-
Cell Biology International Jun 2024Chronic stress is a universal condition commonly associated with many psychiatric diseases. An extensive body of evidence discussed hippocampal affection upon chronic...
Chronic stress is a universal condition commonly associated with many psychiatric diseases. An extensive body of evidence discussed hippocampal affection upon chronic stress exposure, however, the underlying molecular pathways still need to be identified. We investigated the impact of chronic stress on miR200/BMP/Olig-2 signaling and hippocampal myelination. We also compared the effects of chronic administration of amitriptyline and cholecalciferol on chronically stressed hippocampi. Both amitriptyline and cholecalciferol significantly decreased serum cortisol levels, reduced immobility time in the forced swim test, increased the number of crossed squares in open field test, decreased the hippocampal expression of bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) and its messenger RNA (mRNA) levels, reduced miR200 expression as compared to untreated chronically stressed rats. Also, both drugs amended the hippocampal neuronal damage, enhanced the surviving cell count, and increased the pyramidal layer thickness of Cornu Ammonis subregion 1 (CA1) and granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus. Cholecalciferol was more effective in increasing the area percentage of myelin basic protein (MBP) and Olig-2 positive cells count in hippocampi of chronic stress-exposed rats than amitriptyline, thus enhancing myelination. We also found a negative correlation between the expression of BMP4, its mRNA, miR200, and the immunoexpression of MBP and Olig-2 proteins. This work underscores the amelioration of the stress-induced behavioral changes, inhibition of miR200/BMP4 signaling, and enhancement of hippocampal myelination following chronic administration of either amitriptyline or cholecalciferol, though cholecalciferol seemed more effective in brain remyelination.
PubMed: 38890788
DOI: 10.1002/cbin.12200 -
JAMA Jun 2024Approximately 9% of US adults experience major depression each year, with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 17% for men and 30% for women.
IMPORTANCE
Approximately 9% of US adults experience major depression each year, with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 17% for men and 30% for women.
OBSERVATIONS
Major depression is defined by depressed mood, loss of interest in activities, and associated psychological and somatic symptoms lasting at least 2 weeks. Evaluation should include structured assessment of severity as well as risk of self-harm, suspected bipolar disorder, psychotic symptoms, substance use, and co-occurring anxiety disorder. First-line treatments include specific psychotherapies and antidepressant medications. A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported cognitive therapy, behavioral activation, problem-solving therapy, interpersonal therapy, brief psychodynamic therapy, and mindfulness-based psychotherapy all had at least medium-sized effects in symptom improvement over usual care without psychotherapy (standardized mean difference [SMD] ranging from 0.50 [95% CI, 0.20-0.81] to 0.73 [95% CI, 0.52-0.95]). A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported 21 antidepressant medications all had small- to medium-sized effects in symptom improvement over placebo (SMD ranging from 0.23 [95% CI, 0.19-0.28] for fluoxetine to 0.48 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55] for amitriptyline). Psychotherapy combined with antidepressant medication may be preferred, especially for more severe or chronic depression. A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials reported greater symptom improvement with combined treatment than with psychotherapy alone (SMD, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]) or medication alone (SMD, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.20-0.47]). When initial antidepressant medication is not effective, second-line medication treatment includes changing antidepressant medication, adding a second antidepressant, or augmenting with a nonantidepressant medication, which have approximately equal likelihood of success based on a network meta-analysis. Collaborative care programs, including systematic follow-up and outcome assessment, improve treatment effectiveness, with 1 meta-analysis reporting significantly greater symptom improvement compared with usual care (SMD, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.23-0.61]).
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE
Effective first-line depression treatments include specific forms of psychotherapy and more than 20 antidepressant medications. Close monitoring significantly improves the likelihood of treatment success.
PubMed: 38856993
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.5756 -
European Review For Medical and... May 2024Painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PRDN) is a common disabling condition. Pregabalin and amitriptyline are commonly prescribed as the first-line for PPDN despite... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVE
Painful peripheral diabetic neuropathy (PRDN) is a common disabling condition. Pregabalin and amitriptyline are commonly prescribed as the first-line for PPDN despite the contradicting recommendations. There is a need to inform the scientific community regarding first-line pain control among patients with PPDN. This meta-analysis assessed pregabalin and amitriptyline effects on PPDN.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, and Google Scholar; the terms used were amitriptyline, pregabalin, painful diabetic neuropathy, antidepressant, gabapentinoids, quality of life, and adverse events. Boolean operators like AND, and OR were used. Six hundred and thirty-one studies were retrieved, and 37 full texts were screened. However, only six randomized controlled trials fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
RESULTS
No significant statistical differences between amitriptyline and pregabalin regarding pain score and significant pain reduction (odd ratio, -0.82, 95% CI, -2.21-0.58, and odd ratio, 1.16, 95% CI, 0.76-1.76 respectively). Quality of life, total adverse events, and drug discontinuation were not different between the two drugs (odd ratio, 0.89, 95% CI, -2.11-3.89, odd ratio, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.52-1.85, and odd ratio, 0.51, 95% CI, 0.08-3.15, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
No significant statistical differences between amitriptyline and pregabalin regarding their effects on pain and quality of life. The drugs showed similar total adverse events and drug withdrawal. Further larger real-world studies are needed.
