-
The Saudi Dental Journal Nov 2021Fracture resistance of endodontically treated tooth is affected due to large cavity designs and access cavities and an appropriate material capable to resist fracture... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated tooth is affected due to large cavity designs and access cavities and an appropriate material capable to resist fracture plays an important role. This review aims to evaluate the effect of fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) as a post-obturation material on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
OBJECTIVES
To systematically gather and evaluate the fracture resistance of fibre-reinforced composite as a post-obturation restorative material in endodontically treated teeth.
DATA SOURCES
A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Ebsco Host, Scopus, Google Scholar, Hinari and manual search library resources from 1st Jan 2000 to 30th November 2019 to identify appropriate studies.
RESULT
A total of 157 articles were examined out of which 55 articles were selected after reading the title. After removing the duplicates, 27 articles were screened for abstract and 1 article was eliminated as it did not meet the eligibility criteria. A thorough reading of the full text of the remaining 26 selected articles was assessed for eligibility. Amongst these, 1 article was then excluded from the study as the full text was not accessible. Lastly, 25 articles were included in the study.
CONCLUSION
FRC as a core material increases fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth but they do not have the fracture resistance similar to the intact tooth. Both polyethylene and short fibre-reinforced composites showed greater fracture resistance when compared to glass FRC and restoration without reinforcement. Also, the fracture resistance increases if restored with FRC along with retention slots and are placed on the occlusal third surfaces of cavities. Also, favourable fractures were most commonly seen and it usually occurred at the level of enamel and dentin and adhesive fractures were seen.
PubMed: 34803275
DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.07.006 -
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and... Nov 2021Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) was created to minimise wear debris and aseptic loosening. A decade ago, a meta-analysis showed a 10-year... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis Review
BACKGROUND
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) was created to minimise wear debris and aseptic loosening. A decade ago, a meta-analysis showed a 10-year survival rate of just 89%. Based on the excellent tribology of the current CoC, significant improvement of implant survivorship is expected. In patients younger than 60, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess 10-year survival and complications after using current primary CoC THA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Virtual Health Library, and Cochrane Library were used to scan for published trials that met the inclusion criteria until January 2019. The qualified studies were subjected to a systematic review and proportional analysis, and the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were included in a comparison meta-analysis.
RESULTS
Thirteen studies were included 156 findings. The total number of hips was 2278. Nine studies were cohort, and four were RCTs between ceramic and polyethylene cups. The analysis revealed an average age of 44 years (range 24-54). The 10-year survival 96% (95% CI; 95.4-96.8%), aseptic loosening rate 0.516. (95% CI; 0.265-0.903), ceramic fracture rate 0.620 (95% CI; 0.34-1.034) and squeaking rate 2.687 (95% CI; 1.279-4.593). A comparison meta-analysis revealed the risk ratio (RR) for revision was 0.27 (95% CI; 0.15-0.47), and for aseptic loosening 0.15 (0.03-0.70) favouring CoC, while RR for component fracture was 1.62 (95% CI; 0.27-9.66) favouring the polyethylene.
CONCLUSION
In patients under sixty, current CoC THAs are correlated with better 10-year outcomes than before and have high survivorship rates.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Level I.
