-
Community Mental Health Journal Jul 2024To examine the association between scope-of-practice (SoP) regulations and racial disparities in pediatric mental health services. We used the National Survey of...
To examine the association between scope-of-practice (SoP) regulations and racial disparities in pediatric mental health services. We used the National Survey of Children's Health (2016-2020; n = 33,790) to examine racial disparities in unmet mental health care needs and receipt of mental health medication between states with and without SoP expansions for psychologists and nurse practitioners (NP). Our primary outcomes were (1) unmet mental health care needs and (2) receipt of mental health medication. We examined heterogeneous treatment effects of SoP expansion on the outcomes using logistic regression with interaction terms between SoP expansion and race/ethnicity. We estimated population-level racial disparities for both outcomes stratified by SoP expansion to identify differences in racial disparities. The psychologist SoP expansion-associated reduction in unmet need was 15.8 percentage-points (CI= -25.3, -6.2) larger for Other-race children than for White children. The psychologist SoP expansion-associated increase in medication was 5.1%-points (CI=. 0.8, 9.4) larger for Black children and 5.6%-points (CI = 0.5, 10.8) for Other-race children. No differences were found for NP SoP expansion. Racial disparities in both outcomes were lower in psychologist SoP expansion states but varied in NP SoP states. Expanded SoP was generally associated with lower racial disparities in pediatric mental health care access.
PubMed: 38954142
DOI: 10.1007/s10597-024-01310-6 -
Clinical Epidemiology 2024Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are used to document diagnoses, symptoms, tests, and prescriptions. Though not primarily collected for research purposes, owing to...
BACKGROUND
Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are used to document diagnoses, symptoms, tests, and prescriptions. Though not primarily collected for research purposes, owing to the size of the data as well as the depth of information collected, they have been used extensively to conduct epidemiological research. The Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) is an EHR database containing representative data of the UK population with regard to age, sex, race, and social deprivation measures. Fibrotic conditions are characterised by excessive scarring, contributing towards organ dysfunction and eventual organ failure. Fibrosis is associated with ageing as well as many other factors, it is hypothesised that fibrotic conditions are caused by the same underlying pathological mechanism. We calculated the prevalence of fibrotic conditions (as defined in a previous Delphi survey of clinicians) as well as the prevalence of fibrotic multimorbidity (the proportion of people with multiple fibrotic conditions).
METHODS
We included a random sample of 993,370 UK adults, alive, and enrolled at a UK general practice, providing data to the CPRD Aurum database as of 1st of January 2015. Individuals had to be eligible for linkage to hospital episode statistics (HES) and ONS death registration. We calculated the point prevalence of fibrotic conditions and multi-morbid fibrosis on the 1st of January 2015. Using death records of those who died in 2015, we investigated the prevalence of fibrosis associated death. We explored the most commonly co-occurring fibrotic conditions and determined the settings in which diagnoses were commonly made (primary care, secondary care or after death).
RESULTS
The point prevalence of any fibrotic condition was 21.46%. In total, 6.00% of people had fibrotic multimorbidity. Of the people who died in 2015, 34.82% had a recording of a fibrotic condition listed on their death certificate.
CONCLUSION
The key finding was that fibrotic multimorbidity affects approximately 1 in 16 people.
PubMed: 38952572
DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S463499 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2024Overly restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria can reduce generalizability, slow enrollment, and disproportionately exclude historically underrepresented...
Overly restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria can reduce generalizability, slow enrollment, and disproportionately exclude historically underrepresented populations. The eligibility criteria for 196 Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) trials funded by the National Institute on Aging were analyzed to identify common criteria and their potential to disproportionately exclude participants by race/ethnicity. The trials were categorized by type (48 Phase I/II pharmacological, 7 Phase III/IV pharmacological, 128 non-pharmacological, 7 diagnostic, and 6 neuropsychiatric) and target population (51 AD/ADRD, 58 Mild Cognitive Impairment, 25 at-risk, and 62 cognitively normal). Eligibility criteria were coded into the following categories: Medical, Neurologic, Psychiatric, and Procedural. A literature search was conducted to describe the prevalence of disparities for eligibility criteria for African Americans/Black (AA/B), Hispanic/Latino (H/L), American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI) populations. The trials had a median of 15 criteria. The most frequent criterion were age cutoffs (87% of trials), specified neurologic (65%), and psychiatric disorders (61%). Underrepresented groups could be disproportionately excluded by 16 eligibility categories; 42% of trials specified English-speakers only in their criteria. Most trials (82%) contain poorly operationalized criteria (i.e., criteria not well defined that can have multiple interpretations/means of implementation) and criteria that may reduce racial/ethnic enrollment diversity.
