-
Osteoporosis guidelines on TCM drug therapies: a systematic quality evaluation and content analysis.Frontiers in Endocrinology 2023The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of osteoporosis guidelines on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) drug therapies and to analyze the specific...
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of osteoporosis guidelines on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) drug therapies and to analyze the specific recommendations of these guidelines.
METHODS
We systematically collected guidelines, evaluated the quality of the guidelines using the (AGREE) II tool, and summarized the recommendations of TCM drug therapies using the Patient-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome (PICO) model as the analysis framework.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
A total of 20 guidelines were included. Overall quality evaluation results revealed that four guidelines were at level A, four at level B, and 12 at level C, whose quality needed to be improved in the domains of "stakeholder involvement", "rigor of development", "applicability" and "editorial independence". Stratified analysis suggested that the post-2020 guidelines were significantly better than those published before 2020 in the domains of "scope and purpose", "stakeholder involvement" and "editorial independence". Guidelines with evidence systems were significantly better than those without evidence systems in terms of "stakeholder involvement", "rigor of development", "clarity of presentation" and "applicability". The guidelines recommended TCM drug therapies for patients with osteopenia, osteoporosis and osteoporotic fracture. Recommended TCM drugs were mainly Chinese patent medicine alone or combined with Western medicine, with the outcome mainly focused on improving bone mineral density (BMD).
Topics: Humans; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Research Design
PubMed: 38317713
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1276631 -
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and... Apr 2024Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to... (Review)
Review
Half of osteoporotic fractures occur in patients with normal/osteopenic bone density or at intermediate or low estimated risk. Muscle measures have been shown to contribute to fracture risk independently of bone mineral density. The objectives were to review the measurements of muscle health (muscle mass/quantity/quality, strength and function) and their association with incident fragility fractures and to summarize their use in clinical practice. This scoping review follows the PRISMA-ScR guidelines for reporting. Our search strategy covered the three overreaching concepts of 'fragility fractures', 'muscle health assessment' and 'risk'. We retrieved 14 745 references from Medline Ovid SP, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Google Scholar. We included original and prospective studies on community-dwelling adults aged over 50 years that analysed an association between at least one muscle parameter and incident fragility fractures. We systematically extracted 17 items from each study, including methodology, general characteristics and results. Data were summarized in tables and graphically presented in adjusted forest plots. Sixty-seven articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In total, we studied 60 muscle parameters or indexes and 322 fracture risk ratios over 2.8 million person-years (MPY). The median (interquartile range) sample size was 1642 (921-5756), age 69.2 (63.5-73.6) years, follow-up 10.0 (4.4-12.0) years and number of incident fragility fractures 166 (88-277). A lower muscle mass was positively/not/negatively associated with incident fragility fracture in 28 (2.0), 64 (2.5) and 10 (0.2 MPY) analyses. A lower muscle strength was positively/not/negatively associated with fractures in 53 (1.3), 57 (1.7 MPY) and 0 analyses. A lower muscle function was positively/not/negatively associated in 63 (1.9), 45 (1.0 MPY) and 0 analyses. An in-depth analysis shows how each single muscle parameter was associated with each fragility fractures subtype. This review summarizes markers of muscle health and their association with fragility fractures. Measures of muscle strength and function appeared to perform better for fracture risk prediction. Of these, hand grip strength and gait speed are likely to be the most practical measures for inclusion in clinical practice, as in the evaluation of sarcopenia or in further fracture risk assessment scores. Measures of muscle mass did not appear to predict fragility fractures and might benefit from further research, on D3-creatine dilution test, lean mass indexes and artificial intelligence methods.
Topics: Humans; Aged; Middle Aged; Hand Strength; Prospective Studies; Artificial Intelligence; Risk Factors; Osteoporotic Fractures; Muscle, Skeletal
PubMed: 38284511
DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13418 -
Neurospine Dec 2023We aimed to comprehensively compare surgical methods for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) using systematic review and network meta-analysis to...
OBJECTIVE
We aimed to comprehensively compare surgical methods for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) using systematic review and network meta-analysis to understand their effectiveness and outcomes, as current research provides limited overviews.
METHODS
We followed PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines, preregistering our protocol with PROSPERO. We analyzed Englishpublished randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on adults with OVCFs that evaluated pain intensity or functionality using tools like visual analogue scale (VAS) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Exclusions included non-RCTs, malignancy-related fractures, and certain interventions. Using the RoB 2 tool, we assessed bias and visualized results with Robvis. Our primary outcome was pain intensity, with secondary outcomes including disability, new fractures, and cement leakage. Results were synthesized using Stata/MP.
