-
Risk of colorectal cancer with hysterectomy and oophorectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International Journal of Surgery... Oct 2016Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in females. Sex hormones may play a protective effect in CRC pathogenesis. Ovarian sex... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide in females. Sex hormones may play a protective effect in CRC pathogenesis. Ovarian sex steroid levels are reduced in premenopausal women after hysterectomy. Prospective studies have revealed an 80% decrease in serum oestradiol levels after bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women. We aimed to elucidate the relationship between hysterectomy or oophorectomy and risk of CRC.
METHODS
We estimated relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with the meta-analysis. Cochran's Q test and Higgins I statistic were used to check for heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed as were Egger's and Begg's tests and the "trim-and-fill" method for publication bias analysis.
RESULTS
Risk of CRC was increased 30% for women undergoing oophorectomy relative to the general population and 24% with hysterectomy relative to no surgery. The risk was increased 22% with hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoo-ophorectomy as compared with simple hysterectomy. On subgroup analysis, risk of rectal cancer was increased 28% and colon cancer 19% with hysterectomy. Europeans seem to be sensitive to the risk of CRC, with 27% increased risk after hysterectomy. The risk of CRC after oophorectomy gradually increased with age at oophorectomy. The risk was greater with bilateral oophorectomy, with 36% increased risk, than unilateral oophorectomy, with 20% increased risk. Risk was increased 66% with time since oophorectomy 1-4 years as compared with 5-9 and ≥ 10 years.
CONCLUSIONS
Risk of CRC was increased for women undergoing hysterectomy or oophorectomy. Women with susceptibility genes for ovarian cancer or metrocarcinoma should choose oophorectomy or hysterectomy. For women not at high risk for these cancers, oophorectomy or hysterectomy should not be recommended for increasing the subsequent risk of CRC.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Gonadal Steroid Hormones; Humans; Hysterectomy; Middle Aged; Ovariectomy; Premenopause; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors
PubMed: 27568653
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.08.518 -
Obstetrics and Gynecology Sep 2016To compare the long-term risks associated with salpingo-oophorectomy with ovarian conservation at the time of benign hysterectomy. (Review)
Review
OBJECTIVE
To compare the long-term risks associated with salpingo-oophorectomy with ovarian conservation at the time of benign hysterectomy.
DATA SOURCES
MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to January 30, 2015. We included prospective and retrospective comparative studies of women with benign hysterectomy who had either bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) or conservation of one or both ovaries.
METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION
Reviewers double-screened 5,568 citations and extracted eligible studies into customized forms. Twenty-six comparative studies met inclusion criteria. Studies were assessed for results, quality, and strength of evidence.
TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS
Studies were extracted for participant, intervention, comparator, and outcomes data. When compared with hysterectomy with BSO, prevalence of reoperation and ovarian cancer was higher in women with ovarian conservation (ovarian cancer risk of 0.14-0.7% compared with 0.02-0.04% among those with BSO). Hysterectomy with BSO was associated with a lower incidence of breast and total cancer, but no difference in the incidence of cancer mortality was found when compared with ovarian conservation. All-cause mortality was higher in women younger than age 45 years at the time of BSO who were not treated with estrogen replacement therapy (hazard ratio [HR] 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-1.92). Coronary heart disease (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.54) and cardiovascular death were higher among women with BSO (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.27-2.68), especially women younger than 45 years who were not treated with estrogen. Finally, there was an increase in the prevalence of dementia and Parkinson disease among women with BSO compared with conservation, especially in women younger than age 50 years. Clinical practice guidelines were devised based on these results.
CONCLUSION
Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy offers the advantage of effectively eliminating the risk of ovarian cancer and reoperation but can be detrimental to other aspects of health, especially among women younger than age 45 years.
Topics: Age Factors; Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Organ Sparing Treatments; Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Salpingectomy
PubMed: 27500347
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001592 -
Annals of Oncology : Official Journal... Apr 2016Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are epithelial tumors of the ovaries with both malignant and non-malignant aspects. On the one hand, they are characterized by cellular... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) are epithelial tumors of the ovaries with both malignant and non-malignant aspects. On the one hand, they are characterized by cellular proliferation and nuclear atypia but, on the other hand, they usually do not show infiltrative growth pattern. Balancing radicality between oncologic safety and treatment burden has already led to remarkable changes in the management pattern over the last decades and is still a challenging task.
