-
Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal May 2024This study aimed to quantify the vascularity in histological grades of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) and to determine if there is any connection between vasculogenesis... (Review)
Review
Correlation between Vascularity and Advancing Histological Grades of Oral Submucous Fibrosis with a Plausible Role in Malignisation: Systematic review of a persisting matter of conflict.
OBJECTIVES
This study aimed to quantify the vascularity in histological grades of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF) and to determine if there is any connection between vasculogenesis and malignisation. Recent studies show no significant change in vascularity as the stage advances as opposed to the conventional concept.
METHODS
A comprehensive database search until December 2022 was conducted for published articles on vascularity in OSMF following preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 98 articles were screened of which 13 were included for systematic evaluation. The study included 607 cases, with a definite predilection for the male gender. Of the 13 studies, 11 evaluated mean vascular density. In more than half of the studies, the vascularity decreased as the stage advanced. Similar results were obtained for endothelial cells/μm, mean vascular area percentage and mean vascular area.
CONCLUSION
The present review supports the prevailing concept that vascularity decreases with the advancement of the OSMF stage. This denies the systemic absorption of carcinogens into the circulation with resultant longer exposure of compromised epithelium and malignisation.
Topics: Humans; Oral Submucous Fibrosis; Male; Female; Mouth Neoplasms
PubMed: 38828241
DOI: 10.18295/squmj.10.2023.062 -
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology 2024The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy is a promising first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung...
First-line treatments for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with immune checkpoint inhibitors plus chemotherapy: a systematic review, network meta-analysis, and cost-effectiveness analysis.
INTRODUCTION
The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy is a promising first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The cost-effectiveness of combinations with different ICIs is yet to be compared.
METHODS
We utilized Bayesian network meta-analyses for the comparisons of overall survival, progression-free survival, and incidence of adverse events of the included treatments in the total population and subgroups with different programmed death-ligand 1 tumor proportional scores (TPS). The cost-effectiveness of the treatments from the perspectives of the US and Chinese healthcare systems was assessed using Markov models.
RESULTS
Three combinations, including pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (PembroC), nivolumab + ipilimumab + chemotherapy (NivoIpiC), and atezolizumab + chemotherapy (AteC), were included in our study. In terms of efficacy, PembroC was most likely to be ranked first for extending progression-free survival (PFS) (93.16%) and overall survival (OS) (90.73%). Nevertheless, from the US perspective, NivoIpiC and PembroC showed incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of $68,963.1/quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) and $179,355.6/QALY, respectively, compared with AteC. The one-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were primarily sensitive to the hazard ratios for OS or the cost of immunotherapy agents. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000/QALY, NivoIpiC had the highest probability of being cost-effective (63%). As for the Chinese perspective, NivoIpiC and PembroC had ICERs of $145,983.4/QALY and $195,863.3/QALY AteC, respectively. The results were primarily sensitive to the HRs for OS. At a WTP threshold of $38,017/QALY, AteC had the highest probability of cost-effectiveness (94%).
CONCLUSION
Although PembroC has the optimal efficacy, NivoIpiC and AteC were the most favorable treatments in terms of cost-effectiveness for patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC from the US and Chinese perspectives, respectively.
PubMed: 38827178
DOI: 10.1177/17588359241255613 -
Advances in Radiation Oncology Jul 2024Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Initial studies investigating the combination of local and systemic treatments in advanced esophageal cancer (EC) have conflicting conclusions regarding survival benefits. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of the addition of local therapy to systemic treatments in patients with advanced EC.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases. Key eligibility criteria included studies that enrolled patients with histologically confirmed EC or esophagogastric junction cancer with metastasis or recurrence and compared survival benefits between the combined local and systemic treatment group and the systemic treatment alone group. Survival outcomes, represented by hazard ratios (HRs) of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were pooled using a random effects model. The MINORS score was adopted for quality assessment. Risk of bias was statistically examined by Begg's and Egger's tests.
RESULTS
A total of 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT) and 10 qualified retrospective studies including 14,489 patients were identified. Addition of local therapy to systemic treatment significantly improved PFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.37-0.73; < .001) and OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.58-0.81; < .0001) compared with systemic treatment alone. The subgroup analysis revealed that combined local and systemic treatment conferred a significant survival advantage in both patients with oligometastasis (PFS: HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.31-0.64; < .0001; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48-0.79; < .0001) and recurrence (OS: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.37-0.81; = .002).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, addition of local treatment to systemic therapy can improve survival in patients with advanced EC, particularly in those with oligometastasis or recurrent diseases.
