-
Cancer Treatment Reviews Mar 2024Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective... (Review)
Review
Despite recent molecular and immunological advancements, prognosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients remains poor. In this context, several retrospective and phase II studies suggested that after failure of an upfront anti-EGFR based regimen, a subset of patients can still benefit from further anti-EGFR blockade. Several translational studies involving circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis demonstrated that cancer clones harboring mutations driving anti-EGFR resistance, which can arise under anti-EGFR agents selective pressure, often decay after anti-EGFR discontinuation potentially restoring sensitivity to this therapeutic strategy. Accordingly, several retrospective analyses and a recent prospective trial demonstrated that ctDNA RAS and BRAF wild-type mCRC patients are those benefitting the most from anti-EGFR rechallenge. Indeed, in molecularly selected patients, anti-EGFR rechallenge strategy achieved up to 30 % response rate, with a progression free survival longer than 4 months and an overall survival longer than 1 year, which favorably compared with other standard therapeutic options available for heavily pretreated patients. Anti-EGFR is also well tolerated with no unexpected toxicities compared to the upfront setting. However, several open questions remain to be addressed towards a broader applicability of anti-EGFR strategy in the everyday clinical practice such as the identification of the best rechallenge regimen, the right placement in mCRC therapeutic algorithm, the best ctDNA screening panel. In our systematic review, we revised available data from clinical trials assessing anti-EGFR rechallenge activity in chemo-refractory mCRC patients, discussing as well potential future scenarios and development to implement this therapeutic approach. Particularly, we discussed the role of ctDNA as a safe, timely and comprehensive tool to refine patient's selection and the therapeutic index of anti-EGFR rechallenge.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Cetuximab; Colonic Neoplasms; Rectal Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf
PubMed: 38237253
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102683 -
Pharmacological Research Feb 2024To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
OBJECTIVE
To assess the efficacy and safety of FDA-approved KRAS inhibitors in patients with KRAS-mutated solid tumors.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and major international conferences for clinical trials published in English up to March 6, 2023. Clinical trials investigating sotorasib or adagrasib and reporting the clinical outcomes of the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), or incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were eligible. The primary endpoint was the ORR. Secondary endpoints included the DCR, incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs, and odds ratio (OR) of the ORR between patients with or without co-mutation. The Random-effects model was applied for the outcomes of interest.
RESULTS
18 studies with 1224 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORR, DCR, and incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 AEs were 31 % (95 % CI, 25-37 %), 86 % (95 % CI, 82-89 %), and 29 % (95 % CI, 23-36 %), respectively. KRAS-mutated NSCLC patients with a co-mutation of KEAP1 exhibited a worse ORR than those with wild-type KEAP1 (OR: 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.77).
CONCLUSIONS
This study provided a comprehensive understanding of the efficacy and safety of KRAS inhibitors in treating solid tumors and identified KEAP1 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker of inferior response in patients treated with KRAS inhibitors. These findings may assist in the design of future clinical trials for identifying populations that may benefit from KRAS inhibitor treatment.
Topics: Humans; Kelch-Like ECH-Associated Protein 1; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); NF-E2-Related Factor 2; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Mutation; Lung Neoplasms
PubMed: 38185210
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107060 -
Child's Nervous System : ChNS :... May 2024Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumors of the young (PLNTY) represent a rare pediatric-type tumor that most commonly presents as medically refractory epilepsy....
PURPOSE
Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumors of the young (PLNTY) represent a rare pediatric-type tumor that most commonly presents as medically refractory epilepsy. PLNTY has only recently been recognized as a distinct clinical entity, having been first described in 2016 and added to the World Health Organization classification of CNS tumors in 2021. Molecular studies have determined that PLNTY is uniformly driven by aberrant MAPK pathway activation, with most tumors carrying either a BRAF V600E mutation or activating FGFR2 or FGFR3 fusion protein. Although it is known that these driver mutations are mutually exclusive, little is known about differences in clinical presentation or treatment outcomes between PLNTY cases driven by these distinct mutations.
