-
Journal of the American College of... Aug 2017To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients... (Review)
Review
Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association...
OBJECTIVES
To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients with reflex-mediated syncope.
METHODS
MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through October 7, 2015) were searched for randomized trials and observational studies examining pacing and syncope, and the bibliographies of known systematic reviews were also examined. Studies were rejected for poor-quality study methods and for the lack of the population, intervention, comparator, or outcome(s) of interest.
RESULTS
Of 3,188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, including a total of 676 patients. These included 9 randomized trials and 1 observational study. Of the 10 studies, 4 addressed patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and the remaining 6 addressed vasovagal syncope. Among the 6 open-label (unblinded) studies, we found that pacing was associated with a 70% reduction in recurrent syncope (relative risk [RR]: 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.60). When the 2 analyzable studies with double-blinded methodology were considered separately, there was no clear benefit (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.25-2.1), but confidence intervals were wide. The strongest evidence was from the randomized, double-blinded ISSUE-3 (Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology) trial, which demonstrated a benefit of pacing among patients with recurrent syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
CONCLUSIONS
There are limited data with substantive evidence of outcome ascertainment bias, and only 2 studies with a double-blinded study design have been conducted. The evidence does not support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated syncope beyond patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
Topics: Advisory Committees; American Heart Association; Biomedical Research; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial; Cardiology; Disease Management; Humans; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Societies, Medical; Syncope; United States
PubMed: 28286220
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.004 -
Circulation Aug 2017To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Pacing as a Treatment for Reflex-Mediated (Vasovagal, Situational, or Carotid Sinus Hypersensitivity) Syncope: A Systematic Review for the 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association...
OBJECTIVES
To determine, using systematic review of the biomedical literature, whether pacing reduces risk of recurrent syncope and relevant clinical outcomes among adult patients with reflex-mediated syncope.
METHODS
MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through October 7, 2015) were searched for randomized trials and observational studies examining pacing and syncope, and the bibliographies of known systematic reviews were also examined. Studies were rejected for poor-quality study methods and for the lack of the population, intervention, comparator, or outcome(s) of interest.
RESULTS
Of 3188 citations reviewed, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria for systematic review, including a total of 676 patients. These included 9 randomized trials and 1 observational study. Of the 10 studies, 4 addressed patients with carotid sinus hypersensitivity, and the remaining 6 addressed vasovagal syncope. Among the 6 open-label (unblinded) studies, we found that pacing was associated with a 70% reduction in recurrent syncope (relative risk [RR]: 0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15-0.60). When the 2 analyzable studies with double-blinded methodology were considered separately, there was no clear benefit (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.25-2.1), but confidence intervals were wide. The strongest evidence was from the randomized, double-blinded ISSUE-3 (Third International Study on Syncope of Uncertain Etiology) trial, which demonstrated a benefit of pacing among patients with recurrent syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
CONCLUSIONS
There are limited data with substantive evidence of outcome ascertainment bias, and only 2 studies with a double-blinded study design have been conducted. The evidence does not support the use of pacing for reflex-mediated syncope beyond patients with recurrent vasovagal syncope and asystole documented by implantable loop recorder.
Topics: American Heart Association; Humans; Pacemaker, Artificial; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Reflex; Syncope; Syncope, Vasovagal; United States
PubMed: 28280230
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000500 -
Transfusion Medicine (Oxford, England) Feb 2016Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) in blood donors have significant implications for the welfare of donors, donor retention and the management of donor sessions. We present a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) in blood donors have significant implications for the welfare of donors, donor retention and the management of donor sessions. We present a systematic review of interventions designed to prevent or reduce VVRs in blood donors. Electronic databases were searched for eligible randomised trials to March 2015. Data on study design and outcomes were extracted and pooled using random effects meta-analyses. Sixteen trials met the inclusion criteria: five trials (12 042 participants) of pre-donation water, eight trials (3500 participants) of applied muscle tension (AMT) and one trial each of AMT combined with water, caffeine, audio-visual distraction and/or social support. In donors receiving pre-donation water, the relative risk (RR) compared with controls for VVRs was 0·79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·70-0·89, P < 0·0001] and the mean difference (MD) in severity of VVRs measured with the Blood Donation Reactions Inventory (BDRI) score was -0·32 (95% CI -0·51 to -0·12, P < 0·0001). Excluding trials with a high risk of selection bias, the RR for VVRs was 0·70 (95% CI 0·45-1·11, P = 0·13). In donors who received AMT, there was no difference in the risk of chair recline in response to donor distress from controls (RR 0·76, 95% CI 0·53-1·10, P = 0·15), although the MD in BDRI score was -0·07 (95% CI -0·11 to -0·03, P = 0·0005). There was insufficient data to perform meta-analysis for other interventions. Current evidence on interventions to prevent or reduce VVRs in blood donors is indeed limited and does not provide strong support for the administration of pre-donation water or AMT during donation. Further large trials are required to reliably evaluate the effect of these and other interventions in the prevention of VVRs.
Topics: Blood Donors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Donor Selection; Female; Humans; Male; Risk Factors; Syncope, Vasovagal
PubMed: 27061617
DOI: 10.1111/tme.12275 -
Journal of the American Medical... Mar 2016Cardiovascular disorders are recognized as risk factors for falls in older adults. The aim of this systematic review was to identify cardiovascular disorders that are... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Cardiovascular disorders are recognized as risk factors for falls in older adults. The aim of this systematic review was to identify cardiovascular disorders that are associated with falls, thus providing angles for optimization of fall-preventive care.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES
Medline and Embase.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES
studies addressing persons aged 50 years and older that described cardiovascular risk factors for falls. Key search terms for cardiovascular abnormalities included all synonyms for the following groups: structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiac arrhythmia, blood pressure abnormalities, carotid sinus hypersensitivity (CSH), orthostatic hypotension (OH), vasovagal syncope (VVS), postprandial hypotension (PPH), arterial stiffness, heart failure, and cardiovascular disease. Quality of studies was assed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
RESULTS
Eighty-six studies were included. Of studies that used a control group, most consistent associations with falls were observed for low blood pressure (BP) (4/5 studies showing a positive association), heart failure (4/5), and cardiac arrhythmia (4/6). Higher prevalences of CSH (4/6), VVS (2/2), and PPH (3/4) were reported in fallers compared with controls in most studies, but most of these studies failed to show clear association measures. Coronary artery disease (6/10), orthostatic hypotension (9/25), general cardiovascular disease (4/9), and hypertension (7/25) all showed inconsistent associations with falls. Arterial stiffness was identified as an independent predictor for falls in one study, as were several echocardiographic abnormalities.
CONCLUSION
Several cardiovascular associations with falls were identified, including low BP, heart failure, and arrhythmia. These results provide several angles for optimizing fall-preventive care, but further work on standard definitions, as well as the exact contribution of individual risk factors on fall incidence is now important to find potential areas for preventive interventions.
Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Humans; Middle Aged; Syncope
PubMed: 26455926
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.022