-
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Jun 2024We retrospectively analyzed pancreatectomy patients and examined the occurrence rate and timing of postoperative complications (time-to-complication; TTC) and their...
PURPOSE
We retrospectively analyzed pancreatectomy patients and examined the occurrence rate and timing of postoperative complications (time-to-complication; TTC) and their impact on the length of postoperative hospital stay (POHS) to clarify their characteristics, provide appropriate postoperative management, and improve short-term outcomes in the future.
METHODS
A total of 227 patients, composed of 118 pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) and 109 distal pancreatectomy (DP) cases, were analyzed. We examined the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and POHS of each type of postoperative complication, and these were analyzed for each surgical procedure. Complications of the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification Grade II or higher were considered clinically significant.
RESULTS
Clinically significant complications were observed in 70.3% and 36.7% of the patients with PD and DP, respectively. Complications occurred at a median of 10 days in patients with PD and 6 days in patients with DP. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred approximately 7 days postoperatively in both groups. For the POHS, in cases without significant postoperative complications (CD ≤ I), it was approximately 22 days for PD and 11 days for DP. In contrast, when any complications occurred, POHS increased to 30 days for PD and 19 days for DP (each with additional 8 days), respectively. In particular, POPF prolonged the hospital stay by approximately 11 days for both procedures.
CONCLUSION
Each postoperative complication after pancreatectomy has its own characteristics in terms of the frequency of occurrence, TTC, and impact on POHS. A correct understanding of these factors will enable timely therapeutic intervention and improve short-term outcomes after pancreatectomy.
Topics: Humans; Retrospective Studies; Pancreatectomy; Male; Female; Postoperative Complications; Length of Stay; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Middle Aged; Aged; Time Factors; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Pancreatic Fistula; Clinical Relevance
PubMed: 38836878
DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03369-x -
International Journal of Surgery... Dec 2023Reduction in muscle mass can be routinely quantified using computed tomography (CT) of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) during a curative pancreatic cancer (PC) course....
Preoperative low skeletal muscle mass index assessed using L3-CT as a prognostic marker of clinical outcomes in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Reduction in muscle mass can be routinely quantified using computed tomography (CT) of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) during a curative pancreatic cancer (PC) course. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the association between preoperative low skeletal muscle index (SMI) measured by L3 CT and postoperative clinical outcomes in PC resectable patients.
METHODS
Three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus) were searched for articles published through May 2023. Duplicate titles and abstracts, full-text screening, and data extraction were performed. A meta-analysis was performed for overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), morbidity, and postoperative length of stay (P-LOS). The risk of bias was assessed.
RESULTS
A total of 2942 patients with PC from 11 studies were identified. Preoperative low SMI was found in 50.9% of PC resectable patients. Preoperative low SMI was significantly associated with adjusted OS (adjusted HR, 1.52; 95% CI 1.25-1.86, P< 0.0001). No significant associations were found between preoperative low SMI and RFS, number of POPF, significant morbidity, and P-LOS (P>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
SMI should be evaluated in a timely manner as a predictor of OS in PC resectable patients. Studies assessing nutritional protocols for maintaining/increasing skeletal muscle mass are required to develop a personalized nutritional approach to improve clinical outcomes.
PubMed: 38836800
DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000989 -
Annals of Hepato-biliary-pancreatic... Jun 2024Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around...
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is being performed more frequently. A pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) leak is the major determinant of patient outcomes. An omental flap around PJ might improve postoperative outcomes.
METHODS
A prospective randomized controlled trial was planned at PGIMER, Chandigarh. Fifty-eight patients meeting the criteria were included in the study. Group A underwent PD with omental roll-up and group B underwent standard PD.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients in group A was 57.1 ± 14.3 years and 51.2 ± 10.7 in group B. Jaundice ( = 0.667), abdominal pain ( = 0.69), and co-morbidities were equal among the groups. The body mass index of patients in group B was higher at 24.3 ± 5.4 kg/m ( = 0.03). The common bile duct diameter (12.6 ± 5.3 mm vs. 17.2 ± 10.3 mm, = 0.13) and the pancreatic duct diameter (4.06 ± 2.01 mm vs. 4.60 ± 2.43 mm, = 0.91) were comparable. The intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in group B (233.33 ± 9.57 vs. 343.33 ± 177.14, = 0.04). Drain fluid amylase levels on postoperative day (POD) 1 ( = 0.97) and POD3 ( = 0.92) were comparable. The rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) grade A ( ≥ 0.99) and grade B ( = 0.54) were comparable. The mean postoperative length of stay among was similar ( = 0.89).