Topics: Pregabalin; Amitriptyline; Humans; Diabetic Neuropathies; Analgesics; Quality of Life
PubMed: 38856135
DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202405_36296 -
Bioinformation 2024Neuropathic pain largely influences the well-being of patients. Anticonvulsant and antidepressant medications, such as Pregabalin, Gabapentin, and Amitriptyline, are...
Neuropathic pain largely influences the well-being of patients. Anticonvulsant and antidepressant medications, such as Pregabalin, Gabapentin, and Amitriptyline, are routinely prescribed as initial treatments for neuropathic pain. The study sample has a total of 270 patients who meet the inclusion criteria and are further distributed into three equally sized groups (A, B, and C). Group A was administered with Gabapentine 300mg, Group B with Pregabalin 75 mg, and Amitriptyline 10 mg to Group C. The occurrence of any adverse drug response was documented using the ADR reporting form, while the pain of the patient's post-medication was recorded using a numerical pain rating scale (NPRS). The comparison of the NPRS scores of all three groups "by using ANOVA test" both at baseline and after 15 days reveal that the differences between the three groups are statistically insignificant (p > 0.089). However, after one month of continuous use, the difference becomes slightly significant (I.e., p = 0.003). Gabapentin, pregabalin, and amitriptyline demonstrate similar effectiveness in alleviating neuropathic (NeP) pain. The study concludes that gabapentin is superior to both pregabalin and amitriptyline with fewer adverse effects, leading to improved patient adherence for long-term use.
PubMed: 38854766
DOI: 10.6026/973206300200386 -
International Immunopharmacology Jul 2024Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a serious condition that causes intestinal dysfunction and can be fatal. Previous research has shown that toll-like...
Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a serious condition that causes intestinal dysfunction and can be fatal. Previous research has shown that toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) inhibitors have a protective effect against this injury. This study aimed to investigate the protective effects of TLR4 inhibitors, specifically cyclobenzaprine, ketotifen, amitriptyline, and naltrexone, in rats with intestinal (I/R) injury. Albino rats were divided into seven groups: vehicle control, sham-operated, I/R injury, I/R-cyclobenzaprine (10 mg/kg body weight), I/R-ketotifen (1 mg/kg body weight), I/R-amitriptyline (10 mg/kg body weight), and I/R-naltrexone (4 mg/kg body weight) groups. Anesthetized rats (urethane 1.8 g/kg) underwent 30 min of intestinal ischemia by occluding the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), followed by 2 h of reperfusion. Intestinal tissue samples were collected to measure various parameters, including malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide synthase (NO), myeloperoxidase (MPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), TLR4, intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), nuclear factor kappa bp65 (NF-ĸBP65), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), macrophages CD68, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MYD88), and toll interleukin receptor-domain-containing adaptor-inducing interferon β (TRIF). The use of TLR4 inhibitors significantly reduced MDA, MPO, and NO levels, while increasing SOD activity. Furthermore, it significantly decreased TLR4, ICAM-1, TNF-α, MCP-1, MYD88, and TRIF levels. These drugs also showed partial restoration of normal cellular structure with reduced inflammation. Additionally, there was a decrease in NF-ĸBP65 and macrophages CD68 staining compared to rats in the I/R groups. This study focuses on how TLR4 inhibitors enhance intestinal function and protect against intestinal (I/R) injury by influencing macrophages CD86 through (MYD88-TRIF) pathway, as well as their effects on oxidation and inflammation.
Topics: Animals; Toll-Like Receptor 4; Myeloid Differentiation Factor 88; Reperfusion Injury; Rats; Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport; Male; Signal Transduction; Intestines
PubMed: 38850786
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112421 -
Gerodontology Jun 2024
PubMed: 38837448
DOI: 10.1111/ger.12767 -
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary... Apr 2024Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic agents. The treatment for SS involves the administration of a serotonin...
OBJECTIVE
Serotonin syndrome (SS) is an iatrogenic life-threatening condition caused by serotonergic agents. The treatment for SS involves the administration of a serotonin antagonist (cyproheptadine). However, the dosing schedule for cyproheptadine is not uniform in the literature.
METHODS
We retrospectively evaluated 23 adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the Neurology Department and met the Hunter criteria for SS.
RESULTS
The mean age was 35.2 years, and 52% were female. Ten patients were managed in the intensive care unit (ICU), whereas thirteen patients were admitted to the ward. Hyperreflexia was the most common clinical feature (100%), followed by clonus (91%), tachycardia (83%), and tremor (83%). Other common clinical features were rigidity (65%), increased bowel sound (61%), diaphoresis (48%), fever (43%), hypertension (39%), and myoclonus (30%). All but one patient received two or more serotonergic drugs. Tramadol was the most common serotonergic agent (39%), followed by sodium valproate (21%), and amitriptyline (21%). Cyproheptadine was administered to all patients. All patients admitted in the ICU received a loading dose of 12 mg followed by 2 mg every 2 h for at least 24 h. All patients admitted to the ward were given 4 mg of cyproheptadine three times each day. Every patient showed at least some response to cyproheptadine within 24 h. The total doses of cyproheptadine and the length of treatment differed between patients.
