-
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Apr 2023The traction table is generally used in femoral intramedullary nailing surgery. Recently, some published studies have shown that the same or better treatment effects can... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
The traction table is generally used in femoral intramedullary nailing surgery. Recently, some published studies have shown that the same or better treatment effects can be gotten without a traction table. It remains no consensus on this issue.
METHODS
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guideline was applied in this study. We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for eligible studies. The random-effect model was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratios with 95% CIs. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to verify the results.
RESULTS
The pooled estimates of seven studies, including 266 cases each in the manual traction group and traction table group, indicated that manual traction could shorten operative time [SMD, - 0.77; 95% CI (- 0.98, - 0.55); P < 0.00001] and preoperative set-up time [SMD, - 2.37; 95% CI (- 3.90, - 0.84); P = 0.002], but it would not reduce intraoperative blood loss volume and fluoroscopy time. No statistical difference was found in their fracture healing time, postoperative Harris scores, and malunion rate. The use of a Traction repositor could reduce the set-up time [SMD, - 2.48; 95% CI (- 4.91, - 0.05); P < 0.00001].
CONCLUSIONS
Compared with manual traction, the traction table in femoral intramedullary nailing surgery lengthened operative time and preoperative set-up time. At the same time, it did not show significant advantages in reducing blood loss volume and fluoroscopy time, or improving prognosis. In clinical practice, the optimal surgical plan must be made on a case-by-case basis to avoid unnecessary traction table use.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Traction; Femoral Fractures; Femur; Fracture Healing; Bone Nails; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37020232
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03659-y -
International Orthopaedics Dec 2023This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of open- versus closed-reduction and intramedullary nailing (IMN) of adult femur shaft fractures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
PURPOSE
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the outcomes of open- versus closed-reduction and intramedullary nailing (IMN) of adult femur shaft fractures.
METHODS
Four databases were searched from inception until July 2022 for original studies that compared the outcomes of IMN following open-reduction versus closed-reduction technique. The primary outcome was the union rate; the secondary outcomes were time to union, nonunion, malalignment, revision, and infection. This review was conducted in line with PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
A total of 12 studies with 1299 (1346 IMN cases) patients were included, with a mean age of 32.3 ± 3.25. The average follow-up was 2.3 ± 1.45 years. There was a statistically significant difference in union rate (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; p-value, 0.0352), nonunion (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.23-3.44; p-value, 0.0056), and infection rate (OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.16-3.25; p-value, 0.0114) between the open-reduction and closed-reduction groups in favour of the latter. However, malalignment was significantly higher in the closed-reduction group (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.16-0.64; p-value, 0.0012), whereas time to union and revision rates were similar (p = NS).
CONCLUSION
This study showed that closed-reduction and IMN had more favourable union rate, nonunion, and infection rates than the open-reduction group, yet malalignment was significantly less in the open-reduction group. Moreover, time to union and revision rates were comparable. However, these results must be interpreted in context due to confounding effects and the lack of high-quality studies.
Topics: Adult; Humans; Femoral Fractures; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Open Fracture Reduction; Reoperation; Bone Nails; Femur; Treatment Outcome; Retrospective Studies; Fracture Healing; Fractures, Open
PubMed: 36864184
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05740-x -
Strategies in Trauma and Limb... 2022In the past decade, internal limb lengthening nails have gained popularity. In this study, we aim to systematically review the literature on humerus limb lengthening... (Review)
Review
AIM
In the past decade, internal limb lengthening nails have gained popularity. In this study, we aim to systematically review the literature on humerus limb lengthening with a motorized intramedullary nail (MIN). We intend to assess the outcome and complications of this technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A systematic review was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the . The inclusion criteria included limb lengthening of the humerus using an intramedullary nail, clinical studies, all levels of evidence, and no restriction to the date of publication.
RESULTS
Our search yielded 239 journal articles. A total of nine articles remained relevant based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The total number of patients was 20, with 22 segments lengthened. The mean age of the patients was 20.8-year-old [standard deviation (SD), 12.0; range, 13-51]. The mean gained length was 5.7 cm (SD, 0.9; range, 5-7.5) with a mean distraction protocol of 0.82 mm/day (SD, 0.2; range, 0.6-1). The average duration of lengthening was 71.6 days (SD, 12.8; range, 50-93), and the mean duration of consolidation was 192.3 days (SD, 40.5; range, 120-228). Reported complications included a range of motion (ROM) limitation, hardware failure, and hypertrophic bone regeneration.
