-
JAMA Network Open Mar 2024Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
IMPORTANCE
Antipsychotic-induced akathisia (AIA) occurs in 14% to 35% of patients treated with antipsychotics and is associated with increased suicide and decreased adherence in patients with schizophrenia. However, no comprehensive review and network meta-analysis has been conducted to compare the efficacy of treatments for AIA.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the efficacy associated with AIA treatments.
DATA SOURCES
Three databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar) were systematically searched by multiple researchers for double-blind randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing active drugs for the treatment of AIA with placebo or another treatment between May 30 and June 18, 2023.
STUDY SELECTION
Selected studies were RCTs that compared adjunctive drugs for AIA vs placebo or adjunctive treatment in patients treated with antipsychotics fulfilling the criteria for akathisia, RCTs with sample size of 10 patients or more, only trials in which no additional drugs were administered during the study, and RCTs that used a validated akathisia score. Trials with missing data for the main outcome (akathisia score at the end points) were excluded.
DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS
Data extraction and synthesis were performed, estimating standardized mean differences (SMDs) through pairwise and network meta-analysis with a random-effects model. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline was followed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
The primary outcome was the severity of akathisia measured by a validated scale at the last available end point.
RESULTS
Fifteen trials involving 492 participants compared 10 treatments with placebo. Mirtazapine (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -1.20; 95% CI, -1.83 to -0.58), biperiden (6 mg/d for ≥14 days; SMD, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.34), vitamin B6 (600-1200 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.92; 95% CI, -1.57 to -0.26), trazodone (50 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.84; 95% CI, -1.54 to -0.14), mianserin (15 mg/d for ≥5 days; SMD, -0.81; 95% CI, -1.44 to -0.19), and propranolol (20 mg/d for ≥6 days; SMD, -0.78; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.22) were associated with greater efficacy than placebo, with low to moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 34.6%; 95% CI, 0.0%-71.1%). Cyproheptadine, clonazepam, zolmitriptan, and valproate did not yield significant effects. Eight trials were rated as having low risk of bias; 2, moderate risk; and 5, high risk. Sensitivity analyses generally confirmed the results for all drugs except for cyproheptadine and propranolol. No association between effect sizes and psychotic severity was found.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, mirtazapine, biperiden, and vitamin B6 were associated with the greatest efficacy for AIA, with vitamin B6 having the best efficacy and tolerance profile. Trazodone, mianserin, and propranolol appeared as effective alternatives with slightly less favorable efficacy and tolerance profiles. These findings should assist prescribers in selecting an appropriate medication for treating AIA.
Topics: Humans; Antipsychotic Agents; Biperiden; Cyproheptadine; Gallopamil; Mianserin; Mirtazapine; Network Meta-Analysis; Propranolol; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Trazodone; Vitamin B 6; Akathisia, Drug-Induced
PubMed: 38451521
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.1527 -
The American Journal of Clinical... Mar 2024The optimal dosage range for B-vitamin supplementation for stroke prevention has not received sufficient attention. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The optimal dosage range for B-vitamin supplementation for stroke prevention has not received sufficient attention.
OBJECTIVE
Our aim was to determine the optimal dosage range of a combination of folic acid, vitamin B12, and vitamin B6 supplementation in stroke prevention.
METHODS
We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase database for randomized controlled trials published between January 1966 and April 2023, whose participants received B-vitamin supplementation and that reported the number of stroke cases. Relative risk (RR) was used to measure the effect of combined supplementation on risk of stroke using a fixed-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias algorithm.
RESULTS
The search identified 14 randomized controlled trials of folic acid combined with vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 supplementation for stroke prevention that included 76,664 participants with 2720 stroke cases. In areas without and with partial folic acid fortification, combined B-vitamin supplementation significantly reduced the risk of stroke by 34% [RR: 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50, 0.86] and 11% (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79, 1.00), respectively. Further analysis showed that a dosage of folic acid ≤0.8 mg/d and vitamin B12 ≤0.4 mg/d was best for stroke prevention (RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.86) in these areas. In contrast, no benefit of combined supplementation was found in fortified areas (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.94, 1.16).
CONCLUSIONS
Our meta-analysis found that the folic acid combined with vitamin B12 and vitamin B6 supplementation strategy significantly reduced the risk of stroke in areas without and with partial folic acid fortification. Combined dosages not exceeding 0.8 mg/d for folic acid and 0.4 mg/d for vitamin B12 supplementation may be more effective for populations within these areas. This trial was registered at PROSPERO asCRD42022355077.