PubMed: 38826154
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101522 -
Journal of Cancer 2024Immune-activating anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (alone or in combination) are being used to treat advanced melanoma patients and can lead to durable... (Review)
Review
Immune-activating anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 monoclonal antibodies (alone or in combination) are being used to treat advanced melanoma patients and can lead to durable remissions, and long-term overall survival may be achieved in between 50-60% of patients. Although intracranial metastases are very common in melanoma (about 50-75% of all patients with advanced disease), most of the pivotal prospective clinical trials exclude patients with intra-cranial metastases, certainly if their lesions are symptomatic and steroid-requiring and the degree of sensitivity of intra-cranial melanoma to immunotherapy remains uncertain, and requires further investigation especially in view of the demonstrable activity of RAF-MEK inhibitors in this clinical setting and the emergence of stereotactic radiotherapy. Our study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of immunotherapy against advanced melanoma patients with brain metastases. In terms of comparative studies, only retrospective analyses could be identified. Based on 3 retrospective studies, treatment of patients with melanoma brain metastases with immunotherapeutic approaches improves overall survival substantially compared with supportive measures alone (no active anticancer treatment). The efficacy of targeted therapy appeared to be comparable to that of immune therapy in terms of overall survival, based on a small number of patients. The combination of concurrent radiation therapy to the brain and systemic immunotherapy led to improved overall survival compared to radiotherapy alone, suggesting potential synergism between the approaches, and combination treatment could be delivered safely. Our review supports the use of immunotherapeutic strategies for these patients although treatment efficacy appears to be lower for symptomatic lesions. In view of the extremely high efficacy of stereotactic radiotherapy approaches in the brain, understanding the interaction between radiotherapy and immunotherapy is vital and should be an area of active investigation.
PubMed: 38817862
DOI: 10.7150/jca.93306 -
Clinical Hematology International 2024Globally, multiple myeloma (MM) ranks 24 among the most common cancers. The Middle East and Africa are affected by an increasing trend in MM incidence, owing to several...
BACKGROUND
Globally, multiple myeloma (MM) ranks 24 among the most common cancers. The Middle East and Africa are affected by an increasing trend in MM incidence, owing to several underlying factors. This systematic review aims to assess the epidemiology, patient characteristics, and treatment outcomes associated with MM in selected countries in the Middle East and Africa.
METHODS
An electronic search was performed in the PubMed/MEDLINE database. Abstracts presented at the annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, and European Society for Medical Oncology and the GLOBOCAN registry were searched. Qualitative analysis was performed.
RESULTS
A total of 412 articles were screened, and 14 were selected. The five-year prevalence per 100,000 gathered from country-wise GLOBOCAN data ranged between 155 in Kuwait and 5,625 in North Africa. The identified treatment options were proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib, drugs such as thalidomide, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, and newer drugs such as daratumumab.
CONCLUSION
Improved diagnostic capability has increased the incidence of MM in this region. However, advanced drugs and treatment regimens remain unaffordable in many countries of these regions. Therefore, understanding the trends of the disease and improving healthcare settings are imperative.
PubMed: 38817690
DOI: 10.46989/001c.92555 -
Supportive Care in Cancer : Official... May 2024To identify and synthesise interactive digital tools used to support the empowerment of people with cancer and the outcomes of these tools. (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
To identify and synthesise interactive digital tools used to support the empowerment of people with cancer and the outcomes of these tools.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Eric, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases in May 2023. Inclusion criteria were patient empowerment as an outcome supported by interactive digital tools expressed in study goal, methods or results, peer-reviewed studies published since 2010 in cancer care. Narrative synthesis was applied, and the quality of the studies was assessed following Joanna Briggs Institute checklists.
RESULTS
Out of 1571 records screened, 39 studies published in 2011-2022 with RCT (17), single-arm trial (15), quasi-experimental (1), and qualitative designs (6) were included. A total of 30 interactive digital tools were identified to support empowerment (4) and related aspects, such as self-management (2), coping (4), patient activation (9), and self-efficacy (19). Significant positive effects were found on empowerment (1), self-management (1), coping (1), patient activation (2), and self-efficacy (10). Patient experiences were positive. Interactivity occurred with the tool itself (22), peers (7), or nurses (7), physicians (2), psychologists, (2) or social workers (1).
CONCLUSION
Interactive digital tools have been developed extensively in recent years, varying in terms of content and methodology, favouring feasibility and pilot designs. In all of the tools, people with cancer are either active or recipients of information. The research evidence indicates positive outcomes for patient empowerment through interactive digital tools. Thus, even though promising, there still is need for further testing of the tools.