DESIGN
This review is based on both a systematic review published by the authors and added with evidence gained from actually published literature.
RESULTS
As they frequently affect younger patients, the clinical management of BOT is complicated by aspects as preserving fertility and reducing postoperative morbidity. Over the past decades, the surgical therapy shifted from a radical approach to more conservative treatment. Today, fertility-sparing surgery is first-choice treatment in younger patients. In addition, minimal-invasive surgery has become the preferred surgical approach in these patients. Even recurrences are curable in most patients because only a minority of relapses transform to invasive cancer.
CONCLUSION
More studies on BOT are needed and longer follow-up and better characterization of high-risk subtypes are crucial to better understand long-term risk of BOT and avoid the rare but the fatal outcome in those few patients being undertreated by the current management strategies.
Topics: Disease Management; Female; Fertility Preservation; Humans; Neoplasm Staging; Ovarian Neoplasms; Ovariectomy; Ovary
PubMed: 27141065
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw090 -
PloS One 2016Biomechanical tests are widely used in animal studies on osteoporotic fracture healing. However, the biomechanical recovery process is still unknown, leading to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
Biomechanical tests are widely used in animal studies on osteoporotic fracture healing. However, the biomechanical recovery process is still unknown, leading to difficulty in choosing time points for biomechanical tests and in correctly assessing osteoporotic fracture healing. To determine the biomechanical recovery process during osteoporotic fracture healing, studies on osteoporotic femur fracture healing with biomechanical tests in ovariectomized rat (OVX) models were collected from PUBMED, EMBASE, and Chinese databases. Quadratic curves of fracture healing time and maximum load were fitted with data from the analyzed studies. In the fitted curve for normal fractures, the predicted maximum load was 145.56 N, and the fracture healing time was 88.0 d. In the fitted curve for osteoporotic fractures, the predicted maximum load was 122.30 N, and the fracture healing time was 95.2 d. The maximum load of fractured femurs in OVX rats was also lower than that in sham rats at day 84 post-fracture (D84 PF). The fracture healing time was prolonged and maximum load at D84 PF decreased in OVX rats with closed fractures. The maximum load of Wister rats was higher than that of Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, but the fracture healing time of SD and Wister rats was similar. Osteoporotic fracture healing was delayed in rats that were < = 12 weeks old when ovariectomized, and at D84 PF, the maximum load of rats < = 12 weeks old at ovariectomy was lower than that of rats >12 weeks old at ovariectomy. There was no significant difference in maximum load at D84 PF between rats with an osteoporosis modeling time <12 weeks and > = 12 weeks. In conclusion, fracture healing was delayed and biomechanical property decreased by osteoporosis. Time points around D95.2 PF should be considered for biomechanical tests of osteoporotic femur fracture healing in OVX rat models. Osteoporotic fracture healing in OVX rats was affected by the fracture type but not by the strain of the rat.
Topics: Animals; Biomechanical Phenomena; Female; Femur; Fracture Healing; Osteoporotic Fractures; Ovariectomy; Rats
PubMed: 27055104
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153120 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Dec 2014This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in 2007. Traditionally, after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery postoperative oral intake is... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
This is an updated version of the original Cochrane review published in 2007. Traditionally, after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery postoperative oral intake is withheld until the return of bowel function. There has been concern that early oral intake would result in vomiting and severe paralytic ileus with subsequent aspiration pneumonia, wound dehiscence, and anastomotic leakage. However, evidence-based clinical studies suggest that there may be benefits from early postoperative oral intake.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of early versus delayed (traditional) initiation of oral intake of food and fluids after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL), and the citation lists of relevant publications. The most recent search was conducted 1 April 2014. We also searched a registry for ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov) on 13 May 2014.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible that compared the effect of early versus delayed initiation of oral intake of food and fluids after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery. Early feeding was defined as oral intake of fluids or food within 24 hours post-surgery regardless of the return of bowel function. Delayed feeding was defined as oral intake after 24 hours post-surgery and only after signs of postoperative ileus resolution.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors selected studies, assessed study quality and extracted the data. For dichotomous data, we calculated the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We examined continuous data using the mean difference (MD) and a 95% CI. We tested for heterogeneity between the results of different studies using a forest plot of the meta-analysis, the statistical tests of homogeneity of 2 x 2 tables and the I² value. We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE methods.
