-
Frontiers in Medicine 2020Observational studies have shown that vitamin D levels are inversely related to rheumatoid arthritis activity, yet evidence from population interventions remains...
Observational studies have shown that vitamin D levels are inversely related to rheumatoid arthritis activity, yet evidence from population interventions remains inconsistent. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched for studies published before June 2020. Information was collected about the pain visual analog scale (VAS), Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28), serum vitamin D level, tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and parathyroid hormone (PTH) research data. Six studies ( = 438) were included in the meta-analysis. Vitamin D supplementation resulted in a significant improvement in the DAS28 (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -0.41, 95% CI (-0.59, -0.23), < 0.001), ESR (WMD = -3.40, 95% CI (-6.62, -0.18), = 0.04) and TJC (WMD = -1.44, 95% CI (-2.74, -0.14), = 0.03) but not in other outcomes. According to the subgroup analyses, VAS and serum vitamin D were improved in the European ethnic subgroups. TJC and serum vitamin D were improved in the Asian ethnic subgroups. TJC and serum vitamin D were improved in the duration ≤ 12 w subgroups, and the VAS and DAS28 in the duration > 12 w subgroup were different from those of the control group. With a vitamin D dose ≤50,000 IU, only serum vitamin D and TJC improved, and with a vitamin D dose> 50,000 IU, the VAS and DAS28 improved. Compared with placebo control interventions, vitamin D supplementation seemed to be an effective intervention for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Different doses of vitamin D and durations of intervention produce different effects.
PubMed: 33195358
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.596007 -
Frontiers in Endocrinology 2020Currently, increasing evidence shows that excess aldosterone may have an impact on bone health, and primary aldosteronism (PA) may be a secondary cause of osteoporosis.... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Currently, increasing evidence shows that excess aldosterone may have an impact on bone health, and primary aldosteronism (PA) may be a secondary cause of osteoporosis. This problem is worthy of attention because secondary osteoporosis is always potentially reversible, which affects the selection of treatment for PA to some extent. The present systematic review will assess and summarize the available data regarding the relationship between PA and osteoporosis.
METHODS
Pubmed and Embase were searched for clinical trials related to the association between PA and bone metabolism. The results were limited to full-text articles published in English, without restrictions for the publication time. The quality of clinical trials was appraised, and the data were extracted. Biochemical parameters of bone turnover in PA patients were assessed using random-effect meta-analysis. Descriptive analysis was performed for other parameters, for data is insufficient.
RESULTS
A final total of 15 articles were included in this review. The meta-analysis of six studies showed that subjects with PA had higher serum PTH levels (=21.50 pg/ml, 95% CI (15.63, 27.37), <0.00001) and slightly increased urinary calcium levels ( = 1.65 mmol/24 h, 95% CI (1.24, 2.06), < 0.00001) than the EH controls. PA is associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. Bone loss in patients with PA may be reversed by MR antagonists or adrenal surgery.
CONCLUSIONS
PA may be a secondary cause of osteoporosis and is associated with an increased risk of bone fracture. The clarification of the relationships between PA and bone metabolism requires additional prospective randomized controlled studies in a large sample.
Topics: Aldosterone; Bone Density; Bone and Bones; Fractures, Bone; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Osteoporosis; Parathyroid Hormone; Spironolactone
PubMed: 33101208
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2020.574151 -
The Cochrane Database of Systematic... Oct 2020Bilateral neck exploration (BNE) is the traditional approach to sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. With the availability of the preoperative imaging techniques and... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy guided by intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring (IOPTH) and preoperative imaging versus bilateral neck exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism in adults.
BACKGROUND
Bilateral neck exploration (BNE) is the traditional approach to sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. With the availability of the preoperative imaging techniques and intraoperative parathyroid hormone assays, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) is fast becoming the favoured surgical approach.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effects of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) guided by preoperative imaging and intraoperative parathyroid hormone monitoring versus bilateral neck exploration (BNE) for the surgical management of primary hyperparathyroidism.
SEARCH METHODS
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, WHO ICTRP and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 21 October 2019. There were no language restrictions applied.
