-
Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2023Background GALAD score, comprising five clinical parameters, is a predictive model developed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection. Since its emergence, its... (Review)
Review
Background GALAD score, comprising five clinical parameters, is a predictive model developed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection. Since its emergence, its diagnostic ability has been validated in different populations with a wide variation. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate its overall diagnostic performance in differentiating HCC in chronic liver diseases. Methods Eligible studies were searched in the , , , , , and databases by 29 May 2022. Pooled sensitivity, pooled specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated. Results Fifteen original studies (comprising 19,021 patients) were included. For detecting any-stage HCC, GALAD score yielded an excellent ability, with pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.78-0.85), 0.89 (95%CI: 0.85-0.91), and 0.92 (95%CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. Notably, further analyses demonstrated a good diagnostic accuracy of GALAD score for identifying Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging (BCLC) 0/A HCC, with a moderate sensitivity (0.73 (95%CI: 0.66-0.79)) and a high specificity (0.87 (95%CI: 0.81-0.91)); by contrast, only 38% of early-stage patients can be identified by alpha-fetoprotein, with an AUC value of 0.70 (95%CI: 0.66-0.74). Following subgroup analyses based on different HCC etiologies, higher sensitivities and AUC values were observed in subgroups with hepatitis C or non-viral liver diseases. For detecting BCLC 0/A HCC in the cirrhotic population, GALAD score had a pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC of 0.78 (95%CI: 0.66-0.87), 0.80 (95%CI: 0.72-0.87), and 0.86 (95%CI: 0.83-0.89). Conclusions We highlighted the superior diagnostic accuracy of GALAD score for detecting any-stage HCC with a high sensitivity and specificity, especially for early-stage HCC, with a relatively stable diagnostic performance. The addition of GALAD score into ultrasound surveillance may identify more HCC patients. Our findings imply the robust power of the GALAD score as a HCC screening or diagnostic tool, and it should be further validated by more studies with high quality.
PubMed: 36769597
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030949 -
PloS One 2022To evaluate the clinical value of Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) in the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
To evaluate the clinical value of Aldo-keto reductase family 1 member B10 (AKR1B10) in the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS
A search of the PubMed, China Biology Medicine, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed to conduct meta-analyses to evaluate the accuracy of AKR1B10 in diagnosing HCC and to assess the impact on prognosis of patients after curative resection of HCC.
RESULTS
A total of 12 different cohorts from 11 studies including 2747 HCC patients and 2053 controls showed that the pooled specificity and the pooled sensitivity of AKR1B10 for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.69-0.85) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.90), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of serum AKR1B10 for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.77-0.93), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 in malignant tumor tissue for the diagnosis of HCC were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.61-0.89) and 0.82 (95% CI: 0.69-0.90), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 to distinguish HCC from benign liver disease were 0.71 (95% CI: 0.62-0.78) and 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77-0.89), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 combined with alpha fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.73-0.95), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of AKR1B10 in malignant tumor tissue for the diagnosis of early-stage HCC were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.62-0.95) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81-0.93), respectively. A meta-analysis of five studies including 798 patients demonstrated that high AKR1B10 expression in liver malignant tumor was associated with better overall survival in patients with HCC after hepatectomy (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.41-0.72, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
AKR1B10 exhibits a great clinical value in the diagnosis of HCC, especially for early-stage HCC, with excellent diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, AKR1B10 expression can predict the prognosis of HCC patients after hepatic resection.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Aldo-Keto Reductases; Aldehyde Reductase; Biomarkers, Tumor
PubMed: 36584078
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279591 -
The Science of the Total Environment Feb 2023Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are collectively responsible for tens of millions of global deaths each year. These rates are projected to intensify as the... (Review)
Review
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cancer are collectively responsible for tens of millions of global deaths each year. These rates are projected to intensify as the COVID-19 pandemic has caused delays in individualized diagnostics, or exacerbated prevalence due to Post Acute Coronavirus (COVID-19) Syndrome. Wastewater-based epidemiology (WBE) has successfully been employed as a useful tool for generating population-level health assessments, and was examined here in this systematic scoping literature review to (i) identify endogenous human biomarkers reported to indicate CVD or cancer in clinical practice, (ii) assess specificity to the indicated diseases, (iii) evaluate the utility for estimating population-level disease prevalence in community wastewater, and (iv) contextualize the obtained information for monitoring CVD and cancer presence via WBE. A total of 48 peer-reviewed papers were critically examined identifying five urinary protein biomarkers: cardiac troponin I (cTnI) (heart attack/heart failure), cystatin C (atherosclerosis), normetanephrine (tumor presence), α-fetoprotein (prostate and liver cancer), and microtubule assisted serine/threonine kinase 4 (MAST4) (breast cancer). Next, urinary excretion information was utilized to predict biomarker concentrations extant in community wastewater, resulting in average healthy concentrations ranging from 0.02 to 1159 ng/L, and disease-indicating thresholds from 0.16 to 3041 ng/L. Finally, estimating prevalence-adjusted wastewater measurements was explored in order to assess community-level CVD and cancer presence utilizing U.S. reported prevalence rates. Results obtained suggest that WBE can serve as a viable tool in support of current methods for CVD and cancer assessment to reduce morbidities and mortalities worldwide.