CONCLUSION
Any response to cyproheptadine at a therapeutic dose within 24 h, even a partial one, could be a diagnostic indicator of the existence of SS.
PubMed: 38827706
DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_652_23 -
Therapeutic Advances in... 2024Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remain widely prescribed for depression and many other conditions. There may be important differences between individual TCA in regard... (Review)
Review
Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) remain widely prescribed for depression and many other conditions. There may be important differences between individual TCA in regard to their overdose toxicity and their cardiac toxicity in clinical use. We conducted a systematic review to compare the toxicity of individual TCA in overdose and the risk of serious adverse cardiac events occurring with therapeutic doses. We used the fatal toxicity index (FTI) and case fatality ratio as markers of fatality in overdose, and hazard ratios or odds ratios for the risk of cardiovascular adverse events during normal clinical use. In all, 30 reports of mortality in overdose and 14 observational studies assessing the risk of cardiovascular adverse events in clinical use were included. FTI values were of the same order of magnitude (10-10) for all TCAs except lofepramine. Desipramine appears to be somewhat more likely than other TCAs to lead to death in overdose. Amitriptyline, clomipramine, dothiepin/dosulepin, doxepin, trimipramine and imipramine showed broadly similar toxicity and were usually reported to be less toxic than desipramine. Data on nortriptyline were contradictory. Lofepramine had the lowest risk of death in overdose. The rank order of overdose toxicity was broadly consistent between different FTI definitions and between markers used. With respect to the risk of cardiovascular events at clinically relevant exposure, amitriptyline, nortriptyline and lofepramine were associated with a greater risk of in-use cardiotoxicity. All measures of overdose toxicity were subject to external influences and confounding. The continued use of TCAs in depression and other conditions should be minimized when considering their undoubted toxicity in overdose and possible toxicity in normal clinical use.
PubMed: 38827015
DOI: 10.1177/20451253241243297 -
Cureus May 2024Hyperprolactinemia is an endocrinological disorder that might arise from various physiologic or pathologic conditions, as well as from pharmacologic sources. These...
Hyperprolactinemia is an endocrinological disorder that might arise from various physiologic or pathologic conditions, as well as from pharmacologic sources. These pharmacologic sources include antidepressants, antipsychotics, and dopamine receptor-blocking agents. Amitriptyline is classified as a tricyclic antidepressant. While it is FDA-approved primarily for the treatment of depression, amitriptyline also demonstrates efficacy in managing various other conditions, such as anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, insomnia, chronic and neuropathic pain, and migraine prevention. We present a case of a 10-year-old patient with a history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and migraine headaches who was incidentally found to have elevated prolactin levels while taking amitriptyline for migraine prophylaxis. While risperidone, an antipsychotic that can be used for ASD management, is commonly known to induce hyperprolactinemia, the association between amitriptyline and elevated prolactin is less frequently described in the literature. This case underscores the necessity for healthcare providers across various specialties to be aware of amitriptyline-induced hyperprolactinemia.
PubMed: 38826982
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59604 -
Journal of the American Geriatrics... Jun 2024The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is associated with increased risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits and varies by racial and ethnic...
BACKGROUND
The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is associated with increased risk of hospitalizations and emergency room visits and varies by racial and ethnic subgroups. Medicare's nationwide medication therapy management (MTM) program requires that Part D plans offer an annual comprehensive medication review (CMR) to all beneficiaries who qualify, and provides a platform to reduce PIM use. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of CMR on PIM discontinuation in Medicare beneficiaries and whether this differed by race or ethnicity.
METHODS
Retrospective cohort study of community-dwelling Medicare Part D beneficiaries ≥66 years of age who were eligible for MTM from 2013 to 2019 based on 5% Medicare fee-for-service claims data linked to the 100% MTM data file. Among those using a PIM, MTM-eligible CMR recipients were matched to non-recipients via sequential stratification. The probability of PIM discontinuation was estimated using regression models that pooled yearly subcohorts accounting for within-beneficiary correlations. The most common PIMs that were discontinued after CMR were reported.
RESULTS
We matched 24,368 CMR recipients to 24,368 CMR non-recipients during the observation period. Median age was 74-75, 35% were males, most were White beneficiaries (86%-87%), and the median number of PIMs was 1. In adjusted analyses, CMR receipt was positively associated with PIM discontinuation (adjusted relative risk [aRR]: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.20-1.32). There was no evidence of differential impact of CMR by race or ethnicity. The PIMs most commonly discontinued after CMR were glimepiride, zolpidem, digoxin, amitriptyline, and nitrofurantoin.
CONCLUSIONS
Among Medicare beneficiaries who are using a PIM, CMR receipt was associated with PIM discontinuation, suggesting that greater CMR use could facilitate PIM reduction for all racial and ethnic groups.
PubMed: 38826070
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.19013