Topics: Age Factors; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Ceramics; Hip Joint; Hip Prosthesis; Humans; Joint Diseases; Prosthesis Design; Prosthesis Failure; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
PubMed: 34794457
DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02828-1 -
Endoscopy International Open Nov 2021Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an alternative to conventional colonoscopy (CC) in specific clinical settings. High completion rates (CRs) and adequate cleanliness... (Review)
Review
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is an alternative to conventional colonoscopy (CC) in specific clinical settings. High completion rates (CRs) and adequate cleanliness rates (ACRs) are fundamental quality parameters if CCE is to be widely implemented as a CC equivalent diagnostic modality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy of different bowel preparations regimens on CR and ACR in CCE. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Data were independently extracted per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The primary outcome measures (CR, ACR) were retrieved from the individual studies and pooled event rates were calculated. Thirty-four observational (OBS) studies (n = 3,789) and 12 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) (n = 1,214) comprising a total 5,003 patients were included. The overall CR was 0.798 (95 % CI, 0.764-0.828); the highest CRs were observed with sodium phosphate (NaP) + gastrografin booster (n = 2, CR = 0.931, 95 % CI, 0.820-0.976). The overall ACR was 0.768 (95 % CI, 0.735-0.797); the highest ACRs were observed with polyethylene glycol (PEG) + magnesium citrate (n = 4, ER = 0.953, 95 % CI, 0.896-0.979). In the largest meta-analysis on CCE bowel preparation regimens, we found that both CRs and ACRs are suboptimal compared to the minimum recommended standards for CC. PEG laxative and NaP booster were the most commonly used but were not associated with higher CRs or ACRs. Well-designed studies on CCE should be performed to find the optimal preparation regimen.
PubMed: 34790528
DOI: 10.1055/a-1529-5814 -
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology Jan 2022Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with liver failure and/or portal systemic shunting. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte... (Meta-Analysis)
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Polyethylene Glycol Electrolyte Solution Versus Lactulose for Treatment of Hepatic Encephalopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome associated with liver failure and/or portal systemic shunting. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte solution is a commonly used for catharsis of gut, which has been demonstrated to relieve HE in a number of randomized controlled trials. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of PEG with lactulose for current HE treatment.
METHODS
PEG electrolyte solution versus lactulose of HE was deeply studied by conducting a systematic search in electronic databases and other sources until December 31, 2020. The PRISMA statement recommended the use of meta-analysis with 95% confidence interval (CI), relative risk (RR), and weighted mean deviation (WMD) as the estimated effect size. A sensitivity analysis was performed comprehensively to present the risk of bias and the source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS
A total of 434 patients were involved in 7 randomized studies. It is found that there was a significant advantage of PEG therapy in the increase of clinical efficacy (RR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.26-1.68; P=0.000; I2=0.0%) and the decrease of hospital stay (WMD=-1.78; 95% CI: -2.72 to 0.85; P=0.000; I2=90.1%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (RR=0.75; 95% CI: 0.48-1.19; P=0.222>0.05; I2=7.2%) and the level of serum ammonia (WMD=9.02; 95% CI: -14.39 to 32.43; P=0.45>0.05; I2=84.9%) after 24 hours between the 2 groups.
CONCLUSIONS
The results prove that PEG has a beneficial effect on the treatment of HE. Compared with lactulose, PEG can lead to more rapid HE resolution during the first 24 hours and shorten the length of stay without increasing the rate of adverse effects.
Topics: Electrolytes; Hepatic Encephalopathy; Humans; Lactulose; Polyethylene Glycols; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 34739404
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001621 -
EFORT Open Reviews Sep 2021Vitamin E incorporation into highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been introduced to improve wear resistance, and vitamin E incorporated HXLPE (VEPE) has been... (Review)
Review
Vitamin E highly cross-linked polyethylene reduces mid-term wear in primary total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized clinical trials using radiostereometric analysis.
Vitamin E incorporation into highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been introduced to improve wear resistance, and vitamin E incorporated HXLPE (VEPE) has been used in total hip arthroplasty.The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the wear properties of VEPE in clinical practice by synthesizing the data provided in randomized clinical trials.The effects on implant stability, functional outcomes and revision rate of VEPE were also compared with those of HXPLE or ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE).Literature searches were conducted on 1 January 2020 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the aforementioned parameters between VEPE and standard HXPLE/UHMWPE liners were included.Methodological quality and the bias of the included studies were analysed. Meta-analyses were performed using the Review Manager software.Nine RCTs met the eligibility criteria and were included. At early and mid-term follow-up, the vertical penetration and the total penetration of the femoral head were both significantly reduced in the VEPE group. The steady state wear rate of the VEPE group was also remarkably lower.However, at two-year follow-up, significantly increased cup migration was observed in the VEPE group. Moreover, the mid-term clinical outcomes of the VEPE group were worse, while the total revision rates between the two groups were not significantly different.The limited number of included studies may compromise our conclusion regarding clinical outcomes of the VEPE bearing surface. More RCTs with longer follow-up periods are needed to further investigate the effects of VEPE in total hip arthroplasty. Cite this article: 2021;6:759-770. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200072.