CONCLUSIONS
An omental wrap can be performed without increase in complexity of the procedure. However, its utility in preventing POPFs and morbidity remains unclear.
PubMed: 38834539
DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.24-016 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Subgroup analysis aims to identify subgroups (usually defined by baseline/demographic characteristics), who would (or not) benefit from an intervention under specific...
Subgroup analysis aims to identify subgroups (usually defined by baseline/demographic characteristics), who would (or not) benefit from an intervention under specific conditions. Often performed post hoc (not pre-specified in the protocol), subgroup analyses are prone to elevated type I error due to multiple testing, inadequate power, and inappropriate statistical interpretation. Aside from the well-known Bonferroni correction, subgroup treatment interaction tests can provide useful information to support the hypothesis. Using data from a previously published randomized trial where a p value of 0.015 was found for the comparison between standard and Hemopatch® groups in (the subgroup of) 135 patients who had hand-sewn pancreatic stump closure we first sought to determine whether there was interaction between the number and proportion of the dependent event of interest (POPF) among the subgroup population (patients with hand-sewn stump closure and use of Hemopatch®), Next, we calculated the relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI) and the "attributable proportion" (AP). The p value of the interaction was p = 0.034, the RERI was - 0.77 (p = 0.0204) (the probability of POPF was 0.77 because of the interaction), the RERI was 13% (patients are 13% less likely to sustain POPF because of the interaction), and the AP was - 0.616 (61.6% of patients who did not develop POPF did so because of the interaction). Although no causality can be implied, Hemopatch® may potentially decrease the POPF after distal pancreatectomy when the stump is closed hand-sewn. The hypothesis generated by our subgroup analysis requires confirmation by a specific, randomized trial, including only patients undergoing hand-sewn closure of the pancreatic stump after distal pancreatectomy.Trial registration: INS-621000-0760.
Topics: Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Pancreatectomy; Female; Male; Pancreas
PubMed: 38824173
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62896-1 -
Pancreatology : Official Journal of the... May 2024Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most feared and common complications following pancreatoduodenectomies. This study aims to evaluate the performance...
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is one of the most feared and common complications following pancreatoduodenectomies. This study aims to evaluate the performance of different scales in predicting POPF using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including estimation of the pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic texture, main duct index, relation to the portal vein, and intra-abdominal fat thickness.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A retrospective diagnostic test study was designed. Between January 2017 and December 2021, 133 pancreatoduodenectomies were performed at our institution. The performance for predicting overall POPF and clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF) was evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
RESULTS
A total of 96 patients were included in the study, of whom 26 patients experienced overall POPF, and 8 patients had CR-POPF. When analyzing the predictive value of each of the different scores applied, the Birmingham score showed the highest performance for predicting overall POPF and CR-POPF with an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.815 (95 % CI 0.725-0.906) and 0.813 (0.679-0.947), respectively.
CONCLUSION
The Birmingham scale demonstrated the highest predictive performance for POPF. It is a simple scale with only two variables that can be obtained preoperatively using MRI. Based on these results, we recommend its use in patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy.
PubMed: 38824072
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.05.526 -
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery :... May 2024Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have...
Impact of postoperative pancreatic fistula on outcomes in pancreatoduodenectomy: a comprehensive analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data.
BACKGROUND
Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a major surgical procedure associated with significant risks, particularly postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). Studies have highlighted the importance of certain risk factors for POPF, which are crucial for surgical decision-making and the management of high-risk patients undergoing PD. This study aimed to assess the surgical outcomes of patients undergoing PD who met the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery - Class D (ISGPS-D) criteria.
METHODS
This study analyzed American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data (2014-2021) for patients undergoing ISGPS-D PD, classified as having a soft pancreatic texture and a pancreatic duct of ≤3 mm. This study focused on mortality rates and the correlation between several factors and POPF (ISGPS grade B/C).