Topics: Humans; Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Monitoring; Cardiovascular Diseases; Pandemics; COVID-19; Neoplasms; Microtubule-Associated Proteins; Protein Serine-Threonine Kinases
PubMed: 36370774
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160103 -
PeerJ 2022This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
PURPOSE
This study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We enrolled all relevant studies published up to 5 January 2022. Three primary subgroups were investigated: qualitative or quantitative ctDNA analyses, combined alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and ctDNA assay. In addition to the three primary subgroups, we also evaluated the diagnostic value of methylated SEPTIN9 (mSEPT9), which has been studied extensively in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. After a search based on four primary databases, we used a bivariate linear mixed model to analyze the pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). We also plotted hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) and utilized lambda as well as the area under the curve (AUC) to create summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves to estimate the diagnostic value of ctDNA.
RESULTS
A total of 59 qualified articles with 9,766 subjects were incorporated into our meta-analysis. The integrated SEN, SPE, and DOR in the qualitative studies were 0.50 (95% CI [0.43-0.56]), 0.90 (95% CI [0.86-0.93]), and 8.72 (95% CI [6.18-12.32]), respectively, yielding an AUC of 0.78 and lambda of 1.93 (95% CI [1.56-2.33]). For quantitative studies, the corresponding values were 0.69 (95% CI [0.63-0.74]), 0.84 (95% CI [0.77-0.89]), 11.88 (95% CI [7.78-18.12]), 0.81, and 2.32 (95% CI [1.96-2.69]), respectively. Six studies were included to evaluate the SETP9 methylation, which yielded an AUC of 0.86, a SEN of 0.80 (95% CI [0.71-0.87]), and a SPE of 0.77 (95% CI [0.68-0.85]). Likewise, ctDNA concentration yielded an AUC of 0.73, with a SEN of 0.63 (95% CI [0.56-0.70]) and a SPE of 0.86 (95% CI [0.74-0.93]). AFP combined with ctDNA assay resulted in an AUC of 0.89, with a SEN of 0.82 (95% CI [0.77-0.86]) and a SPE of 0.84 (95% CI [0.76-0.90]).
CONCLUSION
This study shows that circulating tumor DNA, particularly mSEPT9, shows promising diagnostic potential in HCC; however, it is not enough to diagnose HCC independently, and ctDNA combined with conventional assays such as AFP can effectively improve diagnostic performance.
Topics: Humans; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; alpha-Fetoproteins; Liver Neoplasms; Circulating Tumor DNA; ROC Curve
PubMed: 36348665
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14303 -
Journal of Cancer Research and... Sep 2022This study aimed to systemically explore the risk factors of secondary infection/recurrence after ablation in patients with liver cancer. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to systemically explore the risk factors of secondary infection/recurrence after ablation in patients with liver cancer.
METHODS
Relevant literature in PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched with keywords including "liver cancer or carcinoma," "ablation," "infectious or infection or recurrence," and "risk factor or relevant factor or correlative factor or influencing factor." Meta-analyses were performed and forest plots were drawn for risk factors, including the tumor size and location, number of tumor nodules, hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels, serum alpha fetal protein (AFP) levels and serum albumin levels, Child-Pugh Class, and lack of antiviral therapy. A funnel plot was drawn to assess the publication bias.
