-
Yonsei Medical Journal Jun 2024This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared to that of conventional radiotherapy in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) compared to that of conventional radiotherapy in patients with various types of solid tumors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We systematically searched eight electronic databases from inception until August 2022 in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The comparative effectiveness of the different treatment options was assessed by a random-effects meta-analysis.
RESULTS
This review included 34 comparative studies and three treatment groups. Overall, the meta-analysis indicated comparable local control rates between the CIRT and control groups [pooled risk ratio (RR)=1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90-1.15]. The local control rate in the CIRT group was higher than that in the photon therapy group, but slightly lower than that in the proton radiation therpy (PRT) group. Additionally, the CIRT group had significantly higher overall survival (OS) (RR=1.19, 95% CI=1.01-1.42) and progression-free survival (PFS) (RR=1.50, 95% CI=1.01-2.21) rates compared to the control group. In the subgroup analysis, survival rates were similar between the CIRT and PRT groups.
CONCLUSION
CIRT was associated with improved toxicity, local tumor control, OS, and PFS compared to conventional treatments. Therefore, CIRT was found to be a safe and effective option for achieving local control in patients with solid tumors.
Topics: Humans; Heavy Ion Radiotherapy; Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 38804027
DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2023.0439 -
Frontiers in Immunology 2024Currently, therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor-T Cell (CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors like programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockers are showing...
Currently, therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor-T Cell (CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors like programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) blockers are showing promising results for numerous cancer patients. However, significant advancements are required before CAR-T therapies become readily available as off-the-shelf treatments, particularly for solid tumors and lymphomas. In this review, we have systematically analyzed the combination therapy involving engineered CAR-T cells and anti PD-1 agents. This approach aims at overcoming the limitations of current treatments and offers potential advantages such as enhanced tumor inhibition, alleviated T-cell exhaustion, heightened T-cell activation, and minimized toxicity. The integration of CAR-T therapy, which targets tumor-associated antigens, with PD-1 blockade augments T-cell function and mitigates immune suppression within the tumor microenvironment. To assess the impact of combination therapy on various tumors and lymphomas, we categorized them based on six major tumor-associated antigens: mesothelin, disialoganglioside GD-2, CD-19, CD-22, CD-133, and CD-30, which are present in different tumor types. We evaluated the efficacy, complete and partial responses, and progression-free survival in both pre-clinical and clinical models. Additionally, we discussed potential implications, including the feasibility of combination immunotherapies, emphasizing the importance of ongoing research to optimize treatment strategies and improve outcomes for cancer patients. Overall, we believe combining CAR-T therapy with PD-1 blockade holds promise for the next generation of cancer immunotherapy.
Topics: Humans; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Immunotherapy, Adoptive; Lymphoma; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Receptors, Chimeric Antigen; Animals; Neoplasms; Combined Modality Therapy; Tumor Microenvironment; Antigens, Neoplasm; T-Lymphocytes
PubMed: 38799440
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1389971 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Chemokines orchestrate many aspects of tumorigenic processes such as angiogenesis, apoptosis and metastatic spread, and related receptors are expressed on tumor cells as... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Chemokines orchestrate many aspects of tumorigenic processes such as angiogenesis, apoptosis and metastatic spread, and related receptors are expressed on tumor cells as well as on inflammatory cells (e.g., tumor-infiltrating T cells, TILs) in the tumor microenvironment. Expressional changes of chemokines and their receptors in solid cancers are common and well known, especially in affecting colorectal cancer patient outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this current systematic review and meta-analysis was to classify chemokines as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer patients. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, CENTRAL and Web of Science. Information on the chemokine expression of 25 chemokines in colorectal cancer tissue and survival data of the patients were investigated. The hazard ratio of overall survival and disease-free survival with chemokine expression was examined. The risk of bias was analyzed using Quality in Prognosis Studies. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to determine the impact on overall respectively disease survival. For this purpose, the pooled hazard ratios (HR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used for calculation. Twenty-five chemokines were included, and the search revealed 5556 publications. A total of thirty-one publications were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Overexpression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 was associated with both a significantly reduced overall survival (HR = 2.70, 95%-CI: 1.57 to 4.66, = 0.0003) as well as disease-free survival (HR = 2.68, 95%-CI: 1.41 to 5.08, = 0.0026). All other chemokines showed either heterogeneous results or few studies were available. The overall risk of bias for CXCR4 was rated low. At the current level of evidence, this study demonstrates that CXCR4 overexpression in patients with colorectal cancer is associated with a significantly diminished overall as well as disease-free survival. Summed up, this systematic review and meta-analysis reveals CXCR4 as a promising prognostic biomarker. Nevertheless, more evidence is needed to evaluate CXCR4 and its antagonists serving as new therapeutic targets.