RESULTS
From 5964 patients who underwent PD and met the ISGPS-D criteria, the 30-day mortality rate was 1.98%. Males had a higher incidence of POPF than females (57.42% vs 47.35%, respectively; P < .001). Patients with POPF experienced significantly higher rates of major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa), including thrombosis, pneumonia, sepsis, delayed gastric emptying, wound disruption, infections, and acute renal failure. There was a marked increase in the 30-day readmission and mortality rates in patients with POPF (30.0% vs 17.6% and 3.2% vs 1.4%, respectively; all P < .001). Multivariate analysis highlighted female sex as a protective factor against mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; P < .001) and extended hospital stay (>10 days) as a predictor of increased mortality risk (OR, 2.37; P < .001).
CONCLUSION
This study underscored the significant association between POPF and increased postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Future efforts should concentrate on refining surgical techniques and improving preoperative assessments to mitigate the risks associated with POPF in patients undergoing PD.
PubMed: 38821210
DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.05.035 -
Surgical Endoscopy May 2024Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Central pancreatectomy is a surgical procedure for benign and low-grade malignant tumors which located in the neck and proximal body of the pancreas that facilitates the preservation of pancreatic endocrine and exocrine functions but has a high morbidity rate, especially postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness between minimally invasive central pancreatectomy (MICP) and open central pancreatectomy (OCP) basing on perioperative outcomes.
METHODS
An extensive literature search to compare MICP and OCP was conducted from October 2003 to October 2023 on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Fixed-effect models or random effects were selected based on heterogeneity, and pooled odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.
RESULTS
A total of 10 studies with a total of 510 patients were included. There was no significant difference in POPF between MICP and OCP (OR = 0.95; 95% CI [0.64, 1.43]; P = 0.82), whereas intraoperative blood loss (MD = - 125.13; 95% CI [- 194.77, -55.49]; P < 0.001) and length of hospital stay (MD = - 2.86; 95% CI [- 5.00, - 0.72]; P = 0.009) were in favor of MICP compared to OCP, and there was a strong trend toward a lower intraoperative transfusion rate in MICP than in OCP (MD = 0.34; 95% CI [0.11, 1.00]; P = 0.05). There was no significant difference in other outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSION
MICP was as safe and effective as OCP and had less intraoperative blood loss and a shorter length of hospital stay. However, further studies are needed to confirm the results.
PubMed: 38816619
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10900-0 -
BJS Open May 2024Postoperative pancreatic fistulas remain a driver of major complications after partial pancreatectomy. It is unclear whether coverage of the anastomosis or pancreatic... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Effect of artificial or autologous coverage of the pancreatic remnant or anastomosis on postoperative pancreatic fistulas after partial pancreatectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
BACKGROUND
Postoperative pancreatic fistulas remain a driver of major complications after partial pancreatectomy. It is unclear whether coverage of the anastomosis or pancreatic remnant can reduce the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of autologous or artificial coverage of the pancreatic remnant or anastomosis on outcomes after partial pancreatectomy.
METHODS
A systematic literature search was performed using MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to March 2024. All RCTs analysing a coverage method in patients undergoing partial pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy were included. The primary outcome was postoperative pancreatic fistula development. Subgroup analyses for pancreatoduodenectomy or distal pancreatectomy and artificial or autologous coverage were conducted.
RESULTS
A total of 18 RCTs with 2326 patients were included. In the overall analysis, coverage decreased the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistulas by 29% (OR 0.71, 95% c.i. 0.54 to 0.93, P < 0.01). This decrease was also seen in the 12 RCTs covering the remnant after distal pancreatectomy (OR 0.69, 95% c.i. 0.51 to 0.94, P < 0.02) and the 4 RCTs applying autologous coverage after pancreatoduodenectomy and distal pancreatectomy (OR 0.53, 95% c.i. 0.29 to 0.96, P < 0.04). Other subgroup analyses (artificial coverage or pancreatoduodenectomy) showed no statistically significant differences. The secondary endpoints of mortality, reoperations, and re-interventions were each affected positively by the use of coverage techniques. The certainty of evidence was very low to moderate.
