-
Lancet (London, England) Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Appendectomy; Preoperative Care; Time-to-Treatment; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors
PubMed: 38908872
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00636-6 -
Pain Research & Management 2024Common postoperative complications following surgery, particularly acute appendicitis surgery, include postoperative pain and vomiting, which can cause discomfort and... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND
Common postoperative complications following surgery, particularly acute appendicitis surgery, include postoperative pain and vomiting, which can cause discomfort and delay recovery time.
METHODS
A randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted with 80 cases of acute appendicitis of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II and aged 18-60 y/o scheduled for appendectomy under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly divided into two equal groups: group A received 4 mg of ondansetron IV (2 ml) and group B received 2 ml of normal slain IV (placebo). Pain according to VAS, nausea and vomiting according to clinical symptoms, shivering and sedation according to the Bedside Shivering Assessment Scale (BSAS), and the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery were evaluated and compared between the groups.
RESULTS
There was a significant decline in the severity of pain only at 2 hours after surgery between the ondansetron and control groups (5.3 ± 1.0 vs. 6.0 ± 1.0; =0.01), not showing a difference between the groups at 6, 12, and 24 hours after appendectomy. Postoperative nausea and vomiting at 2 (5% vs. 25%; =0.03) and 6 (7.5% vs. 27.5%; =0.04) hours after appendectomy in the ondansetron group. At different times, the ondansetron and control groups did not differ in terms of pethidine consumption or sedation.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, our study found that ondansetron was effective in reducing postoperative vomiting after acute appendicitis surgery. However, it did not show a clinically significant effect on postoperative pain. This trial is registered with IRCT20230722058883N1.
Topics: Humans; Double-Blind Method; Ondansetron; Adult; Male; Female; Pain, Postoperative; Appendicitis; Young Adult; Middle Aged; Adolescent; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Appendectomy; Pain Measurement; Antiemetics; Treatment Outcome; Time Factors
PubMed: 38899063
DOI: 10.1155/2024/6429874 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024The role of infestation in the context of appendicitis is largely overlooked, but is considered an unexpected and significant appendicectomy finding. The aim of this...
The role of infestation in the context of appendicitis is largely overlooked, but is considered an unexpected and significant appendicectomy finding. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of findings in appendectomies and to evaluate the clinical and histopathologic features of patients with -associated acute appendicitis and those with appendiceal infestation. The medical records of all children who underwent an appendectomy in two large pediatric centers in Croatia between 1 January 2009 and 1 January 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Of 6359 appendectomies, 61 (0.96%) children were diagnosed with on histopathology and included in further analysis. The groups were compared with regard to demographic characteristics, laboratory values, clinical features and histopathological findings. : The incidence of enterobiasis fluctuated slightly in the individual study years, but was constant overall. The median age of all patients was 11 years (IQR 8.5, 13), with females predominating (60.7%). Acute appendicitis was observed in 34% of the appendiceal species. The patients with infestation, without appendicitis, were younger (9 years (IQR 8, 13) vs. 12 years (IQR 10, 15); = 0.020), had longer duration of symptoms (36 h (IQR, 12, 48) vs. 24 h (IQR, 12, 36); = 0.034), lower body temperature (37 °C (IQR 36.8, 37.4) vs. 37.6 °C (IQR, 37, 38.6) = 0.012), lower Appendicitis Inflammation Response (AIR) score (3 (IQR 2, 5) vs. 7 (IQR 5, 9.5) < 0.001), lower incidence of rebound tenderness (57.1% vs. 20%; = 0.003) and less frequent vomiting (12.5% vs. 47.6%; = 0.004) compared to the patients with -associated acute appendicitis. Acute inflammatory markers in the laboratory showed significantly higher values in the group of patients with acute appendicitis: C-reactive protein ( = 0.009), White blood cells ( = 0.001) and neutrophils ( < 0.001). Eosinophilia was not found in any of the groups, although eosinophil counts were significantly higher in children who had infestation than in those with -related appendicitis (2.5% (IQR 0.9, 4.3) vs. 1.8% (IQR 0.7, 2.1); = 0.040). : Pediatric surgeons should consider infestation as a differential diagnosis when removing a vermiform appendix. Younger age, longer duration of symptoms, lower body temperature, lower AIR score, lower diameter of the appendix and normal laboratory inflammatory markers could predict infection in children presenting with right iliac fossa pain and avoid unnecessary appendectomy.