SELECTION CRITERIA
We included randomised controlled trials comparing MIP to BNE for the treatment of sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism in persons undergoing surgery for the first time.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. Two review authors independently screened for inclusion, extracted data and carried out risk of bias assessment. The content expert senior author resolved conflicts. We assessed studies for overall certainty of the evidence using the GRADE instrument. We conducted meta-analyses using a random-effects model and performed statistical analyses according to the guidelines in the latest version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
MAIN RESULTS
We identified five eligible studies, all conducted in European university hospitals. They included 266 adults, 136 participants were randomised to MIP and 130 participants to BNE. Data were available for all participants post-surgery up to one year, with the exception of missing data for two participants in the MIP group and for one participant in the BNE group at one year. Nine participants in the MIP group and 11 participants in the BNE group had missing data at five years. No study had a low risk of bias in all risk of bias domains. The risk ratio (RR) for success rate (eucalcaemia) at six months in the MIP group compared to the BNE group was 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94 to 1.03; P = 0.43; 5 studies, 266 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 132/136 (97.1%) participants in the MIP group compared with 129/130 (99.2%) participants in the BNE group were judged as operative success. At five years, the RR was 0.94 (95% CI 0.83 to 1.08; P = 0.38; 1 study, 77 participants; very low-certainty evidence). A total of 34/38 (89.5%) participants in the MIP group compared with 37/39 (94.9%) participants in the BNE group were judged as operative success. The RR for the total incidence of perioperative adverse events was 0.50, in favour of MIP (95% CI 0.33 to 0.76; P = 0.001; 5 studies, 236 participants; low-certainty evidence). Perioperative adverse events occurred in 23/136 (16.9%) participants in the MIP group compared with 44/130 (33.9%) participants in the BNE group. The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.25 and 0.99. These adverse events included symptomatic hypocalcaemia, vocal cord palsy, bleeding, fever and infection. Fifteen of 104 (14.4%) participants experienced symptomatic hypocalcaemia in the MIP group compared with 26/98 (26.5%) participants in the BNE group. The RR for this event comparing MIP with BNE at two days was 0.54 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.92; P = 0.02; 4 studies, 202 participants). Statistical significance was lost in sensitivity analyses, with a 95% prediction interval ranging between 0.17 and 1.74. Five out of 133 (3.8%) participants in the MIP group experienced vocal cord paralysis compared with 2/128 (1.6%) participants in the BNE group. The RR for this event was 1.87 (95% CI 0.47 to 7.51; P = 0.38; 5 studies, 261 participants). The 95% prediction interval ranged between 0.20 and 17.87. The effect on all-cause mortality was not explicitly reported and could not be adequately assessed (very low-certainty evidence). There was no clear difference for health-related quality of life between the treatment groups in two studies, but studies did not report numerical data (very low-certainty evidence). There was a possible treatment benefit for MIP compared to BNE in terms of cosmetic satisfaction (very low-certainty evidence). The mean difference (MD) for duration of surgery comparing BNE with MIP was in favour of the MIP group (-18 minutes, 95% CI -31 to -6; P = 0.004; 3 studies, 171 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction interval ranged between -162 minutes and 126 minutes. The studies did not report length of hospital stay. Four studies reported intraoperative conversion rate from MIP to open procedure information. Out of 115 included participants, there were 24 incidences of conversion, amounting to a conversion rate of 20.8%.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS
The success rates of MIP and BNE at six months were comparable. There were similar results at five years, but these were only based on one study. The incidence of perioperative symptomatic hypocalcaemia was lower in the MIP compared to the BNE group, whereas the incidence of vocal cord paralysis tended to be higher. Our systematic review did not provide clear evidence for the superiority of MIP over BNE. However, it was limited by low-certainty to very low-certainty evidence.
