-
Cureus Jul 2023Chronic alcohol use has been associated with impaired pulmonary function, increased risk of pneumonia and poor outcomes after trauma. With a high incidence of rib... (Review)
Review
Chronic alcohol use has been associated with impaired pulmonary function, increased risk of pneumonia and poor outcomes after trauma. With a high incidence of rib fractures in this population, the clinical and physiological factors associated with alcohol dependence may influence how these patients recover from thoracic injuries. Therefore, the aim of the systematic review was to examine the effect of alcohol dependence on rib fracture outcomes. The Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for studies examining adult patients with rib fractures, with and without a history of alcohol dependency. The outcomes of interest were mortality, pulmonary complications, intensive care length of stay, ventilator days and hospital length of stay. A meta-analysis was performed to combine the data and compare results. Three studies met the criteria for inclusion in the review and all studies were observational in design. Alcohol dependency was associated with increased mortality (OR 1.44 (95% CI: 1.33-1.56)), pneumonia (OR 2.14 (2.02-2.27)) and ARDS (OR 1.71(1.48-1.98)) as well as longer stays in hospital and intensive care (p<0.05). No difference was found in ventilator days between the two groups. Early intensive care review should be considered to reduce complications in this population alongside prompt management of withdrawal symptoms. However, limited primary research exists on this topic and the quality of current evidence is low. Additional primary research is needed to further understand this correlation and draw meaningful conclusions.
PubMed: 37644941
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.42639 -
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care... Sep 2023
Non-surgical management and analgesia strategies for older adults with multiple rib fractures: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma: Erratum.
PubMed: 37608454
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004101 -
European Review For Medical and... Feb 2023The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different peripheral nerve blocks, compared to conventional methods (analgesics and epidural block), for pain relief... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy of different peripheral nerve blocks, compared to conventional methods (analgesics and epidural block), for pain relief in rib fracture patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases were systematically searched. The review included studies that were either randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational in design with propensity matching. The primary outcome of interest was patient's reported pain scores, both at rest and on coughing/movement. The secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay, length of stay at intensive care unit (ICU), need for rescue analgesic, arterial blood gas values and parameters of lung function test. STATA was used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS
The meta-analysis was conducted with 12 studies. Compared to conventional methods, peripheral nerve block was associated with better pain control at rest 12 hours (SMD -4.89, 95% CI: -5.91, -3.86) and 24 hours (SMD -2.58, 95% CI: -4.40, -0.76) after institution of block. At 24 hours after block, the pooled findings indicate better pain control on movement/coughing for the peripheral nerve block group (SMD -0.78, 95% CI: -1.48, -0.09). There were no significant differences in the patient's reported pain scores at rest and on movement/coughing at 24 hours post-block. There were no differences in the overall risk of any complications (RR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.18), pulmonary complication (RR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.35, 1.41) and in-hospital mortality (RR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.20, 1.90) between the two groups. Peripheral nerve block was also associated with a relatively lower need for rescue analgesic (SMD -0.31, 95% CI: -0.54, -0.07). There were no differences in the length of ICU and hospital stay, risk of complications, arterial blood gas values or functional lung parameters, i.e., PaO2 and forced vital capacity between the two management strategies.
CONCLUSIONS
Peripheral nerve blocks may be better than conventional pain management strategies for immediate pain control (within 24 hours of initiation of block) in patients with fractured ribs. This method also reduces the need for rescue analgesic. The skills and experience of the health personnel, facilities for care available and the cost involved should guide the decision on which management strategy to utilize.
Topics: Humans; Pain Management; Rib Fractures; Nerve Block; Pain, Postoperative; Peripheral Nerves; Analgesics
PubMed: 36808336
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31183 -
The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care... Mar 2023Chest wall injury in older adults is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Optimal nonsurgical management strategies for these patients have not been fully... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Non-surgical management and analgesia strategies for older adults with multiple rib fractures: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and joint practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma and the Chest Wall Injury Society.
BACKGROUND
Chest wall injury in older adults is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Optimal nonsurgical management strategies for these patients have not been fully defined regarding level of care, incentive spirometry (IS), noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), and the use of ketamine, epidural, and other locoregional approaches to analgesia.