RESULTS
Thirty-four RCTs from 10 countries, totaling 4,384 patients, were analyzed. Shortterm VAS indicated kyphoplasty with facet joint injection (KIJ) as the top treatment at 87.7%, while unipedicular kyphoplasty (UKP) led to long-term at 74.9%. Short-term ODI favored vertebroplasty with facet joint injection (VIJ) at 98.4%, with kyphoplasty (KP) leading longterm at 66.0%. All surgical techniques were superior to conservative treatment. Vertebral augmentation devices reported the fewest new fractures and curved vertebroplasty had the least cement leakage. SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking) analyses suggested UKP and VIJ as top choices for postoperative pain relief, with VIJ excelling in postoperative disability improvement.
CONCLUSION
Our analysis evaluates 12 OVCF interventions, underscoring KIJ for short-term pain relief and VIJ and UKP for long-term efficacy. Notably, VIJ stands out in disability outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive OVCF management.
PubMed: 38171285
DOI: 10.14245/ns.2346996.498 -
Neurospine Dec 2023Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are a significant health concern linked to increased morbidity, mortality, and diminished quality of life. Traditional OVF risk...
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are a significant health concern linked to increased morbidity, mortality, and diminished quality of life. Traditional OVF risk assessment tools like bone mineral density (BMD) only capture a fraction of the risk profile. Artificial intelligence, specifically computer vision, has revolutionized other fields of medicine through analysis of videos, histopathology slides and radiological scans. In this review, we provide an overview of computer vision algorithms and current computer vision models used in predicting OVF risk. We highlight the clinical applications, future directions and limitations of computer vision in OVF risk prediction.
PubMed: 38171281
DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347022.511 -
Frontiers in Medicine 2023In traditional Chinese medicine, Jintiange capsules are frequently used to treat metabolic bone diseases and strengthen bones and tendons. The main component of...
Efficacy of the Chinese herbal medicine Jintiange capsules in the postoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
In traditional Chinese medicine, Jintiange capsules are frequently used to treat metabolic bone diseases and strengthen bones and tendons. The main component of Jintiange capsules is bionic tiger bone powder. However, the active ingredients and proteins are derived from other animal bones, with chemical profiles similar to that of natural tiger bone. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of Jintiange capsules, a Chinese herbal medicine, in the postoperative treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).
METHODS
In this systematic review, literature was retrieved using PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Web of Science, the Wanfang Database, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and the Chinese VIP Database from inception to July 2023. The primary outcome measures were the bone mineral density (BMD) and effective rate. The secondary outcome measures were the visual analog pain score (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), Cobb's angle, serum osteocalcin, serum alkaline phosphatase, and adverse events. RevMan 5.4 and STATA 17.0 software were used for data analysis.
RESULTS
We enrolled randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on 1,642 patients in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis illustrated that Jintiange capsules significantly increased the BMD of the lumbar spine ( < 0.00001), femoral neck ( = 0.0005), and whole body ( = 0.01). The subgroup analysis of Jintiange capsules combination therapy showed that the BMD of the lumbar spine and whole body was significantly improved with Jintiange capsules ( < 0.00001). The test for the overall effect showed that Jintiange capsules had a significantly higher effective rate than the control groups ( = 0.003). Additionally, the overall effect test showed that Jintiange capsules decreased the VAS and ODI ( < 0.00001) and Cobb's angle ( = 0.02), and improved serum OC and ALP ( < 0.00001) compared with the controls. Furthermore, the pooled analysis of adverse reactions showed no serious impacts on the treatment of OVCFs.
CONCLUSION
Jintiange capsules demonstrate high safety and efficacy in the treatment of OVCFs, including increasing BMD, the lift effect rate, serum OC levels, and pain relief, decreasing the ODI, serum ALP levels, and adverse events, and improving Cobb's angle. Additional research is required to validate the efficacy of Jintiange capsules for the postoperative treatment of OVCFs.: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO.
PubMed: 38162884
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1289818 -
International Journal of Clinical... Apr 2024Ibandronate is effective in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, but experimental evidence offers conflicting results regarding nonvertebral fractures. Real-world... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Ibandronate is effective in reducing the risk of vertebral fractures, but experimental evidence offers conflicting results regarding nonvertebral fractures. Real-world evidence has been published evaluating the anti-nonvertebral fracture effect of ibandronate.