CONCLUSION
The implementation of coverage, whether artificial or autologous, is beneficial after partial pancreatectomy, especially in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy with autologous coverage.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatectomy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Postoperative Complications; Anastomosis, Surgical; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreas
PubMed: 38814751
DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae059 -
Journal of the American College of... May 2024To determine the precise frequency of main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation within the remnant pancreas at 1 year after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and its clinical...
Clinical Implications and Risk Factors of Dilatation of Remnant Pancreatic Duct at 1 Year After Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Prospective, Japanese, Multicenter, Observational Cohort Study (DAIMONJI-Study).
BACKGROUND
To determine the precise frequency of main pancreatic duct (MPD) dilatation within the remnant pancreas at 1 year after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and its clinical implications, a prospective multicentre cohort study was performed in patients without MPD dilatation before PD (Registry number; UMIN000029662).
METHODS
Between October 2017 and July 2020, patients with MPD diameter <3mm who were planned to undergo PD for periampullary lesions at 21 hospitals were enrolled. The primary endpoints were frequency of MPD dilatation at 1 year after PD, and the relationship between MPD dilatation and pancreatic endo- and exocrine function, nutritional status, and fatty liver. Secondary endpoints were risk factors for MPD dilatation at 1 year after PD and time-course change in MPD diameter.
RESULTS
Of 200 registered patients, 161 patients were finally analyzed. Pancreatic fistula was the most frequent complication (n=76; 47.2%). MPD dilatation (MPD>3mm) at 1 year after PD was seen in 35 patients (21.7%). Pancreatic exocrine function, assessed by steatorrhea, was significantly impaired in patients with MPD dilatation. However, endocrine function, nutrition status and fatty liver development were comparable between the two groups. In multivariate analysis, the serum toral protein level≥7.3g/dl was an independent predictor for MPD dilatation at 1 year after PD (OR; 3.12, 95%CI; 1.31-7.15). A mean MPD diameter significantly increased at 6 months after PD and kept plateau thereafter.
CONCLUSIONS
MPD dilatation at 1 year after PD was seen in 21.7% of patients and significantly associated with exocrine function impairment but not with endocrine function, nutrition status, or development of fatty liver.
PubMed: 38813957
DOI: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001121 -
Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences 2023Early identification of patients at risk for developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may facilitate drain management. In...
BACKGROUND/AIM
Early identification of patients at risk for developing postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) may facilitate drain management. In this context, it was aimed to examine the efficiency of the serum amylase (SA) value on postoperative day (PoD) 1 in predicting the occurrence of POPF.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 132 patients who underwent PD were studied. Occurrences of POPF were classified according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula classification as a biochemical leak (BL) or clinically relevant grade b/c POPF (CR-POPF). Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified a threshold value of SA on PoD 1 associated with POPF formation.
RESULTS
Overall, 66 (50%) patients had POPF, including 51 (38.7%) with BL and 15 with CR-POPF (11.3%). The threshold value of SA associated with the development of POPF was 120 IU/L (odds ratio [OR]: 3.20; p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, independent POPF risk factors were SA ≥120 IU/L, soft pancreatic texture, and high-risk pathology (i.e., duodenal, biliary, ampullary, islet cell, and benign tumors); SA ≥120 IU/L outperformed soft pancreatic texture and high-risk pathology in predicting POPF, respectively (OR: 2.22; p = 0.004 vs. OR: 1.37; p = 0.012 vs. OR: 1.35; p = 0.018). In a subset analysis according to gland texture (soft vs. hard), patients with soft pancreatic texture exhibited a significantly higher incidence of POPF (63.4% vs. 34.4%) and SA ≥120 IU/L (52.1% vs. 27.9%); SA <120 IU/L had a negative predictive value of 82.5% for developing POPF in patients with hard pancreatic texture (OR: 4.28, p = 0.028).
CONCLUSION
A SA value ≥120 IU/L on the day after PD, which is the strongest predictor for POPF, can be used as a biomarker of the occurrence of POPF. The advantage of SA measurement is that it can contribute to identifying suitable patients for early drain removal.
Topics: Humans; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Amylases; Male; Female; Retrospective Studies; Middle Aged; Aged; Postoperative Complications; Risk Factors; Predictive Value of Tests; Adult; Biomarkers; ROC Curve; Postoperative Period
PubMed: 38813023
DOI: 10.55730/1300-0144.5693