METHODS
We performed a systematic review and cumulative analysis of PLNTY cases to assess whether or not PLNTY tumors carrying the BRAF V600E mutation exhibit different clinical behaviors. By searching the literature for all cases of PLNTY wherein BRAF V600E status was characterized, we compiled a dataset of 62 unique patient instances. Using a logistic regression-based approach, we assessed a primary outcome of what factors of a clinical presentation were associated with BRAF V600E mutations and a secondary outcome of what factors predicted total seizure freedom post-surgical resection.
RESULTS
PLNTY cases carrying BRAF V600E mutations in the literature were strongly positively associated with adult patients (p = 0.0055, OR = 6.556; 95% Conf. Int. = 1.737-24.742). BRAF V600E status was also positively associated with tumor involvement of the temporal lobe (p = 0.0046, OR = 11.036; 95% Conf. Int. = 2.100-58.006). Male sex was also positively associated with BRAF V600E status, but the result did not quite achieve statistical significance (p = 0.0731). BRAF V600E status was not found to be associated with post-operative seizure freedom.
CONCLUSIONS
These findings indicate that BRAF V600E-positive PLNTY exhibit characteristic clinical presentations but are not necessarily different in treatment responsiveness. Non-BRAF V600E tumors are more commonly associated with young patients.
Topics: Child; Humans; Male; Brain Neoplasms; Mutation; Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Seizures
PubMed: 38150037
DOI: 10.1007/s00381-023-06256-w -
Journal of Immunotherapy (Hagerstown,... May 2024The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving due to advances in molecular testing and the...
Clinical Outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With BRAF, ERBB2/HER2, MET , or RET Alterations: A Systematic Literature Review.
The therapeutic landscape for patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving due to advances in molecular testing and the development of new targeted therapies and immunotherapies. However, the efficacy of programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in advanced or metastatic patients with NSCLC whose tumors harbor BRAF V600E mutation, HER2/ERBB2 alteration, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, or RET rearrangement is not completely understood. A systematic literature review was performed to summarize evidence from clinical trials and observational studies on objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients whose tumors express these biomarkers and who were treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE, conference abstracts, and a clinical trial registry identified a total of 12 unique studies: 4 studies included patients with BRAF V600E mutation, 6 studies included patients with HER2/ERBB2 alteration, 7 studies included patients with MET exon 14 skipping mutation, and 5 studies included patients with RET rearrangement. Across studies, there was heterogeneity in treatment and patient characteristics and a lack of reporting on many important predictive and prognostic factors, including treatment regimens, patients' line of therapy, and tumor PD-L1 expression, which may explain the wide variation in objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across studies. Therefore, additional studies prospectively evaluating clinical outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors among patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumors harbor emerging predictive or prognostic biomarkers are needed to determine whether this class of immunotherapy can provide additional survival benefits for these patients.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; B7-H1 Antigen; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-ret; Receptor, ErbB-2
PubMed: 38112201
DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0000000000000500 -
Head and Neck Pathology Dec 2023The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
The BRAF p.V600E genetic variant facilitates the pathogenesis of various tumors by triggering tumor proliferation and progression. The aim of this study was to analyze the prevalence of BRAF p.V600E in benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal and malignant odontogenic tumors. In addition, we discussed the different detection methods used to assess for aberrant BRAF.
METHODS
This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered in Prospero (CRD42023445689). A comprehensive search of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase electronic databases was performed to answer the question "What is the prevalence of the BRAF p.V600E mutation in benign mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors?" The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the JBI's Critical Appraisal Tool.
RESULTS
Initially, 387 records were identified, but only 11 articles met the inclusion criteria. A total of 70 patients with benign mixed epithelial and mesenchymal odontogenic tumors and 63 with malignant odontogenic tumors were included in the analysis. We found that the BRAF p.V600E mutation had a prevalence of 31.42% in mixed tumors and 26.98% in malignant odontogenic tumors. Moreover, immunohistochemistry showed high concordance with DNA-based molecular methods.
CONCLUSION
In general, the BRAF p.V600E variant exhibited a prominent prevalence in mixed and malignant odontogenic tumors. However, most of the findings are based on small cohorts of patients and further studies with larger cohorts are needed.