Topics: Adult; Bias; Humans; Hyperparathyroidism, Primary; Hypocalcemia; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Monitoring, Intraoperative; Neck; Neck Dissection; Operative Time; Parathyroid Hormone; Parathyroidectomy; Postoperative Complications; Quality of Life; Vocal Cord Paralysis
PubMed: 33085088
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010787.pub2 -
International Journal of Hyperthermia :... 2020Whether thyroid function would be affected by ablation remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of energy-based... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Whether thyroid function would be affected by ablation remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of energy-based ablation on thyroid function in treating benign thyroid nodules.
METHODS
EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. The mean difference (MD) or standard MD (SMD) was applied to assess changes in thyroid function, thyroglobulin (Tg), and antibodies after ablation. RevMan version 5.3 was used for data synthesis.
RESULTS
Forty-two studies involving 6380 patients were eligible. The pooled results revealed significant decrease of 1-day thyroid-stimulating hormone (95% CI, -0.67 to -0.14), significant increase of 1-day, 1-week, and 1-month free thyroxine (95% CI, 1.57 to 5.28; 95% CI, 0.61 to 2.42; 95% CI, -0.76 to -0.15), 1-day and 1-week Tg level (95% CI, 0.40 to 0.81; 95% CI, 0.21 to 1.29), 6-month anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.26), 1- and 3-month thyroperoxidase antibody (95% CI, 0.02 to 0.22; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.43), and 1-day, 1-, and 3-month thyrotrophin receptor antibody (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.43; 95% CI, 0.00 to 0.30; 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.36) after ablation. No statistically significant differences were found in these six indicators in the longer term. The results of subgroup analysis were similar to the pooled results. No significant publication bias was found.
CONCLUSIONS
Energy-based ablation was more likely to have negative effects on thyroid function and antibodies and led to transient increase in Tg level in the short term. However, most of the patients would not develop any thyroid dysfunction in the long-term follow-up.
Topics: Humans; Thyroglobulin; Thyroid Nodule; Thyrotropin
PubMed: 32981370
DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2020.1806362 -
Journal of Bone Metabolism Aug 2020We conducted an updated review of the evidence of teriparatide (TPTD) for fracture healing for the following questions. (1) Does it decrease fracture healing time?; (2)...
We conducted an updated review of the evidence of teriparatide (TPTD) for fracture healing for the following questions. (1) Does it decrease fracture healing time?; (2) Can it be an alternative treatment for nonunion?; (3) Does it aid the union of atypical femoral fracture (AFF)? We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library including "Fracture" AND "nonunion" AND "Teriparatide". In total, 57 publications met our inclusion criteria were summarized. This systemic review of the available literature revealed that TPTD works positively with regard to enhancing fracture healing time and union of AFF. There are also many case studies on the use of TPTD could be a potential new safe treatment for nonunion with no side effects. However, level 1 studies on the evidence of TPTD are still lacking so far. Over the last decade, a growing body of evidence has accumulated suggesting that TPTD can be an adjunct to enhance fracture healing or a therapeutic option to treat nonunion, but greater evidences from large volume prospective trials are needed.
PubMed: 32911581
DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2020.27.3.167 -
BioMed Research International 2020This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the role of teriparatide in improving hip fracture healing and function to provide a clinical guide. (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the role of teriparatide in improving hip fracture healing and function to provide a clinical guide.
METHODS
The systematic literature review identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled studies evaluating teriparatide for elderly hip fractures. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan version 5.3.
RESULTS
This study included two RCTs and four retrospective studies comprising 607 patients, with 269 and 338 patients in the teriparatide and control groups, respectively. The quality of these six studies was moderate. Compared to the control group, teriparatide reduced the time to union (weighted mean difference (WMD) = -1.95; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.23--0.68; = 0.003) but did not improve the rate of fracture union at 3 months (odds ratio (OR) = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.50-4.24; = 0.49) or 6 months (OR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.44-1.81; = 0.75). In addition, teriparatide did not decrease the complications, need for reoperation, mortality, rate of deformity after fracture healing, and subsequent fracture or improve hip function.
CONCLUSIONS
The current limited evidence did not support that teriparatide improves fracture healing in hip fractures, due to study heterogeneity and various sources of biases. Further high-quality, large-sample trials are needed. This trial is registered with PROSPERO with registration number CRD42020152205.
