-
European Journal of Obstetrics,... Jun 2024
Letter to the editor on "Perioperative intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine for alleviating postpartum depression after cesarean section: A meta-analysis and systematic review".
PubMed: 38876953
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.06.023 -
Heliyon Jun 2024To compare the safety and efficacy of intranasal high-dose dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus a combination of intranasal low-dose dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate...
Comparison of intranasal dexmedetomidine alone and dexmedetomidine-chloral hydrate combination sedation for electroencephalography in children: A large retrospective cohort study and propensity score-matched analysis.
AIM
To compare the safety and efficacy of intranasal high-dose dexmedetomidine (DEX) versus a combination of intranasal low-dose dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate (DEX-CH) sedation during electroencephalography (EEG) in children.
METHODS
Unadjusted analysis, 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were used to compare the sedation success rate, adverse effects, onset time, and recovery time of these two sedation methods for 6967 children who underwent EEG.
RESULTS
A total of 6967 children were enrolled in this study, of whom 846 (12.1 %) underwent DEX intranasal sedation while 6121 (87.9 %) received DEX-CH sedation. No significant differences were observed in the sedation success rate with the first dose between the two groups [824 (97.4 %) for DEX vs. 5971 (97.6 %) for DEX-CH; RR 0.99; 95 % CI, 0.98-1.01; P = 0.79]. Similarly, there were no notable disparities in the incidence of adverse events [16 (1.9 %) for DEX vs. 101 (1.7 %) for DEX-CH; RR 1.15; 95 % CI, 0.68-1.93; P = 0.32]. However, intranasal DEX sedation compared with DEX-CH sedation was associated with lower vomiting [0 vs. 95(1.6 %); RR 0.04; 95 % CI, 0.02-0.6; P = 0.02] or more bradycardia [13(1.5 %) vs. 2(0.03 %); RR 47.03; 95 % CI, 10.63-208.04; P < 0.001]. Multivariate analysis using PSM and IPTW analysis yielded similar results.
CONCLUSION
Both methods for EEG had high sedation success rate and low incidence of adverse events. High-dose intranasal DEX was more likely to induce bradycardia and had a shorter recovery time than the DEX-CH sedation, which was more likely to induce vomiting.
PubMed: 38873690
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32236 -
Cureus May 2024The clavipectoral fascial plane block (CFPB) that has been utilized for clavicle fracture surgeries and pain management is an emerging anesthetic technique. It has been...
The clavipectoral fascial plane block (CFPB) that has been utilized for clavicle fracture surgeries and pain management is an emerging anesthetic technique. It has been previously used for postoperative pain management, but it can also be used as a stand-alone anesthetic technique for clavicle fracture management. Here we describe a case of a 20-year-old male who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plating for a mid-shaft clavicular fracture under a CFPB as a sole anesthetic.
PubMed: 38872679
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.60244 -
International Journal of Surgery... Jun 2024
PubMed: 38869991
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001788 -
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Jun 2024Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative, analgesic,... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α2 adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative, analgesic, anxiolytic, and sympatholytic properties, and several studies have shown its possible protective effects in cardiac injury. The aim of this review is to further elucidate the underlying cardioprotective mechanisms of dexmedetomidine, thus suggesting its potential in the clinical management of cardiac injury.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSION
Our review summarizes the findings related to the involvement of dexmedetomidine in cardiac injury and discusses the results in the light of different mechanisms. We found that numerous mechanisms may contribute to the cardioprotective effects of dexmedetomidine, including the regulation of programmed cell death, autophagy and fibrosis, alleviation of inflammatory response, endothelial dysfunction and microcirculatory derangements, improvement of mitochondrial dysregulation, hemodynamics, and arrhythmias. Dexmedetomidine may play a promising and beneficial role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.
PubMed: 38869744
DOI: 10.1007/s10557-024-07579-9 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Jun 2024Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Major spine surgery is associated with severe postoperative pain and increased opioid consumption. Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is thought to provide adequate intraoperative analgesia with reduced postoperative opioid consumption. The aim of this study is to compare the impact of intraoperative OFA approach to the conventional opioid-based anesthesia (OBA) on postoperative pain, opioid consumption, and related side effects in patients undergoing multilevel spinal fusion surgery.
METHODS
Forty-eight patients undergoing elective major spine surgery were randomly allocated to either receive intraoperative dexmedetomidine and lidocaine (OFA group) or fentanyl during induction and intraoperative remifentanil (OBA group). All patients received intraoperative sevoflurane, propofol, rocuronium, ketamine, dexamethasone, ondansetron and postoperative paracetamol and patient-controlled analgesia device set to deliver intravenous morphine for 48 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was measured using numerical rating scale. Opioid side effects were documented, when present.
