is sought for infantile hemangioma, concerns over its side effect profile have led to increasing usage of atenolol, a beta-1 selective blocker.
METHODS
A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Cochrane was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using MeSH terms and keywords for the terms propranolol, atenolol, and infantile hemangioma, including alternative spellings. All randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies directly comparing outcomes of hemangioma treatment with atenolol and propranolol were included. A meta-analysis with pooled mean differences, pooled odds ratios, and analysis of proportions was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 669 participants in 7 studies (3 RCTs and 4 cohort) were included. Propranolol showed a significantly higher rate of complete response compared to atenolol (73.3% vs 85.4%, = .0004). The pooled mean difference of 0.07 (95% CI -0.12, 0.27) in Hemangioma Activity Score (HAS) was not statistically significant. In terms of side effects, there were significantly more agitation and bronchial hyperreactivity events in the propranolol group ( = .0245 and < .0001, respectively). Overall, there was a significantly greater number of adverse events in the propranolol group compared to the atenolol group (185 vs 117, < .00001). The overall pooled odds ratio was 2.70 (95% CI 1.90, 3.84), indicating that there is 2.7 times higher odds of adverse events in the propranolol group.
CONCLUSION
Propranolol treatment leads to a significantly higher rate of complete response than atenolol. However, its use must be weighed against its greater side effect profile.
Topics: Humans; Infant; Propranolol; Atenolol; Hemangioma, Capillary; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Hemangioma; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 35466712
DOI: 10.1177/00034894221089758 -
Journal of Psychiatric Research Jun 2022Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops after an exposure to a life-threatening event and is characterized by intrusive memories. According to memory... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) develops after an exposure to a life-threatening event and is characterized by intrusive memories. According to memory reconsolidation theory retrieval of memory under certain conditions leads to its labilization and subsequent re-storage which could be disrupted by drugs. Propranolol has been the most commonly investigated drug for memory reconsolidation therapy in clinical trials. Intervention with propranolol have shown mixed results in PTSD patients with some studies showing improvement in symptoms while other failing to replicate these findings. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the efficacy of trauma memory disruption by propranolol on PTSD symptoms and physiological responses in PTSD patients. 3224 publications were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies on effects of propranolol on PTSD symptoms and 3 studies on effects of propranolol on physiological responses were incorporated in the meta-analyses. Overall, results indicate that propranolol did not show a beneficial effect on PTSD symptoms (standardized mean difference: 1.29; 95% CI = -2.16 - 0.17). Similarly, propranolol did not influence skin conductance (standardized mean difference: 0.77; 95% CI = -1.85 - 0.31) or EMG response (standardized mean difference: 0.16; 95% CI = -0.65 - 0.33). However, propranolol significantly reduced heart rate after trauma memory recall compared to placebo (standardized mean difference: 0.67; 95% CI = -1.27 to -0.07). This study finds a lack of evidence for the efficacy of propranolol on traumatic memory disruption, in PTSD patients, to recommend its routine clinical use. However, a high level of heterogeneity, variation in propranolol dosage and inadequate sample sizes mean that these findings require cautious interpretation.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Fear; Humans; Memory; Propranolol; Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic
PubMed: 35405409
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.03.045 -
Journal of Psychiatry & Neuroscience :... 2022Reconsolidation impairment using propranolol is a novel intervention for mental disorders with an emotional memory at their core. In this systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Reconsolidation impairment using propranolol is a novel intervention for mental disorders with an emotional memory at their core. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we examined the evidence for this intervention in healthy and clinical adult samples.
METHODS
We searched 8 databases for randomized, double-blind studies that involved at least 1 propranolol group and 1 placebo group. We conducted a meta-analysis of 14 studies ( = 478) in healthy adults and 12 studies in clinical samples ( = 446).
RESULTS
Compared to placebo, reconsolidation impairment under propranolol resulted in reduced recall of aversive material and cue-elicited conditioned emotional responses in healthy adults, as evidenced by an effect size (Hedges ) of -0.51 ( = 0.002, 2-tailed). Moreover, compared to placebo, reconsolidation impairment under propranolol alleviated psychiatric symptoms and reduced cue-elicited reactivity in clinical samples with posttraumatic stress disorder, addiction or phobia ( = -0.42, = 0.010).
LIMITATIONS
Methodological differences between studies posed an obstacle for identifying sources of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSION
Reconsolidation impairment is a robust, well-replicated phenomenon in humans. Its clinical use is promising and deserves further controlled investigation.
Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Adult; Emotions; Humans; Mental Recall; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 35361699
DOI: 10.1503/jpn.210057 -
Annals of Palliative Medicine Jan 2022Migraine refers to a group of recurrent, chronic, neurological, and vascular diseases. Long-term recurrent migraine not only affects personal life and work, but also... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Migraine refers to a group of recurrent, chronic, neurological, and vascular diseases. Long-term recurrent migraine not only affects personal life and work, but also results in a huge economic burden on the family and society. Timely and accurate diagnosis of migraine and early and standardized treatment can effectively control migraine attacks. The treatment of migraine is to quickly stop the attack, relieve the associated symptoms, prevent recurrence, and restore normal life function as soon as possible.
METHODS
Literature retrieval was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and OVID-Medline English databases, and the retrieval period was from the establishment of the database to April 2021. Keywords such as migraine, chemical drugs, and therapeutic effect were used.
RESULTS
A total of 13 studies involving 1,921 migraine patients were included. The results showed that there was a significant difference in incidence of adverse events in patients after treatment with chemical drugs and placebo [risk difference (RD) =0.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03 to 0.20; Z=2.70; P=0.007] and the frequency of headaches [mean difference (MD) =-1.31; 95% CI: -1.89 to -0.73; Z=4.40; P<0.0001]. The incidence of adverse events after topiramate treatment [odds ratio (OR) =3.63; 95% CI: 1.65 to 7.97; Z=3.21; P=0.001] and the frequency of headache [MD =-1.31; 95% CI: -1.87 to -0.75; Z=4.59; P<0.00001] was significantly different from the placebo group; The frequency of headache after sodium valproate treatment [MD =-0.92; 95% CI: -1.80 to -0.04; Z=2.05; P=0.04] was also significantly different from the placebo group. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events and the frequency of headaches after flunarizine and placebo treatment.
DISCUSSION
A total of 13 articles were included to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of chemotherapeutic treatments for migraine. This study found that sodium valproate and propranolol were well tolerated for the prevention and treatment of migraine. The clinical manifestations were mainly unilateral temporal pulsing headache, some patients were accompanied by visual aura, fatigue, emotional and other triggers, and nearly half of the patients had a family history.
Topics: Emotions; Fatigue; Headache; Humans; Migraine Disorders; Neurology
PubMed: 35144402
DOI: 10.21037/apm-21-3719