METHODS
Relevant questions regarding older patients with significant chest wall injury with patient population(s), intervention(s), comparison(s), and appropriate selected outcomes were chosen. These focused on intensive care unit (ICU) admission, IS, NIPPV, and analgesia including ketamine, epidural analgesia, and locoregional nerve blocks. A systematic literature search and review were conducted, our data were analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively, and the quality of evidence was assessed per the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. No funding was used.
RESULTS
Our literature review (PROSPERO 2020-CRD42020201241, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, January 15, 2020) resulted in 151 studies. Intensive care unit admission was qualitatively not superior for any defined cohort other than by clinical assessment. Poor IS performance was associated with prolonged hospital length of stay, pulmonary complications, and unplanned ICU admission. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation was associated with 85% reduction in odds of pneumonia ( p < 0.0001) and 81% reduction in odds of mortality ( p = 0.03) in suitable patients without risk of airway loss. Ketamine use demonstrated no significant reduction in pain score but a trend toward reduced opioid use. Epidural and other locoregional analgesia techniques did not affect pneumonia, length of mechanical ventilation, hospital length of stay, or mortality.
CONCLUSION
We do not recommend for or against routine ICU admission. We recommend use of IS to inform ICU status and conditionally recommend use of NIPPV in patients without risk of airway loss. We offer no recommendation for or against ketamine, epidural, or other locoregional analgesia.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Systematic Review/Meta-analysis; Level IV.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Rib Fractures; Ketamine; Pain; Analgesia, Epidural; Thoracic Injuries; Pneumonia; Neck Injuries; Length of Stay
PubMed: 36730672
DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003830 -
Emergency Medicine Journal : EMJ May 2023Over the last 10 years, research has highlighted emerging potential risk factors for poor outcomes following blunt chest wall trauma. The aim was to update a previous... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Over the last 10 years, research has highlighted emerging potential risk factors for poor outcomes following blunt chest wall trauma. The aim was to update a previous systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk factors for mortality in blunt chest wall trauma patients.
METHODS
A systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library from January 2010 to March 2022 was completed. Broad search terms and inclusion criteria were used. All observational studies were included if they investigated estimates of association between a risk factor and mortality for blunt chest wall trauma patients. Where sufficient data were available, ORs with 95% CIs were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic.
RESULTS
73 studies were identified which were of variable quality (including 29 from original review). Identified risk factors for mortality following blunt chest wall trauma were: age 65 years or more (OR: 2.11; 95% CI 1.85 to 2.41), three or more rib fractures (OR: 1.96; 95% CI 1.69 to 2.26) and presence of pre-existing disease (OR: 2.86; 95% CI 1.34 to 6.09). Other new risk factors identified were: increasing Injury Severity Score, need for mechanical ventilation, extremes of body mass index and smoking status. Meta-analysis was not possible for these variables due to insufficient studies and high levels of heterogeneity.
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this updated review suggest that despite a change in demographics of trauma patients and subsequent emerging evidence over the last 10 years, the main risk factors for mortality in patients sustaining blunt chest wall trauma remained largely unchanged. A number of new risk factors however have been reported that need consideration when updating current risk prediction models used in the ED.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42021242063. Date registered: 29 March 2021. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/%23recordDetails.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Thoracic Wall; Thoracic Injuries; Rib Fractures; Risk Factors; Injury Severity Score; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 36241371
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2021-212184 -
Cancer Treatment Reviews Nov 2022Hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is gaining attention in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). However, there is a large unmet need to define... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) is gaining attention in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC). However, there is a large unmet need to define indications, prescription doses and potential adverse events of protons in this clinical scenario. Hence, the present work aims to provide a critical literature revision, and to investigate associations between fractionation schedules/ biological effective doses (BEDs), oncological outcomes and toxicities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This systematic review and meta-analysis complied with the PRISMA recommendations. Inclusion criteria were: 1) curative-intent hypofractionated PBT for ES-NSCLC (≥3 Gy(RBE)/fraction), 2) report of the clinical outcomes of interest, 3) availability of full-text written in English. The bibliographic search was performed on the NCBI Pubmed, Embase and Scopus in September 2021; no other limitations were applied. The BED was calculated for each included study (α/β = 10 Gy); the median BED for all studies was used as a threshold for stratifying selected evidence into "high" and "low"-dose subgroups. Heterogeneity was tested using chi-square statistics; inconsistency was measured with the I index. Pooled estimate was obtained by fitting both the fixed-effect and the DerSimonian and Laird random-effect model.