PubMed: 38892909
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113198 -
Journal of Clinical Medicine May 2024Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7-8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the... (Review)
Review
Globally, acute appendicitis has an estimated lifetime risk of 7-8%. However, there are numerous controversies surrounding the management of acute appendicitis, and the best treatment approach depends on patient characteristics. Non-operative management (NOM), which involves the utilization of antibiotics and aggressive intravenous hydration, and surgical appendectomy are valid treatment options for healthy adults. NOM is also ideal for poor surgical candidates. Another important consideration is the timing of surgery, i.e., the role of interval appendectomy (IA) and the possibility of delaying surgery for a few hours on index admission. IA refers to surgical removal of the appendix 8-12 weeks after the initial diagnosis of appendicitis. It is ideal in patients with a contained appendiceal perforation on initial presentation, wherein an initial nonoperative approach is preferred. Furthermore, IA can help distinguish malignant and non-malignant causes of acute appendicitis, while reducing the risk of recurrence. On the contrary, a decision to delay appendectomy for a few hours on index admission should be made based on the patients' baseline health status and severity of appendicitis. Post-operatively, surgical drain placement may help reduce postoperative complications; however, it carries an increased risk of drain occlusion, fistula formation, and paralytic ileus. Furthermore, one of the most critical aspects of appendectomy is the closure of the appendiceal stump, which can be achieved with the help of endoclips, sutures, staples, and endoloops. In this review, we discuss different aspects of management of acute appendicitis, current controversies in management, and the potential role of endoscopic appendectomy as a future treatment option.
PubMed: 38892745
DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113034 -
International Journal of Molecular... May 2024Appendicitis is primarily diagnosed based on intraoperative or histopathological findings, and few studies have explored pre-operative markers of a perforated appendix....
Appendicitis is primarily diagnosed based on intraoperative or histopathological findings, and few studies have explored pre-operative markers of a perforated appendix. This study aimed to identify systemic biomarkers to predict pediatric appendicitis at various time points. The study group comprised pediatric patients with clinically suspected appendicitis between 2016 and 2019. Pre-surgical serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), intercellular cell-adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and endothelial selectin (E-selectin) levels were tested from day 1 to day 3 of the disease course. The biomarker values were analyzed and compared between children with normal appendices and appendicitis and those with perforated appendicitis (PA) and non-perforated appendicitis. Among 226 pediatric patients, 106 had non-perforated appendicitis, 102 had PA, and 18 had normal appendices. The levels of all serum proinflammatory biomarkers were elevated in children with acute appendicitis compared with those in children with normal appendices. In addition, the serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels in children with PA were significantly higher, with an elevation in TNF-α levels from days 1 and 2. In addition, serum IL-6 levels increased significantly from days 2 and 3 (both < 0.05). Serum ICAM-1 and E-selectin levels were elevated in the PA group, with consistently elevated levels within the first three days of admission (all < 0.05). These results indicate that increased serum levels of proinflammatory biomarkers including IL-6, TNF-α, ICAM-1, and E-selectin could be used as parameters in the prediction and early diagnosis of acute appendicitis, especially in children with PA.
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Child; Female; Male; Biomarkers; Cytokines; Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1; Chemokines; Child, Preschool; Interleukin-6; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; E-Selectin; Adolescent; Appendectomy
PubMed: 38892260
DOI: 10.3390/ijms25116076 -
Journal of Medical Case Reports Jun 2024Schistosomiasis is one of the endemic parasitic diseases in many developing countries. Despite this, appendicitis secondary to schistosomiasis is an uncommon condition...
BACKGROUND
Schistosomiasis is one of the endemic parasitic diseases in many developing countries. Despite this, appendicitis secondary to schistosomiasis is an uncommon condition even in some endemic areas. Schistosomal appendicitis, an incidentally discovered appendicitis associated with schistosomiasis histological findings, affects young males predominantly. Timely diagnosis and treatment, including appendectomy and anti-helminthic therapy, are crucial.
CASE REPORT
A 24-year-old Sudanese male patient presented with abdominal pain. Diagnosed with acute appendicitis, he underwent appendectomy, revealing appendix inflammation with Schistosoma ova in histopathology. Abdominal ultrasound detected no complications. Weakly positive Schistosoma serology was noted, but stool and urine analysis showed no infection evidence. Prescribed praziquantel, patient had 3-year post-op follow-up without complications.
CONCLUSIONS
This case report underscores the significance of including schistosomiasis in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis, particularly in regions where the disease is endemic. It underscores the necessity of histopathological evaluations for accurate diagnosis, emphasizing the potential implications for clinical practice in similar settings.
Topics: Humans; Appendicitis; Male; Young Adult; Praziquantel; Appendectomy; Anthelmintics; Schistosomiasis; Diagnosis, Differential; Abdominal Pain; Ultrasonography; Animals; Treatment Outcome; Appendix
PubMed: 38890741
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-024-04610-3 -
Surgical Endoscopy Jun 2024With the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains...
