-
Systematic Reviews Nov 2020Acute bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has been associated with greater risk of recurrent wheezing and asthma. However, it is unclear whether... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Acute bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has been associated with greater risk of recurrent wheezing and asthma. However, it is unclear whether this association is causal. RSV-specific monoclonal antibodies have been shown to reduce RSV-related hospitalisations in high-risk infants, but the longer-term follow-up has given conflicting evidence for prevention of recurrent wheeze or asthma.
OBJECTIVE
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether monoclonal antibody prophylaxis against RSV bronchiolitis reduces the risk of subsequent recurrent wheeze or asthma. If so, this may support the hypothesis of causality.
METHODS
Studies were identified via an online database search using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. Manufacturers of monoclonal antibodies were contacted directly for unpublished data. The intervention of interest was RSV monoclonal antibody prophylaxis, and the primary outcome measure was recurrent wheeze and/or asthma. Studies were screened according to inclusion/exclusion criteria. Included studies were evaluated for quality and assessed for bias independently by 3 reviewers using the 'Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation' (GRADE) approach. Results were extracted into 2 × 2 outcome tables and a meta-analysis carried out producing forest plots based on relative risk. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic.
RESULTS
The search identified 141 articles, which, after screening, resulted in eight studies (2 randomised controlled trials), thus including 11,195 infants in the meta-analysis. The overall result demonstrated a non-statistically significant reduction in relative risk of developing recurrent wheeze or asthma (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.31 to 1.16). Study quality was generally low with evidence of publication bias and statistical heterogeneity. However, sub-group analysis excluding studies deemed to be 'very low' quality showed a relative risk of 0.42 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.80, p = 0.008). A further sub-group analysis for infants aged 32 to < 36 weeks showed a statistically significant relative risk of 0.35 (95% CI 0.14 to 0.86, p = 0.02).
DISCUSSION
We did not identify an overall statistically significant benefit. However, our two sub-group analyses did find statistically significant benefits of monoclonal antibody therapy on the risk of recurrent wheeze and asthma. The main limitation of this study is the lack of high-quality randomised controlled trials, highlighting the need for more research in this field.
Topics: Asthma; Child; Humans; Infant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Respiratory Sounds; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Viruses
PubMed: 33239107
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01527-y -
PloS One 2020The advent of genome amplification assays has allowed description of new respiratory viruses and to reconsider the role played by certain respiratory viruses in... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
The advent of genome amplification assays has allowed description of new respiratory viruses and to reconsider the role played by certain respiratory viruses in bronchiolitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis was initiated to clarify the prevalence of respiratory viruses in children with bronchiolitis in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic era.
METHODS
We performed an electronic search through Pubmed and Global Index Medicus databases. We included observational studies reporting the detection rate of common respiratory viruses in children with bronchiolitis using molecular assays. Data was extracted and the quality of the included articles was assessed. We conducted sensitivity, subgroups, publication bias, and heterogeneity analyses using a random effect model.
RESULTS
The final meta-analysis included 51 studies. Human respiratory syncytial virus (HRSV) was largely the most commonly detected virus 59.2%; 95% CI [54.7; 63.6]). The second predominant virus was Rhinovirus (RV) 19.3%; 95% CI [16.7; 22.0]) followed by Human bocavirus (HBoV) 8.2%; 95% CI [5.7; 11.2]). Other reported viruses included Human Adenovirus (HAdV) 6.1%; 95% CI [4.4; 8.0]), Human Metapneumovirus (HMPV) 5.4%; 95% CI [4.4; 6.4]), Human Parainfluenzavirus (HPIV) 5.4%; 95% CI [3.8; 7.3]), Influenza 3.2%; 95% CI [2.2; 4.3], Human Coronavirus (HCoV) 2.9%; 95% CI [2.0; 4.0]), and Enterovirus (EV) 2.9%; 95% CI [1.6; 4.5]). HRSV was the predominant virus involved in multiple detection and most codetections were HRSV + RV 7.1%, 95% CI [4.6; 9.9]) and HRSV + HBoV 4.5%, 95% CI [2.4; 7.3]).
CONCLUSIONS
The present study has shown that HRSV is the main cause of bronchiolitis in children, we also have Rhinovirus, and Bocavirus which also play a significant role. Data on the role played by SARS-CoV-2 in children with acute bronchiolitis is needed.
REVIEW REGISTRATION
PROSPERO, CRD42018116067.