RESULTS
Eight studies and 401 patients were available for the meta-analysis; median follow-up was 32.8 months. The median delivered BED was 105.6 Gy(RBE). A BED ≥ 105.6 Gy(RBE) consistently provided superior OS, CSS, DFS and LC rates (i.e.: 4-year OS: 0.56 [0.34-0.76] for BED < 105.6 Gy(RBE) and 0.78 [0.64-0.88] for BED ≥ 105.6 Gy(RBE)). The meta-analysis of proportions showed a comparable probability of developing acute grade ≥ 2 toxicity between the two groups, while the probability of any late grade ≥ 2 event was almost three-times greater for BED ≥ 105.6 Gy(RBE), with rib fractures being more common in the high dose group.
CONCLUSION
Hypofractionated PBT is a safe and effective treatment option for ES-NSCLC; the delivery of BED ≥ 105.6 Gy(RBE) with advanced techniques for uncertainty management has been associated with improved oncological outcomes across all considered time points.
Topics: Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Dose Fractionation, Radiation; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Protons
PubMed: 36194908
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102464 -
The South African Journal of... 2022Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury and notable source of chest pain. Chest pain may lead to compromised respiratory and physical function. (Review)
Review
Effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions on pain and physical function in adults with rib fractures during acute care: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Rib fractures are a common thoracic injury and notable source of chest pain. Chest pain may lead to compromised respiratory and physical function.
OBJECTIVES
Our study aimed to synthesise the evidence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions on pain and physical function in adults admitted with rib fractures to acute care settings. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), respiratory complications, respiratory function and mortality rate.
METHOD
A systematic literature search of English articles in nine databases was conducted. The Joanna Briggs Institute's System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (SUMARI) was used to conduct our study. Articles written from January 2000 to December 2017 were considered and a search update was completed in 2021. Meta-analysis was conducted for pre- versus post-bundle of care implementation for LOS, pneumonia incidence and mortality rate. Certainty of evidence was appraised using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included ( = 2034). Certain interventions were shown to improve respiratory function and reduce pain, pulmonary complications, LOS and mortality rate. No interventions were identified which objectively improved physical function. Meta-analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in relative risk of developing pneumonia ( = 0.00) by 63% following bundled care implementation. Certainty of evidence for this outcome was rated as very low following GRADE appraisal.
CONCLUSION
Nonpharmacological therapeutic interventions used in combination with pharmacological management are viable treatment options to reduce pain, improve respiratory function and reduce the incidence of respiratory complications following acute rib fractures.
CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS
Acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), noninvasive ventilation (NIV) modalities, physiotherapy techniques and multidisciplinary pathways used alongside pharmacological interventions are effective modalities for use in the treatment of acute rib fractures. Multidisciplinary care pathways are important management strategies and reduce the risk of developing pneumonia.
PubMed: 35814044
DOI: 10.4102/sajp.v78i1.1764 -
Annals of Emergency Medicine Jun 2022Chest ultrasonography has been reported as an accurate imaging modality and potentially superior to chest radiographs in diagnosing traumatic rib fractures. However, few... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
STUDY OBJECTIVE
Chest ultrasonography has been reported as an accurate imaging modality and potentially superior to chest radiographs in diagnosing traumatic rib fractures. However, few studies have compared ultrasonography to the reference standard of computed tomography (CT), with no systematic reviews published on the topic to date. Our objective was to summarize the evidence comparing the test characteristics of chest ultrasonography to CT in diagnosing rib fractures.
METHODS
This study was performed and reported in adherence to PRISMA guidelines. We searched 5 databases plus gray literature from inception to October 2021. Two independent reviewers completed study selection, data extraction, and a QUADAS-2 risk of bias assessment. Summary measures were obtained from the Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic model.