Topics: Humans; Alzheimer Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cognitive Dysfunction; Dementia; Eligibility Determination; Ethnicity; National Institute on Aging (U.S.); Patient Selection; United States; Black or African American; Hispanic or Latino; American Indian or Alaska Native; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
PubMed: 38951633
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65767-x -
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health... Jul 2024There is a paucity of research investigating disparities in utilization of inpatient therapeutics for COVID-19 by language preference. The primary aim of this study was...
INTRODUCTION
There is a paucity of research investigating disparities in utilization of inpatient therapeutics for COVID-19 by language preference. The primary aim of this study was to assess if the likelihood of treatment with novel COVID-19 therapies differed for patients using a language other than English (LOE) relative to English-speaking patients.
METHODS
This was a retrospective observational cohort study of COVID-19 patients hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and June 30, 2022, across 11 hospitals within a single not-for-profit health system. Multivariable relative risks were estimated for the impact of preferred language on the receipt of novel COVID-19 therapies: baricitinib, remdesivir, tocilizumab, and convalescent plasma.
RESULTS
This study included 12,510 hospitalized adults with English as the most common preferred language (92.3%) followed by Spanish (3.1%), Somali (1.3%), Russian (0.9%), and Hmong (0.6%). Spanish speakers were more likely to receive any of the novel COVID-19 therapies compared to English speakers (RR 1.45; CI 1.32-1.59). Estimates for Hmong, Somali, Russian, and Other language groups were not statistically significant and closer to the null (aRR range, 0.89-1.12).
CONCLUSION
Linguistic patterns in health outcomes expose inherent heterogeneity within racial and ethnic groups. Our study found that Spanish speakers were nearly 1.5 times more likely to receive any of the four novel inpatient COVID-19 therapeutics in comparison to English speakers. Future research is needed to explore the reasons for the heterogeneous findings including temporal influence, cultural factors, informed consent comprehension, and therapeutic hesitancy in all groups.
PubMed: 38951369
DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02065-2 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2024Meditation, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive relaxation are promoted as complementary approaches for health and wellbeing in the United States, but their uptake by...
Meditation, yoga, guided imagery, and progressive relaxation are promoted as complementary approaches for health and wellbeing in the United States, but their uptake by different sociodemographic groups is unclear. This study assessed the prevalence and 20 year trends in the use of these practices in US adults between 2002-2022. We examined practice use and associations with sociodemographic and health factors in a population-weighted analysis of n = 134,959 participants across 5 cycles of the National Health Interview Survey. The overall use of meditation (18.3%, 60.53 million), yoga (16.8%, 55.78 million) and guided imagery/progressive relaxation (6.7%, 22.22 million) increased significantly from 2002 to 2022. Growth was consistent across most sociodemographic and health strata, however users of 'Other' race (comprising 54% Indigenous Americans, Odds Ratios; ORs = 1.28-1.70) and users with moderate (ORs = 1.19-1.29) psychological distress were overrepresented across all practices, and those with severe psychological distress were overrepresented in meditation (OR = 1.33) and guided imagery/progressive relaxation (OR = 1.42). Meditation use has accelerated over time for 65 + year olds (OR = 4.22), people not accessing mental health care (OR = 1.39), and less educated (OR = 4.02) groups, potentially reflecting unmet health needs. Health professionals should consider the extensive use of complementary practices in service and treatment planning and consider their risks and benefits.
Topics: Humans; Meditation; Yoga; Male; Female; Adult; United States; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Aged; Young Adult; Adolescent; Relaxation Therapy; Imagery, Psychotherapy
PubMed: 38951149
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64562-y -
Disability and Rehabilitation Jul 2024Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a chronic disease process and a public health concern that disproportionately impacts Black populations. While there is an abundance of...