Topics: Bronchiolitis, Viral; Female; Human bocavirus; Humans; Infant; Male; Prevalence; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Respiratory Tract Infections; Rhinovirus
PubMed: 33180855
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242302 -
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases Oct 2020One of the leading challenges in the 2013-2016 West African Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak was how best to quickly identify patients with EVD, separating them from... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
INTRODUCTION
One of the leading challenges in the 2013-2016 West African Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak was how best to quickly identify patients with EVD, separating them from those without the disease, in order to maximise limited isolation bed capacity and keep health systems functioning.
METHODOLOGY
We performed a systematic literature review to identify all published data on EVD clinical symptoms in adult patients. Data was dual extracted, and random effects meta-analysis performed for each symptom to identify symptoms with the greatest risk for EVD infection.
RESULTS
Symptoms usually presenting late in illness that were more than twice as likely to predict a diagnosis of Ebola, were confusion (pOR 3.04, 95% CI 2.18-4.23), conjunctivitis (2.90, 1.92-4.38), dysphagia (1.95, 1.13-3.35) and jaundice (1.86, 1.20-2.88). Early non-specific symptoms of diarrhoea (2.99, 2.00-4.48), fatigue (2.77, 1.59-4.81), vomiting (2.69, 1.76-4.10), fever (1.97, 1.10-4.52), muscle pain (1.65, 1.04-2.61), and cough (1.63, 1.24-2.14), were also strongly associated with EVD diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS
The existing literature fails to provide a unified position on the symptoms most predictive of EVD, but highlights some early and late stage symptoms that in combination will be useful for future risk stratification. Confirmation of these findings across datasets (or ideally an aggregation of all individual patient data) will aid effective future clinical assessment, risk stratification tools and emergency epidemic response planning.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Diarrhea; Ebolavirus; Fatigue; Female; Fever; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Vomiting; Young Adult
PubMed: 33095771
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008799 -
Epidemiology and Infection Aug 2020To provide comprehensive information on the epidemiology and burden of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation (RSVH) in preterm infants, a pooled analysis was... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
To provide comprehensive information on the epidemiology and burden of respiratory syncytial virus hospitalisation (RSVH) in preterm infants, a pooled analysis was undertaken of seven multicentre, prospective, observational studies from across the Northern Hemisphere (2000-2014). Data from all 320-356 weeks' gestational age (wGA) infants without comorbidity were analysed. RSVH occurred in 534/14 504 (3.7%) infants; equating to a rate of 5.65 per 100 patient-seasons, with the rate in individual wGA groups dependent upon exposure time (P = 0.032). Most RSVHs (60.1%) occurred in December-January. Median age at RSVH was 88 days (interquartile range (IQR): 54-159). Respiratory support was required by 82.0% of infants: oxygen in 70.4% (median 4 (IQR: 2-6) days); non-invasive ventilation in 19.3% (median 3 (IQR: 2-5) days); and mechanical ventilation in 10.2% (median 5 (IQR: 3-7) days). Intensive care unit admission was required by 17.9% of infants (median 6 days (IQR: 2-8) days). Median overall hospital length of stay (LOS) was 5 (IQR: 3-8) days. Hospital resource use was similar across wGA groups except for overall LOS, which was shortest in those born 35 wGA (median 3 vs. 4-6 days for 32-34 wGA; P < 0.001). Strategies to reduce the burden of RSVH in otherwise healthy 32-35 wGA infants are indicated.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cohort Studies; Gestational Age; Hospitalization; Humans; Infant; Length of Stay; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
PubMed: 32799945
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268820001661 -
The Lancet. Respiratory Medicine Aug 2020Although a positive association has been established, it is unclear whether lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Assessing the strength of evidence for a causal effect of respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infections on subsequent wheezing illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Although a positive association has been established, it is unclear whether lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) cause chronic wheezing illnesses. If RSV-LRTI were causal, we would expect RSV-LRTI prevention to reduce the incidence of chronic wheezing illnesses in addition to reducing acute disease. We aimed to evaluate the strength of evidence for a causal effect of RSV-LRTI on subsequent chronic wheezing illness to inform public health expectations for RSV vaccines.