Topics: Humans; Colorectal Neoplasms; Prognosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Chemokines; Receptors, CXCR4; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38791414
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105374 -
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics Dec 2024Solid cancer patients, compared to their healthy counterparts, are at a greater risk of contracting and suffering from severe complications and poorer prognosis after... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Solid cancer patients, compared to their healthy counterparts, are at a greater risk of contracting and suffering from severe complications and poorer prognosis after COVID-19 infections. They also have different immune responses after doses of COVID-19 vaccination, but limited evidence is available to reveal the effectiveness and help to guide immunization programs for this subpopulation; MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library databases, and clinicaltrials.gov were used to search literature. The pooled seroconversion rate was calculated using a random-effects model and reported with a 95% confidence interval (CI); The review includes 66 studies containing serological responses after COVID-19 vaccination in 13,050 solid cancer patients and 8550 healthy controls. The pooled seropositive rates after the first dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 55.2% (95% CI 45.9%-64.5% = 18) and 90.2% (95% CI 80.9%-96.6% = 13), respectively. The seropositive rates after the second dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 87.6% (95% CI 84.1%-90.7% = 50) and 98.9% (95% CI 97.6%-99.7% = 35), respectively. The seropositive rates after the third dose in patients with solid cancer and healthy controls are 91.4% (95% CI 85.4%-95.9% = 21) and 99.8% (95% CI 98.1%-100.0% = 4), respectively. Subgroup analysis finds that study sample size, timing of antibody testing, and vaccine type have influence on the results; Seroconversion rates after COVID-19 vaccination are significantly lower in patients with solid malignancies, especially after the first dose, then shrinking gradually after the following two vaccinations, indicating that subsequent doses or a booster dose should be considered for the effectiveness of this subpopulation.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; COVID-19 Vaccines; COVID-19; Antibodies, Viral; Seroconversion; SARS-CoV-2; Vaccination
PubMed: 38785118
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2357424 -
Journal of Nuclear Medicine : Official... Jul 2024Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in the neovasculature of multiple solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Studies have demonstrated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is expressed in the neovasculature of multiple solid tumors, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Studies have demonstrated promising results on the utility of PSMA-targeted PET/CT imaging in RCC. This report aims to provide a systematic review and metaanalysis on the utility and detection rate of PSMA PET/CT imaging in staging or evaluation of primary RCC and restaging of metastatic or recurrent RCC. Searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, and abstract proceedings (last updated, August 2023). Studies that provided a lesion-level detection rate of PSMA radiotracers in staging or restaging of RCC were included in the metaanalysis. The overall pooled detection rate with a 95% CI was estimated, and subgroup analysis was performed when feasible. Nine studies comprising 152 patients (133 clear cell RCC [ccRCC], 19 other RCC subtypes) were included in the metaanalysis. The pooled detection rate of PSMA PET/CT in evaluation of primary or metastatic RCC was estimated to be 0.83 (95% CI, 0.67-0.92). Subgroup analysis showed a pooled PSMA detection rate of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.57-0.86) in staging or evaluation of primary RCC lesions and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.73-0.95) in restaging of metastatic or recurrent RCC. Analysis based on the type of radiotracer showed a pooled detection rate of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95) for Ga-based PSMA tracers and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.76-0.97) for F-DCFPyL PET/CT. Furthermore, in metastatic ccRCC, the available data support a significantly higher detection rate for F-DCFPyL PET/CT than for conventional imaging modalities (2 studies). Our preliminary results show that PSMA PET/CT could be a promising alternative imaging modality for evaluating RCC, particularly metastatic ccRCC. Large prospective studies are warranted to confirm clinical utility in the staging and restaging of RCC.