Topics: Humans; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Prevalence; Odontogenic Tumors; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 38057461
DOI: 10.1007/s12105-023-01601-6 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023Evidence suggests that patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) are at significantly higher risk of developing papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, the course of PTC... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Evidence suggests that patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis (HT) are at significantly higher risk of developing papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). However, the course of PTC in patients with both diseases concomitantly has been found to be more indolent than conventional PTC. Additionally, it has been well proven that BRAF mutation results in an aggressive course of PTC. The aims of this meta-analysis were to identify prevalence of BRAF mutation and its impact on clinicopathological features in patients with concomitant PTC-HT.
METHODS
Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched until 16.09.2022, resulting in 227 articles, of which nine studies were included. Summary estimates, comparing patients with (A) BRAF (+) PTC-HT versus BRAF (+) PTC, and (B) BRAF (+) PTC-HT versus BRAF (-) PTC-HT, were generated with Review Manager 5.0.
RESULTS
In total, 6395 patients were included in this review. PTC-HT patients had significantly less BRAF mutation than PTC patients (Odds Ratio (OR) (95% Confidence Interval (CI))=0.45 (0.35-0.58), P<0.001). BRAF (+) PTC-HT patients were significantly more likely to have multifocal lesions (OR (95% CI)=1.22 (1.04-1.44), P=0.01) but less likely to have lymph node metastasis (OR (95% CI)=0.65 (0.46-0.91), P=0.01) and extrathyroidal extension (OR (95% CI)=0.55 (0.32-0.96), P=0.03) compared to BRAF (+) PTC patients. BRAF (+) PTC-HT patients were more likely to have multifocal lesions (OR (95% CI)=0.71 (0.53-0.95), P=0.02), lymph node metastasis (OR (95% CI)=0.59 (0.44-0.78), P<0.001) and extrathyroidal extension (OR (95% CI)=0.72 (0.56-0.92), P=0.01) compared to BRAF (-) PTC-HT patients.
CONCLUSION
This meta-analysis highlights that the lower prevalence of BRAF mutation in patients with PTC-HT than conventional PTC may explain the indolent clinicopathological course in this cohort.
Topics: Humans; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Hashimoto Disease; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Thyroid Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; Prevalence; Carcinoma, Papillary; Mutation
PubMed: 38047109
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1273498 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Feb 2024Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has high sensitivity for the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic masses, but also a high false-negative rate.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) has high sensitivity for the pathological diagnosis of pancreatic masses, but also a high false-negative rate. K-ras gene mutations occur in over 75 % of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDAC), and this meta-analysis evaluated the utility of detecting K-ras gene mutations from EUS-TA specimens for the diagnosis of PDAC.
METHODS
Relevant studies in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched. Meta-analysis was performed on data from the selected studies using a bivariate model to provide pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, and their 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
RESULTS
This meta-analysis included 1521 patients (from 10 eligible studies) who underwent EUS-TA with K-ras gene mutation analysis for diagnosis of pancreatic solid masses. The pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 76.6 % (95 % CI, 70.9-81.5 %) and 97.0 % (95 % CI, 94.0-98.5 %), respectively, for pathological diagnosis, 75.9 % (95 % CI 69.5-81.4 %) and 95.3 % (95 % CI, 92.3-97.2 %) for K-ras gene mutation analysis, and 88.7 % (95 % CI 87.1-91.7 %) and 94.9 % (95 % CI, 91.5-97.0 %) for pathological diagnosis in combination with K-ras gene mutation analysis. The sensitivity for diagnosis of PDAC was significantly higher for pathological diagnosis in combination with K-ras gene mutation analysis than for pathological diagnosis or K-ras gene mutation analysis alone (both, p < 0.001). There was no difference in specificity between pathological diagnosis in combination with K-ras gene mutation analysis and both either (p = 0.234, 0.945, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
K-ras gene mutation analysis in combination with to pathological diagnosis of EUS-TA increases the accuracy of differential diagnosis of PDAC.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Genes, ras; Adenocarcinoma; Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration; Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal; Mutation
PubMed: 38042675
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.11.012 -