RESULTS
A total of 23 studies were included from the initial 701 potentially relevant articles. Our meta-analyses showed that a large tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 1.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.31-1.92); proximity to the colon, large vessels, and large hepatic vein (OR = 4.10; 95% CI: 2.26-7.43); multinodular tumor (OR = 2.10; 95% CI: 1.46-3.03), the higher HBV DNA levels (OR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.09-0.64); higher serum AFP levels (OR = 1.56; 95% CI: 1.18-2.05), lower serum albumin levels (OR = 1.67; 95% CI: 1.06-2.65); Child-Pugh Class B and Class C (OR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.05-1.54); and lack of antiviral therapy (OR = 1.75; 95% CI: 0.93-3.28) were associated with an increased risk of post-ablation infection/recurrence in patients with liver cancers.
CONCLUSION
Our results indicated that the tumor size and location, number of tumor nodules, HBV DNA levels, serum AFP levels and serum albumin levels, Child-Pugh Class, and lack of antiviral therapy were the risk factors for post-ablation infection/recurrence in patients with liver cancer. Here, we have provided directions for the clinical prevention of secondary infection/recurrence in patients with liver cancer who underwent ablation therapy.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Catheter Ablation; Coinfection; DNA, Viral; Hepatitis B virus; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Serum Albumin; alpha-Fetoproteins
PubMed: 36204883
DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_291_21 -
Liver Transplantation : Official... Dec 2022Patients with indeterminate liver nodules, classified as LR-3 and LR-4 observations per the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, are at risk of developing...
Clinical outcomes of patients with Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 or Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System 4 observations in patients with cirrhosis: A systematic review.
Patients with indeterminate liver nodules, classified as LR-3 and LR-4 observations per the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System, are at risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but risk estimates remain imprecise. We conducted a systematic review of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to December 2021 to identify cohort studies examining HCC incidence among patients with LR-3 or LR-4 observations on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Predictors of HCC were abstracted from each study, when available. Of 13 total studies, nine conducted LR-3 observation-level analyses, with the proportions of incident HCC ranging from 1.2% to 12.5% at 12 months and 4.2% to 44.4% during longer study follow-up. Among three studies with patient-level analyses, 8%-22.2% of patients with LR-3 lesions developed LR-4 observations and 11.1%-24.5% developed HCC. Among nine studies conducting LR-4 observation-level analyses, incident HCC ranged from 30.8% to 44.0% at 12 months and 30.9% to 71.0% during study follow-up; conversely, 6%-42% of observations were downgraded to LR-3 or lower. Patient-level factors associated with HCC included older age, male sex, higher alpha-fetoprotein levels, viral etiology, and prior history of HCC; observation-level factors included maximum diameter, threshold growth, T2 hyperintensity, and visibility on ultrasound. Studies were limited by small sample sizes, inclusion of patients with prior HCC, short follow-up duration, and failure to account for clustering of observations in patients or competing risks of transplantation and death. LR-3 and LR-4 observations have elevated but variable risks of HCC. Higher quality studies are necessary to identify high-risk patients who warrant close CT or MRI-based follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Male; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Liver Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Liver Transplantation; Liver Cirrhosis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Contrast Media; Sensitivity and Specificity
PubMed: 35980600
DOI: 10.1002/lt.26562 -
BMC Cancer Jul 2022To describe and analyze the predictive models of the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing systemic treatment.
OBJECTIVE
To describe and analyze the predictive models of the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing systemic treatment.
DESIGN
Systematic review.
DATA SOURCES
PubMed and Embase until December 2020 and manually searched references from eligible articles.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR STUDY SELECTION
The development, validation, or updating of prognostic models of patients with HCC after systemic treatment.
