-
Cureus Apr 2024Objectives Pancreatic stump closure in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) is commonly performed using an automatic stapler. Herein, the magnification effect of...
Objectives Pancreatic stump closure in laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (Lap-DP) is commonly performed using an automatic stapler. Herein, the magnification effect of laparoscopy was used to observe the pancreatic stump and retrospectively investigate factors that may cause postoperative pancreatic fistula. Methods This is a single-center retrospective study. We selected 62 cases of Lap-DP performed between March 2016 and May 2022. We retrospectively analyzed 54 cases where pancreatic transection sites could be observed using an intraoperative video. Pancreatic transection was performed using the Powered ECHELON FLEX®+ GST® System (Ethicon, Somerville, USA). For quantitative studies, we investigated the factors that cause pancreatic fistula and other factors causing pancreatic fistula. Results Pancreatic parenchymal hemorrhage and injury occurred in 22.2% and 29.6% of cases, respectively. International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C pancreatic fistula was observed in 12 cases (22.2%). Univariate analysis of pancreatic (n = 12) and nonpancreatic (n = 42) fistula groups showed no significant differences in pancreatic thickness. The pancreatic fistula group had a significantly high incidence of the hard pancreas (p = .009), pancreatic parenchymal bleeding (p = .002), and pancreatic parenchymal damage (p < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that pancreatic parenchymal damage was an independent cause of pancreatic fistula (hazard ratio, 81.4 (8.5-772.3), p < .001). Conclusion Pancreatic parenchymal damage due to compression during pancreatic stump closure using an automatic stapler in Lap-DP may cause pancreatic fistula.
PubMed: 38800290
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58959 -
Surgery May 2024Minimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal...
BACKGROUND
Minimally invasive surgery has gained momentum for left pancreatic resections. However, debate remains about whether it has any advantage over open surgery for distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.
METHODS
This retrospective review examined pancreatectomies performed for resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors at 21 centers in France between January 2014 and December 2018. Short and long-term outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching based on tumor size, sex, age, body mass index, center, and method of pancreatic transection.
RESULTS
During the period study, 274 patients underwent left pancreatic resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [109 underwent distal splenopancreatectomy, and 165 underwent spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy [(splenic vessel preservation (n = 97; 58.7%)/splenic vessel resection (n = 68; 41.3%)]. Before propensity score matching, minimally invasive surgery was associated with a lower rate of major morbidity (P = .004), lower rate of postoperative delayed gastric emptying (P = .04), and higher rate of "textbook" outcomes (P = .04). After propensity score matching, there were 2 groups of 54 patients (n = 30 distal splenopancreatectomy; n = 78 spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy). Minimally invasive surgery was associated with less blood loss (P = .05), decreased rate of major morbidity (6% vs. 24%; P = .02), less delayed gastric emptying (P = .05) despite similar rates of postoperative fistula, hemorrhage, and reoperation (P > .05). The 5-year overall survival (79% vs. 75%; P = .74) and recurrence-free survival (10% vs 17%; P = .39) were similar.
CONCLUSION
Minimally invasive surgery for left pancreatic resection can be safely proposed for patients with resectable left pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Minimally invasive surgery decreases the rate of major complications while providing comparable long-term oncologic outcomes.
PubMed: 38797604
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.005 -
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of... Jul 2024Pancreatic duct (PD) leaks are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, trauma to the pancreas, and pancreatic surgery. Diagnosis of PD leaks and... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic duct (PD) leaks are a common complication of acute and chronic pancreatitis, trauma to the pancreas, and pancreatic surgery. Diagnosis of PD leaks and fistulas is often made with contrast-enhanced pancreatic protocol computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging with MRCP. Endoscopic retrograde pancreatography with pancreatic duct stenting in appropriately selected patients is often an effective treatment, helps to avoid surgery, and is considered first-line therapy in cases that fail conservative management.
Topics: Humans; Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde; Pancreatic Fistula; Pancreatic Ducts; Stents; Pancreatitis; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Postoperative Complications
PubMed: 38796289
DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2024.02.001 -
World Journal of Surgery May 2024Pancreatojejunostomy is a technically demanding procedure during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Modified Blumgart anastomosis (mBA) is a common method for the...
BACKGROUNDS
Pancreatojejunostomy is a technically demanding procedure during robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). Modified Blumgart anastomosis (mBA) is a common method for the pancreatojejunostomy; however, the technical details for robotic mBA are not well established. During RPD, we performed a mBA for the pancreatojejunostomy using thread manipulation with gauze and an additional assist port.
METHODS
Patients who underwent robotic pancreatoduodenectomy at Fujita Health University from November 2009 to May 2023 were retrospectively investigated, and technical details for the robotic-modified Blumgart anastomosis were demonstrated.