METHODS
We did a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies evaluating the association between RSV-LRTI and subsequent wheezing illness (exposure studies) and studies evaluating the association between RSV immunoprophylaxis and subsequent wheezing illness (immunoprophylaxis studies). Exposure studies were included if the exposure group members had an LRTI with laboratory-confirmed RSV and if the exposure ascertainment period began before 2 years of age and ended before 5 years of age. We required a wash-out period of more than 30 days between the index RSV-LRTI and the outcome measurement to allow for resolution of the acute illness. Comparisons between RSV-LRTI and non-RSV-LRTI were not included. Immunoprophylaxis studies were included if they measured the association with subsequent wheezing illness relative to a control group, either in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) or an observational design. For the immunoprophylaxis drugs in question, we required evidence of efficacy in targeting RSV-LRTI from at least one RCT to ensure biological plausibility. All variations of wheezing illness were combined into a single outcome that refers broadly to asthma or any other respiratory illness with wheezing symptoms. Ovid MEDLINE and Embase databases were searched from inception up to Aug 28, 2018. We evaluated whether data from exposure studies could provide evidence against the most viable non-causal theory that RSV-LRTI is a marker of respiratory illness susceptibility rather than a causal factor. Additionally, we tested whether RSV immunoprophylaxis reduces the odds of subsequent wheezing illnesses. We used a random-effects modelling framework and, to accommodate studies providing multiple correlated estimates, robust variance estimation meta-regressions. Meta-regression coefficients (b) quantify differences between exposure and comparator groups on the log odds ratio (log OR) scale.
FINDINGS
From 14 235 records we identified 57 eligible articles that described 42 studies and provided 153 effect estimates. 35 studies estimated the direct effect of RSV-LRTI on wheezing illnesses (exposure studies) and eight evaluated the effect of RSV immunoprophylaxis (immunoprophylaxis studies). Exposure studies that adjusted for genetic influences yielded a smaller mean adjusted OR estimate (aOR 2·45, 95% CI 1·23-4·88) compared with those that did not (4·17, 2·36-7·37), a significant difference (b 0·53, 95% CI 0·04-1·02). Infants who were not protected with RSV immunoprophylaxis tended to have higher odds of subsequent wheezing illness, as we would expect if RSV-LRTI were causal, but the effect was not significant (OR 1·21, 95% CI 0·73-1·99). There was generally a high threat of confounding bias in the observational studies. Additionally, in both the observational studies and immunoprophylaxis RCTs, there was high risk of bias due to missing outcome data.
INTERPRETATION
Our findings, limited to exposure and immunoprophylaxis studies, do not support basing policy decisions on an assumption that prevention of RSV-LRTI will reduce recurrent chronic wheezing illnesses.
FUNDING
Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
Topics: Antiviral Agents; Humans; Respiratory Sounds; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Respiratory Tract Infections
PubMed: 32763206
DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30109-0 -
The Lancet. Infectious Diseases Nov 2020Ebola virus disease case definition is a crucial surveillance tool to detect suspected cases for referral and as a screening tool for clinicians to support admission and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Ebola virus disease case definition is a crucial surveillance tool to detect suspected cases for referral and as a screening tool for clinicians to support admission and laboratory testing decisions at Ebola health facilities. We aimed to assess the performance of the WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions and other screening scores.
METHODS
In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published in English between June 13, 1978, and Jan 14, 2020. We included studies that estimated the sensitivity and specificity of WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions, clinical and epidemiological characteristics (symptoms at admission and contact history), and predictive risk scores against the reference standard (laboratory-confirmed Ebola virus disease). Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were calculated using bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (when four or more studies provided data) or random-effects meta-analysis (fewer than four studies provided data).
FINDINGS
We identified 2493 publications, of which 14 studies from four countries (Sierra Leone, Guinea, Liberia, and Angola) were included in the analysis. 12 021 people with suspected disease were included, of whom 4874 were confirmed as positive for Ebola virus infection. Six studies explored the performance of WHO case definitions in non-paediatric populations, and in all of these studies, suspected and probable cases were combined and could not be disaggregated for analysis. The pooled sensitivity of the WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions from these studies was 81·5% (95% CI 74·1-87·2) and pooled specificity was 35·7% (28·5-43·6). History of contact or epidemiological link was a key predictor for the WHO case definitions (seven studies) and for risk scores (six studies). The most sensitive symptom was intense fatigue (79·0% [95% CI 74·4-83·0]), assessed in seven studies, and the least sensitive symptom was pain behind the eyes (1·0% [0·0-7·0]), assessed in three studies. The performance of fever as a symptom varied depending on the cutoff used to define fever.