International Journal of Molecular... Nov 2023Studying primary melanoma and its corresponding metastasis has twofold benefits. Firstly, to better understand tumor biology, and secondly, to determine which sample... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Studying primary melanoma and its corresponding metastasis has twofold benefits. Firstly, to better understand tumor biology, and secondly, to determine which sample should be examined in assessing drug targets. This study systematically analyzed all the literature on primary melanoma and its matched metastasis. Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched multiple medical databases for relevant publications from January 2000 to December 2022, assessed the quality of the primary-level studies using the QUIPS tool, and summarized the concordance rate of the most reported genes using the random-effects model. Finally, we evaluated the inter-study heterogeneity using the subgroup analysis. Thirty-one studies investigated the concordance of and in 1220 and 629 patients, respectively. The pooled concordance rate was 89.4% [95% CI: 84.5; 93.5] for and 97.8% [95% CI: 95.8; 99.4] for . When high-quality studies were considered, only mutation status consistency increased. Five studies reported the concordance status of c (93%, 44 patients) and promoter (64%, 53 patients). Lastly, three studies analyzed the concordance of cancer genes involved in the signaling pathways, apoptosis, and proliferation, such as (25%, four patients), (44%, nine patients), and (20%, five patients). Our study found that the concordance of known drug targets (mainly ) during melanoma progression is higher than in previous meta-analyses, likely due to advances in molecular techniques. Furthermore, significant heterogeneity exists in the genes involved in the melanoma genetic makeup; although our results are based on small patient samples, more research is necessary for validation.
Topics: Humans; Melanoma; Skin Neoplasms; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Mutation; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant
PubMed: 38003476
DOI: 10.3390/ijms242216281 -
Clinical Genetics Feb 2024Gene mutations could predict the tumor progression and prognosis, which are us to predict CLNM in patients with cN0 PTC, however, these results are not consistent. This... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Gene mutations could predict the tumor progression and prognosis, which are us to predict CLNM in patients with cN0 PTC, however, these results are not consistent. This meta-analysis tried to identify gene mutations which could predict CLNM in patients with cN0 PTC. A systematic search was performed for identifying relevant literature published prior to July 2023 in three search engines: PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. Studies that investigated the gene mutations for CLNM in patients with cN0 PTC were included in our meta-analysis. Sixteen studies, including 6095 cN0 PTC with BRAF mutations were include in our meta-analysis. The prevalence of CLNM in cN0 PTC ranged from 13.7% to 50.6%. The pooled analysis demonstrated that BRAFV600E mutation is significantly associated with CLNM (OR = 2.01, 95% CI: 1.55-2.60, p < 0.001) in PTC and PTMC (OR = 1.70, 95% CI: 0.51-1.81, p < 0.001). Whereas, cN0 PTC with TERT (OR = 1.94, 95% CI: 0.51-7.36, p = 0.33) and KRAS (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.51-1.81, p = 0.34) mutations might not contribute to predict CLNM. Our analysis identified that BRAF mutation was a predictive factor for cN0 PTC, as well as for cN0 PTMC, which could be useful for clinician to accurately choose prophylactic CLND and better manage cN0 PTC.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Papillary; Lymphatic Metastasis; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Thyroid Cancer, Papillary; Thyroid Neoplasms
PubMed: 37985961
DOI: 10.1111/cge.14456 -
European Journal of Radiology Dec 2023We read with interest the article from Dr Jia LL and colleagues in Eur J Radiol in which they assessed the methodological quality of radiomics-based studies for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
We read with interest the article from Dr Jia LL and colleagues in Eur J Radiol in which they assessed the methodological quality of radiomics-based studies for non-invasive preoperative prediction of Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS) mutations in patients with colorectal cancer. They systematically evaluated the prediction models diagnostic accuracy of twenty-nine studies between February 2014 and March 2022 and we congratulate the Authors on their accuracy in reporting recent published manuscript about radiomics-based studies to predict KRAS mutations in patients with colorectal cancer however they did not report the impact of contrast administration and the different phases of the contrast study (arterial, portal and transient phase) compared to the EOB phase in this research field.
Topics: Humans; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Colorectal Neoplasms; Mutation
PubMed: 37976763
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111192