PURPOSE
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a chronic disease process and a public health concern that disproportionately impacts Black populations. While there is an abundance of literature on race and TBI outcomes, there is a lack of scholarship that addresses racism within rehabilitation care, and it remains untheorized. This article aims to illuminate how racism becomes institutionalized in the scientific scholarship that can potentially inform rehabilitation care for persons with TBI and what the implications are, particularly for Black populations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Applying Bacchi's What's the Problem Represented to be approach, the writings of critical race theory (CRT) are used to examine the research about race and TBI rehabilitation comparable to CRT in other disciplines, including education and legal scholarship.
RESULTS
A CRT examination illustrates that racism is institutionalized in the research about race and TBI rehabilitation through colourblind ideologies, meritocracy, reinforcement of a deficit perspective, and intersections of race and the property functions of whiteness. A conceptual framework for understanding institutional racism in TBI rehabilitation scholarship is presented.
CONCLUSIONS
The findings from this article speak to the future of TBI rehabilitation research for Black populations, the potential for an anti-racist agenda, and implications for research and practice.
PubMed: 38950599
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2361803 -
Proceedings of the National Academy of... Jul 2024In US cities, neighborhoods have long been racially segregated. However, people do not spend all their time in their neighborhoods, and the consequences of residential...
In US cities, neighborhoods have long been racially segregated. However, people do not spend all their time in their neighborhoods, and the consequences of residential segregation may be tempered by the contact people have with other racial groups as they traverse the city daily. We examine the extent to which people's regular travel throughout the city is to places "beyond their comfort zone" (BCZ), i.e., to neighborhoods of racial composition different from their own-and why. Based on travel patterns observed in more than 7.2 million devices in the 100 largest US cities, we find that the average trip is to a neighborhood less than half as racially different from the home neighborhood as it could have been given the city. Travel to grocery stores is least likely to be BCZ; travel to gyms and parks, most likely; however, differences are greatest across cities. For the first ~10 km people travel from home, neighborhoods become increasingly more BCZ for every km traveled; beyond that point, whether neighborhoods do so depends strongly on the city. Patterns are substantively similar before and after COVID-19. Our findings suggest that policies encouraging more 15-min travel-that is, to amenities closer to the home-may inadvertently discourage BCZ movement. In addition, promoting use of certain "third places" such as restaurants, bars, and gyms, may help temper the effects of residential segregation, though how much it might do so depends on city-specific conditions.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Residence Characteristics; Neighborhood Characteristics; Cities; Travel; United States; Social Segregation; SARS-CoV-2; Racial Groups
PubMed: 38950373
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401661121 -
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty... Jul 2024Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often used by clinicians to evaluate patient response to specialty medications used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) and...
BACKGROUND
Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are often used by clinicians to evaluate patient response to specialty medications used to treat multiple sclerosis (MS) and rheumatologic conditions. Identifying associations among PROs and patient characteristics could inform patient-centered treatment monitoring.
OBJECTIVE
To examine the association among patient characteristics and PROs, including patient-reported adherence (defined as no missed doses), medication tolerance, patient perceived effectiveness, and health care resource utilization (HCRU; defined as emergency department visits or hospitalizations), for patients prescribed specialty medications in 2 health system specialty pharmacies.
METHODS
A dual-center, retrospective review of monthly medication assessments completed by Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy and University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System specialty pharmacy was conducted. Patients were included if they received at least 3 fills of a specialty medication from rheumatology or MS clinics from October 2019 to March 2022, excluding patients with more than a 30-day supply. Primary outcomes were the PROs of patient-reported adherence, medication tolerability, perceived effectiveness, and HCRU. For each of the 2 primary outcomes (adherence and tolerability), a mixed-effects logistic regression model was used to test for associations with age, sex, race, clinic, site, and the other PROs.
RESULTS
A total of 61,926 assessments were completed from 3,677 patients (Site 1 = 3,346; 91.0% and Site 2 = 331; 9.0%). Patients were predominantly White (75.6%) and female (71.7%) with a median age of 50 years (IQR = 37-61). Assessments most frequently originated from rheumatology (76.0%). Nonadherence was reported 4.0% of the time, with the most common explanations being forgetfulness (33.1%) and medication being held because of a procedure or illness (29.5%). Most responses indicated perceived effectiveness as good/excellent (93.9%), with 98.5% of responses indicating no issues with tolerability. Patients who reported tolerability issues were 2.5 times more likely to report a missed dose (95% CI = 1.87-3.23, < 0.001). An effectiveness rating of fair was associated with a 61% increase in the odds of a missed dose compared with a rating of good/excellent (95% CI = 1.33-1.94).
