-
Scientific Reports Jun 2024The initiation of the program Mental Health Support Program for Coronavirus Infection addressed the increased demand for mental health services in the province of...
The initiation of the program Mental Health Support Program for Coronavirus Infection addressed the increased demand for mental health services in the province of Salamanca, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The psychiatry service provided care for COVID-19 patients, their families, and healthcare workers who treated them, as these groups were identified as being at risk. This study aims to describe the assistance provided, including personnel and resources utilized, types of interventions carried out, and to assess the demand for mental health care and predominant symptoms and emotions experienced by patients. Billboards and the complex's intranet publicized the program. Specific clinical approach using telemedicine were provide from March 2020 to December 2021 to COVID-19 patients, their relatives, and healthcare workers. 216 patients were included with a mean age of 53.2 years, with women comprising 77.3% of this group. All the groups received treatment in similar proportions. Over a period of 730 h, a total of 1376 interventions were performed, with an average duration of 31.8 min per intervention. The program could treat 79.6% of these patients without requiring referrals to other services. When the program concluded, only 21 participants (9.7%) were discharged to the local mental health network to continue their mental health treatment. The program effectively reduced the burden on regular mental health services due to its ability to treat most patients without requiring referrals. The program was able to attend to most mental health requests with minimal involvement of the regular mental health service.
Topics: Humans; COVID-19; Telemedicine; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Mental Health Services; Adult; Mental Health; Pandemics; Follow-Up Studies; SARS-CoV-2; Aged; Mental Disorders
PubMed: 38942891
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65382-w -
British Dental Journal Jun 2024
Topics: Humans; United Kingdom; COVID-19
PubMed: 38942833
DOI: 10.1038/s41415-024-7563-9 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024In tuberculosis (TB), chest radiography (CXR) patterns are highly variable, mimicking pneumonia and many other diseases. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of...
In tuberculosis (TB), chest radiography (CXR) patterns are highly variable, mimicking pneumonia and many other diseases. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Google teachable machine, a deep neural network-based image classification tool, to develop algorithm for predicting TB probability of CXRs. The training dataset included 348 TB CXRs and 3806 normal CXRs for training TB detection. We also collected 1150 abnormal CXRs and 627 normal CXRs for training abnormality detection. For external validation, we collected 250 CXRs from our hospital. We also compared the accuracy of the algorithm to five pulmonologists and radiological reports. In external validation, the AI algorithm showed areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.951 and 0.975 in validation dataset 1 and 2. The accuracy of the pulmonologists on validation dataset 2 showed AUC range of 0.936-0.995. When abnormal CXRs other than TB were added, AUC decreased in both human readers (0.843-0.888) and AI algorithm (0.828). When combine human readers with AI algorithm, the AUC further increased to 0.862-0.885. The TB CXR AI algorithm developed by using Google teachable machine in this study is effective, with the accuracy close to experienced clinical physicians, and may be helpful for detecting tuberculosis by CXR.
Topics: Humans; Deep Learning; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary; Radiography, Thoracic; Algorithms; Female; Male; Middle Aged; Adult; Area Under Curve
PubMed: 38942819
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65703-z -
Hypertension Research : Official... Jun 2024There is insufficient evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) can reduce pneumonia by inducing a dry cough that confers a protective effect on the...
Risk of pneumonia-related hospitalization after initiating angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors compared with angiotensin II receptor blockers: a retrospective cohort study using LIFE Study data.
There is insufficient evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) can reduce pneumonia by inducing a dry cough that confers a protective effect on the airway. To increase the evidence base on the clinical use of ACEIs for pneumonia prevention, this retrospective cohort study aimed to comparatively examine the risk of pneumonia-related hospitalization between ACEI initiators and angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) initiators using claims data from two Japanese municipalities. We identified persons who were newly prescribed any ACEI or ARB as their first antihypertensive agent between April 2016 and March 2020. The Fine-Gray method was applied to a Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the subdistribution hazard ratio (HR) of ACEI use (reference: ARB use) for pneumonia-related hospitalization, with death treated as a competing risk. Sex, age, comorbidities, medications, and pneumococcal immunization were included as covariates. The analysis was conducted on 1421 ACEI initiators and 9040 ARB initiators, and the adjusted subdistribution HR of ACEI use was estimated to be 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.89-1.65; P = 0.22). ACEI initiation did not demonstrate any significant preventive effect against pneumonia-related hospitalization relative to ARB initiation. There remains a lack of strong evidence on the protective effects of ACEIs, and further research is needed to ascertain the benefits of their use in preventing pneumonia. We conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study using real-world healthcare data from a Japanese population. In this study, ACEI initiation did not indicate a significant preventive effect against pneumonia-related hospitalization.
PubMed: 38942815
DOI: 10.1038/s41440-024-01768-7 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, causes a spectrum of symptoms ranging from mild upper to severe lower...