RESULTS
OFA group required less morphine in the first 24 hours post-surgery (17.28±12.25 mg versus 27.96±19.75 mg, P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was significantly lower in the OFA group. More patients in the OFA group required antihypertensive medications compared to patients in the OBA group (P<0.05). In the post anesthesia care unit, OFA patients had a significantly longer stay than OBA patients (114.1±49.33 min versus 89.96±30.71 min, P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
OFA can be an alternative to OBA in patients undergoing multilevel spine fusion surgery. OFA reduces opioids consumption in the first 24 hours and PONV.
Topics: Humans; Male; Female; Analgesics, Opioid; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pain, Postoperative; Adult; Spine; Dexmedetomidine; Aged; Spinal Fusion; Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; Remifentanil; Anesthesia
PubMed: 38869262
DOI: 10.23736/S0375-9393.24.17962-X -
Journal of Investigative Medicine High... 2024Patients infected with COVID-19 can develop coinfections or acute respiratory disorder that result in ventilation. Dexmedetomidine is a common medication used to sedate...
Patients infected with COVID-19 can develop coinfections or acute respiratory disorder that result in ventilation. Dexmedetomidine is a common medication used to sedate ventilated patients in the intensive care unit and for nonintubated patients prior to a surgical procedure. As a highly selective alpha-2 agonist, dexmedetomidine provides sedation while reducing the need for anxiolytics or opioids. However, previous case reports suggest dexmedetomidine can induce fever in a variety of conditions. The purpose of this case report is to describe a patient who acquired a fever of 42.6°C in the setting of COVID-19 after administration of dexmedetomidine.
Topics: Humans; Dexmedetomidine; COVID-19; Fever; SARS-CoV-2; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Male; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; Coronavirus Infections; Betacoronavirus; Middle Aged; Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor Agonists; Drug Fever
PubMed: 38869108
DOI: 10.1177/23247096241260959 -
European Heart Journal Supplements :... Apr 2024Arrhythmic storm is a clinical emergency associated with high mortality, which requires multi-disciplinary management. Reprogramming of the implantable cardiac...
Arrhythmic storm is a clinical emergency associated with high mortality, which requires multi-disciplinary management. Reprogramming of the implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) aimed at reducing shocks, adrenergic blockade using beta-blockers, sedation/anxiolysis, and blockade of the stellate ganglion represent the first simple and effective manoeuvres, but further suppression of arrhythmias with antiarrhythmics is often required. A low-risk patient (e.g. monomorphic ventricular tachycardia, functioning ICD, and haemodynamically stable) should be managed with a beta-blocker (possibly non-selective) plus amiodarone, in addition to sedation with a benzodiazepine or dexmedetomidine; in patients at greater risk (high burden and haemodynamic instability), autonomic modulation with blockade of the stellate ganglion and the addition of a second antiarrhythmic (lidocaine) should be considered. In patients refractory to these measures, with advanced heart failure, general anaesthesia with intubation and the establishment of a haemodynamic circulatory support should be considered. Ablation, performed early, appears to be superior in terms of mortality and reduction of future shocks compared with titration of antiarrhythmics.
PubMed: 38867867
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suae016 -
Frontiers in Pharmacology 2024As a class of analgesics, opioids are frequently used to treat both acute and chronic moderate to severe pain. Patients frequently receive opioid painkillers after...
BACKGROUND
As a class of analgesics, opioids are frequently used to treat both acute and chronic moderate to severe pain. Patients frequently receive opioid painkillers after orthopedic accidents or surgeries. Evidence suggests that opioid drug users have a 55.1% higher risk of fracture and poor bone repair than non-users of opioid drugs. The key pathogenic alterations in the incidence and progression of poor bone repair are over apoptosis and aging of osteoblasts due to the stress caused by oxidation. Dexmedetomidine (Dex) has been proven to protect against a variety of degenerative illnesses by reducing oxidative stress. However, nothing is known about how it affects bone repair.
METHODS
PI3K/Akt/Nrf2 pathway was detected by immunofluorescence and Western blot. SOD, CAT, JC-1, dihydroethidium and mitosox were used in the Oxidative Stress. Micro-CT, H&E and Masson's staining, immunohistochemically were performed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of DEX on calvarial defects in the morphine-induced rat model.
RESULTS
We found that morphine-induced an imbalance in the metabolism and catabolism of primary rat Osteoblasts. However, these conditions could be inhibited by DEX treatment. In the meantime, DEX induced the expression of Nrf2-regulated antioxidant enzymes such as NQO1, HO-1, GCLm, GCLc, and TrxR1. DEX-mediated Nrf2 activation is linked to the PI3K/Akt signaling system. Furthermore, it has been established that intravenous DEX enhanced the growth of bone healing in a model of a surgically produced rat cranial lesion.
CONCLUSION
This is the first description of the unique DEX mechanism acting as a Nrf2 activator against morphine-mediated oxidative harm, raising the possibility that the substance may be used to prevent bone defects.
PubMed: 38863982
DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1396713