CONCLUSION
Humeral lengthening with an MIN provides favourable outcomes with low complication rates. Future high-level studies should focus on comparing long-term outcomes of humeral lengthening utilising internal and external fixation techniques.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE
Humeral lengthening using MIN can be used safely. Each surgical approach and type of nail have different risks and benefits. These should be carefully discussed when planning the surgery.
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Lorange JP, Alamiri N, Marwan Y, . Humerus Lengthening with a Motorized Intramedullary Nail: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(3):165-171.
PubMed: 36756294
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1568 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jan 2023Supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) are frequent in children, and closed reduction with percutaneous pin fixation remains the standard surgical treatment for... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Supracondylar humeral fractures (SCHFs) are frequent in children, and closed reduction with percutaneous pin fixation remains the standard surgical treatment for displaced SCHFs. Two pinning configurations, medial-lateral crossed entry pinning (MLP) and lateral-only entry pinning (LP), are widely used, but which one is superior to another one is still debatable. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both pinning fixation methods.
METHODS
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library and Google Scholar. Relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for radiographical outcomes, functional outcomes and complications.
RESULTS
A total of 19 RCTs comprising 1297 Gartland type II and type III fractures were included. MLP had a decreased risk of loss of reduction (RR = 0.70, 95%CI 0.52-0.94, P = 0.018) but a higher risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injury (RR = 2.21, 95%CI 1.11-4.41, P = 0.024) than LP. However, no significant difference was observed for incidence of ulnar nerve injury if applying a mini-open technique in MLP group (RR = 1.73, 0.47-6.31, P = 0.407). There were no differences between both groups in loss of carrying angle (MD = - 0.12, 95%CI - 0.39 to 0.16), loss of Baumann angle (MD = 0.08, 95%CI - 0.15 to 0.30), excellent grading of Flynn criteria (RR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.99-1.14, P = 0.102) and pin tract infection (RR = 0.92, 95%CI 0.50-1.70).
CONCLUSIONS
MLP is more effective in maintaining fixation, while LP is safer with respect to ulnar nerve injury. MLP with a mini-open technique reduces the risk of ulnar nerve lesion and is an effective and safe choice.
Topics: Child; Humans; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Humeral Fractures; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Ulnar Nerve
PubMed: 36647086
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03528-8 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Jan 2023External fixators (EFs) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are two effective methods for open tibial fractures. However, both methods have advantages and disadvantages,... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
External fixators (EFs) and intramedullary nailing (IMN) are two effective methods for open tibial fractures. However, both methods have advantages and disadvantages, and the optimal surgical approach remains controversial. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare EF with IMN to evaluate their efficacy and safety.
METHODS
A systematic study of the literature was conducted in relevant studies published in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, Wanfang and Weipu from database inception to April 2022. All eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality via the Cochrane's collaboration tool. The primary outcome measurements included postoperative superficial infection, postoperative deep infection, union time, delayed union, malunion, nonunion, and hardware failure.
RESULTS
Nine RCTs involving 733 cases were included in the current meta-analysis. The pooled results suggested that cases in the IMN group had a significantly lower postoperative superficial infection rate [risk ratio (RR) = 2.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.83 to 4.39; P < 0.00001)] and malunion rate (RR = 3.05; 95% CI = 2.06 to 4.52; P < 0.00001) versus EF, but IMN had a significantly higher hardware failure occurrence versus EF (RR = 0.38; 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.83; P = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the postoperative deep infection rate, union time, delayed union rate or nonunion rate between the two groups (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Compared to EF, IMN had a significantly lower risk of postoperative superficial infection and malunion in patients with open tibial fractures. Meanwhile, IMN did not prolong the union time and increased the risk of the deep infection rate, delayed union rate and nonunion rate but had a higher hardware failure rate. The reanalysis of union time showed that it was significantly shorter in the IMN group than in the EF group after excluding the study with significant heterogeneity during sensitivity analysis. Therefore, IMN is recommended as a preferred method of fracture fixation for patients with open tibial fractures, but more attention should be given to the problem of hardware failure.
Topics: Humans; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Tibia; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; External Fixators; Postoperative Complications; Tibial Fractures; Fractures, Open; Treatment Outcome; Bone Nails
PubMed: 36604668
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-03490-x -
Journal of Orthopaedics Feb 2023The surgical treatment for distal femur fractures has evolved over time, and it depends upon certain factors; open or closed fracture type, the pattern of fracture,... (Review)
Review
Comparison of outcomes of retrograde intramedullary nailing versus locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 936 patients in 16 studies.