Topics: Humans; Vitamins; Vitamin B 12; Folic Acid; Vitamin B 6; Stroke; Dietary Supplements
PubMed: 38432716
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.021 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Apr 2024The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether maternal exposure to folate antagonists is associated with increased rates of congenital heart disease in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
AIMS
The objective of this meta-analysis was to determine whether maternal exposure to folate antagonists is associated with increased rates of congenital heart disease in offspring.
METHODS
A comprehensive search for articles in the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases published up to 21 August 2023 was performed. The search strategy was not limited by study design but only for articles in the English language.
RESULTS
Analysis of 6 cohort studies and 5 cross-sectional studies, published between 1976 and 2020, showed significant increase in rate of congenital heart disease (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.87) when exposed to folate antagonists compared with the control. Further subgroup analysis showed the increased rate for exposure to both dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs separately. No differences were observed when analyses were stratified by timing of study.
CONCLUSION
Administration of folate antagonists within the 12-week period preceding conception and throughout the second and third months of gestation exhibited a statistically significant elevation in the susceptibility to congenital heart diseases. Notably, the protective effect of folic acid supplementation was reported in cases of congenital heart disease linked to dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors but not that associated with antiepileptic drugs.
Topics: Female; Humans; Maternal Exposure; Folic Acid Antagonists; Anticonvulsants; Cross-Sectional Studies; Heart Defects, Congenital; Folic Acid
PubMed: 38369772
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.16021 -
Journal of Diabetes and Its... Feb 2024Alpha-lipoic acid, epalrestat, and mecobalamin are widely used as monotherapies for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, whether a triple-combination therapy with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Alpha-lipoic acid, epalrestat, and mecobalamin are widely used as monotherapies for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. However, whether a triple-combination therapy with these three drugs is superior to monotherapy or dual therapy remains debatable.
METHODS
Nine randomized controlled trials were identified through a search on electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The trial participants (N = 1153) were divided into the experimental group who received the triple-combination therapy and the control group who received conventional or dual therapy with the aforementioned drugs.
RESULTS
Therapeutic outcomes were better in the experimental group than in the control group (odds ratio: 3.74; 95 % confidence interval: 2.57-5.45; I = 0 %; p < 0.00001). No statistic difference was noted in adverse effects. Compared with the control group, the experimental group exhibited significant improvements in median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), peroneal MNCV, peroneal SNCV, and vibration perception thresholds (VPT) in the left and right lower limbs. In the control group, a subgroup analysis by treatment strategy revealed similar improvements in total efficacy, MNCV, and SNCV.
CONCLUSIONS
For diabetic peripheral neuropathy, the triple-combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy or dual therapy.
Topics: Humans; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Thioctic Acid; Antioxidants; Diabetes Mellitus
PubMed: 38330524
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2024.108691 -
General Hospital Psychiatry 2024Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a serious neurological disorder that is underdiagnosed. Despite limited clinical guidelines, the standard use of intravenous (IV)... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a serious neurological disorder that is underdiagnosed. Despite limited clinical guidelines, the standard use of intravenous (IV) thiamine is underutilized and remains an area of research deserving much attention.
OBJECTIVES
We conducted a systematic review using Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases to identify and summarize the literature on IV thiamine treatment in WE. Human studies with WE patients who received ≥100 mg of thiamine IV met inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and case reports were included.
RESULTS
A total of 27 studies were included: 20 case reports, five retrospective studies, one prospective study and one randomized control trial. Of the case reports, 11 (55%) cases were female, and the average age of all cases was 45 years (SD = 15). The other seven studies included 688 patients; the average age was 52 years (SD = 9), and 266 (38.7%) were female. Among the case reports, neurological and clinical findings were used to diagnose WE in 16 (80%) cases. MRI was utilized to diagnose 15 (75%) cases. 500 mg IV thiamine TID was reported in 12 case reports (60%). 18 (90%) of case reports had partial or complete resolution of symptoms following IV thiamine.
CONCLUSION
IV thiamine can alleviate neurological symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and brain imaging lesions associated with WE. We found key limitations in the evidence for IV thiamine and diagnostic standards for WE. Future targeted research should establish clear diagnostic and treatment guidelines for WE to prevent this serious condition from being underdiagnosed or undertreated.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Male; Wernicke Encephalopathy; Thiamine Deficiency; Retrospective Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Prospective Studies; Thiamine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 38306946
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.01.005 -
BMJ Open Jan 2024The objective of the current study is to compare the treatment effects of different vitamins on essential hypertension to provide an initial basis for developing... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
The objective of the current study is to compare the treatment effects of different vitamins on essential hypertension to provide an initial basis for developing evidence-based practices.