INTERPRETATION
WHO Ebola virus disease case definitions perform suboptimally to identify cases at both community level and during triage at Ebola health facilities. Inclusion of intense fatigue as a key symptom and contact history could improve the performance of case definitions, but implementation of these changes will require effective collaboration with, and trust of, affected communities.
FUNDING
Médecins sans Frontières.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angola; Child; Child, Preschool; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diarrhea; Disease Outbreaks; Ebolavirus; Epidemiological Monitoring; Fatigue; Female; Fever; Guinea; Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Liberia; Male; Middle Aged; ROC Curve; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sierra Leone; Young Adult
PubMed: 32593318
DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30193-6 -
BMC Medicine Jun 2020Major infectious disease outbreaks are a constant threat to human health. Clinical research responses to outbreaks generate evidence to improve outcomes and outbreak...
BACKGROUND
Major infectious disease outbreaks are a constant threat to human health. Clinical research responses to outbreaks generate evidence to improve outcomes and outbreak control. Experiences from previous epidemics have identified multiple challenges to undertaking timely clinical research responses. This scoping review is a systematic appraisal of political, economic, administrative, regulatory, logistical, ethical and social (PEARLES) challenges to clinical research responses to emergency epidemics and solutions identified to address these.
METHODS
A scoping review. We searched six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Scopus and Epistemonikos) for articles published from 2008 to July 2018. We included publications reporting PEARLES challenges to clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics and solutions identified to address these. Two reviewers screened articles for inclusion, extracted and analysed the data.
RESULTS
Of 2678 articles screened, 76 were included. Most presented data relating to the 2014-2016 Ebola virus outbreak or the H1N1 outbreak in 2009. The articles related to clinical research responses in Africa (n = 37), Europe (n = 8), North America (n = 5), Latin America and the Caribbean (n = 3) and Asia (n = 1) and/or globally (n = 22). A wide range of solutions to PEARLES challenges was presented, including a need to strengthen global collaborations and coordination at all levels and develop pre-approved protocols and equitable frameworks, protocols and standards for emergencies. Clinical trial networks and expedited funding and approvals were some solutions implemented. National ownership and community engagement from the outset were a key enabler for delivery. Despite the wide range of recommended solutions, none had been formally evaluated.
CONCLUSIONS
To strengthen global preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic and future epidemics, identified solutions for rapid clinical research deployment, delivery, and dissemination must be implemented. Improvements are urgently needed to strengthen collaborations, funding mechanisms, global and national research capacity and capability, targeting regions vulnerable to epidemics and pandemics. Solutions need to be flexible to allow timely adaptations to context, and research led by governments of affected regions. Research communities globally need to evaluate their activities and incorporate lessons learnt to refine and rehearse collaborative outbreak response plans in between epidemics.
Topics: Betacoronavirus; Biomedical Research; COVID-19; Coronavirus Infections; Delivery of Health Care; Disease Outbreaks; Ebolavirus; Epidemics; Global Health; Health Services Needs and Demand; Humans; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; Pandemics; Pneumonia, Viral; SARS-CoV-2
PubMed: 32586391
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01624-8 -
Journal of Clinical Virology : the... Aug 2020Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis (IP) has been shown to reduce RSV hospitalization rates in high-risk infants; however, it is unclear whether RSV IP...
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis (IP) has been shown to reduce RSV hospitalization rates in high-risk infants; however, it is unclear whether RSV IP is associated with increased risk of non-RSV disease, particularly non-RSV hospitalizations. We conducted a systematic literature review to understand the occurrences of non-RSV disease and/or non-RSV hospitalizations in published studies of RSV IP. Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed databases were searched and reviewed to summarize data regarding the incidence of RSV and non-RSV respiratory disease among RSV IP recipients and controls in randomized and non-randomized studies. Independent investigators screened and selected studies for inclusion. Risk-of-bias assessment was conducted to assess strength/validity of the data using the Jadad scoring system and Downs and Black quality assessment tool, where appropriate. Twenty studies were included for review (5 randomized controlled trials [RCTs]; 15 non-randomized studies). RCTs of RSV IP demonstrated reductions in RSV hospitalizations and all-cause hospitalizations, with no increase in hospitalizations for non-RSV disease. Non-randomized studies also demonstrated reduced RSV hospitalizations in RSV IP recipients but had mixed results in assessments of hospitalizations for non-RSV disease. When RSV IP recipients and controls were more similar in disease severity risk, results of non-randomized studies aligned more closely with RCTs. Observations of increased non-RSV hospitalization rates among RSV IP recipients in some non-randomized studies could be primarily explained by differences in the clinical characteristics between RSV IP recipients and controls.