BACKGROUND
The surgical treatment for distal femur fractures has evolved over time, and it depends upon certain factors; open or closed fracture type, the pattern of fracture, presence of metaphyseal comminution, intra-articular extension, and the bone quality are some of the crucial ones. Both retrograde intramedullary nails (RIMN) and locking plates (LP) can be used for the fixation of these fractures. However, the optimal method among the two devices is still a topic of debate, the superiority of one over the other being unclear. Hence, this systematic review and meta-analysis was conceptualized to compare the outcomes of RIMN with distal femur LP.
METHODS
The primary electronic search was conducted on Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane Library databases for the published literature from the inception to 25 February 2022. The studies compared outcomes of RIMN versus LP fixation of the acute supracondylar or distal femur fracture (AO/OTA type-33A, B, and C) and reported at least one primary (mean fracture union time, complications, implant-related complications, and re-operation rate) or secondary outcome (duration of surgery, intra-operative blood loss, and knee range of motion), were included.
RESULTS
Six randomized control trials, 2 prospective and 8 retrospective studies with 936 patients with 8 bilateral cases (467: RIMN; 477: LP) were included. Our analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in terms of mean fracture union time, overall complications, implant-related complications, re-operation rates, and duration of surgeries. Although a better knee range of motion was seen in the LP group, however, it also showed more nonunion and infection than the RIMN group.
CONCLUSION
The present review shows that there are significantly lesser nonunions and infections, in the RIMN group as compared to LP for distal femur fractures, although a better postoperative knee range of motion was seen in the latter. However, in terms of fracture union time, the overall rate of complications, re-operation rates, and duration of surgeries, there is no difference between the two surgical options.
PubMed: 36591439
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.12.007 -
International Journal of Environmental... Dec 2022Background: Despite known association of internet addiction with a reduced brain volume and abnormal connectivity, the impact of excessive smartphone use remains... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Background: Despite known association of internet addiction with a reduced brain volume and abnormal connectivity, the impact of excessive smartphone use remains unclear. Methods: PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov, and Web of Science databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2022 using appropriate keywords for observational studies comparing differences in brain volumes and activations between excessive smartphone users and individuals with regular use by magnetic resonance imaging. Results: Of the 11 eligible studies retrieved from 6993 articles initially screened, seven and six evaluated brain volumes and activations, respectively. The former enrolled 421 participants (165 excessive smartphone users vs. 256 controls), while the latter recruited 276 subjects with 139 excessive smartphone users. The results demonstrated a smaller brain volume in excessive smartphone users compared to the controls (g = −0.55, p < 0.001), especially in subcortical regions (p < 0.001). Besides, the impact was more pronounced in adolescents than in adults (p < 0.001). Regression analysis revealed a significant positive association between impulsivity and volume reduction. Regarding altered activations, the convergences of foci in the declive of the posterior lobe of cerebellum, the lingual gyrus, and the middle frontal gyrus were noted. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated a potential association of excessive smartphone use with a reduced brain volume and altered activations.
Topics: Adult; Adolescent; Humans; Smartphone; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Impulsive Behavior
PubMed: 36498362
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192316277 -
Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery &... Apr 2023Anterior femoral cortical impingement and perforation are known risks of cephalomedullary nailing. The incidence of and risk factors for these findings have not been...
BACKGROUND
Anterior femoral cortical impingement and perforation are known risks of cephalomedullary nailing. The incidence of and risk factors for these findings have not been fully established in the literature. The purpose of this review was to answer: (1) What is the incidence of anterior femoral cortical impingement and perforation associated with cephalomedullary nailing of proximal femur fractures? (2) How does incidence vary by nail radius of curvature (ROC)? (3) What populations are at increased risk of impingement and perforation? (4) What surgical techniques prevent their occurrence?
HYPOTHESIS
Our hypothesis was that impingement would be a relatively common finding following cephalomedullary nailing, and perforation would be much less frequent but still an appreciable risk. Secondarily, nails with a larger ROC would have a higher rate of impingement.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
In this systematic review, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles from 1990-2020 written in English using the terms "cephalomedullary nail" or "femoral nail" and "perforation" or "impingement", and similar words. Inclusion criteria were studies discussing the complication of anterior femoral cortical impingement or perforation associated with the use of a cephalomedullary nail. Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria. Rates of anterior femoral cortical impingement or perforation, patient demographics, nail type, and ROC were extracted. Surgical techniques to prevent perforation were qualitatively reviewed.