DESIGN
Systematic review and network meta-analysis.
DATA SOURCES
Five electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched from their inception to 25 September 2023.
OUTCOMES
The primary outcomes were the difference between the intervention group and the control group in changes in office systolic blood pressure (SBP) and office diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from baseline. The secondary outcomes were the difference between the intervention group and the control group in changes in 24-hour mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (24 hours SBP), 24-hour mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (24 hours DBP) and heart rate (HR) from baseline.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies comparing five vitamins (vitamin B, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, folic acid) and involving 2218 participants were included. The included trials were all vitamin versus placebo, so the network was star-shaped. Among the five vitamins, only vitamin E was significantly more effective at reducing SBP (mean difference: -14.14 mm Hg, 95% credible intervals: -27.62 to -0.88) than placebo. In addition, no evidence was found that any of the five vitamins influenced DBP, 24 hours SBP, 24 hours DBP, or HR. The dose of vitamins, geographical region and percentage of males (only SBP) might be sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis revealed that the effect of vitamin intervention on blood pressure varies according to different doses of vitamins.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the results, vitamin E might be an effective measure to reduce SBP, but more research is needed to validate this finding.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022352332.
Topics: Adult; Male; Humans; Vitamin D; Ascorbic Acid; Hypertension; Folic Acid; Riboflavin; Vitamin E; Network Meta-Analysis; Vitamins; Essential Hypertension; Blood Pressure; Vitamin A; Vitamin K
PubMed: 38296289
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074511 -
Canadian Journal of Diabetes Jun 2024Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Ranking Alpha Lipoic Acid and Gamma Linolenic Acid in Terms of Efficacy and Safety in the Management of Adults With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
Current medications for diabetic neuropathy (DN) recommended by the American Diabetes Association and American Academy of Neurology do not address the pathologic process of denervation among patients with DN, because ancillary treatments, such as reactive oxygen scavengers, may be needed. The purpose of this work was to summarize the available evidence about the efficacy and safety of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) and gamma linolenic acid (GLA) in the management of DN.
METHODS
Using the search terms [(alpha lipoic acid or ALA or thioctic acid or thioctacid) or (gamma linolenic acid or GLA)] AND [(diabetes or diabetes mellitus) AND (polyneuropathy or neuropathy or sensorimotor polyneuropathy or radiculopathy)], 11 studies were included in this review and combined meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Eight of the 11 articles (73%) reported significant benefit of ALA vs placebo. In the meta-analysis, the Total Symptom Score (TSS) for ALA 600 mg/day (ALA600) was 1.05 points lower (standard mean difference [SMD] -1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] -2.07 to -0.04, p=0.04, I=98.18%) compared with control at the end of the study. In the network meta-analysis, ALA600 (SMD -1.68, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.6) and GLA (SMD -2.39, 95% CI -4.3 to -0.5) had significantly lower TSSs compared with placebo. Moreover, GLA had the highest probability of being the best (52.7%) for improving DN symptoms. In all studies, most adverse events include gastrointestinal disturbances. In terms of tolerability, no differences were detected between ALA and control groups.
CONCLUSION
ALA and GLA appear to be safe and efficacious biofactors for improvement of DN symptoms.
Topics: Humans; Thioctic Acid; Diabetic Neuropathies; gamma-Linolenic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Antioxidants
PubMed: 38295879
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.01.007 -
European Journal of Clinical... Jun 2024Stroke represents a significant public health challenge, necessitating the exploration of preventive measures. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Stroke represents a significant public health challenge, necessitating the exploration of preventive measures. This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of different vitamin treatments compared to a placebo in preventing stroke.
METHODS
A systematic electronic search in databases including PubMed, EmBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar until 31 May 2023 was conducted, to identify published studies investigating the association between vitamin intake and the risk of stroke. Pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using a frequentist network meta-analysis. Furthermore, we ranked vitamins based on p-scores, facilitating a comparative assessment of their effectiveness in preventing stroke.
RESULTS
A total of 56 studies, including 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 39 cohort studies were analyzed. Direct estimates obtained from network meta-analysis, we found that vitamin A (RR: .81 [.72-.91]), vitamin B-complex (RR: .85 [.74-.97]), vitamin B (RR: 79 [.68-.92]), folate (RR: .86 [.75-.97]), vitamin C (RR: .77 [.70-.85]) and vitamin D (RR: .73 [.64-.83]) were significantly associated with a decreased stroke risk. However, no significant association was observed for vitamin B, vitamin B, and vitamin E. Subsequent to network meta-analysis, vitamins were ranked in decreasing order of their efficacy in stroke prevention based on p-score, with vitamin D (p-score = .91), vitamin C (p-score = .79), vitamin B (p-score = .70), vitamin A (p-score = .65), vitamin B-complex (p-score = .53), folate (p-score = .49), vitamin B (p-score = .39), vitamin E (p-score = .28), vitamin B (.13) and placebo (.10).