MAIN RESULTS
Rates of developing postoperative ileus were comparable between study groups (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.17 to 1.29, P = 0.14, 3 RCTs, 279 women, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). When we considered the rates of nausea or vomiting or both, there was no evidence of a difference between the study groups (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.67, P = 0.90, 4 RCTs, 484 women, I² = 73%, moderate-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference between the study groups in abdominal distension (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.47, 2 RCTs, 301 women, I² = 0%) or a need for postoperative nasogastric tube placement (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.80, 1 RCT, 195 women).Early feeding was associated with shorter time to the presence of bowel sound (MD -0.32 days, 95% CI -0.61 to -0.03, P = 0.03, 2 RCTs, 338 women, I² = 52%, moderate-quality evidence) and faster onset of flatus (MD -0.21 days, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.01, P = 0.04, 3 RCTs, 444 women, I² = 23%, moderate-quality evidence). In addition, women in the early feeding group resumed a solid diet sooner (MD -1.47 days, 95% CI -2.26 to -0.68, P = 0.0003, 2 RCTs, 301 women, I² = 92%, moderate-quality evidence). There was no evidence of a difference in time to the first passage of stool between the two study groups (MD -0.25 days, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.09, P = 0.15, 2 RCTs, 249 women, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). Hospital stay was shorter in the early feeding group (MD -0.92 days, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.31, P = 0.003, 4 RCTs, 484 women, I² = 68%, moderate-quality evidence). Infectious complications were less common in the early feeding group (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.73, P = 0.02, 2 RCTs, 183 women, I² = 0%, high-quality evidence). In one study, the satisfaction score was significantly higher in the early feeding group (MD 11.10, 95% CI 6.68 to 15.52, P < 0.00001, 143 women, moderate-quality evidence).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
Early postoperative feeding after major abdominal gynaecologic surgery for either benign or malignant conditions appeared to be safe without increased gastrointestinal morbidities or other postoperative complications. The benefits of this approach include faster recovery of bowel function, lower rates of infectious complications, shorter hospital stay, and higher satisfaction.
Topics: Drinking; Eating; Female; Food; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Humans; Hysterectomy; Intestinal Pseudo-Obstruction; Nausea; Ovariectomy; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Time Factors
PubMed: 25502897
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004508.pub4 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Jul 2014Background Prophylactic oophorectomy alongside hysterectomy in premenopausal women is a common procedure. The decision to remove or conserve the ovaries is often based... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study Review
Background Prophylactic oophorectomy alongside hysterectomy in premenopausal women is a common procedure. The decision to remove or conserve the ovaries is often based on the perceived risk for ovarian cancer and the need for additional gynaecological surgical interventions,and is weighed against the perceived risk of negative health effects caused by surgically induced menopause. The evidence needed to recommend either prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy or conservation of ovaries at the time of hysterectomy in premenopausal women is limited. This is an update of the original version of this systematic review published in 2008.Objectives To compare hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy plus bilateral oophorectomy in women with benign gynaecological conditions,with respect to rates of mortality or subsequent gynaecological surgical interventions.Search methods We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (December 2005 to January 2014) and the following electronic databases: CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2013, Issue 12), MEDLINE (January 1966 to January 2014),EMBASE (January 1985 to January 2014), and PsycINFO (1806 to January 2014).Selection criteria Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of hysterectomy alone versus hysterectomy with bilateral oophorectomy in premenopausal women with benign gynaecological conditions were eligible. Any surgical approach could be used.Data collection and analysis Three review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion. Study authors were contacted if information was unclear.Main results Only one RCT comparing the benefits and risks of hysterectomy with or without oophorectomy was identified. The results of this pilot RCT have not been published and we have not been able to obtain the results. Therefore, no data could be included in this review. Authors' conclusions The conclusions of this review are limited by a lack of RCTs. Although no evidence is available from RCTs, there is growing evidence from observational studies that surgical menopause may impact negatively on cardiovascular health and all cause mortality.
Topics: Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Humans; Hysterectomy; Ovariectomy; Premenopause
PubMed: 25101365
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005638.pub3