AIM
This meta-analysis of observational studies assessed the effectiveness of ibandronate in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures in women with osteoporosis.
METHOD
Pubmed/Embase databases were searched for observational studies. Risks of nonvertebral fractures and hip fractures were the outcomes. Meta-analyses were performed pooling rate ratios (RRs), using random-effects models. Data were reanalysed in sensitivity analyses considering Knapp-Hartung method and Bayesian random-effects.
RESULTS
Six cohort studies were included. Overall, once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate reduced the risk of nonvertebral fractures (RR 0.84; 95% CI 0.76-0.94). Similar results were obtained when the comparison was restricted to once-monthly 150 mg risedronate, but no differences were found when the comparator was other oral bisphosphonates (weekly alendronate/risedronate). Ibandronate didn't significantly change the risk of hip fractures (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.89-1.76). The risk of hip fracture was comparable between once monthly, 150 mg oral ibandronate and other oral bisphosphonates. Intravenous ibandronate was not effective in reducing hip fractures comparing to intravenous zoledronate. The low number of studies diminished the robustness of sensitivity analyses.
CONCLUSION
Results suggest that once-monthly 150 mg oral ibandronate may be as effective as other oral bisphosphonates in reducing the risk of nonvertebral fractures. However, uncertainty associated to the small number of included studies, which are characterized by heterogeneous demographics and methodologies, precluded definitive conclusions.
Topics: Female; Humans; Ibandronic Acid; Risedronic Acid; Bone Density Conservation Agents; Diphosphonates; Bayes Theorem; Osteoporosis; Hip Fractures; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal; Observational Studies as Topic
PubMed: 38112890
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-023-01666-x -
Joint Diseases and Related Surgery Jan 2024The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and vertebral body stenting (VBS) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes of vertebral body stenting versus percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
OBJECTIVES
The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and vertebral body stenting (VBS) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) and evaluate the clinical efficacy, Cobb angle correction, and cement leakage associated with both methods for OVCFs.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Medline, China National Knowledge, and Wanfang Data for clinical studies comparing VBS with PKP for OVCF up to May 2023. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3, with a focus on evaluating clinical and radiologic outcomes.
RESULTS
A total of eight eligible clinical studies were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of clinical outcomes, VBS was found to have a longer surgical time compared to PKP (standard mean difference [SMD]=1.06 min; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.20, 1.92; p=0.02). However, VBS demonstrated comparable blood loss to PKP (SMD =0.00 mL; 95% CI: -0.45, 0.45; p=0.99). Additionally, VBS showed slight superiority in alleviating back pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (SMD=-0.38; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.12; p=0.004), as well as in improving functional disability based on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (SMD= -0.28; 95% CI: -0.54, -0.03; p=0.03). Radiographically, VBS achieved better Cobb angle correction compared to PKP (SMD= -1.00; 95% CI: -1.48, -0.51; p<0.0001), while there was no significant difference in cement leakage between VBS and PKP (odds ratio=0.81; 95% CI: 0.21, 3.14; p=0.76).
CONCLUSION
The findings suggest that VBS has a comparable clinical outcome to PKP based on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, VAS, and ODI. Furthermore, VBS showed slightly better maintenance of Cobb angle correction, whereas VBS did not demonstrate a significant advantage over PKP in terms of cement leakage.
Topics: Humans; Kyphoplasty; Fractures, Compression; Spinal Fractures; Vertebral Body; Osteoporotic Fractures; Bone Cements
PubMed: 38108184
DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2023.1356 -
BMJ Open Dec 2023Early identification of fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis is essential. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising technique to predict the risk, whereas... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
OBJECTIVES
Early identification of fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis is essential. Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising technique to predict the risk, whereas its predictive performance remains controversial. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the predictive efficiency of ML for the risk of fracture in patients with osteoporosis.
METHODS
Relevant studies were retrieved from four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) until 31 May 2023. A meta-analysis of the C-index was performed using a random-effects model, while a bivariate mixed-effects model was used for the meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, subgroup analysis was performed according to the types of ML models and fracture sites.