RESULTS
The systematic search yielded 42 eligible articles: 28 articles described the development of 28 prognostic models of patients with HCC treated with systemic therapy, and 14 articles described the external validation of 32 existing prognostic models of patients with HCC undergoing systemic treatment. Among the 28 prognostic models, six were developed based on genes, of which five were expressed in full equations; the other 22 prognostic models were developed based on common clinical factors. Of the 28 prognostic models, 11 were validated both internally and externally, nine were validated only internally, two were validated only externally, and the remaining six models did not undergo any type of validation. Among the 28 prognostic models, the most common systemic treatment was sorafenib (n = 19); the most prevalent endpoint was overall survival (n = 28); and the most commonly used predictors were alpha-fetoprotein (n = 15), bilirubin (n = 8), albumin (n = 8), Child-Pugh score (n = 8), extrahepatic metastasis (n = 7), and tumor size (n = 7). Further, among 32 externally validated prognostic models, 12 were externally validated > 3 times.
CONCLUSIONS
This study describes and analyzes the prognostic models developed and validated for patients with HCC who have undergone systemic treatment. The results show that there are some methodological flaws in the model development process, and that external validation is rarely performed. Future research should focus on validating and updating existing models, and evaluating the effects of these models in clinical practice.
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO CRD42020200187 .
Topics: Bilirubin; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Prognosis; Sorafenib
PubMed: 35810271
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09841-5 -
Cancers Jun 2022Acute porphyrias are a group of metabolic disorders resulting in defective porphyrin synthesis and reduced heme production, which carries a risk of malignancy.... (Review)
Review
Acute porphyrias are a group of metabolic disorders resulting in defective porphyrin synthesis and reduced heme production, which carries a risk of malignancy. Porphyrias are inborn defects in the heme biosynthesis pathway resulting in neurovisceral manifestations and cutaneous photosensitivity attacks with multi-systemic involvement. Its estimated prevalence nears 5 per 100,000 patients worldwide. Subclinical liver disease is common, which can progress into transaminitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and malignancy. However, data on the incidence of primary liver cancer are lacking. We aim to determine the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with porphyria. A systematic review and pooled analysis were conducted through 2021 on studies assessing blood tests, imaging, cancer development, liver transplant, surgical resection, and outcomes in porphyria. In total, 19 studies, which included 7381 patients with porphyria (3476 females), were considered for the final review. In eight studies, alpha-fetoprotein levels were elevated between 200 and 1000 IU/mL. Of the total cohort of patients with porphyria, primary liver cancer was diagnosed in 351 patients (4.8%), of whom 243 (3.3% of the total) were found to have HCC. A subset of patients was found to have cholangiocarcinoma ( = 18; 0.3% of the total). Interestingly, advanced liver disease or cirrhosis was not a prerequisite for the formation of HCC in a small group of patients. Of the total cohort, 30 patients underwent liver resection, 48 patients underwent liver transplantation, and 327 patients died. Patients with porphyria are at risk of developing primary liver malignancy. Further studies should aim to develop diagnostic and prognostic models aimed at the early detection of HCC in porphyria.
PubMed: 35740611
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122947 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... May 2022Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Hepatocellular carcinoma occurs mostly in people with chronic liver disease and ranks sixth in terms of global incidence of cancer, and third in terms of cancer deaths. In clinical practice, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used as a second-line diagnostic imaging modality to confirm the presence of focal liver lesions suspected as hepatocellular carcinoma on prior diagnostic test such as abdominal ultrasound or alpha-fetoprotein, or both, either in surveillance programmes or in clinical settings. According to current guidelines, a single contrast-enhanced imaging study (computed tomography (CT) or MRI) showing typical hallmarks of hepatocellular carcinoma in people with cirrhosis is considered valid to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma. The detection of hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to surgical resection could improve the prognosis. However, a significant number of hepatocellular carcinomas do not show typical hallmarks on imaging modalities, and hepatocellular carcinoma may, therefore, be missed. There is no clear evidence of the benefit of surveillance programmes in terms of overall survival: the conflicting results can be a consequence of inaccurate detection, ineffective treatment, or both. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI may clarify whether the absence of benefit could be related to underdiagnosis. Furthermore, an assessment of the accuracy of MRI in people with chronic liver disease who are not included in surveillance programmes is needed for either ruling out or diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.