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, causes a spectrum of symptoms ranging from mild upper to severe lower respiratory tract infections. However, the dynamics of nucleocapsid (N) protein antigenemia and RNAemia are not fully understood. We conducted a cohort study involving 117 patients with clinically confirmed COVID-19, focusing on the kinetics of antigenemia and RNAemia and their association with various clinical characteristics. The patients had a median age of 66.0 years (52.0-79.0 years), with a gender distribution of 46.2% male and 53.8% female. Antigenemia reached 100% in fatal cases during the first week after admission. The sensitivity/specificity of antigenemia for diagnosis were 64.7%/73.0% at admission, 69.1%/100% in Week 1, and 66.3%/100% in Week 2. Additionally, the rates of antigenemia in asymptomatic patients were 27.3% upon admission and 22.0% in Week 1, respectively; however, no antigenemia was in samples collected in Week 2. Viral RNAemia was not detected in asymptomatic patients, but RNAemia viral loads were elevated in fatal cases. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated a higher mortality rate when antigenemia concentrations were elevated in the follow-up samples (P = 0.005). Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of the kinetics of viral N-protein antigenemia and RNAemia according to disease severity and clinical classification. Our findings suggest that highest concentrations of antigenemia in fatal cases occur in the first week after admission, indicating that early elevated antigenemia may serve as a marker of mortality risk.
Topics: Humans; Male; COVID-19; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; SARS-CoV-2; RNA, Viral; Severity of Illness Index; Antigens, Viral; Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Proteins; Cohort Studies; Phosphoproteins
PubMed: 38942808
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65489-0 -
Nature Communications Jun 2024Dexamethasone is the standard of care for critically ill patients with COVID-19, but the mechanisms by which it decreases mortality and its immunological effects in this...
Dexamethasone is the standard of care for critically ill patients with COVID-19, but the mechanisms by which it decreases mortality and its immunological effects in this setting are not understood. Here we perform bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing of samples from the lower respiratory tract and blood, and assess plasma cytokine profiling to study the effects of dexamethasone on both systemic and pulmonary immune cell compartments. In blood samples, dexamethasone is associated with decreased expression of genes associated with T cell activation, including TNFSFR4 and IL21R. We also identify decreased expression of several immune pathways, including major histocompatibility complex-II signaling, selectin P ligand signaling, and T cell recruitment by intercellular adhesion molecule and integrin activation, suggesting these are potential mechanisms of the therapeutic benefit of steroids in COVID-19. We identify additional compartment- and cell- specific differences in the effect of dexamethasone that are reproducible in publicly available datasets, including steroid-resistant interferon pathway expression in the respiratory tract, which may be additional therapeutic targets. In summary, we demonstrate compartment-specific effects of dexamethasone in critically ill COVID-19 patients, providing mechanistic insights with potential therapeutic relevance. Our results highlight the importance of studying compartmentalized inflammation in critically ill patients.
Topics: Dexamethasone; Humans; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Lung; Cytokines; Critical Illness; Male; Single-Cell Analysis; Female; Middle Aged; T-Lymphocytes; Aged; Lymphocyte Activation
PubMed: 38942804
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49756-2 -
Scientific Reports Jun 2024Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) has been associated with neonatal infections, with colonization of the anovaginal tract being the main source of vertical...
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) has been associated with neonatal infections, with colonization of the anovaginal tract being the main source of vertical transmission. The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the frequency of antibiotic usage, potentially contributing to changes in the dynamics of bacterial agents colonizing humans. Here we determined MRS colonization rates among pregnant individuals attending a single maternity in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil before (January 2019-March 2020) and during (May 2020-March 2021) the COVID-19 pandemic. Anovaginal samples (n = 806 [521 samples before and 285 during the pandemic]) were streaked onto chromogenic media. Colonies were identified by MALDI-TOF MS. Detection of mecA gene and SCCmec typing were assessed by PCR and antimicrobial susceptibility testing was done according to CLSI guidelines. After the onset of the pandemic, MRS colonization rates increased significantly (p < 0.05) from 8.6% (45) to 54.7% (156). Overall, 215 (26.6%) MRS isolates were detected, of which S. haemolyticus was the most prevalent species (MRSH, 84.2%; 181 isolates). SCCmec type V was the most frequent among MRS (63.3%; 136), and 31.6% (68) of MRS strains had a non-typeable SCCmec, due to new combinations of ccr and mecA complexes. Among MRS strains, 41.9% (90) were resistant to at least 3 different classes of antimicrobial agents, and 60% (54) of them were S. haemolyticus harboring SCCmec V. MRS colonization rates and the emergence of multidrug-resistant variants detected in this study indicate the need for continuing surveillance of this important pathogen within maternal and child populations.
Topics: Humans; Female; Pregnancy; COVID-19; Staphylococcal Infections; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Adult; Brazil; Pregnancy Complications, Infectious; Anti-Bacterial Agents; SARS-CoV-2; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pandemics; Vagina
PubMed: 38942787
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-64422-9 -
Nature Communications Jun 2024In a pivotal trial (EPIC-HR), a 5-day course of oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, given early during symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (within three days of symptoms...