RESULTS
Among 78 patients who underwent RPD during the study period, 33 underwent robotic mBA. Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) occurred in six patients (18%). None of the patients suffered POPF Grade C according to the international study group of pancreatic surgery definition. The anastomotic time for mBA was 80 min (54-125 min).
CONCLUSION
Robotic mBA resulted in reasonable outcomes. We propose that mBA could be used as one of the standard methods for robotic pancreatojejunosotomy.
PubMed: 38794794
DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12208 -
Life (Basel, Switzerland) Apr 2024Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have...
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is a complex and high-skill demanding procedure often associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, the results have improved over the past two decades. However, there is a paucity of research concerning the learning curve for PD. Our aim was to report the outcomes of 100 consecutive PDs representing a single surgeon's learning curve and to depict the factors that influenced the learning process.
METHODS
We reviewed the first 121 PDs performed at our academic center (2013-2019) by a single surgeon; 110 were PDs (5 laparoscopic and 105 open) and 11 were total PDs (1 laparoscopic and 10 open). Subsequent statistics was performed on the first 100 PDs, with attention paid to the learning curve and survival rate at 5 years. The data were analyzed comparing the first 50 cases (Group 1) to the last 50 cases (Group 2).
RESULTS
The most frequent histopathological tumor type was pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (50%). A total of 39% of patients had preoperative biliary drainage and 45% presented with positive biliary cultures. The preferred reconstruction technique included pancreaticogastrostomy (99%), in situ hepaticojejunostomy (70%), and precolic gastro-jejunal anastomosis (88%). Postoperative complications included biliary fistula (1%), pancreatic fistula (8%), pancreatic stump bleeding (4%), and delayed gastric emptying (13%). The mean operative time decreased after the first 50 cases ( < 0.001) and blood loss after 60 cases ( = 0.046). R1 resections lowered after 25 cases ( = 0.025). Vascular resections (17%) did not influence the rate of complications ( = 0.8). The survival rate at 5 years for pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 32.93%.
CONCLUSIONS
Outcomes improve as surgeon experience increases, with proper training being the most important factor for minimizing the impact of the learning curve over the postoperative complications. Analyzing the learning curve from the perspective of a single surgeon is mandatory for accurate statistical results and interpretation.
PubMed: 38792572
DOI: 10.3390/life14050549 -
Surgery May 2024The method of transecting the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatic resection may influence the rate of complications, including pancreatic fistula and bleeding. The...
BACKGROUND
The method of transecting the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatic resection may influence the rate of complications, including pancreatic fistula and bleeding. The objective of this study is to compare the transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy with monopolar electrocautery versus scalpel in terms of postoperative complications.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis of patients with open pancreatoduodenectomy from the German DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas registry (January 2013 to December 2021) was performed. Transection of the pancreatic parenchyma with a scalpel versus monopolar electrocautery was compared regarding postoperative pancreatic fistula B/C, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage B/C, and major complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥3) rates. Multivariable analysis with adjustment for potential confounders and surgical center cluster effect was performed.
RESULTS
Overall, 6,752 patients were included in the study. In 4,072 (60.3%), transection was performed with a scalpel and, in 2,680 (39.7%), with electrocautery. Transection with electrocautery was associated with higher postoperative pancreatic fistula B/C (15.4% vs 12.8%; P = .003), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage B/C (11% vs 7.4%; P < .001), and major complications (33.4% vs 29.6%; P = .001) rates. In the multivariable analysis, after adjustment for potential confounders and surgical center, the association of the transection method with postoperative pancreatic fistula B/C (odds ratio = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79-1.2; P = .962), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage B/C (odds ratio = 1.23; 95% CI, 0.94-1.6; P = .127), and major complications (odds ratio = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93-1.27; P = .297) was not significant.
CONCLUSION
The study found no significant association between transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during open pancreatoduodenectomy with a scalpel compared with monopolar electrocautery regarding pancreatic fistula, postoperative bleeding, or overall major complication rates.
PubMed: 38789356
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.03.023 -
Surgery May 2024The absence of surgical complications has traditionally been used to define successful recovery after pancreas surgery. However, patient-reported outcome measures as...
BACKGROUND
The absence of surgical complications has traditionally been used to define successful recovery after pancreas surgery. However, patient-reported outcome measures as metrics of a challenging recovery may be superior to objective morbidity. This study aims to evaluate the use of patient-reported outcomes in assessing recovery after pancreas surgery.
METHODS
Patients scheduled for pancreatoduodenectomy were prospectively enrolled between 2016 to 2018. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using the linear analog self-assessment questionnaire preoperatively and on postoperative days 2, 7, 14, 30, and monthly until 6 months. Patients were also asked if they felt fully recovered at 30 days and 6 months. Thirty-day surgical morbidity was prospectively assessed, and the comprehensive complication index at 30 days was used to categorize morbidity as major or multiple minor complications (comprehensive complication index ≥26.2) vs uncomplicated (comprehensive complication index <26.2). Clinically significant International Study Group Pancreas Surgery Grade B and C pancreatic fistulas and delayed gastric emptying were reported. χ and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to assess associations with recovery by 6 months and quality of life throughout the postoperative period.