Topics: Carcinoma, Renal Cell; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Humans; Kidney Neoplasms; Neoplasm Staging; Glutamate Carboxypeptidase II; Antigens, Surface
PubMed: 38782453
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267417 -
Journal of Controlled Release :... Jul 2024Ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis and therapy of cancer. Tumors can be treated by thermal or mechanical tissue ablation. Furthermore, tumors can be manipulated... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ultrasound is widely used in the diagnosis and therapy of cancer. Tumors can be treated by thermal or mechanical tissue ablation. Furthermore, tumors can be manipulated by hyperthermia, sonodynamic therapy and sonoporation, e.g., by increasing tumor perfusion or the permeability of biological barriers to enhance drug delivery. These treatments induce various immune responses in tumors. However, conflicting data and high heterogeneity between experimental settings make it difficult to generalize the effects of ultrasound on tumor immunity. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to answer the question: "Does ultrasound alter the immune reaction of peripheral solid tumors in humans and animals compared to control conditions without ultrasound?" A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science and 24,401 potentially relevant publications were identified. Of these, 96 publications were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Experiments were performed in humans, rats, and mice and focused on different tumor types, primarily breast and melanoma. We collected data on thermal and non-thermal ultrasound settings, the use of sono-sensitizers or sono-enhancers, and anti-tumor therapies. Six meta-analyses were performed to quantify the effect of ultrasound on tumor infiltration by T cells (cytotoxic, helper, and regulatory T cells) and on blood cytokines (interleukin-6, interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor-α). We provide robust scientific evidence that ultrasound alters T cell infiltration into tumors and increases blood cytokine concentrations. Furthermore, we identified significant differences in immune cell infiltration based on tumor type, ultrasound settings, and mouse age. Stronger effects were observed using hyperthermia in combination with sono-sensitizers and in young mice. The latter may impair the translational impact of study results as most cancer patients are older. Thus, our results may help refining ultrasound parameters to enhance anti-tumor immune responses for therapeutic use and to minimize immune effects in diagnostic applications.
Topics: Animals; Neoplasms; Humans; Ultrasonic Therapy
PubMed: 38777126
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.05.030 -
Investigational New Drugs Jun 2024In the era of precision oncology (PO), systemic therapies for patients (pts) with solid tumors have shifted from chemotherapy (CT) to targeted therapy (TT) and...
In the era of precision oncology (PO), systemic therapies for patients (pts) with solid tumors have shifted from chemotherapy (CT) to targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IO). This systematic survey describes features of trials enrolling between 2010 and 2020, focusing on inclusion criteria, type of dose escalation scheme (DES) utilized, and use of expansion cohorts (ECs). A literature search identified phase I studies in adults with solid tumors published January 1, 2000- December 31, 2020 from 12 journals. We included only studies enrolling between 2010 and 2020 to better capture the PO era. Two reviewers abstracted data; a third established concordance. Of 10,744 studies, 10,195 were non-topical or enrolled prior to 2010; 437 studies were included. The most common drug classes were TT (47.6%), IO (22%), and CT (6.9%). In studies which reported race, patients were predominantly white (61.7%) or Asian (25.7%), followed by black (6.5%) or other (6.1%). Heterogeneity was observed in the reporting and specification of study inclusion criteria. Only 40.1% of studies utilized ECs, and among the studies which used ECS, 46.6% were defined by genomic selection. Rule-based DES were used in 89% of trials; a 3+3 design was used in 80.5%. Of all drugs tested, 37.5% advanced to phase II, while 10.3% garnered regulatory licensure (for an indication tested in phase I). In the era of PO, TT and IO have emerged as the most studied agents in phase I trials. Rule-based DES, which are more relevant for escalating CT, are still chiefly utilized.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Precision Medicine; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Antineoplastic Agents; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Immunotherapy; Medical Oncology
PubMed: 38775890
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-024-01445-z -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024V-set domain-containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1 (aliases VTCN1, B7H4) participates in tumour immune escape by delivering inhibitory signals to T cells. The purpose... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
V-set domain-containing T-cell activation inhibitor 1 (aliases VTCN1, B7H4) participates in tumour immune escape by delivering inhibitory signals to T cells. The purpose of this article was to assess the B7H4 prognostic value in solid cancers. Three databases were searched for relevant articles. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), progression-free survival (PFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Appropriate hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled. The R studio software (version 4.0.3) was used for data analysis. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. High expression of B7H4 was associated with worse OS (HR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.37-1.68) but not with DSS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.49-2.63), RFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI: 0.75-4.18), DFS (HR = 1.29, 95% CI: 0.8-2.09), or PFS (HR = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.91-3.2) in patients with solid cancers. High expression of B7H4 is associated with a poorer prognosis in patients with solid cancers. B7H4 is a promising prognostic biomarker and immunotherapeutic target for various solid cancers because of its activity in cancer immunity and tumourigenesis.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; V-Set Domain-Containing T-Cell Activation Inhibitor 1; Prognosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Disease-Free Survival
PubMed: 38732263
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25095045 -
Heliyon May 2024Endometrial carcinoma is the most widespread gynecological cancer, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets PD1...