Topics: Animals; Fracture Healing; Hip Fractures; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Teriparatide
PubMed: 32904518
DOI: 10.1155/2020/5914502 -
PloS One 2020Giving patients anti-osteoporotic agents peri-operatively is a well-accepted strategy to increase fusion rate and prevent complications. The purpose of this study was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND
Giving patients anti-osteoporotic agents peri-operatively is a well-accepted strategy to increase fusion rate and prevent complications. The purpose of this study was to investigate effectiveness of teriparatide and bisphosphonate on fusion surgery of thoracic and lumbar spine.
METHODS
We searched EMBASE and PubMed for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies using teriparatide or bisphosphonate in peri-operative spinal fusion surgery. Our synthesized data of fusion rate, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and adverse event in contrast-based network meta-analysis. Pooled results were presented in risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
RESULTS
Our search hit eight RCTs and three prospective studies with 676 patients receiving spinal surgery. Pooled result showed that teriparatide+Denosumab leads to significantly higher fusion rate than placebo (RR, 2.84; 95% CI: 1.22 to 6.60) and bisphosphonate (RR, 2.59; 95% CI: 1.13 to 5.96). We did not observe significant finding among placebo, teriparatide, and bisphosphonate in the two network models.
CONCLUSION
This is the first network meta-analysis providing an overview of the use of teriparatide and bisphosphonate for spinal fusion surgery. Teriparatide treatments are worth to be consider for spinal fusion surgery.
Topics: Bone Density Conservation Agents; Calcium-Regulating Hormones and Agents; Diphosphonates; Humans; Lumbar Vertebrae; Spinal Diseases; Spinal Fusion; Teriparatide; Thoracic Vertebrae; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32870946
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237566 -
Scientific Reports Jul 2020In this systematic review and meta-analysis our aim was to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiac outcomes in patients with coronary artery... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
In this systematic review and meta-analysis our aim was to assess the effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardiac outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The search terms were performed from January 2000 to January 2018, only randomized clinical trials (RCT) in human subjects were considered, with no language restrictions. The electronic databases used in this study were: PubMed; Cochran library; Embase; and Scopus. Two independent expert reviewers carried out data extraction according to Cochrane recommendations. Only four RCTs were found in relation to the effects of vitamin D supplementation on the coronary artery disease. In these 299 patients, vitamin D supplementation had significant favorable effects on Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (- 2.96, p = 0.02) and Parathyroid hormone (PTH) (- 4.05, p < 0.001). However, it had no significant effects on hs-CRP mean difference (- 0.04, p = 0.25), total cholesterol (TC) (- 0.46, p = 0.83), triglyceride (TG) (0.68, p = 0.89), low-density lipoproteins (LDL) (2.08, p = 0.56), and high-density lipoproteins (HDL) (- 2.59, p = 0.16). In conclusion, the use of vitamin D was associated with improvements in some cardiac outcomes of CAD patients with vitamin D deficiency. Also, further research is needed to clarify these results.
Topics: Blood Pressure; Coronary Artery Disease; Dietary Supplements; Humans; Lipids; Parathyroid Hormone; Vitamin D
PubMed: 32737345
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-69762-w -
Health Technology Assessment... Jun 2020Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.
BACKGROUND
Fragility fractures are fractures that result from mechanical forces that would not ordinarily result in fracture.
OBJECTIVES
The objectives were to evaluate the clinical effectiveness, safety and cost-effectiveness of non-bisphosphonates {denosumab [Prolia; Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA], raloxifene [Evista; Daiichi Sankyo Company, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan], romosozumab [Evenity; Union Chimique Belge (UCB) S.A. (Brussels, Belgium) and Amgen Inc.] and teriparatide [Forsteo; Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA]}, compared with each other, bisphosphonates or no treatment, for the prevention of fragility fracture.
DATA SOURCES
For the clinical effectiveness review, nine electronic databases (including MEDLINE, EMBASE and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched up to July 2018.
