-
Medicine Jan 2017Although hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been widely used to treat malignant ascites or as a preventive strategy for microscopic carcinomatosis... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Although hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) has been widely used to treat malignant ascites or as a preventive strategy for microscopic carcinomatosis following surgical resection of abdominal tumors, application of hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy (HITHOC) in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion is limited. The objective of the current study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on the application of HITHOC in the palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusion.
METHODS
After thorough searching of online databases, total 27 articles were included into qualitative systematic review and 5 of them were used to conduct qualitative meta-analysis.
RESULTS
It was found that most of HITHOC was used in combination of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) including pleurectomy/decortication or after surgical resection of primary tumors, which mainly were lung cancer, thymoma or thymic carcinoma, breast cancer, and ovarian cancer. Patients who received HITHOC had significantly longer median survival length compared to the patients without HITHOC (Hedges g = 0.763, P < 0.001). In addition, HITHOC therapy was favored (Hedges g = 0.848, P < 0.001) in terms of median survival length, tumor-free survival rate, with tumor survival rate or Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scale.
CONCLUSION
HITHOC is a safe and effective therapy in controlling pleural effusion and increasing patient's survival rate.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Chemotherapy, Cancer, Regional Perfusion; Combined Modality Therapy; Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Neoplasm Staging; Palliative Care; Pleural Effusion, Malignant; Survival Analysis; Thoracic Cavity; Thoracic Surgical Procedures
PubMed: 28072694
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005532 -
Journal of Thoracic Oncology : Official... Jan 2016Complete resection is the standard of care for treatment of thymic malignancies. The use of minimally invasive surgery remains controversial. We searched online... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis Review
Complete resection is the standard of care for treatment of thymic malignancies. The use of minimally invasive surgery remains controversial. We searched online databases and identified studies from 1995 to 2014 that compared minimally invasive to open thymectomy for thymic malignancies. Study end points included operative blood loss, operative time, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, length of hospital stay, R0 resection, and recurrence. We summarized outcomes across studies using random-effects meta-analysis to account for study heterogeneity. We calculated ORs for binary outcomes and standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes. We calculated incidence rate ratios for the number of recurrences, accounting for total person-time observed in each study. Of 516 potential reference studies, 30 with a total of 2038 patients met the inclusion criteria. Patients with Masaoka stage I or II thymic malignancy constituted 94.89% of those in the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) group and 78.62% of those in open thymectomy (open) group. Mean tumor size was 4.09 cm (MIS) versus 4.80 (open). Of the 1355 MIS cases, 32 were converted to open cases. Patients in the MIS group had significantly less blood loss; however, no significant differences in operating time, respiratory complications, cardiac complications, or overall complications were identified. Length of stay was shorter for patients in the MIS group. When patients with Masaoka stage I and II thymic malignancy only were analyzed, there was no difference in rate of R0 resection or overall recurrence rate. One postoperative death occurred in the open group. The results of this unadjusted meta-analysis of published reports comparing minimally invasive with open thymectomy suggest that in selected patients with thymic malignancy, minimally invasive thymectomy is safe and can achieve oncologic outcomes similar to those of open thymectomy.
Topics: Humans; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Risk Assessment; Thymectomy; Thymoma; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 26762737
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.08.004 -
Medical Science Monitor : International... Aug 2015The association between PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and risk of myasthenia gravis (MG) remains controversial. Therefore, we did this meta-analysis to investigate this... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
The association between PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and risk of myasthenia gravis (MG) remains controversial. Therefore, we did this meta-analysis to investigate this association.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
We did a comprehensive search in PubMed, Medline, Embase, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and Wanfang electronic databases to retrieve relevant articles. The overall effect was measured by odds ratios (ORs) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Statistical analyses were conducted with STATA software.
RESULTS
Overall, a total of 7 case-control studies with 2802 cases and 3730 controls were finally included in this review. PTPN22 R620W polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of MG (OR=1.57; 95% CI, 1.34-1.82; I(2)=31%). In the subgroup analysis, thymoma patients were significantly associated with risk of MG (OR=1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.98; I(2)=0%). However, non-thymoma patients with this polymorphism did not have increased MG risk (OR=1.36; 95% CI, 0.86-2.15; I(2)=77%). In addition, PTPN22 R620W polymorphism showed increased early-onset myasthenia gravis (EOMG) risk (OR=2.38; 95% CI, 1.52-3.71; I(2)=0%).
CONCLUSIONS
This meta-analysis shows a significant association between PTPN22 R620W polymorphism and MG risk.
Topics: Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Myasthenia Gravis; Polymorphism, Genetic; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 22
PubMed: 26318187
DOI: 10.12659/MSM.894307 -
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical... Feb 2015Thymic malignancies, comprising thymoma and thymic carcinoma, are rare. Consequently, optimal chemotherapy for advanced thymic malignancies remains controversial.... (Review)
Review
PURPOSE
Thymic malignancies, comprising thymoma and thymic carcinoma, are rare. Consequently, optimal chemotherapy for advanced thymic malignancies remains controversial. Platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the consensus treatment based on the results of single-arm phase II trials and retrospective investigations. However, comparison of cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based chemotherapy has yet to be undertaken; the effectiveness of the addition of anthracycline also remains uncertain.
METHODS
In the present study, clinical trials and retrospective data regarding platinum-based chemotherapy were analyzed. The endpoint was the response rate to each chemotherapy. For advanced thymoma, we compared platinum with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and platinum with non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy. For advanced thymic carcinoma, anthracycline-based versus non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy and carboplatin-based versus cisplatin-based chemotherapy were compared. This analysis included a retrospective study of response of advanced thymic carcinoma to irinotecan and cisplatin in our institution.
RESULTS
The response rate for the 314 patients from 15 studies with advanced thymoma, including both prospective and retrospective data, was 69.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 63.1-75.0%] for platinum with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and 37.8% (95% CI 28.1-48.6%; p < 0.0001) for platinum with non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The response rates after anthracycline-based and non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma were similar (41.8 vs. 40.9%; p < 0.91), whereas the response rates after cisplatin-based and carboplatin-based chemotherapy for advanced thymic carcinoma differed significantly (53.6 vs. 32.8%; p = 0.0029) in 206 patients from 10 studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Platinum with anthracycline-based chemotherapy is an optimal combination for advanced thymoma. For advanced thymic carcinoma, cisplatin-based chemotherapy may be superior to carboplatin-based chemotherapy.
Topics: Anthracyclines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Carboplatin; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Humans; Prognosis; Thymus Neoplasms
PubMed: 25146529
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1800-6