RESULTS
Of 116 patients who met inclusion criteria and were enrolled, 32 (28%) had major or multiple minor complications (comprehensive complication index ≥26.2). Overall, fewer than 1 in 10 patients (7%) reported feeling fully recovered at 30 days postoperatively, whereas 55% reported feeling fully recovered at 6 months. Of patients suffering major morbidity, 62% did not recover by 6 months, whereas 38% of those in the uncomplicated group reported not being recovered at 6 months (P = .03). Patients who experienced delayed gastric emptying reported low quality-of-life scores at 1 month (P = .04) compared to those with no delayed gastric emptying, but this did not persist at 6 months (P = .80). Postoperative pancreatic fistula was not associated with quality of life at 1 or 6 months (both P > .05). In the uncomplicated patients, age, sex, surgical approach, and cancer status were not associated with failed recovery at 6 months (all P > .05), and healthier patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists 1-2) were less likely to report complete recovery (42% vs 69% American Society of Anesthesiologists 3-4, P = .04). With the exception of higher preoperative pain scores (mean 2.3 [standard deviation 2.4] among patients not fully recovered at 6 months vs 1.6 [2.2] among those fully recovered, P = .04), preoperative patient-reported outcomes were not associated with failed recovery at 6 months (all P > .05). However, lower 30-day quality of life, social activity, pain, and fatigue scores were associated with incomplete recovery at 6 months.
CONCLUSION
More than 1 in 3 patients with an uncomplicated course do not feel fully recovered from pancreas surgery at 6 months; the presence of surgical complications did not universally correspond with recovery failure. In patients with complications, delayed gastric emptying appears to drive quality of life more significantly than postoperative pancreatic fistula. In patients with uncomplicated recovery, healthier patients were less likely to report full recovery at 6 months. Thirty-day patient-reported outcomes may be able to identify patients who are at risk of incomplete long-term recovery.
PubMed: 38777657
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.04.002 -
Cureus Apr 2024Black pleural effusions (BPEs) are an exceedingly rare class of exudative effusions of unexplored causality. Their characteristic pitch-black coloring and striking first...
Black pleural effusions (BPEs) are an exceedingly rare class of exudative effusions of unexplored causality. Their characteristic pitch-black coloring and striking first appearance upon thoracocentesis make them a bewildering occurrence even for seasoned physicians. Forming a free-from-error diagnostic work-up can be arduous and largely depends on thorough history-taking, deliberate imaging studies, and the correct biochemical profile. The upcoming article aims to raise awareness of this pathology by presenting our experience with a BPE after an episode of acute-on-chronic (ACP) pancreatitis and the confounding route to achieving the correct diagnosis and forming the precise therapeutic approach to this scenario. Keeping in mind that this is not a common clinical case, we strive to dispel some misconceptions and thus avoid any subsequent complications and delays in diagnosis when treating this type of effusions and their underlying pathology.
PubMed: 38770474
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58687 -
Asian Journal of Surgery May 2024
PubMed: 38762416
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.05.109 -
International Journal of Surgery Case... Jun 2024Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication most associated with alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis. This usually presents with chest symptoms instead of...
INTRODUCTION
Pancreaticopleural fistula is a rare complication most associated with alcohol-induced chronic pancreatitis. This usually presents with chest symptoms instead of abdominal ones. Diagnosis requires a high index of suspicion in patients with pancreatitis and persistent pleural effusions.
PRESENTATION OF CASE
We present a case of an 81-years-old man admitted in the emergency department with a one week complaints of productive cough, fever, dyspnea and left-side chest pain. The chest X-ray revealed a moderated-volume left-side pleural effusion. The pleural fluid analysis was consistent with an exsudative pleural effusion with high levels of amylase. The thoracoabdominal CT raised the suspicion of a pancreaticopleural fistula, confirmed by ERCP. A pancreatic main duct stenting was performed with good results. The patient was discharged asymptomatic after 18 days of hospitalization.
DISCUSSION
Because of PPF insidious presentation it poses a great number of differential diagnosis, so pleural fluid analysis is of paramount importance with high levels of amylase confirming the diagnosis. MRCP and ERCP may establish the fistulous tract between the pancreatic duct and the pleural cavity, with the latter being also therapeutic.
CONCLUSION
The rarity of this complication related to pancreatitis and the seldomly presence of abdominal pain in contrast with chest symptoms poses a diagnostic challenge.
PubMed: 38761693
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2024.109755