REVIEW METHODS
A systematic review and network meta-analysis of fracture and femoral neck bone mineral density were conducted. A review of published economic analyses was undertaken and a model previously used to evaluate bisphosphonates was adapted. Discrete event simulation was used to estimate lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years for a simulated cohort of patients with heterogeneous characteristics. This was done for each non-bisphosphonate treatment, a strategy of no treatment, and the five bisphosphonate treatments previously evaluated. The model was populated with effectiveness evidence from the systematic review and network meta-analysis. All other parameters were estimated from published sources. An NHS and Personal Social Services perspective was taken, and costs and benefits were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Fracture risk was estimated from patient characteristics using the QFracture (QFracture-2012 open source revision 38, Clinrisk Ltd, Leeds, UK) and FRAX (web version 3.9, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK) tools. The relationship between fracture risk and incremental net monetary benefit was estimated using non-parametric regression. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis and scenario analyses were used to assess uncertainty.
RESULTS
Fifty-two randomised controlled trials of non-bisphosphonates were included in the clinical effectiveness systematic review and an additional 51 randomised controlled trials of bisphosphonates were included in the network meta-analysis. All treatments had beneficial effects compared with placebo for vertebral, non-vertebral and hip fractures, with hazard ratios varying from 0.23 to 0.94, depending on treatment and fracture type. The effects on vertebral fractures and the percentage change in bone mineral density were statistically significant for all treatments. The rate of serious adverse events varied across trials (0-33%), with most between-group differences not being statistically significant for comparisons with placebo/no active treatment, non-bisphosphonates or bisphosphonates. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were > £20,000 per quality-adjusted life-year for all non-bisphosphonate interventions compared with no treatment across the range of QFracture and FRAX scores expected in the population eligible for fracture risk assessment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for denosumab may fall below £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year at very high levels of risk or for high-risk patients with specific characteristics. Raloxifene was dominated by no treatment (resulted in fewer quality-adjusted life-years) in most risk categories.
LIMITATIONS
The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are uncertain for very high-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS
Non-bisphosphonates are effective in preventing fragility fractures, but the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios are generally greater than the commonly applied threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year.
STUDY REGISTRATION
This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018107651.
FUNDING
This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 24, No. 29. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Topics: Bone Density Conservation Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Denosumab; Diphosphonates; Humans; Osteoporotic Fractures; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Teriparatide; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 32588816
DOI: 10.3310/hta24290 -
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Feb 2021Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were reported in several clinical trials, but mostly in small-scale studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
AIMS
Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were reported in several clinical trials, but mostly in small-scale studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the efficacy and safety of ferric citrate in controlling hyperphosphataemia and iron-deficiency anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.
METHODS
PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library were searched for clinical trials that enrolled CKD patients receiving ferric citrate for hyperphosphataemia. Two investigators performed systematic literature search to identify eligible studies, evaluated risk of bias and extracted relevant data.
RESULTS
Sixteen studies were included in the meta-analysis. Phosphate-lowering effects of ferric citrate were greater compared to no active treatment (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.15; P < 0.001) and comparable to other phosphate binders (SMD = 0.03; P = 0.61). Calcium concentrations post ferric citrate treatment did not differ compared to no active treatment (SMD = 0.15; P = 0.21) but were significantly lower compared to other phosphate binders (SMD = -0.14; P = 0.01). These led to significant reductions in calcium-phosphorus product with ferric citrate versus no active control (SMD = -1.02; P < 0.001) but no difference versus active control (SMD = -0.01; P = 0.93). Intact parathyroid hormone showed no substantial between-group difference in both comparison against no active and active controls. Ferric citrate improved iron stores and anaemia parameters, but increased risk of diarrhoea, abdominal pain and discoloured faeces.
CONCLUSION
Ferric citrate was effective in lowering phosphorus and phosphorus-calcium product versus no active treatment and had comparable effects versus other phosphate binders. Calcium levels were significantly lower with ferric citrate than with other phosphate-lowering treatment. Ferric citrate had additive effects on iron repletion and anaemia control and was associated with mostly gastrointestinal side effects.
Topics: Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Ferric Compounds; Humans; Hyperphosphatemia; Phosphates; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic
PubMed: 32470149
DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14396