RESULTS
Fifty-three studies were included in our meta-analysis, involving 15 209 268 patients, 86 prediction models specifically developed for the osteoporosis population and 41 validation sets. The most commonly used predictors in these models encompassed age, BMI, past fracture history, bone mineral density T-score, history of falls, BMD, radiomics data, weight, height, gender and other chronic diseases. Overall, the pooled C-index of ML was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.78) and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.78) in the training set and validation set, respectively; the pooled sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.84) and 0.76 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.81) in the training set and validation set, respectively; and the pooled specificity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.75, 0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.72, 0.90) in the training set and validation set, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
ML has a favourable predictive performance for fracture risk in patients with osteoporosis. However, most current studies lack external validation. Thus, external validation is required to verify the reliability of ML models.
PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER
CRD42022346896.
Topics: Humans; Bone Density; Reproducibility of Results; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Risk Assessment
PubMed: 38070927
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071430 -
Medicine Nov 2023To investigate the effect of Vertebral augmentation (VA) in the treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) on new vertebral fractures. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
The risk of new vertebral fracture after percutaneous vertebral augmentation in patients suffering from single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A meta-analysis and systematic review.
BACKGROUND
To investigate the effect of Vertebral augmentation (VA) in the treatment of single-level osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) on new vertebral fractures.
METHODS
Electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database creation to 5 September 2022. Eligible studies had to use VA as an intervention and conservative treatment as a control group. Studies had to explicitly report whether new vertebral fractures occurred during follow-up. Data were extracted by multiple investigators. Data were pooled using random or fixed effects models depending on the degree of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
Of the 682 articles screened, 7 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, giving a total of 1240 patients. Meta-analysis showed that VA (OR = 2.10, 95% CI: 1.35-3.28, P = .001) increased the risk of new postoperative vertebral fractures compared with conservative treatment. Subgroup analyses showed that the risk was greater in the group with a follow-up time greater than 1 year (OR = 2.57, 95% CI: 1.06-6.26, P = .001). Compared with conservative treatment, VA (OR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.23-3.82, P = .007) increased the risk of postoperative adjacent vertebral fracture.
CONCLUSION SUBSECTIONS
VA is associated with an increased risk of new vertebral fractures and adjacent vertebral fractures following single-level OVCFs. With longer follow-ups, new vertebral fractures may be more significant. Clinical surgeons should pay attention to long-term postoperative complications and choose treatment carefully.
Topics: Humans; Spinal Fractures; Fractures, Compression; Kyphoplasty; Vertebroplasty; Osteoporotic Fractures; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 37986316
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000035749 -
Osteoporosis International : a Journal... Mar 2024The RICO study indicated that most patients would like to receive information regarding their fracture risk but that only a small majority have actually received it....
UNLABELLED
The RICO study indicated that most patients would like to receive information regarding their fracture risk but that only a small majority have actually received it. Patients globally preferred a visual presentation of fracture risk and were interested in an online tool showing the risk.
PURPOSE
The aim of the Risk Communication in Osteoporosis (RICO) study was to assess patients' preferences regarding fracture risk communication.
METHODS
To assess patients' preferences for fracture risk communication, structured interviews with women with osteoporosis or who were at risk for fracture were conducted in 11 sites around the world, namely in Argentina, Belgium, Canada at Hamilton and with participants from the Osteoporosis Canada Canadian Osteoporosis Patient Network (COPN), Japan, Mexico, Spain, the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA in California and Washington state. The interviews used to collect data were designed on the basis of a systematic review and a qualitative pilot study involving 26 participants at risk of fracture.
RESULTS
A total of 332 women (mean age 67.5 ± 8.0 years, 48% with a history of fracture) were included in the study. Although the participants considered it important to receive information about their fracture risk (mean importance of 6.2 ± 1.4 on a 7-point Likert scale), only 56% (i.e. 185/332) had already received such information. Globally, participants preferred a visual presentation with a traffic-light type of coloured graph of their FRAX® fracture risk probability, compared to a verbal or written presentation. Almost all participants considered it important to discuss their fracture risk and the consequences of fractures with their healthcare professionals in addition to receiving information in a printed format or access to an online website showing their fracture risk.
CONCLUSIONS
There is a significant communication gap between healthcare professionals and patients when discussing osteoporosis fracture risk. The RICO study provides insight into preferred approaches to rectify this communication gap.
Topics: Humans; Female; Middle Aged; Aged; Patient Preference; Pilot Projects; Risk Assessment; Canada; Osteoporosis; Osteoporotic Fractures; Communication; Risk Factors
PubMed: 37955683
DOI: 10.1007/s00198-023-06955-9