In a pivotal trial (EPIC-HR), a 5-day course of oral ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, given early during symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (within three days of symptoms onset), decreased hospitalization and death by 89.1% and nasal viral load by 0.87 log relative to placebo in high-risk individuals. Yet, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir failed as post-exposure prophylaxis in a trial, and frequent viral rebound has been observed in subsequent cohorts. We develop a mathematical model capturing viral-immune dynamics and nirmatrelvir pharmacokinetics that recapitulates viral loads from this and another clinical trial (PLATCOV). Our results suggest that nirmatrelvir's in vivo potency is significantly lower than in vitro assays predict. According to our model, a maximally potent agent would reduce the viral load by approximately 3.5 logs relative to placebo at 5 days. The model identifies that earlier initiation and shorter treatment duration are key predictors of post-treatment rebound. Extension of treatment to 10 days for Omicron variant infection in vaccinated individuals, rather than increasing dose or dosing frequency, is predicted to lower the incidence of viral rebound significantly.
Topics: Humans; SARS-CoV-2; Ritonavir; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; COVID-19; Viral Load; Antiviral Agents; Indazoles; Models, Theoretical; Post-Exposure Prophylaxis; Lactams; Leucine; Nitriles; Proline
PubMed: 38942778
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49458-9 -
NPJ Primary Care Respiratory Medicine Jun 2024We sought to investigate the incidence of severe COVID-19 outcomes after treatment with antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies, and estimate the comparative...
We sought to investigate the incidence of severe COVID-19 outcomes after treatment with antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies, and estimate the comparative effectiveness of treatments in community-based individuals. We conducted a retrospective cohort study investigating clinical outcomes of hospitalisation, intensive care unit admission and death, in those treated with antivirals and monoclonal antibodies for COVID-19 in Scotland between December 2021 and September 2022. We compared the effect of various treatments on the risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, stratified by most prevalent sub-lineage at that time, and controlling for comorbidities and other patient characteristics. We identified 14,365 individuals treated for COVID-19 during our study period, some of whom were treated for multiple infections. The incidence of severe COVID-19 outcomes (inpatient admission or death) in community-treated patients (81% of all treatment episodes) was 1.2% (n = 137/11894, 95% CI 1.0-1.4), compared to 32.8% in those treated in hospital for acute COVID-19 (re-admissions or death; n = 40/122, 95% CI 25.1-41.5). For community-treated patients, there was a lower risk of severe outcomes (inpatient admission or death) in younger patients, and in those who had received three or more COVID-19 vaccinations. During the period in which BA.2 was the most prevalent sub-lineage in the UK, sotrovimab was associated with a reduced treatment effect compared to nirmaltrelvir + ritonavir. However, since BA.5 has been the most prevalent sub-lineage in the UK, both sotrovimab and nirmaltrelvir + ritonavir were associated with similarly lower incidence of severe outcomes than molnupiravir. Around 1% of those treated for COVID-19 with antivirals or neutralising monoclonal antibodies required hospital admission. During the period in which BA.5 was the prevalent sub-lineages in the UK, molnupiravir was associated with the highest incidence of severe outcomes in community-treated patients.
Topics: Humans; Scotland; Antiviral Agents; Retrospective Studies; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Male; Female; Middle Aged; COVID-19; Hospitalization; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Aged; SARS-CoV-2; Antibodies, Neutralizing; Adult; Treatment Outcome; Severity of Illness Index; Intensive Care Units; Incidence
PubMed: 38942748
DOI: 10.1038/s41533-024-00374-x -
Clinical Colorectal Cancer May 2024Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-1, has shown limited efficacy in patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic...
BACKGROUND
Pembrolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-1, has shown limited efficacy in patients with microsatellite stable or mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We evaluated vicriviroc (small-molecule C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 antagonist) plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
This open-label, phase 2 trial (NCT03631407) enrolled adults with histologically confirmed, locally advanced, unresectable or metastatic CRC that was MSS per local assessment. All patients had received previous treatment with standard therapies. Patients were randomized 1:1 to vicriviroc 150 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or vicriviroc 250 mg orally once daily plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles (2 years). Primary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator per RECIST v1.1, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), and discontinuations due to AEs.
RESULTS
Forty patients were enrolled and treated. ORR was 5% (95% CI, 0.1%-24.9%) in both treatment groups. There were no complete responses; 1 patient in each treatment group experienced a partial response. No patient in the vicriviroc 150 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced a DLT. Two patients in the vicriviroc 250 mg plus pembrolizumab group experienced DLTs (1 grade 4 encephalopathy and 1 grade 4 pneumonitis).
CONCLUSION
The combination of vicriviroc at doses of 150 or 250 mg plus pembrolizumab 200 mg showed limited antitumor activity in patients with advanced or metastatic MSS/pMMR CRC. Toxicity with the combination was manageable.
PubMed: 38942693
DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.05.003