Topics: Databases, Factual; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Infant; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human
PubMed: 32512375
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104339 -
The Journal of Infectious Diseases Oct 2020Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) in young children aged <5 years. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Cost of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Acute Lower Respiratory Infection Management in Young Children at the Regional and Global Level: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
BACKGROUND
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of acute lower respiratory infection (ALRI) in young children aged <5 years.
METHODS
We aimed to identify the global inpatient and outpatient cost of management of RSV-ALRI in young children to assist health policy makers in making decisions related to resource allocation for interventions to reduce severe morbidity and mortality from RSV in this age group. We searched 3 electronic databases including Global Health, Medline, and EMBASE for studies reporting cost data on RSV management in children under 60 months from 2000 to 2017. Unpublished data on the management cost of RSV episodes were collected through collaboration with an international working group (RSV GEN) and claim databases.
RESULTS
We identified 41 studies reporting data from year 1987 to 2017, mainly from Europe, North America, and Australia, covering the management of a total of 365 828 RSV disease episodes. The average cost per episode was €3452 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3265-3639) and €299 (95% CI, 295-303) for inpatient and outpatient management without follow-up, and it increased to €8591(95% CI, 8489-8692) and €2191 (95% CI, 2190-2192), respectively, with follow-up to 2 years after the initial event.
CONCLUSIONS
Known risk factors (early and late preterm birth, congenital heart disease, chronic lung disease, intensive care unit admission, and ventilator use) were associated with €4160 (95% CI, 3237-5082) increased cost of hospitalization. The global cost of inpatient and outpatient RSV ALRI management in young children in 2017 was estimated to be approximately €4.82 billion (95% CI, 3.47-7.93), 65% of these in developing countries and 55% of global costs accounted for by hospitalization. We have demonstrated that RSV imposed a substantial economic burden on health systems, governments, and the society.
Topics: Child; Cost of Illness; Databases, Factual; Global Health; Health Policy; Heart Diseases; Hospitalization; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Lung Diseases; Morbidity; Premature Birth; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Respiratory Tract Infections; Risk Factors
PubMed: 32227101
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz683 -
PloS One 2020Data on the variation in the medical resource utilization rate of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (HRSV) infected children by gestational age have recently been made... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Meta-Analysis
Comparison of health care resource utilization among preterm and term infants hospitalized with Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis of retrospective cohort studies.
INTRODUCTION
Data on the variation in the medical resource utilization rate of Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus (HRSV) infected children by gestational age have recently been made available. This review aimed to determine whether prematurity is independently associated with the use of medical resources in hospitalized children for HRSV infections.
METHODS
We conducted this systematic review on cohort studies published on the medical resources use in preterm and full-term patients hospitalized for confirmed HRSV infections. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Global Index medicus for eligible studies. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and Risk Ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated as summary statistics with random effects meta-analysis. The overall results were adjusted to the common confounders by stratified analyses.
RESULTS
A total of 14 articles (20 studies) were included. Compared to full-term, preterm hospitalized with HRSV infections had more frequent intensive care unit admission (RR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.9-3.5), increased length of stay in hospital (SMD = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.5-0.8) and intensive care unit (SMD = 0.6, 95% CI = 0.4-0.8) and increased case fatality rate (RR = 6.9, 95% CI = 2.0-23.8). Mechanical ventilation utilization was more frequent in preterm children ≤ 2 years (RR = 15.5, 95% CI = 8.9-26.4) and those who did not receive prophylaxis against HRSV (RR = 15.9, 95% CI = 9.1-27.9)] than in full-term children. No differences were identified in the frequency of emergency department visits, oxygen utilization, and the age at the first HRSV episode between preterm and full-term infants.
CONCLUSIONS
Regardless of gestational age, preterm infants hospitalized for HRSV infections, especially those ≤ 2 years, have an increased frequency of use of health resources and poor outcomes compared to full-term infants. HRSV vaccine development programs for pregnant women should be accelerated.
CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION
Review registration PROSPERO, CRD42019124375.
Topics: Child Health Services; Delivery of Health Care; Gestational Age; Hospitalization; Humans; Infant; Infant, Premature; Infant, Premature, Diseases; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections; Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human; Retrospective Studies
PubMed: 32084214
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229357