RESULTS
The rate of anterior cortical impingement with long cephalomedullary nails was 17.2% (192/1117 patients) and with short nails was 29.2% (176/602). The rate of anterior cortical perforation with long nails was 1.0% (11/1116) and with short nails was 0% (0/234). Long nails with ROC>150cm showed an impingement rate of 10.9% (62/567) and perforation rate of 1.1% (7/617 patients). Nails with ROC 150cm or 100cm had an impingement rate of 1.1% (1/93) and perforation rate of 0% (0/93).
DISCUSSION
Impingement and perforation of the anterior femoral cortex during cephalomedullary nailing are appreciable risks that surgeons should anticipate and avoid, especially in certain populations and with nails with larger ROC. Surgeons may consider use of long nails with ROC 150cm and below, given a nearly 10-fold lower incidence of impingement and no reported perforations.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Therapeutic, level IV.
Topics: Humans; Bone Nails; Femoral Fractures; Femur; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Hip Fractures; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36496157
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103505 -
Orthopaedic Surgery Jan 2023Several modifications of the induced membrane technique (IMT) have been reported, but there is no consensus regarding their results and prognosis. Moreover, most studies... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Several modifications of the induced membrane technique (IMT) have been reported, but there is no consensus regarding their results and prognosis. Moreover, most studies have focused on tibial defects; no meta-analysis of the treatment of femoral defects using the IMT has been reported. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify the potential risk factors of post-procedural complications following the treatment of segmental femoral defects using the IMT. A comprehensive search was performed on the Cochrane Library, EBSCO, EMBASE, Ovid, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using the keywords "femur," "Masquelet technique," and "induced membrane technique." Original articles composed in English, having accessible individual patient data, and reporting more than two cases of bony defect or nonunion of femur or more than five cases of any body part were included. Post-procedural bone graft infections, final union status, and union time after second-stage operation were analyzed. Fourteen reports, including 90 patients, were used in this study. External fixation in second-stage surgery had an odds ratio of 9.267 for post-procedural bone graft infection (p = 0.047). The odds ratio of post-procedural bone graft infection and age >65 years for final non-union status was 51.05 (p = 0.003) and 9.18 (p = 0.042). Shorter union time was related to impregnated antibiotics in the spacer (p = 0.005), transplanting all-autologous grafts (p = 0.042), and the application of intramedullary nails as the second-stage fixation method (p = 0.050). The IMT appears to be reasonable and reproducible for femoral segmental bone defects. Several preoperative and surgical factors may affect post-procedural complications and union time.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Femur; Tibia; Prognosis; Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bone Transplantation; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 36444955
DOI: 10.1111/os.13604 -
Strategies in Trauma and Limb... 2022Circular frame fixation remains a key tool in the armamentarium of the limb reconstruction surgeon. One of the key drawbacks is the onset of pin-site infection (PSI). As... (Review)
Review
INTRODUCTION
Circular frame fixation remains a key tool in the armamentarium of the limb reconstruction surgeon. One of the key drawbacks is the onset of pin-site infection (PSI). As a result of limited evidence and consensus of PSI prevention, a wide variation in practice remains.
AIM
The principal aim of this review is to synthesise primary research concerning all aspects of treatment regarded as relevant to PSI in frame constructs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Comparative studies until week 26, 2021, were included in the trial. Studies were included that concerned patients undergoing management of a musculoskeletal condition in which pin-site care is necessary for over 4 weeks.
RESULTS
Eighteen studies over a 13-year period were captured using the search strategy. Sulphadiazine and hydrogen peroxide cleansing was found to reduce PSI, with the use of low-energy fine wires and hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated pins also associated with lower infection rate. The remainder of studies found no significant improvement across interventions.
CONCLUSION
There is no superiority between weekly and daily care. Low-energy pin-insertion technique had lower rates of infection. Sulphadiazine has positive results as a pin-care solution, but more research is necessary to determine the most effective care regime. Current literature is limited by absence of established definitions and by a lack of studies addressing all aspects of care relevant to PSI.
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Shields DW, Iliadis AD, Kelly E, . Pin-site Infection: A Systematic Review of Prevention Strategies. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2022;17(2):93-104.
PubMed: 35990183
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1562