PubMed: 34667647
DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200072 -
Cureus Sep 2021For colonoscopy, bowel preparation, especially that using polyethylene glycol (PEG) or senna, is performed among children with gastrointestinal disorders; however, it is... (Review)
Review
For colonoscopy, bowel preparation, especially that using polyethylene glycol (PEG) or senna, is performed among children with gastrointestinal disorders; however, it is not fully grounded in evidence. This study reviewed via meta-analyses the approaches to bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. Electronic databases and trial registries were searched until April 2021. Quality assessment was conducted using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method. In total, three randomized controlled trials (318 patients) were identified. PEG was observed as a preferred protocol of bowel preparation compared with senna (risk ratio [RR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.74; I = 15%). It was less painful than senna (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44-0.87; I = 0%). No serious adverse events were noted. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate. PEG might be a preferred preparation agent for colonoscopy in children. Given the limited data, more studies are recommended.
PubMed: 34660023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.17813 -
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and... Oct 2021Constipation is a common gastrointestinal problem in the elderly. Because of the limitations of life style modifications and the comorbidity, laxative use is also very... (Review)
Review
BACKGROUND/AIMS
Constipation is a common gastrointestinal problem in the elderly. Because of the limitations of life style modifications and the comorbidity, laxative use is also very common. Therefore, this study reviews the latest literature on the effect and safety of laxative in the elderly.
METHODS
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials investigating the effectiveness and safety of laxatives for constipation in elderly patients over 65 years old were performed using the following databases: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library.
RESULTS
Twenty-three randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Among the selected studies, 9 studies compared laxative with placebo and 5 studies compared laxatives of the same type. Four studies compared different types of laxatives or compared combination agents. Five studies compared novel medications such as prucalopride, lubiprostone, and elobixibat with placebo. Psyllium, calcium polycarbophil, lactulose syrup, lactitol, polyethylene glycol, magnesium hydroxide, stimulant laxative with or without fiber, and other medications were more effective than placebo in elderly constipation patients in short-term. Generally, the frequency and severity of adverse effects of laxative were similar between the arms of studies.
CONCLUSIONS
Bulk laxative, osmotic laxative, stimulant laxative with or without fiber, and other medications can be used in elderly patients in short-term within 3 months with reasonable safety. However, the quality of included studies was not high and most of studies was conducted in a small number of patients. Among these laxatives, polyethylene glycol seems to be safe and effective in long-term use of about 6 months in elderly patients.
PubMed: 34642269
DOI: 10.5056/jnm20210 -
Journal of Vascular Surgery Feb 2022We have summarized the available in situ laser fenestration (ISLF) literature, including experimental studies with their subsequent recommendations regarding the optimal...
OBJECTIVE
We have summarized the available in situ laser fenestration (ISLF) literature, including experimental studies with their subsequent recommendations regarding the optimal fenestration technique and fabric, and the short- and mid-term results of clinical studies.
METHODS
A systematic search for English-language reports was performed in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database, and EMBASE in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis) guidelines by two investigators (C.F.P. and D.L.). The search period was from inception of the databases to August 31, 2020. The search terms included in situ, laser, fenestration, and endograft. A quality assessment of the studies was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale by two other investigators (G.T. and A.W.) independently.
RESULTS
A total of 19 clinical studies were included, with a total of 428 patients (390 cases of supra-aortic trunk ISLF, 38 cases of visceral vessel ISLF). The technical success rate was 96.9% and 95.6% for supra-aortic and visceral vessel ISLF, respectively. Most studies had reported <12 months of follow-up. The longest available follow-up was in one study at 5 years for left subclavian artery ISLF and 17 months for visceral vessel ISLF. Overall, the quality of the evaluated clinical studies was low. Six experimental studies were included, with the highest level of evidence suggesting fenestration of multifilament polyethylene terephthalate grafts, followed by dilation with either a 6- or 8-mm noncompliant balloon.