CONCLUSION
Our study has established noteworthy connections between vitamin A, vitamin B-complex, vitamin B, folate, vitamin C, and vitamin D in the realm of stroke prevention. These findings add substantial weight to the accumulating evidence supporting the potential advantages of vitamin interventions in mitigating the risk of stroke. However, to solidify and validate these observations, additional research is imperative. Well-designed clinical trials or cohort studies are needed to further explore these associations and formulate clear guidelines for incorporating vitamin supplementation into effective stroke prevention strategies.
Topics: Humans; Vitamins; Stroke; Vitamin B Complex; Folic Acid; Network Meta-Analysis; Vitamin D; Vitamin E; Ascorbic Acid; Vitamin A; Vitamin B 6; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Dietary Supplements
PubMed: 38291560
DOI: 10.1111/eci.14165 -
Journal of Cataract and Refractive... May 2024Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used for treating keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. However, refractive surgery is not usually performed with... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Comparative Study
Corneal crosslinking (CXL) is used for treating keratoconus and post-laser in situ keratomileusis ectasia. However, refractive surgery is not usually performed with prophylactic CXL. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis comparing outcomes of refractive surgeries with vs without prophylactic CXL. We systematically searched databases for studies comparing refractive surgeries for myopic correction with vs without prophylactic corneal crosslinking. Review Manager 5.4.1 was used to perform statistical analysis. We included 2820 eyes from 28 studies. Compared with refractive surgery alone, surgery with prophylactic CXL resulted in decreased central corneal thickness, corrected distance visual acuity logMAR, and safety and efficacy indices. There were no significant differences in postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better at ≥12 months and other visual outcomes among both groups. More randomized controlled trials with standard crosslinking protocols are needed to analyze the prophylactic use of crosslinking with refractive surgeries.
Topics: Humans; Cross-Linking Reagents; Photosensitizing Agents; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ; Riboflavin; Collagen; Visual Acuity; Myopia; Photorefractive Keratectomy; Photochemotherapy; Lasers, Excimer; Corneal Stroma; Ultraviolet Rays; Keratoconus; Corneal Surgery, Laser; Refraction, Ocular
PubMed: 38288954
DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001405 -
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Feb 2024Vitamin B12 is essential to human but the implications of serum vitamin B12 level for mortality in clinical practice remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Vitamin B12 is essential to human but the implications of serum vitamin B12 level for mortality in clinical practice remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis to quantify the relationship between vitamin B12 levels and the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality.
METHODS
Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception through May 2023. Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated the risk of bias among the studies using the Newcastle‒Ottawa Scale. To examine a potential nonlinear relationship between the vitamin B12 levels and all-cause mortality, we performed a two-stage random effects dose‒response meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Twenty-two cohort studies (92,346 individuals with 10,704 all-cause deaths) were included. A linear trend dose-response analysis showed that each 100 pmol/L increase in serum vitamin B12 concentration was associated with a 4 % higher risk of all-cause mortality in the general population (adjusted HR 1.04, 95 % confidence interval CI 1.01 to 1.08; n = 8; P non-linearity = 0.11) and a 6 % higher risk for all-cause mortality in older adults (adjusted HR 1.06, 95 % CI 1.01 to 1.13; n = 4; P non-linearity = 0.78). Current evidence was mixed for the association between serum vitamin B12 concentration and cardiovascular mortality and was limited for cancer mortality. The meta-analysis of cohort studies showed a positive association between a high serum vitamin B12 concentration (>600 pmol/L) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.50, 95 % CI 1.29 to 1.74; n = 10; p < 0.01), CVD mortality (adjusted HR 2.04, 95 % CI 0.99 to 4.19; n = 2; p = 0.02), except cancer mortality (adjusted HR 1.56, 95 % CI 0.82 to 2.95; n = 3). Similarly, serum vitamin B12 concentrations (400-600 pmol/L) were associated with increased all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.34, 95 % CI 1.10 to 1.64; n = 9; p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Serum vitamin B12 concentration was positively associated with the risk of all-cause mortality, especially among older adults, with a linear increasing trend. These findings suggested the primary cause of elevated level of serum vitamin B12 concentration should be timely identified and effectively managed in clinical practice.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Neoplasms; Databases, Factual; Vitamin B 12
PubMed: 38252787
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2023.105230