Topics: Humans; Neoplasms; Empowerment; Self Efficacy; Adaptation, Psychological; Patient Participation; Self-Management
PubMed: 38816629
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08545-9 -
Biomolecules & Biomedicine May 2024The effectiveness of removing lymph nodes before initial treatment in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still debated. This article presents a... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The effectiveness of removing lymph nodes before initial treatment in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is still debated. This article presents a meta-analysis that systematically evaluates the impact of this approach on oncological outcomes. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Science Direct, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (up to December 2023) was performed to obtain relevant studies. The findings were combined using fixed-effects models to address potential differences. Combined risk ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Egger's test was used to assess publication bias. Out of 1025 screened articles, four studies (involving 838 women) met the inclusion criteria. The results showed that lymph node dissection before initial treatment did not affect overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer compared to concurrent radiotherapy (HR = 1.11, 95% CI = 0.91-1.36, P = 0.30). It also did not increase the incidence of postoperative complications or cause delays in radiotherapy. In particular, removing larger lymph nodes (>2cm) aided in defining the radiation field and decreasing radiotherapy-related complications. The surgical technique also had some impact on postoperative complications. In summary, in order to obtain the best therapeutic outcomes, personalized plans should be developed for each patient, accounting for their individual circumstances to achieve precise treatment and enhance their quality of life.
PubMed: 38814195
DOI: 10.17305/bb.2024.10591 -
Cureus Apr 2024Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer often diagnosed at advanced stages, highlighting the urgent need for early detection strategies. This... (Review)
Review
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer often diagnosed at advanced stages, highlighting the urgent need for early detection strategies. This systematic review explores the potential of fecal and urinary biomarkers for early PDAC detection. A comprehensive search identified eight relevant studies investigating various biomarkers, including proteins, metabolites, microbial profiles, DNA mutations, and non-coding RNAs. Promising findings suggest that urinary biomarkers related to metabolic alterations, inflammatory processes, fecal microbiome profiles, and fecal miRNAs hold diagnostic potential even at early stages of PDAC. Combining biomarkers into panels may enhance diagnostic accuracy. Challenges such as validation in larger cohorts, standardization of protocols, and regulatory approval must be addressed for clinical translation. Despite these hurdles, non-invasive urinary and fecal biomarkers represent a promising avenue for improving PDAC outcomes through early detection.
PubMed: 38813271
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59248 -
Digital Health 2024Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems hold promise for revolutionizing communication between cancer patients and healthcare providers across various care... (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) systems hold promise for revolutionizing communication between cancer patients and healthcare providers across various care settings. This systematic review explores the multifaceted landscape of ePROs in cancer care, encompassing their advantages, disadvantages, potential risks, and opportunities for improvement.
METHODS
In our systematic review, we conducted a rigorous search in Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed, employing comprehensive medical subject heading terms for ePRO and cancer, with no date limitations up to 2024. Studies were critically appraised and thematically analyzed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, including considerations of advantages, disadvantages, opportunities, and threats.
FINDINGS
Analyzing 85 articles revealed 69 themes categorized into four key areas. Advantages ( = 14) were dominated by themes like "improved quality of life and care." Disadvantages ( = 26) included "limited access and technical issues." Security concerns and lack of technical skills were prominent threats ( = 10). Opportunities ( = 19) highlighted advancements in symptom management and potential solutions for technical challenges.
CONCLUSION
This review emphasizes the crucial role of continuous exploration, integration, and innovation in ePRO systems for optimizing patient outcomes in cancer care. Beyond traditional clinical settings, ePROs hold promise for applications in survivorship, palliative care, and remote monitoring. By addressing existing limitations and capitalizing on opportunities, ePROs can empower patients, enhance communication, and ultimately improve care delivery across the entire cancer care spectrum.
PubMed: 38812853
DOI: 10.1177/20552076241257146 -
Journal of Integrative Neuroscience May 2024Multiple radiomics models have been proposed for grading glioma using different algorithms, features, and sequences of magnetic resonance imaging. The research seeks to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Multiple radiomics models have been proposed for grading glioma using different algorithms, features, and sequences of magnetic resonance imaging. The research seeks to assess the present overall performance of radiomics for grading glioma.
METHODS
A systematic literature review of the databases Ovid MEDLINE PubMed, and Ovid EMBASE for publications published on radiomics for glioma grading between 2012 and 2023 was performed. The systematic review was carried out following the criteria of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.
RESULTS
In the meta-analysis, a total of 7654 patients from 40 articles, were assessed. R-package mada was used for modeling the joint estimates of specificity (SPE) and sensitivity (SEN). Pooled event rates across studies were performed with a random-effects meta-analysis. The heterogeneity of SPE and SEN were based on the χ2 test. Overall values for SPE and SEN in the differentiation between high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) were 84% and 91%, respectively. With regards to the discrimination between World Health Organization (WHO) grade 4 and WHO grade 3, the overall SPE was 81% and the SEN was 89%. The modern non-linear classifiers showed a better trend, whereas textural features tend to be the best-performing (29%) and the most used.
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings confirm that present radiomics' diagnostic performance for glioma grading is superior in terms of SEN and SPE for the HGGs vs. LGGs discrimination task when compared to the WHO grade 4 vs. 3 task.
Topics: Glioma; Humans; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Brain Neoplasms; Neoplasm Grading; Neuroimaging; Radiomics
PubMed: 38812383
DOI: 10.31083/j.jin2305100