OBJECTIVES
Primary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and at any stage in adults with chronic liver disease. Secondary: to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of resectable hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, and to identify potential sources of heterogeneity in the results.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test of Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and three other databases to 9 November 2021. We manually searched articles retrieved, contacted experts, handsearched abstract books from meetings held during the last 10 years, and searched for literature in OpenGrey (9 November 2021). Further information was requested by e-mails, but no additional information was provided. No data was obtained through correspondence with investigators. We applied no language or document-type restrictions.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease, with cross-sectional designs, using one of the acceptable reference standards, such as pathology of the explanted liver and histology of resected or biopsied focal liver lesion with at least a six-month follow-up.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
At least two review authors independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns, using the QUADAS-2 checklist. We presented the results of sensitivity and specificity, using paired forest plots, and we tabulated the results. We used a hierarchical meta-analysis model where appropriate. We presented uncertainty of the accuracy estimates using 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We double-checked all data extractions and analyses.
MAIN RESULTS
We included 34 studies, with 4841 participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain because most studies used different reference standards, often inappropriate to exclude the presence of the target condition, and the time interval between the index test and the reference standard was rarely defined. Regarding applicability, we judged 15% (5/34) of studies to be at low concern and 85% (29/34) of studies to be at high concern mostly owing to characteristics of the participants, most of whom were on waiting lists for orthotopic liver transplantation, and due to pathology of the explanted liver being the only reference standard. MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage: sensitivity 84.4% (95% CI 80.1% to 87.9%) and specificity 93.8% (95% CI 90.1% to 96.1%) (34 studies, 4841 participants; low-certainty evidence). MRI for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: sensitivity 84.3% (95% CI 77.6% to 89.3%) and specificity 92.9% (95% CI 88.3% to 95.9%) (16 studies, 2150 participants; low-certainty evidence). The observed heterogeneity in the results remains mostly unexplained. The sensitivity analyses, which included only studies with clearly prespecified positivity criteria and only studies in which the reference standard results were interpreted without knowledge of the results of the index test, showed no variation in the results.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
We found that using MRI as a second-line imaging modality to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma of any size and stage, 16% of people with hepatocellular carcinoma would be missed, and 6% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would be unnecessarily treated. For resectable hepatocellular carcinoma, we found that 16% of people with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma would improperly not be resected, while 7% of people without hepatocellular carcinoma would undergo inappropriate surgery. The uncertainty resulting from the high risk of bias in the included studies and concerns regarding their applicability limit our ability to confidently draw conclusions based on our results.
Topics: Adult; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; Ultrasonography
PubMed: 35521901
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014798.pub2 -
Cancer Cell International Apr 2022Delayed cancer diagnosis and inefficient cancer prognosis determination are problems faced in cancer diagnosis and treatment. MicroRNAs (miRs), especially miR-212, have... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Delayed cancer diagnosis and inefficient cancer prognosis determination are problems faced in cancer diagnosis and treatment. MicroRNAs (miRs), especially miR-212, have shown a promise in cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Herein, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the prognostic and diagnostic value of miR-212 level in cancer and evaluated its association with patient characteristics.
METHODS
A fully electronic literature search using related keywords was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and ScienceDirect databases by June 6, 2021, with no time or language restriction. Meta-analysis was performed to pool survival prognosis data using hazard ratio (HR), association using odds ratio (OR), and diagnostic data using sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Sub-group analysis and meta-regression were performed as appropriate.
RESULTS
Results of 28 studies on 1880 patients showed a poor cancer prognosis with high levels of miR-212 in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, HR = 2.451 [1.447-4.149]), and a poor cancer prognosis with low levels of miR-212 in other cancers (HR = 2.514 [2.162-2.923]). Higher alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level and Edmondson-Steiner grade were factors associated with miR-212 low level incidence. Diagnostic odds ratio 10.688 (3.644-31.348) and SROC AUC of 0.84 confirmed high diagnostic performance of miR-212.
CONCLUSION
Our systematic review and meta-analysis results confirm miR-212 high value in cancer prognosis and diagnosis. High level of miR-212 showed poor prognosis in PDAC and low level of miR-212 showed poor prognosis in other cancers. in conclusion, miR-212 could be a novel potential biomarker in cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
PubMed: 35473623
DOI: 10.1186/s12935-022-02584-0