CONCLUSIONS
The results from experimental studies favor the use of multifilament polyethylene terephthalate, followed by dilation with noncompliant balloons as the most durable in vitro technique for ISLF. The short-term outcomes for arch and visceral vessel revascularization have been promising, with low rates of in-hospital mortality, stroke, and end-organ ischemia. Nonetheless, the long-term durability of ISLF has not yet been determined, and ISLF should be limited to selected symptomatic and urgent cases.
Topics: Blood Vessel Prosthesis; Endovascular Procedures; Humans; Laser Therapy; Postoperative Complications; Prosthesis Design; Reoperation
PubMed: 34634422
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.031 -
Hip & Pelvis Sep 2021The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an established approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but has been sparingly tried for revisions. The purpose of this study was... (Review)
Review
The direct anterior approach (DAA) is an established approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but has been sparingly tried for revisions. The purpose of this study was to examine the available literature in order to consolidate information available on revision THA using the DAA. A PubMed, Embase, and Scopus search was performed using relevant keywords. Studies reporting on patients undergoing revision THA using DAA were included for analysis. In a review of the literature, nine studies matched the pre-decided inclusion criteria with 319 hip joints undergoing revision THA. Mean follow-up of all included studies was 34 months. The indications of revision after primary THA in decreasing order were aseptic loosening (53%), prosthetic joint infection (20.7%), peri-prosthetic fracture (16.9%), dislocation (7.2%), psoas impingement (1.9%), polyethylene wear (1.2%), pain (0.6%), and instability (0.3%). Of the 319 revisions evaluated, 107 underwent a stem revision, 142 underwent cup revision, 49 underwent a combined revision, and 21 underwent isolated liner/head change. A statistically significant improvement in functional score (<0.05) was observed for all studies reporting on functional outcomes. A low complication rate (51/319, 16.0%), which includes dislocation (12), infection (12), loosening of the acetabular shell (5), peri-prosthetic fractures (6), haematoma (4), and transient nerve palsy (6), was reported. Based on available level III-IV evidence, DAA appears to be a reliable alternative for revision of the failed hip arthroplasty with acceptable complication rates. Evidence of a higher quality is needed to further characterize its role in revision scenarios.
PubMed: 34552888
DOI: 10.5371/hp.2021.33.3.109 -
SICOT-J 2021Debate encompasses the use of Vitamin E Polyethylene or conventional Polyethylene liner in primary hip arthroplasty. Does the Inclusion of Vitamin E in PE give adequate...
Femoral head penetration in Vitamin-E polyethylene liner versus conventional liners in total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.
BACKGROUND
Debate encompasses the use of Vitamin E Polyethylene or conventional Polyethylene liner in primary hip arthroplasty. Does the Inclusion of Vitamin E in PE give adequate protection from oxidation and maintains lower rates of wear?
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We performed this study following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Statement (PRISMA) and the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Studies were included from any region, written in any language. We had only the randomised control trials comparing the femoral head penetration between Vitamin-E diffused highly cross-linked polyethylene (VEPE) liner and conventional liners in primary total hip arthroplasty.
RESULTS
We included 10 studies in this meta-analysis. We conducted them using Review Manager V.5.0. We computed the risk ratio to measure the treatment effect, considering the heterogeneity. We used Random-effect models. VEPE had insignificant marginal advantages for FHP within three months post-operative. Additionally, VEPE showed significantly less FHP after two and five years. After one year, it showed significantly less FHP with the VEPE group versus the UHMWPE cohort and a non-significant difference between the VEPE and XLPE group.
CONCLUSIONS
In terms of FHP, this metanalysis shows less FHP for the VEPE than conventional PE. A longer follow-up period is required to evaluate whether the oxidation protection gained by Vitamin E results in lower wear rates, less osteolysis, and aseptic loosening compared to the conventional PE in the long term.
PubMed: 34515633
DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2021045