-
VASA. Zeitschrift Fur Gefasskrankheiten Jan 2017We conducted a systematic review regarding the efficacy and outcome of endovascular treatment of infected iliofemoral arterial pseudoaneurysms with covered stents. 35... (Review)
Review
We conducted a systematic review regarding the efficacy and outcome of endovascular treatment of infected iliofemoral arterial pseudoaneurysms with covered stents. 35 cases were identified, including 5 own. 22 pseudoaneurysms were located in the femoral area and 13 in the iliac vessels. The most commonly reported complaints were pulsatile groin mass (40 %), sepsis (37.1 %), active bleeding (31.4 %), and groin infection with purulent discharge (17.1 %). S. aureus (65.7 %) and Streptococcus species (22.9 %) were the most common microbes isolated. Factors for the development of infected pseudoaneurysms were intravenous drug use (20 %), infection of anastomosis in bypass surgery (22.9 %), cancer (14.3 %), history of multiple hip operations (14.3 %), renal transplantation (2.9 %), and obesity (5.7 %). The most commonly used covered stents were Viabahn (22.9 %),Jostent (17.1 %), Fluency (14.3 %), and Wallgraft (14.3 %). In 15 cases, surgical debridement and/or drainage was also performed.The mean follow-up was 15.8 months. There were only 2 cases of stent graft thrombosis (5.7 %). 2 patients required an open vascular bypass procedure at a later stage. One death was attributed to procedure-related complications (2.9 %). The infection rate of the deployed stent graft in follow-up was 3.4 %. Endovascular exclusion of an infected pseudoaneurysm with primary stent grafting and drainage may be an option in high-risk patients. .
Topics: Aneurysm, False; Aneurysm, Infected; Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; Debridement; Drainage; Endovascular Procedures; Femoral Artery; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Humans; Iliac Aneurysm; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Risk Factors; Stents; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 27925869
DOI: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000572 -
The British Journal of Dermatology Aug 2017Nonpurulent cellulitis is an acute bacterial infection of the dermal and subdermal tissues that is not associated with purulent drainage, discharge or abscess. The... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Nonpurulent cellulitis is an acute bacterial infection of the dermal and subdermal tissues that is not associated with purulent drainage, discharge or abscess. The objectives of this systematic review and meta-analysis were to identify and appraise all controlled observational studies that have examined risk factors for the development of nonpurulent cellulitis of the leg (NPLC). A systematic literature search of electronic databases and grey literature sources was performed in July 2015. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess methodological quality of included studies. Of 3059 potentially eligible studies retrieved and screened, six case-control studies were included. An increased risk of developing NPLC was associated with previous cellulitis [odds ratio (OR) 40·3, 95% confidence interval (CI) 22·6-72·0], wound (OR 19·1, 95% CI 9·1-40·0), current leg ulcers (OR 13·7, 95% CI 7·9-23·6), lymphoedema/chronic leg oedema (OR 6·8, 95% CI 3·5-13·3), excoriating skin diseases (OR 4·4, 95% CI 2·7-7·1), tinea pedis (OR 3·2, 95% CI 1·9-5·3) and body mass index > 30 kg m (OR 2·4, 95% CI 1·4-4·0). Diabetes, smoking and alcohol consumption were not associated with NPLC. Although diabetics may have been underrepresented in the included studies, local risk factors appear to play a more significant role in the development of NPLC than do systemic risk factors. Clinicians should consider the treatment of modifiable risk factors including leg oedema, wounds, ulcers, areas of skin breakdown and toe-web intertrigo while administering antibiotic treatment for NPLC.
Topics: Alcohol Drinking; Cellulitis; Humans; Leg Injuries; Leg Ulcer; Lymphedema; Obesity; Observational Studies as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Smoking; Tinea Pedis
PubMed: 27864837
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15186 -
The American Journal of Medicine Nov 2015In patients with red eye, traditional teachings suggest that photophobia, visual blurring, and eye pain indicate serious eye disease; in patients with presumed... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
In patients with red eye, traditional teachings suggest that photophobia, visual blurring, and eye pain indicate serious eye disease; in patients with presumed conjunctivitis, the finding of purulent drainage traditionally indicates a bacterial cause. The accuracy of these teachings is unknown.
METHODS
A MEDLINE search was performed to retrieve articles published between 1966 and April 2014 relevant to the bedside diagnosis of serious eye disease and bacterial conjunctivitis.
RESULTS
In patients with red eye, the most useful findings indicating serious eye disease are anisocoria (with the smaller pupil in the red eye and difference between pupil diameters >1 mm; likelihood ratio [LR], 6.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-16.3) and photophobia, elicited by direct illumination (LR, 8.3; 95% CI, 2.7-25.9), indirect illumination (LR, 28.8; 95% CI, 1.8-459), or near synkinesis test ("finger-to-nose convergence test," LR, 21.4; 95% CI, 12-38.2). In patients with presumed conjunctivitis, complete redness of the conjunctival membrane obscuring tarsal vessels (LR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.2-17.1), observed purulent discharge (LR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.7-9.1), and matting of both eyes in the morning (LR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.9-6.5) increase the probability of a bacterial cause; failure to observe a red eye at 20 feet (LR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0-0.8) and absence of morning gluing of either eye (LR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8) decrease the probability of a bacterial cause.
CONCLUSIONS
Several bedside findings accurately distinguish serious from benign eye disease in patients with red eye and, in patients with presumed conjunctivitis, distinguish bacterial from viral or allergic causes.
Topics: Conjunctivitis; Diagnosis, Differential; Eye Diseases; Humans; Physical Examination
PubMed: 26169885
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.06.026 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2014One to eight per cent of women suffer third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter injury) and fourth-degree perineal tear (rectal mucosa injury) during vaginal birth, and... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
One to eight per cent of women suffer third-degree perineal tear (anal sphincter injury) and fourth-degree perineal tear (rectal mucosa injury) during vaginal birth, and these tears are more common after forceps delivery (28%) and midline episiotomies. Third- and fourth-degree tears can become contaminated with bacteria from the rectum and this significantly increases in the chance of perineal wound infection. Prophylactic antibiotics might have a role in preventing this infection.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis for reducing maternal morbidity and side effects in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2014) and the reference lists of retrieved articles.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials comparing outcomes of prophylactic antibiotics versus placebo or no antibiotics in third- and fourth-degree perineal tear during vaginal birth.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently assessed the trial reports for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified and included one trial (147 women from a pre-planned sample size of 310 women) that compared the effect of prophylactic antibiotic (single-dose, second-generation cephalosporin - cefotetan or cefoxitin, 1 g intravenously) on postpartum perineal wound complications in third- or fourth-degree perineal tears compared with placebo. Perineal wound complications (wound disruption and purulent discharge) at the two-week postpartum check up were 8.20% and 24.10% in the treatment and the control groups respectively (risk ratio (RR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12 to 0.96). However, the high failed-appointment rate may limit the generalisability of the results. The overall risk of bias was low except for incomplete outcome data. The quality of the evidence using GRADE was moderate for infection rate at two weeks' postpartum, and low for infection rate at six weeks' postpartum.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Although the data suggest that prophylactic antibiotics help to prevent perineal wound complications following third- or fourth-degree perineal tear, loss to follow-up was very high. The results should be interpreted with caution as they are based on one small trial.
Topics: Anal Canal; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Cefotetan; Cefoxitin; Cephalosporins; Delivery, Obstetric; Female; Humans; Intestinal Mucosa; Perineum; Pregnancy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rectum; Rupture; Wound Infection
PubMed: 25289960
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005125.pub4