BACKGROUND
With the primary objective of addressing the disparity in global surgical care access, the College of Surgeons of East, Central, and Southern Africa (COSECSA) trains surgeons. While sufficient operative experience is crucial for surgical training, the extent of utilization of minimally invasive techniques during COSECSA training remains understudied.
METHODS
We conducted an extensive review of COSECSA general surgery trainees' operative case logs from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, focusing on the utilization of minimally invasive surgical procedures. Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of laparoscopic procedures and compare this to open procedures. We analyzed the distribution of laparoscopic cases across common indications such as cholecystectomy, appendicitis, and hernia operations. Additionally, we examined the impact of trainee autonomy, country development index, and hospital type on laparoscopy utilization.
RESULTS
Among 68,659 total cases, only 616 (0.9%) were laparoscopic procedures. Notably, 34 cases were conducted during trainee external rotations in countries like the United Kingdom, Germany, and India. Gallbladder and appendix pathologies were most frequent among the 582 recorded laparoscopic cases performed in Africa. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accounted for 29% (276 of 975 cases), laparoscopic appendectomy for 3% (76 of 2548 cases), and laparoscopic hernia repairs for 0.5% (26 of 5620 cases). Trainees self-reported lower autonomy for laparoscopic (22.5%) than open cases (61.5%). Laparoscopy usage was more prevalent in upper-middle-income (2.7%) and lower-middle-income countries (0.8%) compared with lower-income countries (0.5%) (p < 0.001). Private (1.6%) and faith-based hospitals (1.5%) showed greater laparoscopy utilization than public hospitals (0.5%) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The study highlights the relatively low utilization of minimally invasive techniques in surgical training within the ECSA region. Laparoscopic cases remain a minority, with variations observed based on specific diagnoses. The findings suggest a need to enhance exposure to minimally invasive procedures to ensure well-rounded training and proficiency in these techniques.
PubMed: 38890173
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10960-2 -
Gut Jun 2024
PubMed: 38889961
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332353 -
JAMA Surgery Jun 2024Despite widespread use to guide patients to hospitals providing the best care, it remains unknown whether Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital star...
IMPORTANCE
Despite widespread use to guide patients to hospitals providing the best care, it remains unknown whether Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) hospital star ratings are a reliable measure of hospital surgical quality.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the CMS hospital star ratings and hospital surgical quality measured by 30-day postoperative mortality, serious complications, and readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries undergoing colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and incisional hernia repair.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS
This cohort study evaluated 100% Medicare administrative claims for nonfederal acute care hospitals with a CMS hospital star rating for calendar years 2014-2018. Data analysis was performed from January 15, 2022, to April 30, 2023. Participants included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years who underwent colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair with continuous Medicare coverage for 3 months before and 6 months after surgery.
EXPOSURE
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services hospital star rating.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES
Risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of 30-day postoperative mortality, serious complications, and 30-day readmissions were measured and compared across hospitals and star ratings.
RESULTS
A total of 1 898 829 patients underwent colectomy, coronary artery bypass graft, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or incisional hernia repair at 3240 hospitals with a CMS hospital star rating. Mean (SD) age was 74.8 (7.0) years, 50.6% of the patients were male, and 86.5% identified as White. Risk- and reliability-adjusted 30-day mortality rate decreased in a stepwise fashion from 6.80% (95% CI, 6.79%-6.81%) in 1-star hospitals to 4.93% (95% CI, 4.93%-4.94%) in 5-star hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.73-2.00). There was wide variation in the rates of hospital mortality (variation, 1.89%; range, 2.4%-16.2%), serious complications (variation, 1.97%; range, 5.5%-45.1%), and readmission (variation, 1.27%; range, 9.1%-22.5%) across all hospitals. After stratifying hospitals by their star rating, similar patterns of variation were observed within star rating groups for 30-day mortality: 1 star (variation, 1.91%; range, 3.6%-12.0%), 2 star (variation, 1.86%; range, 2.8%-16.2%), 3 star (variation, 1.84%; range, 2.9%-12.3%), 4 star (variation, 1.76%; range, 2.9%-11.5%), and 5 star (variation, 1.79%; range, 2.4%-9.1%). Similar patterns were observed for serious complications and readmissions.
CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE
Although CMS hospital star rating was associated with postoperative mortality, serious complications, and readmissions, there was wide variation in surgical outcomes within each star rating group. These findings highlight the limitations of the CMS hospital star rating system as a measure of surgical quality and should be a call for continued improvement of publicly reported hospital grade measures.
PubMed: 38888915
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.1582 -
Is liquid skin adhesive safe and feasible for skin closure in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy?Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery Jun 2024
PubMed: 38886998
DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.2.74