CONCLUSIONS
Patients filling rheumatology or MS specialty medications within health system specialty pharmacies reported high rates of medication effectiveness and adherence and low rates of issues with tolerability and HCRU. Patients who report tolerability issues or lower perceived effectiveness may benefit from additional monitoring to prevent nonadherence.
Topics: Humans; Female; Male; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Middle Aged; Medication Adherence; Retrospective Studies; Adult; Multiple Sclerosis; Aged; Rheumatic Diseases
PubMed: 38950163
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.710 -
Journal of Managed Care & Specialty... Jul 2024Although disparities and inequities in health status and access to health care services have long existed in our nation, the COVID-19 pandemic cast a bright spotlight on...
Although disparities and inequities in health status and access to health care services have long existed in our nation, the COVID-19 pandemic cast a bright spotlight on them. Communities of color and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations were disproportionally affected by the pandemic. These same populations suffer from higher prevalences of chronic illnesses, which puts them at greater risk for poor outcomes associated with SARS-CoV-2. At long last, in the wake of the pandemic, the health care community began to acknowledge improving health equity as a public health imperative. In a November 2020 Viewpoints article, Dr Stephen Kogut of the University of Rhode Island College of Pharmacy presented an insightful analysis of disparities in medication use (DMU) and offered 4 suggestions on how the managed care pharmacy community can help eliminate DMU. This Viewpoints article assesses what progress has been made in addressing those imperatives and proposes further steps that should be taken. Although the managed care pharmacy community has broadly acknowledged the existence of DMU and taken steps to mitigate them, there is much work to do in examining and improving benefit design and coverage policies; collecting and reporting data on race and ethnicity and DMU; incorporating the perspectives of patients, including those representing minority populations, in benefit design and coverage policies; and addressing the challenges associated with traditional cost-sharing models. The entire managed care pharmacy community, including AMCP and other membership organizations, must remain steadfast in its efforts to improve health equity and eliminate DMU.
Topics: Humans; Managed Care Programs; Healthcare Disparities; COVID-19; Pharmaceutical Services; Health Services Accessibility; SARS-CoV-2; Health Equity; United States
PubMed: 38950162
DOI: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.7.747 -
Sexual Health Jul 2024Background Disproportionate rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people are often attributed to...
Sexual risk and testing for sexually transmissible infections in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous young South Australians: results of an online survey.
Background Disproportionate rates of sexually transmissible infections (STIs) among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people are often attributed to risk-taking behaviours, but research rarely conducts direct comparison with their non-Indigenous peers to address this negative discourse. Methods 'Let's Talk About It 2019' was a cross-sectional online survey of South Australians (16-29 years). It prioritised recruitment of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respondents to compare behaviours with non-Indigenous peers using multivariable Poisson regression models. Results Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (n =231) and non-Indigenous (n =2062) respondents reported similar condom use (40% vs 43%, P =0.477) and sexual debut median ages (16 years vs 17 years). Higher proportions of Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander respondents reported a recent health check (48% vs 38%, P =0.002), STIs (60% vs 49%, P P =0.006) testing, STI diagnosis (29% vs 21%, P =0.042), and intoxication during last sex (30% vs 18%, P Conclusions Behaviours associated with STI transmission were mostly similar among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and non-Indigenous respondents. Higher STI/HIV testing among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander respondents suggests effectiveness of targeted programs. Interventions targeting substance use and condom use among all young people are needed. Future interventions need to focus beyond behaviours and explore social determinants of health and sexual networks as contributors to disproportionate STI rates.
Topics: Humans; Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander; Sexually Transmitted Diseases; Adolescent; Male; Female; Cross-Sectional Studies; Young Adult; Adult; Sexual Behavior; Surveys and Questionnaires; South Australia; Risk-Taking; Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples; Australasian People
PubMed: 38950143
DOI: 10.1071/SH24041