RESULTS
From 1,660 citations, we identified 7 studies for inclusion, of which 6 had available 2×2 data for meta-analysis (n = 663). Of the 6 studies, 3 involved emergency department-performed ultrasonography and 3 radiology-performed ultrasonography. Chest ultrasonography had a pooled sensitivity of 89.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 81.1 to 94.3) and specificity of 98.4% (95% CI, 90.2 to 99.8) compared with CT imaging for the diagnosis of any rib fracture. The finding of a fracture on ultrasonography, defined as an underlying cortical irregularity, was associated with a +likelihood ratio (LR) of 55.7 (95% CI, 8.5 to 363.4) for CT diagnosed rib fracture, while the absence of ultrasonography fracture held a -LR of 0.11 (95% CI, 0.06 to 0.20). We were unable to detect a difference in test characteristics between emergency department- and radiology-performed ultrasonography (P=.11). The overall risk of bias of included studies was high, with patient selection identified as the highest risk domain.
CONCLUSION
Chest ultrasonography is both sensitive and highly specific in diagnosing rib fractures following blunt trauma.
Topics: Humans; Radiography; Rib Fractures; Thoracic Injuries; Ultrasonography; Wounds, Nonpenetrating
PubMed: 35461720
DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.02.006 -
The Journal of Surgical Research Aug 2022Multiple rib fractures and flail chest are common in trauma patients and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. While rib fractures have historically been... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple rib fractures and flail chest are common in trauma patients and may result in significant morbidity and mortality. While rib fractures have historically been treated conservatively, there is increasing interest in the benefits of surgical fixation. However, strong evidence that supports surgical rib fixation and identifies the most appropriate patients for its application is currently sparse.
METHODS
A systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines was performed to identify all peer-reviewed papers that examined surgical compared to conservative management of rib fractures. We undertook a subgroup analysis to determine the specific effects of rib fracture type, age, the timing of fixation and study design on outcomes. The primary outcomes were the length of hospital and ICU stay, and secondary outcomes included mechanical ventilation time, rates of pneumonia, and mortality.
RESULTS
Our search identified 45 papers in the systematic review, and 40 were included in the meta-analysis. There was a statistical benefit of surgical fixation compared to conservative management of rib fractures for length of ICU stay, mechanical ventilation, mortality, pneumonia, and tracheostomy. The subgroup analysis identified surgical fixation was most favorable for patients with flail chest and those who underwent surgical fixation within 72 h. Patients over 60 y had a statistical benefit of conservative management on length of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical fixation of flail and multiple rib fractures is associated with a reduction in morbidity and mortality outcomes compared to conservative management. However, careful selection of patients is required for the appropriate application of surgical rib fixation.
Topics: Flail Chest; Fracture Fixation, Internal; Humans; Length of Stay; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies; Rib Fractures; Ribs; Spinal Fractures
PubMed: 35390577
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.02.055 -
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma... Feb 2023Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Multiple rib fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in elderly patients. There is growing interest in surgical stabilization in this subgroup of patients. This systematic review compares conservative treatment to surgical fixation in elderly patients (older than 60 years) with multiple rib fractures. The primary outcome is mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital and intensive care length of stay (HLOS and ILOS), duration of mechanical ventilation (DMV) and pneumonia rates.
METHODS
Multiple databases were searched for comparative studies reporting on conservative versus operative treatment for rib fractures in patients older than 60 years. Both observational studies and randomised clinical trials were considered.
RESULTS
Five observational studies (n = 2583) were included. Mortality was lower in operatively treated patients compared to conservative treatment (4% vs. 8%). Pneumonia rate and DMV were similar (5/6% and 5.8/6.5 days) for either treatment modality. Overall ILOS and HLOS of stay were longer in operatively treated patients (6.5 ILOS and 12.7 HLOS vs. 2.7 ILOS and 6.5 ILOS). There were only minimal reports on perioperative complications. Notably, the median number of rib fractures (8.4 vs. 5) and the percentage of flail chest were higher in operatively treated patients (47% vs. 39%).
CONCLUSION
It remains unknown to what extent conservative and operative treatment contribute individually to reducing morbidity and mortality in the elderly with multiple rib fractures. To date, the quality of evidence is rather low, thus well-performed comparative observational studies or randomised controlled trials considering all confounders are needed to determine whether operative treatment can improve a patient's outcome.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Rib Fractures; Flail Chest; Length of Stay; Fracture Fixation; Spinal Fractures; Pneumonia; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 35137253
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04362-z