OBJECTIVE
Endometrial carcinoma is the most widespread gynecological cancer, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets PD1 receptor tumors, is approved for patients with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) solid tumors. Many clinical trials and observational studies have been conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab combination therapy in the setting of endometrial cancer. However, results have been inconsistent, and current data is based on a heterogeneous population. The primary objective was to assess the safety and efficacy of Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for endometrial cancer.
DATA SOURCES
The search was conducted from inception from four databases; PubMed, Google Scholar, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The electronic database search was conducted from inception to August 20, 2023.
STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
We considered randomized controlled trials and single-arm observational studies, i.e. cohort, case-control and cross-sectional studies.
METHODOLOGY
We performed a single-arm meta-analysis, involving 7 studies having a total of 495 patients with endometrial cancer were eventually included which had the following outcomes: Complete response, Partial response, Progression-free survival, stable disease, progressive disease, safety outcomes, Adverse events, and the total number of deaths.
RESULTS
Our results showed that 88.6 % of the patients were positive for non-MSI-H/pMMR tumors (95 % CI = 0.825-0.927) whereas 6.5 % (95 % CI = 3.8-9.8 %) of the patients for MSI-H/dMMR tumors. The pooled objective response of endometrial cancer patients treated with Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab was 36.5 % (95 % CI = 0.258-0.471), the pooled estimate of complete and partial response was 47 % (95 % CI = 0.024-0.070) and 31.3 % (95 % CI = 0.230-0.396). 38.2 % patients had stable disease (95 % CI = 0.329-0.435) and 24.0 % patients had progressive disease (95 % CI = 0.103-0.378). The pooled median progression-free survival was 5.97 (95 % CI 5.43-7.63) months and, whereas the median overall survival was 17.19 months (95 % CI 15.34-19.31). All grade adverse events occurred in 85 % and Grade 3 or worse adverse events occurred in 39 % of patients during the therapy whereas death occurred in 23.8 % during the treatment.
CONCLUSION
The results of this meta-analysis concludes that although the combined treatment of a Lenvatinib and Pembrolizumab had a PFS and OS that was inferior to the standard therapy used to treat advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, it is still a novel treatment and shows potential for further research with a greater sample size.
PubMed: 38720703
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30257 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... Jun 2024Solid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound likely does not improve diagnostic adequacy during endoscopic ultrasound guided tissue acquisition: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Solid pancreatic masses are sampled through tissue acquisition by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Inadequate samples may significantly delay diagnosis, increasing costs and carrying risks to the patients.
AIM
assess the diagnostic adequacy of tissue acquisition using contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound (CEH-EUS) compared to conventional EUS.
METHODS
Five databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus and Web of Science) were searched in November 2023. Studies comparing diagnostic adequacy, accuracy and safety using CEH-EUS versus conventional EUS for tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic masses were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool for randomized controlled trials (RoB2) and the Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for non-randomized studies, level of evidence using the GRADE approach, Odds Ratios (RR) with 95 % Confidence Intervals (CI) calculated and pooled using a random-effects model. I quantified heterogeneity.
RESULTS
The search identified 3858 records; nine studies (1160 patients) were included. OR for achieving an adequate sample was 1.467 (CI: 0.850-2.533), for randomized trials 0.902 (CI: 0.541-1.505), for non-randomized 2.396 (CI: 0.916-6.264), with significant subgroup difference. OR for diagnostic accuracy was 1.326 (CI: 0.890-1977), for randomized trials 0.997 (CI: 0.593-1.977) and for non-randomized studies 1.928 (CI: 1.096-3.393), significant subgroup difference (p = 0.0467). No differences were observed for technical failures or adverse events. Heterogeneity was low, risk of bias "low" to "some concerns" for most outcomes, mostly moderate for non-randomized studies.
CONCLUSION
Non-randomized studies indicated differences in favor of contrast-enhanced EUS, randomized studies showed no difference in diagnostic adequacy, accuracy or sensitivity when using CEH-EUS.
Topics: Humans; Contrast Media; Endosonography; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreas
PubMed: 38714387
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.04.007